1. Predictors and Outcomes of Patient Knowledge of Plan of Care in Hospital Medicine: A Quality Improvement Study
- Author
-
Richard Caplan, Bailey Ingraham, LeRoi S. Hicks, V. Surekha Bhamidipati, Patty McGraw Rn, and Edmondo J. Robinson
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Multivariate analysis ,Quality management ,Leadership and Management ,Concordance ,Psychological intervention ,Pharmacist ,Patient Readmission ,Article ,Hospital Medicine ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,Length of Stay ,Quality Improvement ,Checklist ,Hospital medicine ,Hospitalists ,Family medicine ,Ambulatory ,Teaching Rounds ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient understanding of plan of care is associated with positive outcomes in ambulatory settings. In hospital medicine settings, patient-physician agreement on plan of care (concordance) has been limited and difficult to improve. This study examined the impact of adding a hospitalist to interdisciplinary rounds (IDR) on physician-patient-nurse concordance and the relationship between concordance and outcomes. METHODS: IDR were conducted by core teams made up of unit-based nurses, a case manager, and a pharmacist. Over time, with cohorting, hospitalists were included in IDR (hospitalist IDR) for some patients assigned to unit-based hospitalists. In developing hospitalist IDR, researchers emphasized using an IDR checklist, including a patient communication plan. Patient-nurse-physician interviews were used to assess concordance in the domains of diagnosis, tests and procedures, and expected discharge date. Using two-hospitalist review, agreement was rated as none, partial, or complete, and a total concordance score was calculated for each patient in both IDR groups. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the relationship between concordance, IDR type, patient factors, and utilization outcomes. RESULTS: For 658 patients, the mean concordance score was 11.71 out of a possible 18. There was no difference in concordance between hospitalist and core IDR groups (11.68 vs. 11.84, p = 0.7). Higher total concordance score was associated with lower lengths of stay (p < 0.001) and readmission rates (p = 0.001). Total concordance had a negative association with patient age (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Concordance did not change with IDR type. Higher concordance appears to be related to positive utilization outcomes. Future studies are needed to evaluate potential interventions to improve concordance.
- Published
- 2021