Search

Paclitaxel injection concentrate for nano-dispersion (PICN) is a Cremophor-free, nanotechnology-driven paclitaxel formulation. This phase I study examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PICN alone and in combination with carboplatin. Its early efficacy in unresectable biliary tract cancers (BTCs) was also evaluated. This multi-center study comprised two parts. Part A contained a dose-escalation cohort following “3 + 3” design using PICN monotherapy in advanced solid tumors (Part A1); Part A2 dose-expansion cohort was then conducted in advanced BTCs due to observed efficacy in Part A1. Part B1 and B2 evaluated escalating dose of PICN with carboplatin in advanced solid tumors. PICN was administered as a 30 min-infusion every 3 weeks without pre-medications for hypersensitivity reactions. Thirty-six patients received PICN monotherapy in Part A and 21 received PICN plus carboplatin in Part B. The MTD of PICN was determined to be 295 mg/m2 both as a monotherapy and in combination with carboplatin at AUC 5. Dose-proportional exposure in paclitaxel Cmax and AUC was observed overdose range from 175 to 325 mg/m2 for PICN monotherapy and its combination with carboplatin. Carboplatin did not alter PICN exposure. Clinically significant toxicities mainly include neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. PICN monotherapy yielded a response rate of 20% in unresectable BTCs. This study demonstrated the safety and stable pharmacokinetics of PICN as a monotherapy and in combination with carboplatin. Single-agent PICN showed promising antitumor activity in advanced BTCs, warranting further studies to investigate its role in gastrointestinal cancers.

Purpose: Atezolizumab has shown antitumor activity in patients with ovarian cancer. Dual blockade of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and VEGF enhances anticancer immunity and augments antitumor activity in several cancers. The safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab were evaluated in patients with ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: In this open-label, multicenter phase Ib study, patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer received intravenous atezolizumab (1,200 mg) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory biomarkers were also evaluated. Results: Twenty patients received treatment. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 patients (95%); seven (35%) had grade 3/4 events. No grade 5 events occurred. The safety profile of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was consistent with those of the individual agents. Two patients (10%) discontinued treatment because of pneumonitis and small bowel obstruction. Three patients had partial responses of 11.3–18.9 months' duration; the ORR was 15%. Eight patients (40%) had stable disease, hence the disease control rate was 55%. The median DOR was not reached (95% confidence interval, 11.3–not reached). Median PFS was 4.9 months (range, 1.2–20.2); median OS was 10.2 months (range, 1.2–26.6). No association was seen between treatment response and PD-L1 expression, tumor histology, or number of prior therapies. Conclusions: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab led to durable responses and/or disease stabilization in some patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer; the safety profiles were consistent with those of each agent.

Christina is 35 years old and has been living with metastatic colorectal cancer for the last several years. She is bright, vivacious, and has an edgy honesty about her. Our team first met Christina...

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype defined by lack of hormone receptor expression and non-amplified HER2. TNBC accounts for approximately 15% of breast cancer cases, however, is associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence, brain metastasis, and death due to metastatic breast cancer. Mutations in p53 are common in TNBC, occurring in approximately 85% of tumors. While a number of promising targeted therapies are on the horizon in TNBC including immunotherapy, there remains an unmet need for active targeted therapies where chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for metastatic disease and results in a median survival of 12-18 months. Adavosertib (AZD1775) is a potent, small molecule, ATP-competitive inhibitor of the Wee1 kinase that potentiates the activity of many DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics and is currently in clinical development for multiple indications. AZD1775 potentiates the activity of DNA-damaging and antimetabolite chemotherapeutics in preclinical models without TP53-deficiency, possibly due to baseline replicative stress or compromised DNA repair proficiency. A previous unbiased screen of CTEP compounds in TNBC PDX models demonstrated that the combination of adavosertib and capecitabine/5FU had greater anti-proliferative effects than either of the single agents. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the combination of adavosertib and capecitabine/5FU in preclinical TNBC models. Methods: HCC1937, CAL51, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were plated in 96-well plates and exposed to increasing concentrations of adavosertib, 5FU, or the combination. Cellular proliferation was assessed in real-time using IncuCyte® Live Cell Analysis. Apoptosis was assessed via the Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay system. Western blotting was used to assess changes in expression of CDC2, phospho-CDC2, H2AX, and Bcl-xL. TNBC PDX models CU_TNBC_012 and CU_TNBC_013 were treated with vehicle, adavosertib, capecitabine, or the combination and assessed for tumor growth inhibition. Results: From the initial PDX screen, two of the four TNBC PDX models demonstrated a better response in the combination treatment than either of the single agents. As confirmation, two PDX models were expanded for statistical comparison. Both PDX models demonstrated a significant growth inhibition in the combination versus either of the single agents. (TNBC012, p Citation Format: Todd M Pitts, Dennis M Simmons, Kyrie Dailey, Stacey M Bagby, Sarah J Hartman, Betelehem W Yacob, Brian Gittleman, John J Tentler, Diana Cittely, D. Ryan Ormond, Wells A Messersmith, S Gail Eckhardt, Jennifer R Diamond. Wee1 inhibition enhances the anti-tumor effects of capecitabine in preclinical models of triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-25.

Immunotherapy is a rapidly evolving treatment paradigm that holds promise to provide long-lasting survival benefits for patients with cancer. This promise, however, remains unfulfilled for the majority of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, as significant limitations in efficacy exist with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in this disease group. A plethora of novel combination treatment strategies are currently being investigated in various clinical trials to make them more efficacious as our understanding of molecular mechanisms mediating resistance to immunotherapy advances. In this article, we summarize the current status of immune checkpoint blockade in GI cancers and discuss the biological rationales that underlie the emerging treatment strategies being tested in ongoing clinical trials in combination with ICIs. We also highlight the promising early results from these strategies and provide future perspectives on enhancing response to immunotherapy for patients with GI cancers.

Current public health problems such as cancer have an expansive set of lifestyle and social circumstances that affect the cause and course of the disease. In response, over the past 7 years, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has recognized the important role that cancer centers play in their community and has gradually increased the requirements and stringency of these sections in the Cancer Center Support Grant guidelines to include a plan for community outreach and engagement. Developing sustainable community-academic partnerships is an essential factor for the successful dissemination and implementation of promising interventions and programs aimed at decreasing barriers and improving cancer outcomes. Understanding how best to facilitate linkages and collaboration can expedite translation of research knowledge into practice and allow more evidence-based improvements to be implemented into practice as well as influence research agendas. This article will examine several examples of successful community-academic partnerships focused on cancer prevention and control and explore lessons learned.

Molecularly-targeted agents have improved outcomes for a subset of patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma, but treatment of resistant and BRAF wild-type tumors remains a challenge. The MERTK receptor tyrosine kinase is aberrantly expressed in melanoma and can contribute to oncogenic phenotypes. Here we report the effect of treatment with a MERTK-selective small molecule inhibitor, UNC2025, in preclinical models of melanoma. In melanoma cell lines, treatment with UNC2025 potently inhibited phosphorylation of MERTK and downstream signaling, induced cell death, and decreased colony formation. In patient-derived melanoma xenograft models, treatment with UNC2025 blocked or significantly reduced tumor growth. Importantly, UNC2025 had similar biochemical and functional effects in both BRAF-mutated and BRAF wild-type models and irrespective of NRAS mutational status, implicating MERTK inhibition as a potential therapeutic strategy in tumors that are not amenable to BRAF-targeting and for which there are limited treatment options. In BRAF-mutated cell lines, combined treatment with UNC2025 and the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib provided effective inhibition of oncogenic signaling through ERK, AKT, and STAT6, increased induction of cell death, and decreased colony-forming potential. Similarly, in NRAS-mutated cell lines, addition of UNC2025 to cobimetinib therapy increased cell death and decreased colony-forming potential. In a BRAF-mutated patient-derived xenograft, treatment with combined UNC2025 and vemurafenib was well-tolerated and significantly decreased tumor growth compared with vemurafenib alone. These data support the use of UNC2025 for treatment of melanoma, irrespective of BRAF or NRAS mutational status, and suggest a role for MERTK and targeted combination therapy in BRAF and NRAS-mutated melanoma.

The aim of this study was to identify correlates of quality of life (QOL) for socioeconomically disadvantaged cancer patients receiving care in the "safety net" health system.This cross-sectional study used linear regressions to determine the effect of patient reported outcome measures (PRO) on QOL.Sample/Methods: Cancer patients (More than 60% of patients reported an annual income below $24,999. Forty-five percent of patients were either uninsured or county-funded. Depression, pain, and financial toxicity were found to be consistently significant correlates of QOL.Implications: Cancer patients with existing financial strain have unique psychosocial stressors. This study provides insight into the relationship between these stressors, and the need for targeted screening and intervention that address such aspects of care.

Over the past decade, immunotherapies have revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Although the success of immunotherapy is remarkable, it is still limited to a subset of patients. More than 1500 clinical trials are currently ongoing with a goal of improving the efficacy of immunotherapy through co-administration of other agents. Preclinical, small-animal models are strongly desired to increase the pace of scientific discovery, while reducing the cost of combination drug testing in humans. Human immune system (HIS) mice are highly immune-deficient mouse recipients rtpeconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells. These HIS-mice are capable of growing human tumor cell lines and patient-derived tumor xenografts. This model allows rapid testing of multiple, immune-related therapeutics for tumors originating from unique clinical samples. Using a cord blood-derived HIS-BALB/c-Rag2nullIl2rγnullSIRPαNOD (BRGS) mouse model, we summarize our experiments testing immune checkpoint blockade combinations in these mice bearing a variety of human tumors, including breast, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, adrenocortical, melanoma and hematological malignancies. We present in-depth characterization of the kinetics and subsets of the HIS in lymph and non-lymph organs and relate these to protocol development and immune-related treatment responses. Furthermore, we compare the phenotype of the HIS in lymph tissues and tumors. We show that the immunotype and amount of tumor infiltrating leukocytes are widely-variable and that this phenotype is tumor-dependent in the HIS-BRGS model. We further present flow cytometric analyses of immune cell subsets, activation state, cytokine production and inhibitory receptor expression in peripheral lymph organs and tumors. We show that responding tumors bear human infiltrating T cells with a more inflammatory signature compared to non-responding tumors, similar to reports of “responding” patients in human immunotherapy clinical trials. Collectively these data support the use of HIS mice as a preclinical model to test combination immunotherapies for human cancers, if careful attention is taken to both protocol details and data analysis.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide insight for improvement in care for young adults diagnosed with cancer (YADC), by identifying underemphasized outcomes that strongly matter to YADC and the gaps in care that may limit achieving these outcomes for this unique and vulnerable population. Methods: Twenty-seven YADC, ages 25-39, participated in unstructured discussions focusing on topics relating to diagnosis, daily experiences living with cancer outside of the clinical setting, goals, concerns, and clinical care experience. Most participants engaged in group discussions using Experience Group methodology. Discussions were designed to collect information on three dimensions of health: capability, comfort, and calm (CCC). Data were coded using thematic analysis with NVivo software. Results: Several themes were identified within the CCC framework: capability in terms of confronting mortality at a young age, losing youthful identity and control over major life course decisions, especially fertility, and debilitating side effects, comfort in terms of the lack of understanding from peers and family and the fear of cancer recurrence, and calm was discussed as the difficulty of making complex medical decisions, financial toxicity, and loss of clinical support in survivorship. Conclusion: This research highlighted four care additions that are important for YADC: (1) concise and understandable education about their condition and treatment; (2) same-age support groups; (3) fertility support; and (4) better care transitions for life after cancer. These findings emphasize the importance of creating a collaborative, multidisciplinary care team and a holistic approach with care innovations that support clinicians to meet the unique needs of YADC.

Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with limited systemic treatment options. RX-5902 is a novel anti-cancer agent that inhibits phosphorylated-p68 and thus attenuates nuclear β-catenin signaling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of β-catenin signaling blockade to enhance the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in immunocompetent, preclinical models of TNBC. Methods Treatment with RX-5902, anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4 or the combination was investigated in BALB/c mice injected with the 4 T1 TNBC cell line. Humanized BALB/c-Rag2nullIl2rγnullSIRPαNOD (hu-CB-BRGS) mice transplanted with a human immune system were implanted with MDA-MB-231 cells. Mice were randomized into treatment groups according to human hematopoietic chimerism and treated with RX-5902, anti-PD-1 or the combination. At sacrifice, bone marrow, lymph nodes, spleen and tumors were harvested for flow cytometry analysis of human immune cells. Results The addition of RX-5902 to CTLA-4 or PD-1 inhibitors resulted in decreased tumor growth in the 4 T1 and human immune system and MDA-MB-231 xenograft models. Immunologic analyses demonstrated a significant increase in the number of activated T cells in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with RX-5902 treatment compared to vehicle (p p Conclusions Conclusions: RX-5902 enhanced the efficacy of nivolumab in a humanized, preclinical model of TNBC. Several changes in immunologic profiles were noted in mice treated with RX-5902 and the combination, including an increase in activated TILs and a decrease in human myeloid populations, that are often associated with immunosuppression in a tumor microenvironment. RX-5902 also was shown to potentiate the effects of checkpoint inhibitors of CTLA4 and the PD-1 inhibitor in the 4 T-1 murine TNBC model. These findings indicate that RX-5902 may have important immunomodulatory, as well as anti-tumor activity, in TNBC when combined with a checkpoint inhibitor.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rational combination of TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 and Aurora A kinase inhibitor alisertib in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to conduct a phase I dose escalation trial in patients with advanced solid tumors. Experimental Design: TNBC cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with alisertib, TAK-228, or the combination and evaluated for changes in proliferation, cell cycle, mTOR pathway modulation, and terminal cellular fate, including apoptosis and senescence. A phase I clinical trial was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with escalating doses of alisertib and TAK-228 using a 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Results: The combination of TAK-228 and alisertib resulted in decreased proliferation and cell-cycle arrest in TNBC cell lines. Treatment of TNBC PDX models resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition and increased apoptosis with the combination. In the phase I dose escalation study, 18 patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled. The MTD was alisertib 30 mg b.i.d. days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle and TAK-228 2 mg daily, continuous dosing. The most common treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, rash, mucositis, and alopecia. Conclusions: The addition of TAK-228 to alisertib potentiates the antitumor activity of alisertib in vivo, resulting in increased cell death and apoptosis. The combination is tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors and should be evaluated further in expansion cohorts with additional pharmacodynamic assessment.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype defined by lack of hormone receptor expression and non-amplified HER2. Adavosertib (AZD1775) is a potent, small-molecule, ATP-competitive inhibitor of the Wee1 kinase that potentiates the activity of many DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics and is currently in clinical development for multiple indications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the combination of AZD1775 and capecitabine/5FU in preclinical TNBC models. TNBC cell lines were treated with AZD1775 and 5FU and cellular proliferation was assessed in real-time using IncuCyte&reg, Live Cell Analysis. Apoptosis was assessed via the Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay system. Western blotting was used to assess changes in expression of downstream effectors. TNBC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with AZD1775, capecitabine, or the combination and assessed for tumor growth inhibition. From the initial PDX screen, two of the four TNBC PDX models demonstrated a better response in the combination treatment than either of the single agents. As confirmation, two PDX models were expanded for statistical comparison. Both PDX models demonstrated a significant growth inhibition in the combination versus either of the single agents. (TNBC012, p &lt, 0.05 combo vs. adavosertib or capecitabine, TNBC013, p &lt, 0.01 combo vs. adavosertib or capecitabine.) An enhanced anti-proliferative effect was observed in the adavosertib/5FU combination treatment as measured by live cell analysis. An increase in apoptosis was observed in two of the four cell lines in the combination when compared to single-agent treatment. Treatment with adavosertib as a single agent resulted in a decrease in p-CDC2 in a dose-dependent manner that was also observed in the combination treatment. An increase in &gamma, H2AX in two of the four cell lines tested was also observed. No significant changes were observed in Bcl-xL following treatment in any of the cell lines. The combination of adavosertib and capecitabine/5FU demonstrated enhanced combination effects both in vitro and in vivo in preclinical models of TNBC. These results support the clinical investigation of this combination in patients with TNBC, including those with brain metastasis given the CNS penetration of both agents.

Background Patients with ovarian cancer who are enrolled on phase 1 trials typically have platinum-resistant and heavily pretreated disease, with a poor prognosis. In the current study, the authors assessed prognostic factors and survival in women with recurrent ovarian cancer who were treated on phase 1 clinical trials. Methods The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated from 2008 through 2018 at the University of Colorado Cancer Center. Patient characteristics and treatment and toxicity-related survival data were assessed. Descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors associated with survival time. Results A total of 132 patients were treated on phase 1 clinical trials. Patients had a median age of 59 years (range, 33-88 years) with a median of 5.5 previous chemotherapy lines (range, 1-13 lines). Of the 132 patients, 53 (40%) were treated on multiple phase 1 trials with a median of 1 (range, 0-5) prior phase 1 trial. The overall response rate was 14.7%. The median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.1-13.4 months). Two patients died on trial due to progression of disease whereas no patients died of treatment-related toxicity. Independent risk factors found to be predictive of shorter survival were an elevated cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) level (hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6-5.2) and albumin 25 kg/m2 was predictive of longer survival (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96). Conclusions In the current single-institution series, patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer who were treated on phase 1 clinical trials experienced a median overall survival of 11.3 months. When available, phase 1 clinical trials represent a reasonable treatment option for patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer with a preserved performance status.

A number of important drugs used to treat cancer—many of which serve as the backbone of modern chemotherapy regimens—have outdated prescribing information in their drug labeling. The Food and Drug Administration is undertaking a pilot project to develop a process and criteria for updating prescribing information for longstanding oncology drugs, based on the breadth of knowledge the cancer community has accumulated with the use of these drugs over time. This article highlights a number of considerations for labeling updates, including selecting priorities for updating; data sources and evidentiary criteria; as well as the risks, challenges, and opportunities for iterative review to ensure prescribing information for oncology drugs remains relevant to current clinical practice., The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is undertaking a pilot project to develop a process and criteria for updating prescribing information for long‐standing oncology drugs. This article highlights a number of considerations for labeling updates.

This phase I study evaluates the safety, MTD, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary anticancer activity of enavatuzumab, a humanized IgG1 antibody to the TWEAK receptor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Patients received escalating doses of enavatuzumab given intravenously over 60 minutes every 2 weeks. Blood was obtained for PK and biomarker assessment. Three patients were enrolled per dose level in a standard 3+3 design with response assessment by RECIST version 1.0, every 8 weeks. Thirty patients were enrolled at 6 dose levels ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 mg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 (G4) lipase, G3 bilirubin, and G4 amylase elevations. There was no apparent correlation of liver or pancreatic enzyme elevation with drug exposure or the presence of liver metastases. Enavatuzumab exhibited a two-compartment linear PK model. Estimated systemic clearance was 23 to 33 mL/h with an elimination half-life of 7 to 18 days. The predicted target efficacious peak and trough concentrations occurred at 1.0 mg/kg following the second dose. There were no objective responses; 4 patients had stable disease. The MTD of enavatuzumab is 1.0 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks. Higher doses were not tolerated due to hepatopancreatic lab abnormalities. Further evaluation of the mechanisms of the liver and pancreatic enzyme toxicities is needed before embarking on further single-agent or combination strategies. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(1); 215–21. ©2017 AACR.

// Justin Greene 1, * , Anna Nguyen 1, * , Stacey M. Bagby 1 , Gemma N. Jones 4 , WM. Tai 1, 3 , Kevin S. Quackenbush 1 , Anna Schreiber 1 , Wells A. Messersmith 1 , Kalpana M. Devaraj 2 , Patrick Blatchford 1 , S. Gail Eckhardt 1 , Elaine B. Cadogan 4 , Gareth D. Hughes 4 , Aaron Smith 4 , Todd M. Pitts 1 and John J. Arcaroli 1 1 Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA 2 Pathology Department, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA 3 Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 4 Innovative Medicines and Early Development, Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: John J. Arcaroli, email: john.arcaroli@ucdenver.edu Keywords: ATM; DNA damage; IRN; PDTX; CRC Received: August 06, 2017 Accepted: November 09, 2017 Published: December 05, 2017 ABSTRACT Irinotecan, a standard of care therapy for CRC, elicits cytotoxic effects by generating double strand breaks resulting in DNA damage. The activation of the ATM pathway plays a fundamental role in regulating the cellular response and repair to DNA damage. The objective of this preclinical study was to determine whether ATM inhibition would enhance sensitivity to irinotecan treatment. Treatment effects of AZ31, irinotecan or AZ31 + irinotecan were investigated in CRC cell lines and CRC patient derived xenografts. Activation of ATM and downstream targets p-RAD50 and p-H2AX were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Combinational effects were demonstrated in 4 out of 8 CRC explants. Interestingly, each of the combinational sensitive CRC PDX models were shown to be more resistant to irinotecan single agent therapy. Treatment with irinotecan significantly elevated the ATM pathway evident by an increase in the activation of H2AX and RAD50. Combinational therapy reduced the activation of H2AX and RAD50 when compared to irinotecan alone in the combination sensitive CRC098. AZ31 + irinotecan was effective at reducing tumor growth in tumors that exhibited resistance to irinotecan in our CRC PDX model. These findings support further investigation of this combinational therapy for the treatment of CRC patients.

Aim: Far less is known about colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in individuals under the age of 50. This study examined CRC incidence in order to better understand the changing CRC population. Methods: This study analyzed 39,525 CRC cases from the Colorado Central Cancer Registry from 1992 through 2013. Age-adjusted incidence, observed and relative 5-year survival, and estimated annual percentage change was analyzed. Results: Age-adjusted rates averaging 1.7% per year were observed in the under-50 population, while falling on average 4.3% per year (p < 0.05) in the over-50 population. Average-adjusted incidence rose in males under 50 by 2.7% per year (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The absolute incidence of CRC continues to fall in Colorado, however incidence is rising in individuals under 50, particularly males.

Purpose: The incidence rates of colorectal cancers are increasing in young adults. The objective of this study was to investigate genomic differences between tumor samples collected from younger and older patients with colorectal cancer. Experimental Design: DNA was extracted from 18,218 clinical specimens, followed by hybridization capture of 3,769 exons from 403 cancer-related genes and 47 introns of 19 genes commonly rearranged in cancer. Genomic alterations (GA) were determined, and association with patient age and microsatellite stable/microsatellite instability high (MSS/MSI-H) status established. Results: Overall genomic alteration rates in the younger ( Conclusions: Tumors from younger and older patients with colorectal cancer demonstrated similar overall rates of genomic alteration. However, differences were noted in several genes relevant to biology and response to therapy. Further study will need to be conducted to determine whether the differences in gene alteration rates can be leveraged to provide personalized therapies for young patients with early-onset sporadic colorectal cancer.

Context Although the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed treatment strategies of several human malignancies, research models to study immunotherapy in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) are lacking. Objective To explore the effect of anti-PD1 immunotherapy on the alteration of the immune milieu in ACC in a newly generated preclinical model and correlate with the response of the matched patient. Design, Setting, and Intervention To characterize the CU-ACC2-M2B patient-derived xenograft in a humanized mouse model, evaluate the effect of a PD-1 inhibitor therapy, and compare it with the CU-ACC2 patient with metastatic disease. Results Characterization of the CU-ACC2-humanized cord blood-BALB/c-Rag2nullIl2rγnullSirpaNOD model confirmed ACC origin and match with the original human tumor. Treatment of the mice with pembrolizumab demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition (60%) compared with controls, which correlated with increased tumor infiltrating lymphocyte activity, with an increase of human CD8+ T cells (P < 0.05), HLA-DR+ T cells (P < 0.05) as well as Granzyme B+ CD8+ T cells ( Conclusions Our study reports the first humanized ACC patient-derived xenograft mouse model, which may be useful to define mechanisms and biomarkers of response and resistance to immune-based therapies, to ultimately provide more personalized care for patients with ACC.

3075 Background: OKI-179 is a novel, oral pro-drug analog of largazole, a compound in the romidepsin-depsipeptide class of natural products. OKI-006, the active metabolite of OKI-179, inhibits HDAC 1,2,3 (IC50 = 1.2, 2.4, 2.0 nM, respectively), with no significant inhibition of Class IIa HDACs and has shown promising activity in preclinical models of solid tumors. We conducted a first-in-human dose escalation study of OKI-179 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, ECOG ≤1, normal QTc, and disease refractory to or with no available standard therapy options were treated with OKI-179 with either intermittent dosing (once daily for 4 days on 3 days off) or continuous dosing (once daily). Dose escalation was conducted using a standard 3+3 design. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) testing was performed at various time points after dosing. Results: As of Feb 4, 2021, 26 patients (19 female, 7 male) were enrolled with mean age of 63 (range 41-83). Patients received a median of 5 (range 1-11) prior lines of therapy and most common tumor types included pancreatic (N = 5), breast (N = 4), lung (N = 4), and ovarian cancer (N = 4). Twenty patients were treated in intermittent dosing cohorts from 30-450 mg. One DLT (Grade 2 [G2] thrombocytopenia) occurred in the 450 mg cohort which was expanded to 6 patients without subsequent DLTs. Six patients were treated in 2 continuous dosing cohorts of 200 mg and 300 mg. Two of 3 patients in the 300 mg cohort had DLTs of G3-4 thrombocytopenia and no DLTs were observed in 3 patients treated at 200 mg PO daily. The most common adverse events (AEs) were nausea (62%), fatigue (42%), anemia (39%), anorexia (27%), and vomiting (23%). These AE’s were G1-2 except for G3 anemia (12%), G3 fatigue (12%), and G3 anorexia (4%). No other G4-5 treatment-related AEs occurred. Median time on study was 79 days and best response was stable disease (SD) in 10 of 24 patients evaluable for efficacy (42%). Prolonged SD was observed in patients with platinum-resistant serous ovarian cancer (446 days) and adenoid cystic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (256 days). OKI-006 achieved consistent exposure with Cmax > 2,000 ng/ml and AUC > 8,000 hr*ng/ml, well above the targeted exposure for efficacy based on pre-clinical studies in murine models. Tmax was 2 hours and T1/2 was 6-8 hours. OKI-179 treatment resulted in > 3X increased T cell histone H3K9 and H3K27 acetylation within circulating PBMCs at doses of 180 - 450 mg. Conclusions: OKI-179 has a manageable safety profile, with thrombocytopenia being the on-target DLT. It has a favorable PK profile and demonstrated on-target PD effects at tolerable doses. The MTD and RP2D for OKI-179 was 450 mg daily for intermittent dosing and 200 mg daily for continuous dosing. Phase 2 studies are being designed, with a focus on combination with endocrine therapy in ER+ breast cancer and in NRAS-mutant melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03931681.

126 Background: In microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, frequent amplifications in 13q and 20q regions have been reported with limited understanding of their potential role for prognosis and treatment. Based on an internal research molecular tumor board case analysis of a KRAS WT, MSS left-sided (LS), metastatic CRC patient, we noted 50% of the 11 listed variants of unknown significance were on 20q. This study aims to investigate the potential prognostic role for gain of 20q chromosomal regions relative to other chromosomal imbalances using a retrospective cohort. Methods: We performed a genome-wide CN cluster analysis using the TCGA data with resulting patient clusters compared based on Kaplan-Meier estimated disease-free interval (DFI) in months (mos) using a log-rank. We examined associations between CN-derived clusters and CRC phenotypes. Results: Using TCGA data, we identified four CN-derived patient clusters of which two had significantly different DFI’s. One longer DFI cluster (n = 83; median DFI = 28mos) was defined by a signature of copy neutral genes along Chr8p and 18q regions. The shorter DFI cluster (n = 46; median DFI = 20mos) was defined by a signature of Chr8p and 18q regions of loss. The two clusters significantly differed in terms of site (85% right-sided in the shorter vs. 85% LS in the longer DFI cluster) and MS status (81% MSS in the shorter vs. 72% MSI in the longer DFI cluster) with no significant differences in age (mean of 70 years at diagnosis) and KRAS status (around 50% WT) between clusters. The shorter DFI was able to be further differentiated based on gain of chromosomal regions 20q (n = 26; median DFI = 24mos) and 13q (n = 20; median DFI = 18mos). No significant differences in mean age, tumor stage, site, and MS status between the shorter DFI subgroups were noted. Enriched pathways in the Chr20q gain sub-cluster include cell differentiation (Hippo, Rap1, VEGF), whereas metabolic signaling pathways via AGE-RAGE and AMPK, as well as cell growth and malignant transformation via RAS are enriched in the Chr13q gain sub-cluster. Conclusions: Clinical sequencing is able to identify regions of gain in Chr20q and Chr13q as part of VUS’s. Gain of Chr20q has been reported with better survival in mCRC patients. Gain of chromosomal region 20q and loss of 18q has been reported to discriminate between Lynch Syndrome and familial colorectal cancer. Herein, we show that gain of the 20q region with 18q and 8p regions of loss is associated with shorter DFI and gain of 13q region with loss of 8p even worse prognosis.

// Todd M. Pitts 1, 3, * , Erica L. Bradshaw-Pierce 2, 3, 5, * , Stacey M. Bagby 1 , Stephanie L. Hyatt 1 , Heather M. Selby 1 , Anna Spreafico 1 , John J. Tentler 1, 3 , Kelly McPhillips 1 , Peter J. Klauck 1 , Anna Capasso 1 , Jennifer R. Diamond 1, 3 , S. Lindsey Davis 1, 3 , Aik Choon Tan 1, 3 , John J. Arcaroli 1, 3 , Alicia Purkey 1 , Wells A. Messersmith 1, 3 , Jeffery A. Ecsedy 4 , S. Gail Eckhardt 1, 3 1 Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA 3 University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA 4 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA 5 Takeda California, San Diego, CA, USA * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Todd M. Pitts, email: Todd.Pitts@ucdenver.edu Keywords: colorectal cancer, aurora kinase a Received: January 20, 2016 Accepted: June 17, 2016 Published: July 1, 2016 ABSTRACT Background: The Aurora kinases are a family of serine/threonine kinases comprised of Aurora A, B, and C which execute critical steps in mitotic and meiotic progression. Alisertib (MLN8237) is an investigational Aurora A selective inhibitor that has demonstrated activity against a wide variety of tumor types in vitro and in vivo , including CRC. Results: CRC cell lines demonstrated varying sensitivity to alisertib with IC 50 values ranging from 0.06 to > 5 umol/L. Following exposure to alisertib we observed a decrease in pAurora A, B and C in four CRC cell lines. We also observed an increase in p53 and p21 in a sensitive p53 wildtype cell line in contrast to the p53 mutant cell line or the resistant cell lines. The addition of alisertib to standard CRC treatments demonstrated improvement over single agent arms; however, the benefit was largely less than additive, but not antagonistic. Methods: Forty-seven CRC cell lines were exposed to alisertib and IC 50 s were calculated. Twenty-one PDX models were treated with alisertib and the Tumor Growth Inhibition Index was assessed. Additionally, 5 KRAS wildtype and mutant PDX models were treated with alisertib as single agent or in combination with cetuximab or irinotecan, respectively. Conclusion: Alisertib demonstrated anti-proliferative effects against CRC cell lines and PDX models. Our data suggest that the addition of alisertib to standard therapies in colorectal cancer if pursued clinically, will require further investigation of patient selection strategies and these combinations may facilitate future clinical studies.

// Kevin S. Quackenbush 1 , Stacey Bagby 1 , Wai Meng Tai 1, 2 , Wells A. Messersmith 1 , Anna Schreiber 1 , Justin Greene 1 , Jihye Kim 1 , Guoliang Wang 1 , Alicia Purkey 1 , Todd M. Pitts 1 , Anna Nguyen 1 , Dexiang Gao 1 , Patrick Blatchford 1 , Anna Capasso 1 , Alwin G. Schuller 3 , S. Gail Eckhardt 1 , John J. Arcaroli 1 1 Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA 2 Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 3 AstraZeneca R & D Boston, Massachusetts, Waltham, Massachusetts, MA, USA Correspondence to: John J. Arcaroli, email: john.arcaroli@ucdenver.edu Keywords: CRC, WNT, IRN, NuMA, PDTX Received: December 30, 2015 Accepted: February 28, 2016 Published: April 07, 2016 ABSTRACT Background: Dysregulation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway has been implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC) development as well as incipient stages of malignant transformation. In this study, we investigated the antitumor effects of AZ1366 (a novel tankyrase inhibitor) as a single agent and in combination with irinotecan in our patient derived CRC explant xenograft models. Results: Six out of 18 CRC explants displayed a significant growth reduction to AZ1366. There was one CRC explant (CRC040) that reached the threshold of sensitivity (TGII ≤ 20%) in this study. In addition, the combination of AZ1366 + irinotecan demonstrated efficacy in 4 out of 18 CRC explants. Treatment effects on the WNT pathway revealed that tankyrase inhibition was ineffective at reducing WNT dependent signaling. However, the anti-tumor effects observed in this study were likely a result of alternative tankyrase effects whereby tankyrase inhibition reduced NuMA levels. Materials and Methods: Eighteen CRC explants were treated with AZ1366 single agent or in combination for 28 days and treatment responses were assessed. Pharmacokinetic (AZ1366 drug concentrations) and pharmacodynamic effects (Axin2 levels) were investigated over 48 hours. Immunohistochemistry of nuclear β-catenin levels as well as western blot was employed to examine the treatment effects on the WNT pathway as well as NuMA. Conclusions: Combination AZ1366 and irinotecan achieved greater anti-tumor effects compared to monotherapy. Activity was limited to CRC explants that displayed irinotecan resistance and increased protein levels of tankyrase and NuMA.

4031 Background: The majority of pts with mCRC have microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors with minimal response to PD-L1/PD-1 blockade. MEK inhibition and VEGF inhibition have immunomodulatory effects (upregulation of tumor major histocompatibility complex-I expression, enhanced T-cell infiltration, reduced MDSCs and Tregs in tumors) supporting clinical evaluation of combined MEKi (B), anti–PD-1 (P), and anti-VEGF (BV) in pts with mCRC. We hypothesize that the combination of binimetinib, pembrolizumab, and bevacizumab (BPBV) will result in greater clinical benefit than pembrolizumab alone. Methods: Patients with chemotherapy-refractory mCRC were evaluated (20 planned in the safety lead-in and 50 planned for total accrual). B was dosed at 45mg PO BID, P was administered at 200mg IV Q21 days, and BV was administered at 7.5mg/kg IV Q21 days. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and investigator-assessed ORR by RECIST 1.1. Clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) and progression-free survival were secondary endpoints. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize safety and clinical activity. Results: As of January 9, 2020, 21 pts (10 KRAS/NRASmt, 11 RASwt, 21 MSS) were enrolled into the safety lead-in and were evaluable. The median number of prior therapies was 6. The BPBV combination was tolerable. Treatment-related Gr 1-2 and Gr 3-4 AEs occurred at 60% and 38%, respectively. The most frequent related Gr 3-4 AEs were aceniform rash, diarrhea, and hypertension (19%, 14%, 14% respectively). No treatment-related Gr 5 AEs occurred. A total of 17 patients were evaluable for response. Confirmed PR was observed in 2 pts (12%). SD was noted in 14 patients (82%) leading to a clinical benefit rate of 94%. 1 patient had PD as the best response to treatment. Median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI 4.2-8.9). Molecular determinants, immune biomarkers, and updated tumor assessments of response will be presented. Conclusions: B + P + BV demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and improvements in ORR and clinical benefit rate compared to those reported with SOC in heavily pretreated pts with mCRC. Objective responses observed in pts were durable, suggesting benefit of this novel combination in a patient population refractory to immune therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT03475004 .

MEK inhibition is of interest in cancer drug development, but clinical activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been limited. Preclinical studies demonstrated Wnt pathway overexpression in KRAS-mutant cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, selumetinib. The combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A, a noncanonical Wnt pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in mCRC patient-derived xenografts. To translate these results, we conducted a NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program–approved multicenter phase I/IB trial (NCT02188264) of the combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A. Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with the combination of oral selumetinib and cyclosporin A in the dose escalation phase, followed by an expansion cohort of irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC. The expansion cohort utilized a single-agent selumetinib “run-in” to evaluate FZD2 biomarker upregulation and KRAS-WT and KRAS-MT stratification to identify any potential predictors of efficacy. Twenty and 19 patients were enrolled in dose escalation and expansion phases, respectively. The most common adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities were rash, hypertension, and edema. Three dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 hypertension, rash, and increased creatinine) were reported. The MTD was selumetinib 75 mg twice daily and cyclosporin A 2 mg/kg twice daily on a 28-day cycle. KRAS stratification did not identify any differences in response between KRAS-WT and KRAS-MT cancers. Two partial responses, 18 stable disease, and 10 progressive disease responses were observed. Combination selumetinib and cyclosporin A is well tolerated, with evidence of activity in mCRC. Future strategies for concept development include identifying better predictors of efficacy and improved Wnt pathway modulation. Significance: These findings translate preclinical studies combining selumetinib and cyclosporin into a phase I first-in-human clinical trial of such a combination in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5398–407. ©2018 AACR.

Purpose: This first-in-human study assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical activity of single and multiple doses of TAK-441, an investigational inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced, solid tumors received daily oral TAK-441 (50–1,600 mg/day); daily dose was doubled in each subsequent cohort until the maximum tolerated/feasible dose (MTD/MFD) was reached. Blood was collected to evaluate TAK-441 plasma concentrations. Skin biopsies were obtained to evaluate suppression of the Hedgehog-regulated gene Gli1. Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled (median age 59). The most common diagnoses were colorectal cancer (26%), basal cell carcinoma (BCC, 21%), and pancreatic cancer (9%). The MFD of 1,600 mg/day (based on tablet size and strength) was considered the MTD. Dose-limiting toxicities included muscle spasms and fatigue. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events, regardless of causality, occurred in 15 patients (44%), of which hyponatremia (n = 4) and fatigue (n = 3) were most common. Oral absorption was fairly rapid; median Tmax was 2.0 to 4.0 hours after a single dose. Mean elimination half-life was 13.5 to 22.6 hours. Systemic exposure of TAK-441 based on the area under the plasma concentration–time curve was linear across the dose range. Gli1 expression in skin biopsies was strongly inhibited at all dose levels. Best response was partial response (1 patient with BCC) and stable disease (7 patients with various solid tumors). Conclusions: TAK-441 was generally well tolerated up to MFD of 1,600 mg/day, with preliminary antitumor activity. Further study of TAK-441 may be appropriate in populations selected for tumors with ligand-dependent or independent Hedgehog signaling. Clin Cancer Res; 21(5); 1002–9. ©2014 AACR.

Background Dysregulation of the Src pathway has been shown to be important at various stages of cancer. Dasatinib is a potent Src/Abl inhibitor and has demonstrated to have anti-proliferative and anti-invasive activity in many preclinical models. The objective of this study was to determine the anti-tumor activity of dasatinib using in vitro and in vivo preclinical colorectal (CRC) models. Methods CRC cell lines and patient-derived tumor explant (PDX) models were used to investigate the efficacy of dasatinib. We treated 50 CRC cell lines with dasatinib for 72 hours and proliferation was assayed by a sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay; an IC50 ≤ 0.08 μmol/L was considered sensitive. We treated 17 patient-derived CRC explants with dasatinib (50 mg/kg/day, administered once-daily) for 28 days to determine in vivo efficacy. Tumor growth inhibition (TGI) ≥ 50% was considered sensitive. Results We found that 8 out of 50 CRC cell lines reached an IC50 ≤ 0.08 μmol/L with dasatinib treatment. In addition, of 17 CRC explants grown in the xenograft mouse model, 2 showed sensitivity to dasatinib. The anti-tumor effects observed in this study were a result of G1 cell cycle arrest as the dasatinib sensitive CRC cell lines exhibited G1 inhibition. Moreover, those CRC cell lines that were responsive (0.08 μmol/L) to treatment demonstrated a significant baseline increase in Src and FAK gene expression. Conclusion Dasatinib demonstrated significant anti-proliferative activity in a subset of CRC cell lines in vitro, especially in those with increased Src expression at baseline, but only showed modest efficacy in CRC explants. Dasatinib is currently being studied in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced CRC, as its use as a single agent appears limited.

Nature Reviews Cancer 17, 254–268 (2017) In the online html version of this article, Joan Seoane's affiliations were not correct. He is also a member of the EurOPDX Consortium and is at the Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra,and the Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain.

Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have emerged as an important platform to elucidate new treatments and biomarkers in oncology. PDX models are used to address clinically relevant questions, including the contribution of tumour heterogeneity to therapeutic responsiveness, the patterns of cancer evolutionary dynamics during tumour progression and under drug pressure, and the mechanisms of resistance to treatment. The ability of PDX models to predict clinical outcomes is being improved through mouse humanization strategies and the implementation of co-clinical trials, within which patients and PDXs reciprocally inform therapeutic decisions. This Opinion article discusses aspects of PDX modelling that are relevant to these questions and highlights the merits of shared PDX resources to advance cancer medicine from the perspective of EurOPDX, an international initiative devoted to PDX-based research.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a challenge clinically due to a lack of response to hormonal and HER2-targeted agents coupled with an aggressive disease course. As the biology of this breast cancer subtype is better understood, it is clear that TNBC is a heterogeneous disease and one targeted therapy is unlikely to be active in all patients. Biomarkers predictive of response to treatment are thus of great importance in TNBC. This review outlines studies evaluating biomarkers predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to targeted therapies in the advanced setting. The development of validated biomarkers in conjunction with novel targeted therapies represents an opportunity to improve patient outcomes in TNBC.

74 Background: Despite advances in cancer treatment, the orientation of our health system does not address the whole cancer patient or support the wellbeing of the heart, soul, and mind. We launched the CaLM Model of Whole Person Cancer Care, an oncology medical home approach that integrates high acuity, sub-specialty clinical cancer care with comprehensive, ongoing supportive care. The CaLM Model operationalizes the six components in the conceptual framework set forth in the NASEM’s 2013 report. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care. Methods: Beginning December 2018, we piloted a “flipped” ambulatory care model in GYN and GI oncology delivering daily care through a subset of providers, the SWAT Team: a palliative NP, med onc NP, clinical social worker, and navigator. The SWAT Team triages all physical and social needs. As opposed to anchoring care with the oncologist and referring the patient out to social services, the SWAT team anchors care and the oncologist plugs in for treatment planning. The CaLM Model also utilizes coordinated, interdisciplinary care including financial and fertility navigation, nutrition, genetic counseling, pharmacy, and psychiatry, to manage the patient’s needs via a team-based approach by assessing and addressing the patient’s needs according to their values and preferences. We designed a new clinical and psychosocial assessment tool and patient-facing care plan; launched a Multi-Disciplinary “whole-person” case review process with all interdisciplinary providers and measured patient reported outcomes using the FACT-G, PHQ, GAD, and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory at baseline (initial visit) and every clinical visit. Measured at initial visit and every 6 months. Results: Early data show that the CaLM Model reduces patient symptom burden while improving quality of life. Conclusions: The CaLM Model is an efficient use of resources, compared to a traditional oncologist-focused model of cancer care. Further research is underway to assess cost benefit to the system, the patient and the payers. Ultimately, the CaLM Model may shift the paradigm of cancer care by demonstrating the feasibility and effectiveness of a patient-centered model of care delivery that builds a foundation for a value-based payment model.

5559 Background: Ovarian cancer patients who enroll in Phase I clinical trials are typically platinum resistant, heavily pretreated patients with a poor prognosis. Historically, clinical benefit of Phase I trials in this patient population has been uncertain. We assessed prognostic factors and survival in women with recurrent, previously treated ovarian cancer who enrolled in Phase I clinical trials. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all ovarian cancer patients who were treated on Phase I clinical trials from 2008 through 2018 at the University of Colorado Cancer Center. Patient characteristics, treatment-related toxicities and survival data were assessed. Descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to identify risk factors associated with survival time. Results: A total of 132 individual patients were treated on Phase I clinical trials. Patients had a median age of 59 years (range 33-88) with a median of 5.5 (range 1-13) previous chemotherapy lines. 53/132 (40%) of patients were treated on multiple Phase I trials with a median of 1 (range 0-5) prior Phase 1 clinical trial enrollments. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Overall response rate (defined as complete or partial response) was 9% and disease control rate (defined as complete or partial response or stable disease as best response) was 33%. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months (95% CI: 9.3-13.7). Two patients died on trial due to progression of disease while no patients died due to treatment-related toxicity. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factors predicting shorter survival were elevated CA-125 (HR 2.8; 95% CI: 1.6-5.2) and albumin < 3.5 g/dL (HR 2.5; 95% CI: 1.65-3.79). BMI > 25 predicted longer survival (HR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44-0.96). Conclusions: Phase I clinical trials for heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients are safe by a standard of no patients experiencing toxicity-related deaths in our study. They are clinically efficacious with patients experiencing OS of 11.5 months, which is comparable to existing approved therapies. Elevated CA-125 and low albumin levels predict shorter survival, while BMI > 25 predicts longer survival. Phase I clinical trial options should be considered for all heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients if available to them.

Patient derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) models provide a necessary platform in facilitating anti-cancer drug development prior to human trials. Human tumor pieces are injected subcutaneously into athymic nude mice (immunocompromised, T cell deficient) to create a bank of tumors and subsequently are passaged into different generations of mice in order to maintain these tumors from patients. Importantly, cellular heterogeneity of the original tumor is closely emulated in this model, which provides a more clinically relevant model for evaluation of drug efficacy studies (single agent and combination), biomarker analysis, resistant pathways and cancer stem cell biology. Some limitations of the PDTX model include the replacement of the human stroma with mouse stroma after the first generation in mice, inability to investigate treatment effects on metastasis due to the subcutaneous injections of the tumors, and the lack of evaluation of immunotherapies due to the use of immunocompromised mice. However, even with these limitations, the PDTX model provides a powerful preclinical platform in the drug discovery process.

For several decades, cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents were considered the basis of anti-cancer treatment for patients with metastatic tumors. A decrease in tumor burden, assessed by volumetric computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), was considered as a radiological response to cytotoxic chemotherapies. In addition to RECIST-based dimensional measurements, a metabolic response to cytotoxic drugs can be assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluoro-thymidine (FLT) as a radioactive tracer for drug-disrupted DNA synthesis. The decreased 18FLT-PET uptake is often seen concurrently with increased apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) by diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) due to chemotherapy-induced changes in tumor cellularity. Recently, the discovery of molecular origins of tumorogenesis led to the introduction of novel signal transduction inhibitors (STIs). STIs are targeted cytostatic agents; their effect is based on a specific biological inhibition with no immediate cell death. As such, tumor size is not anymore a sensitive end-point for a treatment response to STIs; novel physiological imaging end-points are desirable. For receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as modulators of the downstream signaling pathways, an almost immediate inhibition in glycolytic activity (the Warburg effect) and phospholipid turnover (the Kennedy pathway) has been seen by metabolic imaging in the first 24 hours of treatment. The quantitative imaging end-points by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and metabolic PET (including 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose, FDG, and total choline) provide an early treatment response to targeted STIs, before a reduction in tumor burden can be seen.

Purpose: Cross-talk between type I IGF receptor (IGF1R), insulin receptor (INSR), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mediates resistance to individual receptor blockade. This study aimed to determine the MTD, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of linsitinib, a potent oral IGF1R/INSR inhibitor, with EGFR inhibitor erlotinib. Experimental Design: This open-label, dose-escalation study investigated linsitinib schedules S1: once daily intermittent (days 1–3 weekly); S2, once daily continuous; S3, twice-daily continuous; each with erlotinib 100–150 mg once daily; and a non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expansion cohort. Results: Ninety-five patients were enrolled (S1, 44; S2, 24; S3, 12; expansion cohort, 15) and 91 treated. Seven experienced dose-limiting toxicities: QTc prolongation (3), abnormal liver function (2), hyperglycemia (1), and anorexia (1). Common adverse events included drug eruption (84%), diarrhea (73%), fatigue (68%), nausea (58%), vomiting (40%). MTDs for linsitinib/erlotinib were 450/150 mg (S1), 400/100 mg (S2). On the basis of prior monotherapy data, S3 dosing at 150 mg twice daily/150 mg once daily was the recommended phase II dose for the expansion cohort. There was no evidence of drug–drug interaction. Pharmacodynamic data showed IGF-1 elevation and reduced IGF1R/INSR phosphorylation, suggesting pathway inhibition. Across schedules, 5/75 (7%) evaluable patients experienced partial responses: spinal chordoma (268+ weeks), rectal cancer (36 weeks), three NSCLCs including 2 adenocarcinomas (16, 72 weeks), 1 squamous wild-type EGFR NSCLC (36 weeks). Disease control (CR+PR+SD) occurred in 38 of 75 (51%), and 28 of 91 (31%) patients were on study >12 weeks. Conclusions: The linsitinib/erlotinib combination was tolerable with preliminary evidence of activity, including durable responses in cases unlikely to respond to erlotinib monotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2897–907. ©2016 AACR.

Purpose: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of PX-866 in patients with incurable cancers. Experimental Design: This was a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study. Drug was administered orally once per day either on an intermittent (arm 1; days 1–5 and 8–12 of a 28-day cycle) or continuous (arm 2; days 1–28 of a 28-day cycle) schedule. Additional patients were treated at the arm 2 MTD in a food effects substudy. Results: Eighty-four patients were treated in the arm 1 (n = 51), arm 2 (n = 20), and food effects (n = 13) cohorts. The most frequent study drug–related adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (69.0%), with diarrhea being the most common (48.8%). The MTD was 12 and 8 mg for arm 1 and 2, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) consisted of grade III diarrhea (n = 3) and grade III elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST; n = 1). The pharmacokinetics profile was dose proportional, with no evidence of drug accumulation. PX-866–associated inhibition of platelet pAKTSER473 was observed at the arm 2 MTD. The best response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was stable disease in 22% of evaluable patients in arm 1, 53% in arm 2, and 11% in the food effects cohort. Eight patients were on study for 4 or more months. Conclusions: This first-in-human study shows that PX-866, an irreversible small-molecule inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), was well tolerated and was associated with prolonged stable disease, particularly when using a continuous dosing schedule. Clin Cancer Res; 18(15); 4173–82. ©2012 AACR.

Progress in oncology drug development has been hampered by a lack of preclinical models that reliably predict clinical activity of novel compounds in cancer patients. In an effort to address these shortcomings, there has been a recent increase in the use of patient-derived tumour xenografts (PDTX) engrafted into immune-compromised rodents such as athymic nude or NOD/SCID mice for preclinical modelling. Numerous tumour-specific PDTX models have been established and, importantly, they are biologically stable when passaged in mice in terms of global gene-expression patterns, mutational status, metastatic potential, drug responsiveness and tumour architecture. These characteristics might provide significant improvements over standard cell-line xenograft models. This Review will discuss specific PDTX disease examples illustrating an overview of the opportunities and limitations of these models in cancer drug development, and describe concepts regarding predictive biomarker development and future applications.

Purpose: Rigosertib, a dual non-ATP inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathways (PI3K), and gemcitabine have synergistic antitumor activity when combined in preclinical studies. This phase I study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of the combination of rigosertib and gemcitabine in patients with cancer. Experimental Design: Patients with solid tumors who failed standard therapy or were candidates for gemcitabine-based therapy were eligible. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle and rigosertib on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, and 18. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted during an expansion cohort of patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Results: Forty patients were treated, 19 in the dose-escalation phase and 21 in the expansion cohort. Dose levels evaluated were (gemcitabine/rigosertib mg/m2): 750/600 (n = 4), 750/1,200 (n = 3), 1,000/600 (n = 3), 1,000/1,200 (n = 3), and 1,000/1,800 (n = 6 + 21). One dose-limiting toxicity (death) occurred at the highest dose level (1,000/1,800) tested. Non–dose-limiting ≥grade II/III toxicities included neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and nausea. Grade III/IV neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue were seen in two, one, and two patients in the expansion cohort. Partial responses were observed in PDA, thymic cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma, including gemcitabine-pretreated PDA. The pharmacokinetic profile of rigosertib was not affected by gemcitabine. Conclusion: The RPTD established in this study is rigosertib 1,800 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. This regimen is well tolerated with a toxicity profile of the combination similar to the profile of gemcitabine alone. Antitumor efficacy was observed in patients who previously progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 18(7); 2048–55. ©2012 AACR.

Background Vandetanib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that affects vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and rearranged during transfection (RET) mediated receptors which are important for growth and invasion of biliary and pancreatic cancers. This phase I study evaluated the safety profile of vandetanib in combination with standard doses of gemcitabine and capecitabine in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Methods In this single center phase I trial, patients received gemcitabine intravenously (IV) at 1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 in a 28 day cycle, capecitabine orally at 850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–21, and escalating doses of vandetanib (200 or 300 mg orally daily). Once the MTD was defined, an expansion cohort of patients with advanced biliary cancers and locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer was enrolled. Blood samples were also collected at predetermined time points for biomarker analysis. Results Twenty-three patients were enrolled: 9 in the dose escalation and 14 in the dose expansion cohort. One dose limiting toxicity (DLT), of grade 4 neutropenia, occurred in the 200 mg vandetanib cohort. The most common adverse effects were diarrhea (39 %), nausea and vomiting (34 %), and rash (33 %). There were 3 partial responses and stable disease of >2 months (range 2–45, median 5) was observed in 15/23 patients. There was no association between changes in biomarker analytes and disease response. Conclusion The combination of gemcitabine, capecitabine and vandetanib is well tolerated at the recommended phase II dose of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for three consecutive weeks, capecitabine 850 mg/m2 BID days 1–21, and vandetanib 300 mg daily, every 28 days. This combination demonstrated promising activity in pancreaticobiliary cancers and further evaluation is warranted in these diseases. NCT00551096.

To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a single dose of erlotinib in cancer patients with moderate hepatic impairment (MHI) to those of cancer patients with adequate hepatic function (AHF).Cancer patients with either AHF or MHI were treated with a single 150 mg dose of erlotinib on day 1 only followed by 96 h of plasma sampling for PK assessment. From day 5, patients were allowed to continue daily erlotinib in a maintenance phase. Non-smoking patients were stratified into an AHF cohort (total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal [ULN] and ALT/AST ≤ 1.5 X ULN) or a MHI cohort (Child-Pugh score of 7-9). The frequency of adverse events and laboratory changes were assessed.Thirty-six patients, 21 with AHF and 15 with MHI, received at least one dose of erlotinib. The PK of erlotinib was similar between the two cohorts with a median C (max) of 1.09 versus 0.828 μg/mL and corresponding median AUC(0-t ) 29.3 versus 30.5 μg h/mL for the AHF and MHI cohorts, respectively. Adverse events from erlotinib in cancer patients with MHI were consistent with the known safety profile.The PK and safety profiles of erlotinib in patients with MHI were similar to those with AHF. As a result, a reduced starting dose of erlotinib in patients with MHI is not required and treatment should be guided by patients' tolerability.

Purpose: ENMD-2076 is a unique orally bioavailable Aurora kinase and VEGFR inhibitor. The purpose of this phase 1 study of ENMD-2076 was to determine the MTD, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles and preliminary antitumor activity. Experimental Design: Patients with refractory advanced solid malignancies were treated with ENMD-2076 orally with continuous once daily dosing. Doses from 60 to 200 mg/m2 were evaluated using a standard 3 (to 4) + 3 design. Pharmacokinetic parameters were studied on days 1, 28, and 30 to 35 of cycle 1. Expanded MTD cohorts included patients with ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and refractory solid tumors. Results: A total of 67 patients (46 F, 21M; ages 30–76) entered the study. Dose levels of 60, 80, 120, 200, and 160 mg/m2 were evaluated. Two patients experienced grade 3 hypertension at 200 mg/m2, and additional grade 3 neutropenia events limited tolerability at this dose. An intermediate dose of 160 mg/m2 was determined to be the MTD. The most common drug-related adverse events included hypertension, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue. The pharmacokinetics of ENMD-2076 were characterized by a rapid absorption phase (Tmax 3–7.8 hours), a t1/2 of 27.3 to 38.3 hours after a single dose, and dose proportional exposure. Decreased plasma sVEGFR2 was observed posttreatment. Two patients with platinum refractory/resistant ovarian cancer had RECIST partial responses. Conclusions: ENMD-2076 was well tolerated, had a linear pharmacokinetic profile, and showed promising antitumor activity, particularly in ovarian cancer. The recommended phase 2 dose of ENMD-2076 is 160 mg/m2 administered orally once daily with continuous dosing. Clin Cancer Res; 17(4); 849–60. ©2010 AACR.

Purpose: There is growing evidence implicating the importance of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) pathway in colorectal cancer based upon the results of population studies and preclinical experiments. However, the combination of an IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) inhibitor with standard colorectal cancer chemotherapies has not yet been evaluated. In this study, we investigated the interaction between PQIP, the dual IGF-IR/insulin receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and standard chemotherapies in colorectal cancer cell line models. Experimental Design: The antiproliferative effects of PQIP, as a single agent and in combination with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, or SN38, were analyzed against four colorectal cancer cell lines. Downstream effector proteins, apoptosis, and cell cycle were also assessed in the combination of PQIP and SN-38. Lastly, the efficacy of OSI-906 (a derivative of PQIP) combined with irinotecan was further tested using a human colorectal cancer xenograft model. Results: Treatment with the combination of PQIP and each of three chemotherapies resulted in an enhanced decrease in proliferation of all four colorectal cancer cell lines compared with single-agent treatment. This inhibition was not associated with a significant induction of apoptosis, but was accompanied by cell cycle arrest and changes in phosphorylation of Akt. Interestingly, antitumor activity between PQIP and SN-38 in vitro was also reflected in the human colorectal cancer xenograft model. Conclusions: Combination treatment with PQIP, the dual IGF-IR/insulin receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and standard colorectal cancer chemotherapy resulted in enhanced antiproliferative effects against colorectal cancer cell line models, providing a scientific rationale for the testing of OSI-906 and standard colorectal cancer treatment regimens. Clin Cancer Res; 16(22); 5436–46. ©2010 AACR.

Purpose To determine the maximal tolerated dose of bortezomib with concurrent external beam radiation therapy in patients with incurable solid malignant tumors requiring palliative therapy. Methods and Materials An open label, dose escalation, phase I clinical trial evaluated the safety of three dose levels of bortezomib administered intravenously (1.0 mg/m 2 , 1.3 mg/m 2 , and 1.6 mg/m 2 / dose) once weekly with concurrent radiation in patients with histologically confirmed solid tumors and a radiographically appreciable lesion suitable for palliative radiation therapy. All patients received 40 Gy in 16 fractions to the target lesion. Dose-limiting toxicity was the primary endpoint, defined as any grade 4 hematologic toxicity, any grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity, or any toxicity requiring treatment to be delayed for ≥2 weeks. Results A total of 12 patients were enrolled. Primary sites included prostate (3 patients), head and neck (3 patients), uterus (1 patient), abdomen (1 patient), breast (1 patient), kidney (1 patient), lung (1 patient), and colon (1 patient). The maximum tolerated dose was not realized with a maximum dose of 1.6 mg/m 2 . One case of dose-limiting toxicity was appreciated (grade 3 urosepsis) and felt to be unrelated to bortezomib. The most common grade 3 toxicity was lymphopenia (10 patients). Common grade 1 to 2 events included nausea (7 patients), infection without neutropenia (6 patients), diarrhea (5 patients), and fatigue (5 patients). Conclusions The combination of palliative external beam radiation with concurrent weekly bortezomib therapy at a dose of 1.6 mg/m 2 is well tolerated in patients with metastatic solid tumors. The maximum tolerated dose of once weekly bortezomib delivered concurrently with radiation therapy is greater than 1.6 mg/m 2 .

Lessons Learned The maximum tolerated dose of the combination of linsitinib and irinotecan is linsitinib 450 mg daily on days 1–3 every 7 days and irinotecan 125 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The adverse effects associated with the combination are not significantly increased beyond what is expected of each drug as a single agent. Multiple negative trials of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitors performed in unselected patient populations led to the early discontinuation of linistinib development and this trial. Earlier integration of assessment of potential predictive biomarkers into clinical trials, as was planned in this study, is vital to the development of targeted therapies in oncology. Background This phase I dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination of irinotecan and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) inhibitor linsitinib in patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapy. Methods Dose escalation in three specified dose levels was performed according to a standard 3 + 3 design. Dose levels were as follows: (a) linsitinib 400 mg and irinotecan 100 mg/m2, (b) linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 100 mg/m2, and (c) linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 125 mg/m2. Linisitinib was administered once daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17, and irinotecan on days 1 and 8. Assessment of a candidate predictive biomarker was planned in all patients, with further evaluation in an expansion cohort of advanced colorectal cancer. Results A total of 17 patients were treated, with 1 patient in both cohort 2 and 3 experiencing dose-limiting toxicity. Linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 125 mg/m2 was the maximum tolerated dose. Sixteen (94%) patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event. Neutropenia was the only grade >3 toxicity (4%). No significant hyperglycemia or QT interval prolongation was noted. No objective responses were observed; 47% (n = 8) had stable disease with median duration of 5.25 months. Conclusion Although the combination was determined safe, the study was halted due to termination of linsitinib development, and biomarker testing was not performed.

In an era of targeted therapies and personalized medicine, the search for predictive and prognostic biomarkers has reached the forefront in cancer research. Testing for KRAS mutation status in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has now become standard of care, especially for patients being considered for treatment with antibodies to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Because metastatic CRC patients whose tumors harbor KRAS mutations do not respond to EGFR-targeting antibodies, their management is challenging. As our understanding of the role of KRAS mutations grows, new treatment strategies are being devised but are not yet ready for clinical use. In this review, we examine some of these potential strategies.

Background: Tumors with impaired arginine synthesis are susceptible to extracellular arginine depletion. We report results from the first-in-human phase I trial of pegzilarginase (AEB1102, Co-ArgI-PEG), a pegylated, recombinant, cobalt-substituted human arginase I (NCT02561234). Experimental design: Patients with metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapies were enrolled in 3+3 cohorts at increasing dose levels of weekly intravenous pegzilarginase. Primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Additional endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, expression of arginine synthesis pathway enzymes in tumor tissue, and preliminary efficacy. Results: Forty patients were enrolled in 9 cohorts at doses from 0.01 to 0.40 mg/kg. The 3 most prevalent histologies (4 patients each) were colorectal and prostate adenocarcinoma, and uveal melanoma. Two dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed: G3 failure to thrive (0.33 mg/kg) and G3 maculopapular rash (0.40 mg/kg). After assessment of overall safety profile, the MTD was determined to be 0.33 mg/kg once weekly. Other related serious or ≥ grade 3 adverse events (AEs) not considered DLTs per protocol were hypophosphatemia (2 patients), and anemia, neutropenia, tremor, weakness, and transient hypertension (one occurrence each in a single patient). Pegzilarginase-related AEs in ≥10% of patients included nausea (9 patients with G1-2), stomatitis/mouth sores (8), fatigue (8), vomiting (6), pruritic, macular, or maculopapular rash (4, 1 G3), decreased appetite (4), and diarrhea (4). Pegzilarginase exposure was dose proportional on day 1 and day 29 for all doses starting at 0.02 mg/kg, and the mean half-life was constant at doses ≥ 0.04 mg/kg (33-55 hr after dose 5). On average, doses ≥0.18 mg/kg depleted arginine to ≤10% of baseline for up to 72 hrs. Analysis of the initial 27 patients revealed no anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Median number of doses was 6.5 (range 1-20); 4 patients had stable disease after 8 weeks of treatment and continued in the trial for a total of 16-20 weeks. ASS1, ASL, and OTC expression levels varied across the different histologies. Conclusions: The MTD of pegzilarginase was 0.33 mg/kg, and the PK/PD profile supports once-weekly dosing with potential adjustable margin. The manageable safety profile, absence of ADA, and observation of stable disease supports further exploration as monotherapy and combination therapy. Expansion cohorts were initiated at MTD in specific histologies with high probability of low ASS1 expression (uveal melanoma, cutaneous melanoma and small-cell lung cancer [SCLC]). Based on pre-clinical data showing enhanced effects of PD-1 inhibition, a parallel study is investigating pegzilarginase in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with previously-treated SCLC. Citation Format: Drew W. Rasco, S. Gail Eckhardt, Diwakar Davar, Karl Lewis, Humberto Lara-Guerra, Susan E. Alters, Stephen Eckert, Scott W. Rowlinson, James E. Wooldridge, Richard D. Carvajal. Phase I dose escalation trial of pegzilarginase in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT030.

PurposeApoptosis ligand 2/tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (Apo2L/TRAIL)—a member of the tumor necrosis factor cytokine family—induces apoptosis by activating the extrinsic pathway through the proapoptotic death receptors DR4 and DR5. Recombinant human Apo2L/TRAIL (rhApo2L/TRAIL) has broad potential as a cancer therapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-human clinical trial to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of multiple intravenous doses of rhApo2L/TRAIL in patients with advanced cancer.Patients and MethodsThis phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study treated patients with advanced cancer with rhApo2L/TRAIL doses ranging from 0.5 to 30 mg/kg/d, with parallel dose escalation for patients without liver metastases and with normal liver function (cohort 1) and for patients with liver metastases and normal or mildly abnormal liver function (cohort 2). Doses were given daily for 5 days, with cycles repeating every 3 weeks. Assessments included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, pharmacokinetics, and imaging to evaluate antitumor activity.ResultsSeventy-one patients received a mean of 18.3 doses; seven patients completed all eight treatment cycles. The AE profile of rhApo2L/TRAIL was similar in cohorts 1 and 2. The most common AEs were fatigue (38%), nausea (28%), vomiting (23%), fever (23%), anemia (18%), and constipation (18%). Liver enzyme elevations were concurrent with progressive metastatic liver disease. Two patients with sarcoma (synovial and undifferentiated) experienced serious AEs associated with rapid tumor necrosis. Two patients with chondrosarcoma experienced durable partial responses to rhApo2L/TRAIL.ConclusionAt the tested schedule and dose range, rhApo2L/TRAIL was safe and well tolerated. Dose escalation achieved peak rhApo2L/TRAIL serum concentrations equivalent to those associated with preclinical antitumor efficacy.