Search

Mesothelioma is a rare and fatal cancer with limited therapeutic options until the recent approval of combination immune checkpoint blockade. Here we report the results of the phase 2 PrE0505 trial (NCT02899195) of the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab plus platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy for 55 patients with previously untreated, unresectable pleural mesothelioma. The primary endpoint was overall survival compared to historical control with cisplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy; secondary and exploratory endpoints included safety, progression-free survival and biomarkers of response. The combination of durvalumab with chemotherapy met the pre-specified primary endpoint, reaching a median survival of 20.4 months versus 12.1 months with historical control. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with known side effects of chemotherapy, and all adverse events due to immunotherapy were grade 2 or lower. Integrated genomic and immune cell repertoire analyses revealed that a higher immunogenic mutation burden coupled with a more diverse T cell repertoire was linked to favorable clinical outcome. Structural genome-wide analyses showed a higher degree of genomic instability in responding tumors of epithelioid histology. Patients with germline alterations in cancer predisposing genes, especially those involved in DNA repair, were more likely to achieve long-term survival. Our findings indicate that concurrent durvalumab with platinum-based chemotherapy has promising clinical activity and that responses are driven by the complex genomic background of malignant pleural mesothelioma., In a phase 2 trial, the combination of chemotherapy with durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, exhibited promising clinical activity in patients with previously untreated, unresectable mesothelioma, with additional analyses providing insights into genomic and immunologic features potentially associated with response.

Introduction Smoking cessation has been reported to benefit patients even after a diagnosis of lung cancer. We studied the smoking behavior of patients who participated in a phase 3 trial of adjuvant therapy following resection of stages IB–IIIA NSCLC. Methods The ECOG-ACRIN 1505 was conducted to determine whether the addition of bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy would improve overall survival (OS) for patients with early-stage NSCLC. Studying the association between smoking status and OS was a secondary end point. Patients completed a questionnaire on their smoking habits at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Results A total of 1501 patients were enrolled, and 99.8%, 95%, 94%, 93%, and 93% responded to the questionnaire at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. A total of 90% reported a current or previous history of cigarette smoking. In addition, 60% of nonsmokers at enrollment reported smoking after diagnosis (before randomization); however, 1% of them reported smoking at 12 months. Furthermore, 94% of the respondents smoked none/fewer cigarettes daily at 12 months. The incidence of grades 3–5 toxicity on treatment was 68%, 76%, and 72% in never, former, and current smokers, respectively (p = 0.05). The disease-free survival for never-smokers relative to current and former smokers was (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, p = 0.64 and HR 1.05, p = 0.72), and OS was (adjusted HR for death 0.54, p = 0.005 and adjusted HR for death 0.68, p = 0.03), respectively. Conclusions This is the first comprehensive, prospective report of smoking habits in patients with NSCLC patients from a phase III early-stage trial. There was a high rate of smoking reduction and cessation following study entry. The disease-free survival did not differ significantly between smokers and never smokers, though there were less grade 3–5 toxicities and more favorable OS in never-smokers.

Study Objectives Hypothalamic amenorrhea is common in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with anorexia nervosa (AN), and ovarian reserve is not routinely assessed. AN increases rates of fertility problems, but how or when AN negatively influences future fertility is unclear. We sought to determine whether biomarkers of ovarian reserve were impacted in AYA with AN. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Tertiary care center. Participants Females with AN and amenorrhea (n = 97) at the pre-intervention visit of a clinical trial, n = 19 females without an eating disorder or menstrual dysfunction. Main Outcome Measures Serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) concentrations. Results AMH levels were higher in AYA with AN than unaffected adolescents (4.7 vs. 3.2 ng/mL; P = .03). Neither FSH nor inhibin B differed between groups. In 19.6% of participants with AN, AMH levels were elevated above the normal range (>6.78 ng/mL). These subjects had a longer disease duration than those with normal AMH levels (9 vs. 3 mos; P = .03); age or degree of malnutrition did not differ between AN subjects with normal or elevated AMH. Conclusions AMH levels appear to be normal or elevated in AYA with AN. Low AMH in a patient with AN should raise clinical concern regarding ovarian reserve, and should not be attributed to degree of malnutrition alone. Currently, AMH is not regularly assessed during routine AN clinical care. However, our findings suggest some clinical utility in identifying those patients with reduced ovarian reserve. Potential links between the hypothalamic amenorrhea suffered by patients with AN and PCOS should be explored.

Purpose: We pursued genomic analysis of an exceptional responder with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a multi-platform effort to discover novel oncogenic targets. Experimental Design: In this open-label, single-arm phase II study (NCT01829217), an enriched cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC was treated with the multi-kinase inhibitor sunitinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Tissue was collected for multi-platform genomic analysis of responders, and a candidate oncogene was validated using in vitro models edited by CRISPR-Cas9. Results: Of 13 patients enrolled, 1 patient (8%), a never smoker, had a partial response lasting 33 months. Genomic analysis of the responder identified no oncogenic variant using multi-platform DNA analysis including hotspot allelotyping, massively parallel hybrid-capture next-generation sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. However, bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) revealed a novel fusion, TMEM87A–RASGRF1, with high overexpression of the fusion partners. RASGRF1 encodes a guanine exchange factor which activates RAS from GDP-RAS to GTP-RAS. Oncogenicity was demonstrated in NIH/3T3 models with intrinsic TMEM87A–RASGRF1 fusion. In addition, activation of MAPK was shown in PC9 models edited to express this fusion, although sensitivity to MAPK inhibition was seen without apparent sensitivity to sunitinib. Conclusions: Sunitinib exhibited limited activity in this enriched cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC. Nonetheless, we find that RNA-seq of exceptional responders represents a potentially underutilized opportunity to identify novel oncogenic targets including oncogenic activation of RASGRF1.

Purpose: Evaluating drug responses using primary patient-derived cells ex vivo represents a potentially rapid and efficient approach to screening for new treatment approaches. Here, we sought to identify neratinib combinations in HER2 mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient xenograft-derived organotypic spheroids (XDOTS) using a short-term ex vivo system. Experimental Design: We generated two HER2-mutant NSCLC PDX models [DFCI359 (HER2 exon19 755_757LREdelinsRP) and DFCI315 (HER2 exon20 V777_G778insGSP)] and used the PDX tumors to generate XDOTS. Tumor spheroids were grown in a microfluidic device and treated ex vivo with neratinib-based drug combinations. Live/dead quantification was performed by dual-labeling deconvolution fluorescence microscopy. The most efficacious ex vivo combination was subsequently validated in vivo using the DFCI359 and DFCI315 PDXs and a HER2YVMA genetically engineered mouse model. Results: Both neratinib and afatinib, but not gefitinib, induced cell death in DFCI359 XDOTS. The combinations of neratinib/trastuzumab and neratinib/temsirolimus enhanced the therapeutic benefit of neratinib alone in DFCI315 and DFCI359. The combination of neratinib and trastuzumab in vivo was more effective compared with single-agent neratinib or trastuzumab and was associated with more robust inhibition of HER2 and downstream signaling. Conclusions: The XDOTS platform can be used to evaluate therapies and therapeutic combinations ex vivo using PDX tumors. This approach may accelerate the identification and clinical development of therapies for targets with no or few existing models and/or therapies.

Purpose Targeted inhibition of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been widely used for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK rearrangements. We performed tumor volume analysis of ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC treated with crizotinib to identify an early predictive marker for prolonged survival. Materials and methods Cases of 42 patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC (16 men, 26 women; median age: 55.7 y) treated with crizotinib as their first ALK-directed therapy were retrospectively studied. Tumor volume measurements of dominant lung lesions were performed on baseline computed tomography and follow-up computed tomography at 8 weeks of therapy. The relationships between the 8-week volume change (%) and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results The 8-week tumor volume change ranged from -99.3% to 117.5% (median: -57.7%). Using the 25th percentile of the 8-week volume change of -74%, 11 patients with >74% volume decrease at 8 weeks had a significantly longer OS compared with 31 patients with ≤74% decrease (median OS: 92.0 vs. 22.8 mo; P=0.0048). In multivariable analyses using Cox proportional hazards models, the 8-week volume decrease of >74% was significantly associated with longer OS (hazard ratio=0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.59; Cox P=0.008) after adjusting for tumor stage (stage IV vs. recurrent NSCLC, hazard ratio=5.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-24.3; P=0.02). Conclusions The 8-week tumor volume decrease of >74% is significantly associated with longer OS in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with crizotinib.

PURPOSE Baseline use of corticosteroids is associated with poor outcomes in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with programmed cell death-1 axis inhibition. To approach the question of causation versus correlation for this association, we examined outcomes in patients treated with immunotherapy depending on whether corticosteroids were administered for cancer-related palliative reasons or cancer-unrelated indications. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated with immunotherapy who received ≥ 10 mg prednisone were compared with outcomes in patients who received 0 to < 10 mg of prednisone. RESULTS Of 650 patients, the 93 patients (14.3%) who received ≥ 10 mg of prednisone at the time of immunotherapy initiation had shorter median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) times than patients who received 0 to < 10 mg of prednisone (mPFS, 2.0 v 3.4 months, respectively; P = .01; mOS, 4.9 v 11.2 months, respectively; P < .001). When analyzed by reason for corticosteroid administration, mPFS and mOS were significantly shorter only among patients who received ≥ 10 mg prednisone for palliative indications compared with patients who received ≥ 10 mg prednisone for cancer-unrelated reasons and with patients receiving 0 to < 10 mg of prednisone (mPFS, 1.4 v 4.6 v 3.4 months, respectively; log-rank P < .001 across the three groups; mOS, 2.2 v 10.7 v 11.2 months, respectively; log-rank P < .001 across the three groups). There was no significant difference in mPFS or mOS in patients receiving ≥ 10 mg of prednisone for cancer-unrelated indications compared with patients receiving 0 to < 10 mg of prednisone. CONCLUSION Although patients with NSCLC treated with ≥ 10 mg of prednisone at the time of immunotherapy initiation have worse outcomes than patients who received 0 to < 10 mg of prednisone, this difference seems to be driven by a poor-prognosis subgroup of patients who receive corticosteroids for palliative indications.

Purpose To develop an automated analytic module for calculation of tumor growth rate from serial CT scans and to apply the module and evaluate reproducibility in a pilot cohort of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Materials and methods The module utilized a commercially available image-processing workstation equipped with a validated tumor volume measurement tool. An automated analytic software module was programmed with the capability to record and display serial tumor volume changes and to calculate tumor volume growth rate over time and added to the workstation. The module was applied to evaluate the tumor growth rate in a pilot cohort of 24 EGFR-mutant patients treated with EGFR inhibitors, and reproducibility references as tested by two independent thoracic radiologists. Results The module analyzed chest CT scans from 24 patients (5 males, 19 females; median age: 61) with a median of 8 scans per patient, totaling 227 scans and provided a graphical display with an automated and instant calculation of tumor growth rate after the nadir volume for each patient. High inter and intraobserver agreements were noted for tumor growth rates, with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.9323 and 0.9668, respectively. Interpretation of slow versus fast tumor growth using previously identified threshold of ≤0.15/month had a perfect interobserver agreement (κ = 1.00), and an excellent intraobserver agreement (κ = 0.895). Conclusions The present study describes the development of an image analytic module for assessing tumor growth rate and the data demonstrates the functionality and reproducibility of the module in a pilot cohort of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKI. The image analytic module is an initial step for clinical translation of the tumor growth rate approach to guide cancer treatment in precision oncology.

Introduction Glycoprotein NMB is a transmembrane protein linked with poor prognosis and is expressed in most squamous lung cancer. Glembatumumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting glycoprotein NMB, administered intravenously every 3 weeks in this phase 1 study to determine the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose in patients who had progressed on any number of previous therapies. Results A total of 13 patients were enrolled; adverse events (of any grade) including dyspnea, neutropenia, respiratory failure, anemia, increased aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase, diarrhea, and hypophosphatemia were seen in 15% of patients. Grade 5 events included two cases of respiratory failure, either completely or partially attributed to cancer progression. The only other grade 5 event was "disease progression." The most common adverse events (23%) were decreased appetite, fatigue, rash, and weight loss. The median overall and progression-free survivals were 5.7 months (90% confidence interval: 2.5–16.8) and 2.5 months (90% confidence interval: 1.6–5.8) respectively. Conclusions Glembatumumab vedotin exhibited no serious or unexpected toxicity in this heavily pretreated population, except those caused by disease progression. Modest anticancer activity was observed with a recommendation for a phase 2 dose of 1.9 mg/kg. This portion of the study was not undertaken owing to the company's decision to discontinue drug development.

Objectives The ECOG‐ACRIN Cancer Research Group trial E2511 recently demonstrated a potential benefit for the addition of veliparib to cisplatin‐etoposide (CE) in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) in a phase II randomized controlled trial. Secondary trial endpoints included comparison of the incidence and severity of neurotoxicity, hypothesized to be lower in the veliparib arm, and tolerability of the addition of veliparib to CE. Physician‐rated and patient‐reported neurotoxicity was also compared. Materials and Methods Patients randomized to veliparib plus CE (n = 64) or placebo plus CE (n = 64) completed the 11‐item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity (questionnaire pre‐treatment, end of cycle 4 [ie 3 months after randomization] and 3 months post‐treatment [ie 6‐months]). Adherence analysis was based on treatment forms. Results and Conclusion No significant differences in mean or magnitude of change in neurotoxicity scores were observed between treatment arms at any time point. However, patients in the placebo arm reported worsening neurotoxicity from baseline to 3‐months (M difference = −1.5, P = .045), compared to stable neurotoxicity in the veliparib arm (M difference = −0.2, P = .778). Weakness was the most common treatment‐emergent (>50%) and moderate to severe (>16%) symptom reported, but did not differ between treatment arms. The proportion of adherence to oral therapy in the overall sample was 75%. Three percent of patients reported clinically significant neurotoxicity that was not captured by physician assessment. Neurotoxicity scores were not different between treatment arms. The addition of veliparib to CE appeared tolerable, though weakness should be monitored. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01642251., We examined patient‐reported tolerability of the addition of a PARP inhibitor, veliparib, to cisplatin‐etoposide for treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer in randomized controlled trial E2511. The addition of veliparib to cisplatin‐etoposide was tolerable according to a patient‐reported outcome and adherence. Future studies should assess whether veliparib may have a protective effect against chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy.

Treatment for lung cancer has evolved in the past 3 decades starting with platinum-based chemotherapy as the standard of care, regardless of histology, in the early 1990s to the current age of biomarker-driven therapy. Consequently, clinical trials in lung cancer have evolved in response to this new shift of paradigm, leading to novel approaches that simultaneously shorten the development process and allow evaluation of multiple patient cohorts. Herein, we provide an overview of the landscape of lung cancer clinical trials in the era of targeted therapies, precision medicine, and biomarkers. Specific trials are given as examples to illustrate the design paradigms. The paper is organized by drug development phases starting with early-phase biomarker discovery to proof-of-concept trials to definitive trials. We also present some thoughts on future directions.

PURPOSE Heterogeneity in tumor mutational burden (TMB) quantification across sequencing platforms limits the application and further study of this potential biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We hypothesized that harmonization of TMB across platforms would enable integration of distinct clinical data sets to better characterize the association between TMB and ICI response. METHODS Cohorts of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer sequenced by 1 of 3 targeted panels or by whole-exome sequencing (WES) were compared (N = 7,297). TMB was calculated uniformly and compared across cohorts. TMB distributions were harmonized by applying a normal transformation followed by standardization to z scores. In subcohorts of patients treated with ICIs (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute n = 272; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center n = 227), the association between TMB and outcome was assessed. Durable clinical benefit (DCB) was defined as responsive/stable disease lasting ≥ 6 months. RESULTS TMB values were higher in the panel cohorts than in the WES cohort. Average mutation rates per gene were highly concordant across cohorts (Pearson’s correlation coefficients, 0.842-0.866). Subsetting the WES cohort by gene panels only partially reproduced the observed differences in TMB. Standardization of TMB into z scores harmonized TMB distributions and enabled integration of the ICI-treated subcohorts. Simulations indicated that cohorts > 900 are necessary for this approach. TMB did not associate with response in never-smokers or patients who harbor targetable driver alterations, although these analyses were underpowered. An increase of TMB thresholds increased DCB rate, but DCB rates within deciles varied. Receiver operating characteristic curves yielded an area under the curve of 0.614, with no natural inflection point. CONCLUSION The z score conversion harmonizes TMB values and enables integration of data sets derived from different sequencing panels. Clinical and biologic features may provide context to the clinical application of TMB and warrant additional study.

Purpose Although programmed death (PD)-1 pathway inhibitors are now used in nearly all patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the large number of patients with NSCLC and concurrent autoimmune disease (AID) have been universally excluded from immunotherapy clinical trials. Therefore, the safety of PD-1 and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in patients with NSCLC and underlying AID is currently unknown. Methods As part of a multi-institutional effort, we retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data from patients with NSCLC and a history of AID who received monotherapy with either a PD-1 or a PD-L1 (herein referred to as PD-[L]1) inhibitor. Qualifying AIDs included but were not limited to: rheumatologic, neurologic, endocrine, GI, and dermatologic conditions. Results We identified 56 patients with NSCLC and an AID who received a PD-(L)1 inhibitor. At the time of treatment initiation, 18% of patients had active AID symptoms and 20% were receiving immunomodulatory agents for their AID. A total of 55% of patients developed an AID flare and/or an immune-related adverse event (irAE). Exacerbation of the AID occurred in 13 patients (23% of the whole cohort), four of whom required systemic corticosteroids. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 21 patients (38%). Among irAEs, 74% were grade 1 or 2 and 26% were grade 3 or 4; eight patients required corticosteroids for irAE management. PD-(L)1 therapy was permanently discontinued in eight patients (14%) because of irAEs. The overall response rate to immunotherapy in this population was 22%. Conclusion In patients with NSCLC with AID treated with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor, exacerbation of AID occurred in a minority of patients. The incidence of irAEs was similar to reported rates in clinical trials where patients with AID were excluded. Adverse events were generally manageable and infrequently led to permanent discontinuation of immunotherapy.

Background Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors increasingly are being used to treat patients with advanced lung carcinomas. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumor cells (TCs) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) is used to select patients for programmed cell death protein 1 inhibition, but few studies have evaluated PD-L1 IHC in cytology specimens. The objective of the current study was to compare PD-L1 IHC in cytology cell blocks and matched surgical specimens. Methods A total of 56 cytology specimens obtained between 2013 and 2016 with matching surgical specimens were stained with anti-PD-L1. Membranous positivity was scored as a percentage of the TCs and ICs by 2 pathologists. Results were compared between cytology and surgical specimens, and interobserver concordance was assessed. Results The average PD-L1 positivity rate was 28% in TCs and 5% in ICs in surgical specimens (standard deviations of 37% and 7%, respectively), and 21% in TCs and 8% in ICs in cytology specimens (standard deviations of 33% and 15%, respectively). Interobserver concordance was high for TCs in surgical and cytology specimens (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.96 and 0.96, respectively), and was moderate for ICs in surgical and cytology specimens (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.47 and 0.67, respectively). There was moderate to high correlation between PD-L1 positivity in TCs between surgical and cytology specimens (Spearman correlation coefficient [Spearman r], 0.69), particularly among fine-needle aspiration specimens (Spearman r, 0.78), but not between PD-L1 positivity in ICs in surgical and cytology specimens (Spearman r, 0.14), including among fine-needle aspiration specimens (Spearman r, 0.23). Conclusions Tumor PD-L1 IHC positivity in cytology specimens appears to correlate strongly with results obtained from matching surgical specimens. PD-L1 IHC in ICs within cytology specimens does not reflect results in matched surgical specimens and should not be used in clinical decision making. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:253-63. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Summary Background Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) provides a modest survival benefit. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against VEGF, improves outcomes when added to platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced-stage non-squamous NSCLC. We aimed to evaluate the addition of bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage resected NSCLC. Methods We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial of adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and who had completely resected stage IB (≥4 cm) to IIIA (defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer 6th edition) NSCLC. We enrolled patients from across the US National Clinical Trials Network, including patients from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) affiliates in Europe and from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, within 6–12 weeks of surgery. The chemotherapy regimen for each patient was selected before randomisation and administered intravenously; it consisted of four 21-day cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 on day 1 in all regimens) in combination with investigator's choice of vinorelbine (30 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8), docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 on day 1), gemcitabine (1200 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8), or pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 on day 1). Patients in the bevacizumab group received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days starting with cycle 1 of chemotherapy and continuing for 1 year. We randomly allocated patients (1:1) to group A (chemotherapy alone) or group B (chemotherapy plus bevacizumab), centrally, using permuted blocks sizes and stratified by chemotherapy regimen, stage of disease, histology, and sex. No one was masked to treatment assignment, except the Data Safety and Monitoring Committee. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00324805. Findings Between June 1, 2007, and Sept 20, 2013, 1501 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups: 749 to group A (chemotherapy alone) and 752 to group B (chemotherapy plus bevacizumab). 383 (26%) of 1458 patients (with complete staging information) had stage IB, 636 (44%) had stage II, and 439 (30%) had stage IIIA disease (stage of disease data were missing for 43 patients). Squamous cell histology was reported for 422 (28%) of 1501 patients. All four cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens were used: 377 (25%) patients received vinorelbine, 343 (23%) received docetaxel, 283 (19%) received gemcitabine, and 497 (33%) received pemetrexed. At a median follow-up of 50·3 months (IQR 32·9–68·0), the estimated median overall survival in group A has not been reached, and in group B was 85·8 months (95% CI 74·9 to not reached); hazard ratio (group B vs group A) 0·99 (95% CI 0·82–1·19; p=0·90). Grade 3–5 toxicities of note (all attributions) that were reported more frequently in group B (the bevacizumab group) than in group A (chemotherapy alone) were overall worst grade (ie, all grade 3–5 toxicities; 496 [67%] of 738 in group A vs 610 [83%] of 735 in group B), hypertension (60 [8%] vs 219 [30%]), and neutropenia (241 [33%] vs 275 [37%]). The number of deaths on treatment did not differ between the groups (15 deaths in group A vs 19 in group B). Of these deaths, three in group A and ten in group B were considered at least possibly related to treatment. Interpretation Addition of bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve overall survival for patients with surgically resected early-stage NSCLC. Bevacizumab does not have a role in this setting and should not be considered as an adjuvant therapy for patients with resected early-stage NSCLC. Funding National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

Purpose: Genotype-directed therapy is the standard of care for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but obtaining tumor tissue for genotyping remains a challenge. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis may allow for noninvasive evaluation. This prospective trial evaluated CTCs and cfDNA in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib until progression. Experimental Design: EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients were enrolled in a phase II trial of erlotinib. Blood was collected at baseline, every 2 months on study, and at disease progression. Plasma genotyping was performed by droplet digital PCR for EGFR19del, L858R, and T790M. CTCs were isolated by CellSave, enumerated, and analyzed by immunofluorescence for CD45 and pan-cytokeratin and EGFR and MET FISH were also performed. Rebiopsy was performed at disease progression. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled; 44 patients discontinued therapy for disease progression. Rebiopsy occurred in 35 of 44 patients (80%), with paired CTC/cfDNA analysis in 41 of 44 samples at baseline and 36 of 44 samples at progression. T790M was identified in 23 of 35 (66%) tissue biopsies and 9 of 39 (23%) cfDNA samples. CTC analysis at progression identified MET amplification in 3 samples in which tissue analysis could not be performed. cfDNA analysis identified T790M in 2 samples in which rebiopsy was not possible. At diagnosis, high levels of cfDNA but not high levels of CTCs correlated with progression-free survival. Conclusions: cfDNA and CTCs are complementary, noninvasive assays for evaluation of acquired resistance to first-line EGFR TKIs and may expand the number of patients in whom actionable genetic information can be obtained at acquired resistance. Serial cfDNA monitoring may offer greater clinical utility than serial monitoring of CTCs. Clin Cancer Res; 22(24); 6010–20. ©2016 AACR.

Summary Background Erlotinib is approved for the treatment of all patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but is most active in the treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC. Cabozantinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, targets MET, VEGFR, RET, ROS1, and AXL, which are implicated in lung cancer tumorigenesis. We compared the efficacy of cabozantinib alone or in combination with erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC. Methods This three group, randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial was done in 37 academic and community oncology practices in the USA. Patients were eligible if they had received one or two previous treatments for advanced non-squamous, EGFR wild-type, NSCLC. Patients were stratified by performance status and line of therapy, and randomly assigned using permuted blocks within strata to receive open-label oral daily dosing of erlotinib (150 mg), cabozantinib (60 mg), or erlotinib (150 mg) and cabozantinib (40 mg). Imaging was done every 8 weeks. At the time of radiographic progression, there was optional crossover for patients in either single-drug group to receive combination treatment. The primary endpoint was to compare progression-free survival in patients given erlotinib alone versus cabozantinib alone, and in patients given erlotinib alone versus the combination of erlotinib plus cabozantinib. We assessed the primary endpoint in the per-protocol population, which was defined as all patients who were eligible, randomly assigned, and received at least one dose of treatment. The safety analysis population included all patients who received study treatment irrespective of eligibility. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01708954. Findings Between Feb 7, 2013, and July 1, 2014, we enrolled and randomly assigned 42 patients to erlotinib treatment, 40 patients to cabozantinib treatment, and 43 patients to erlotinib plus cabozantinib treatment, of whom 111 (89%) in total were included in the primary analysis (erlotinib [n=38], cabozantinib [n=38], erlotinib plus cabozantinib [n=35]). Compared with erlotinib alone (median 1·8 months [95% CI 1·7–2·2]), progression-free survival was significantly improved in the cabozantinib group (4·3 months [3·6–7·4]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·39, 80% CI 0·27–0·55; one-sided p=0·0003) and in the erlotinib plus cabozantinib group (4·7 months [2·4–7·4]; HR 0·37, 0·25–0·53; one-sided p=0·0003). Among participants included in the safety analysis of the erlotinib (n=40), cabozantinib (n=40), and erlotinib plus cabozantinib (n=39) groups, the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were diarrhoea (three [8%] cases in the erlotinib group vs three [8%] in the cabozantinib group vs 11 [28%] in the erlotinib plus cabozantinib group), hypertension (none vs ten [25%] vs one [3%]), fatigue (five [13%] vs six [15%] vs six [15%]), oral mucositis (none vs four [10%] vs one [3%]), and thromboembolic event (none vs three [8%] vs two [5%]). One death due to respiratory failure occurred in the cabozantinib group, deemed possibly related to either drug, and one death due to pneumonitis occurred in the erlotinib plus cabozantinib group, deemed related to either drug or the combination. Interpretation Despite its small sample size, this trial showed that, in patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC, cabozantinib alone or combined with erlotinib has clinically meaningful, superior efficacy to that of erlotinib alone, with additional toxicity that was generally manageable. Cabozantinib-based regimens are promising for further investigation in this patient population. Funding ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

Phase I cancer trials increasingly incorporate dose-expansion cohorts (DECs), reflecting a growing demand to acquire more information about investigational drugs. Protocols commonly fail to provide a sample-size justification or analysis plan for the DEC. In this study, we develop a statistical framework for the design of DECs.We assume the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the investigational drug has been identified in the dose-escalation stage of the trial. We use the 80% lower confidence bound and the 90% upper confidence bound for the response and toxicity rates, respectively, as decision thresholds for the dose-expansion stage. We calculate the operating characteristics with reference to prespecified minimum effective response rates and maximum safe DLT rates.We apply our framework to specify a system of DEC plans. The design comprises three components: 1) the number of subjects enrolled at the MTD, 2) the minimum number of responses necessary to indicate provisional drug efficacy, and 3) the maximum number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) permitted to indicate drug safety. We demonstrate our method in an application to a cancer immunotherapy trial.Our simple and practical tool enables creation of DEC designs that appropriately address the safety and efficacy objectives of the trial.

PURPOSE Pemetrexed or bevacizumab is used for maintenance therapy of advanced nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The combination of bevacizumab and pemetrexed has also demonstrated efficacy. We conducted a randomized study to determine the optimal maintenance therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC and no prior systemic therapy received carboplatin (area under the curve, 6), paclitaxel (200 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) for up to four cycles. Patients without progression after four cycles were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg), pemetrexed (500 mg/m2), or a combination of the two agents. The primary end point was overall survival, with bevacizumab serving as the control group. RESULTS Of the 1,516 patients enrolled, 874 (57%) were randomly assigned after induction therapy to one of the three maintenance therapy groups. With a median follow-up of 50.6 months, median survival with pemetrexed was 15.9 months, compared with 14.4 months with bevacizumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; P = .12); median survival with pemetrexed and bevacizumab was 16.4 months (HR, 0.9; P = .28); median progression-free survival was 4.2, 5.1 (HR, 0.85; P = .06), and 7.5 months (HR, 0.67; P < .001) for the three groups, respectively. Incidence of worst grade 3 to 4 toxicity was 29%, 37%, and 51%, respectively, for bevacizumab, pemetrexed, and the combination regimen. CONCLUSION Single-agent bevacizumab or pemetrexed is efficacious as maintenance therapy for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Because of a lack of survival benefit and higher toxicity, the combination of bevacizumab and pemetrexed cannot be recommended.

Detailed guidelines pertaining to radiological assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma are currently lacking due to the rarity of the disease, complex morphology, propensity to invade multiple planes simultaneously, and lack of specific recommendations within the radiology community about assessment, reporting, and follow-up. In March 2017, a multidisciplinary meeting of mesothelioma experts was co-sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. One of the outcomes of this conference was the foundation of detailed, multidisciplinary consensus imaging and management guidelines. Here, we present the recommendations for radiologic assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma in the setting of clinical trial enrollment. We discuss optimization of imaging parameters across modalities, standardized reporting, and response assessment within clinical trials.

Background Clinically-available biomarkers to identify the fraction of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are lacking. High nonsynonymous tumor mutational burden (TMB), as assessed by whole exome sequencing, correlates with improved clinical outcomes for patients with SCLC treated with ICIs. Whether TMB as assessed by targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) is associated with improved efficacy of ICIs in patients with SCLC is currently unknown. Here we determined whether TMB by targeted NGS is associated with efficacy of ICIs in patients with SCLC. Methods We collected clinicopathologic data from patients with relapsed or refractory SCLC which underwent targeted NGS with TMB assessment by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute OncoPanel platform. The relationship between TMB and clinical outcomes after treatment with ICIs was investigated. Results Among the 52 patients treated with ICIs, we found no significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) between patients with a TMB above the 50th percentile (“TMB high”) and those with a TMB at or below the 50th percentile (“TMB low”). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were significantly longer in patients with a high TMB compared to those with a low TMB (mPFS: 3.3 versus 1.2 months, HR: 0.37 [95% CI: 0.20–0.69], P

Objectives Although dramatic responses to MET inhibitors have been reported in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the impact of these treatments on overall survival in this population is unknown. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with METex14 NSCLC to determine if treatment with MET inhibitors impacts median overall survival (mOS). Event-time distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios. Results We identified 148 patients with METex14 NSCLC; the median age was 72; 57% were women and 39% were never smokers. Of the 34 metastatic patients who never received a MET inhibitor, the mOS was 8.1 months; those in this group with concurrent MET amplification had a trend toward worse survival compared to cancers without MET amplification (5.2 months vs 10.5 months, P = 0.06). Of the 27 metastatic patients who received at least one MET inhibitor the mOS was 24.6 months. A model adjusting for receipt of a MET inhibitor as first- or second-line therapy as a time-dependent covariate demonstrated that treatment with a MET inhibitor was associated with a significant prolongation in survival (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.92, P = 0.04) compared to patients who did not receive any MET inhibitor. Among 22 patients treated with crizotinib, the median progression-free survival was 7.4 months. Discussion For patients with METex14 NSCLC, treatment with a MET inhibitor is associated with an improvement in overall survival.

Highlights • The presence of baseline ILA in patients with advanced NSCLC is significantly associated with shorter overall survival. • It could be regarded as a reproducible prognostic marker in patients with NSCLC. It is important for radiologists to mention ILA on baseline CT of NSCLC patients. • Awareness of the presence of ILA may help optimize clinical management and outcome., Purpose The presence of interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) at diagnosis of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has previously shown to be associated with shorter overall survival (OS). The present study aimed to validate the association between ILA and shorter OS in a larger cohort of treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC patients. Materials and methods This study includes 484 patients (205 men and 279 women) with a pathological diagnosis of stage IV NSCLC with pretreatment baseline CT available for review. ILA was visually scored on the baseline chest CT with a 3-point scale (0=no ILA, 1=indeterminate for ILA, 2 = ILA) as published previously. Clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared in patients with ILA score 2 vs. those with ILA score 0 or 1. Results ILA was present (score 2) on baseline CT in 19 of 484 patients (3.9%, 95%CI2.4–6.1%). Patients with ILA were significantly older (p = 0.0008) and more commonly male (p = 0.03) compared to those with ILA score 0 or 1. Patients with ILA score 2 showed significantly shorter OS compared to those with ILA score 0 or 1 (median OS 9.95 months vs. 16.95 months; p = 0.0002). In multivariate analyses, baseline ILA score 2 remained significant as a marker for shorter OS (HR = 2.09, p = 0.004) after adjustments for age (HR = 1.48; p = 0.001), gender (HR = 1.22, p = 0.06), and smoking (HR = 0.79; p = 0.051). Conclusions ILA on baseline CT at diagnosis of stage IV NSCLC patients was associated with shorter OS (HR = 2.09, p = 0.004), validating ILA as an independent marker for poor clinical outcome.

Purpose Veliparib, a poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitor, potentiated standard chemotherapy against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in preclinical studies. We evaluated the combination of veliparib with cisplatin and etoposide (CE; CE+V) doublet in untreated, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). Materials and Methods Patients with ES-SCLC, stratified by sex and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, were randomly assigned to receive four 3-week cycles of CE (75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3) along with veliparib (100 mg orally twice per day on days 1 through 7) or placebo (CE+P). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Using an overall one-sided 0.10-level log-rank test, the study had 88% power to demonstrate a 37.5% reduction in the PFS hazard rate. Results A total of 128 eligible patients received treatment on protocol. The median age was 66 years, 52% of patients were men, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 for 29% of patients and 1 for 71%. The respective median PFS for the CE+V arm versus the CE+P arm was 6.1 versus 5.5 months (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [one-sided P = .06]; stratified HR, 0.63 [one-sided P = .01]), favoring CE+V. The median overall survival was 10.3 versus 8.9 months (stratified HR, 0.83; 80% CI, 0.64 to 1.07; one-sided P = .17) for the CE+V and CE+P arms, respectively. The overall response rate was 71.9% versus 65.6% (two-sided P = .57) for CE+V and CE+P, respectively. There was a significant treatment-by-strata interaction in PFS: Male patients with high lactate dehydrogenase levels derived significant benefit (PFS HR, 0.34; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.51) but there was no evidence of benefit among patients in other strata (PFS HR, 0.81; 80% CI, 0.60 to 1.09). The following grade ≥ 3 hematology toxicities were more frequent in the CE+V arm than the CE+P arm: CD4 lymphopenia (8% v 0%; P = .06) and neutropenia (49% v 32%; P = .08), but treatment delivery was comparable. Conclusion The addition of veliparib to frontline chemotherapy showed signal of efficacy in patients with ES-SCLC and the study met its prespecified end point.

BACKGROUND Erlotinib is a standard first-line therapy for patients who have metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The recommended dose of 150 mg daily is the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Few clinical data are available regarding its efficacy at doses less than the MTD. METHODS An institutional database was queried for patients with advanced NSCLC who were positive for EGFR L858R mutations or exon 19 deletions and had received treatment with erlotinib. The treatment course, including the erlotinib dose at initiation of treatment, at 4 months into therapy, and at disease progression, was retrospectively studied. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between patients who received the MTD (150 mg) and those who received reduced-dose erlotinib (≤100 mg). RESULTS In total, 198 eligible patients were identified. Thirty-one patients (16%) were initiated on reduced-dose erlotinib; they were older (P = .001) and had lower performance status (P = .01) compared with those who were initiated on erlotinib at the MTD. The response rate to reduced-dose erlotinib was 77%. The median PFS of patients initiated on reduced-dose erlotinib was 9.6 months versus 11.4 months for those initiated at the MTD, a difference that was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.21; P = .30). There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher rates of progression within the central nervous system with reduced-dose erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS At doses below the MTD, erlotinib treatment results in a high response rate and a prolonged median PFS. Review of the literature indicates that 15 of 30 small-molecule inhibitors that are approved or in late-stage development for cancer therapy have recommended doses below the MTD. When the toxicities of MTD dosing are a concern, an investigation of small-molecule inhibitors at doses below the MTD is warranted. Cancer 2016;122:3456–63. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND Preclinical targeting of the hedgehog pathway by vismodegib and of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor by cixutumumab enhances the efficacy of chemotherapy and also demonstrates activity against the tumor cell fraction responsible for disease recurrence in small cell lung cancer. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC-ED) were randomized to receive four 21-day cycles of cisplatin and etoposide alone (cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide at 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3; arm A) or in combination with either vismodegib (150 mg/d by mouth; arm B) or cixutumumab (6 mg/kg/wk intravenously on day 1; arm C). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were isolated/enumerated with the Veridex CellSearch platform at the baseline. RESULTS One hundred fifty-two eligible patients were treated. Patient demographics and disease characteristics were well balanced between the 3 arms except for the higher rate with a performance status of 0 in arm B (P = .03). The median PFS times in arms A, B, and C were 4.4, 4.4, and 4.6 months, respectively; the median overall survival (OS) times were 8.8, 9.8, and 10.1 months, respectively; and the response rates were 48%, 56%, and 50%, respectively. None of the comparisons of these outcomes were statistically significant. The median OS was 10.5 months for those with low CTC counts (≤100/7.5 mL) at baseline and 7.2 months for those with high CTC counts (hazard ratio, 1.74; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant improvement in PFS or OS with the addition of either vismodegib or cixutumumab to chemotherapy in patients with SCLC-ED. A low baseline CTC count was associated with a favorable prognosis. Cancer 2016;122:2371–2378. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Introduction Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene ( EGFR ) predict for prolonged progression-free survival in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) versus chemotherapy. Long-term survival outcomes, however, remain undefined. The objective of this study was to determine the 5-year survival in these patients and identify clinical factors associated with overall survival (OS). Methods Patients with EGFR -mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma who had been treated with erlotinib or gefitinib at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2002 and 2009 were included. OS was analyzed. Results Among 137 patients, median progression-free survival and OS were 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.2–13.5) and 30.9 months (95% CI: 28.2–35.7), respectively. Twenty patients (14.6%) were 5-year survivors. In multivariate analysis, exon 19 deletions (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44–0.91, p = 0.01), absence of extrathoracic (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41–0.93, p = 0.02) or brain metastasis (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30–0.77, p = 0.002), and not a current smoker (HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09–0.59, p = 0.002) were associated with prolonged OS. Age; sex; stage at diagnosis; liver, bone, or adrenal metastasis; specific TKI; and line of TKI therapy were not associated with OS. Conclusions Our data suggest that the rate of 5-year survival among patients with EGFR -mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib or gefitinib is 14.6%. Exon 19 deletions and absence of extrathoracic or brain metastasis are associated with prolonged survival. On the basis of our findings, clinicians can gain an enhanced estimation of long-term outcomes in this population.

Purpose Non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) harboring mutations in MET exon 14 and its flanking introns may respond to c-Met inhibitors. We sought to describe the clinical, pathologic, and genomic characteristics of patients with cancer with MET exon 14 mutations. Patients and Methods We interrogated next-generation sequencing results from 6,376 cancers to identify those harboring MET exon 14 mutations. Clinical characteristics of MET exon 14 mutated NSCLCs were compared with those of NSCLCs with activating mutations in KRAS and EGFR. Co-occurring genomic mutations and copy number alterations were identified. c-Met immunohistochemistry and real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect exon 14 skipping were performed where sufficient tissue was available. Results MET exon 14 mutations were identified in 28 of 933 nonsquamous NSCLCs (3.0%) and were not seen in other cancer types in this study. Patients with MET exon 14–mutated NSCLC were significantly older (median age, 72.5 years) than patients with EGFR-mutant (median age, 61 years; P < .001) or KRAS-mutant NSCLC (median age, 65 years; P < .001). Among patients with MET exon 14 mutations, 68% were women, and 36% were never-smokers. Stage IV MET exon 14–mutated NSCLCs were significantly more likely to have concurrent MET genomic amplification (mean ratio of MET to chromosome 7, 4.3) and strong c-Met immunohistochemical expression (mean H score, 253) than stage IA to IIIB MET exon 14–mutated NSCLCs (mean ratio of MET to chromosome 7, 1.4; P = .007; mean H score, 155; P = .002) and stage IV MET exon 14–wild-type NSCLCs (mean ratio of MET to chromosome 7, 1.2; P < .001; mean H score, 142; P < .001). A patient whose lung cancer harbored a MET exon 14 mutation with concurrent genomic amplification of the mutated MET allele experienced a major partial response to the c-Met inhibitor crizotinib. Conclusion MET exon 14 mutations represent a clinically unique molecular subtype of NSCLC. Prospective clinical trials with c-Met inhibitors will be necessary to validate MET exon 14 mutations as an important therapeutic target in NSCLC.

Rationale and Objectives The aims of this study were to investigate the association between 8-week tumor volume decrease and survival in an independent cohort of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first-line erlotinib or gefitinib, and to assess the rate of their volumetric tumor growth after the volume nadir. Materials and Methods In patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations treated with first-line erlotinib or gefitinib, computed tomography (CT) tumor volumes of dominant lung lesions were analyzed for (1) the association with survival, and (2) the volumetric tumor growth rate after the volume nadir. Results In 44 patients with the 8-week follow-up CT, the 8-week tumor volume decrease (%) was significantly associated with longer overall survival when fitted as a continuous variable in a Cox model ( P = 0.01). The growth rate of the logarithm of tumor volume (log e V), obtained using a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for time since baseline, was 0.096/month (SE: 0.013/month; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.071–0.12/month), which was similar to the rate of 0.12/month (SE: 0.015/month; 95%CI: 0.090–0.15/month) observed in the previous report. Conclusions The 8-week tumor volume decrease was validated as a marker for longer survival in the independent cohort of EGFR -mutant NSCLC patients treated with first-line erlotinib or gefitinib. The volumetric tumor growth rate after the nadir in this cohort was similar to that of the previous cohort, indicating the reproducibility of the observation among different patient cohorts.

Introduction Clinical responses to immune checkpoint blockade by anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are associated with PD-L1 expression and smoking status. We aimed to determine the expression profile of PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, in both smokers and never smokers patients with KRAS -mutant NSCLC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and molecular characteristics of 114 KRAS -mutant NSCLC patients (84 smokers and 30 never smokers) and their clinical tumor samples for the expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We used murine monoclonal antibodies anti-PD-L1 (clone 9A11) and anti-PD-L2 (clone 9E5) to examine for tumor cell expression (0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, intense) and anti-PD-1 (clone EH33) for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Results PD-L1 expression was detected in 27 of 114 patients (24%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16–33%) and associated with smoking status (current smokers, 44%; former smokers, 20%; never smokers, 13%; p = 0.03). Higher intensity of PD-L1 expression (IHC-2+/IHC-3+) was more frequently observed in smokers and associated with more pack-years. PD-L2 was positive in 54 of 114 patients (47%; 95% CI, 38–57%) and not related to smoking status. PD-1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were present in 77 of 114 tumor specimens tested (68%; 95% CI, 59–77%) including 21 of 27 samples with PD-L1 expression and 39 of 54 samples with PD-L2-positive expression. We found that PD-L1 expression fades with the age of the specimens used for analyses decreasing beyond 3 years ( p = 0.016). Conclusions The expression of PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 is heterogeneous within KRAS -mutant NSCLC and suggests an inducible expression of PD-L1 by smoking.

TPS9077 Background: ALCHEMIST (Adjuvant Lung Cancer Enrichment Marker Identification and Sequencing Trial) is a clinical trial platform of the National Cancer Institute that offers biomarker analysis for high-risk resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to support randomized trials of novel adjuvant therapies within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN). EA5142, a trial of adjuvant nivolumab for patients (pts) without EGFR / ALK alterations, has completed enrollment. Given the survival benefit seen with 1st-line chemo-immunotherapy (chemo-IO) for advanced NSCLC without EGFR / ALK alterations, there was compelling rationale for the launch of a trial offering concurrent immunotherapy with adjuvant chemo. Here we report updated enrollment to ALCHEMIST as of Jan 14, 2020. Methods: ALCHEMIST includes a screening trial (A151216, 5362 registered) that enrolls pts with completely resected clinical stage IB (≥4 cm)–IIIA (per AJCC 7) NSCLC. Tissue and blood are collected, biomarker testing includes EGFR sequencing, ALK FISH and PD-L1 IHC. 733 active sites are enrolling across the NCTN. Pts with EGFR mutations may enroll to adjuvant erlotinib vs observation (A081105, 352 randomized); those with ALK fusions may enroll to adjuvant crizotinib vs observation (E4512, 99 randomized). A trial offering adjuvant nivolumab vs observation regardless of PD-L1 status (EA5142, 935 randomized) recently completed enrollment. To support ongoing investigation of adjuvant immunotherapy, ALCHEMIST is adding A081801 (opens spring 2020). Pts will be randomized to one of 3 arms: chemo-IO with pembrolizumab during and after chemo vs sequential chemo followed by pembrolizumab vs chemo alone. Pts with pathological N2 nodes are eligible and can undergo postoperative radiotherapy after completing chemo. Pts are eligible if enrolled to A151216, negative for EGFR and ALK alterations, and with PD-L1 testing completed (required for stratification). Local testing for EGFR, ALK and PD-L1 will be accepted for enrollment; central testing will not delay randomization. Pts may not have received any therapy except surgery for the lung cancer and must be age >18, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, have no active autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment within 2 years, must not be pregnant or nursing, have no active second malignancy within 3 years and meet standard organ function values. By building off the ongoing ALCHEMIST platform, we hope to facilitate rapid enrollment to A081801 across participating NCTN sites. Clinical trial information: NCT02194738.

Highlights • Tumor growth rate of ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with crizotinib was assessed. • Overall growth rate after nadir was 0.04/month for the logarithm of tumor volume. • The study provides objective reference values for ALK-directed treatment decisions., Purpose The purpose of the study is to investigate volumetric tumor burden dynamics and tumor growth rates in ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC patients during crizotinib monotherapy. Methods The study included 44 ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib monotherapy as their initial ALK-directed therapy, who had at least one measurable lung lesion and at least two follow-up CT scans, and experienced tumor volume increase while on crizotinib. The tumor volume (in mm3) of the dominant lung lesion was measured on serial CT scans during therapy for analysis of tumor growth rates after the volume nadir. Results A total of 231 volume measurements from the nadir to the end of crizotinib therapy or the last follow-up in 44 patients were analyzed in a linear mixed-effects model, fitting time (in months since baseline) as a random effect. When measured from the volume nadir, the tumor growth rate of the logarithm of tumor volume (logeV) was 0.04/month (SE = 0.012, P = 0.0011) in the unadjusted model. When adjusted for the baseline volume (logeV0), the growth rate was again 0.04/month (SE = 0.011, P = 0.0004). When adjusted for clinical variables and logeV0, the growth rate was 0.045/month (SE = 0.012, P = 0.0002), indicating that the tumor growth rate after nadir in this cohort remains very close to 0.04/month regardless of logeV0 or clinical factors. Conclusions Tumor volume growth rate after nadir in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib was obtained, providing objective reference values that can inform physicians when deciding to keep their patients on ALK directed therapy with slowly progressing lung cancer.

The 8th edition of TNM staging of lung cancer revised M staging and defined M1b disease with single extrathoracic metastasis, to be distinguished from M1c with multiple extrathoracic metastases in one or more organs. This new distinct category of M1b disease consists of patients with a single extrathoracic metastasis, thus consisting of a strictly defined oligometastatic disease. This article reports the prevalence of M1b disease among patients with stage IV non‐small cell lung cancer, focusing on the clinical characteristics and patterns of single extrathoracic metastasis and relationships with overall survival., Background. The 8th edition of TNM staging of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has revised M classification and defined M1b disease with single extrathoracic metastasis, which is distinguished from M1c with multiple extrathoracic metastases. We investigated the prevalence, characteristics, and overall survival (OS) of M1b disease in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Methods. The study reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of 567 patients with stage IV NSCLC to determine M stage using the 8th edition of TNM staging. Clinical characteristics and OS were compared according to M stages. Results. Among 567 patients, 57 patients (10%) had M1b disease, whereas 119 patients (21%) had M1a disease and 391 patients (69%) had M1c disease. Squamous histology was more common in M1b (16%) than in M1a (6%) and M1c (6%; p = .03). The median OS of patients with M1b disease was 14.8 months, compared with 22.6 months for patients with M1a and 13.4 months for those with M1c disease (p

On March 28- 29, 2017, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Thoracic Malignacy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation convened the NCI-International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer- Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Mesothelioma Clinical Trials Planning Meeting in Bethesda, Maryland. The goal of the meeting was to bring together lead academicians, clinicians, scientists, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to focus on the development of clinical trials for patients in whom malignant pleural mesothelioma has been diagnosed. In light of the discovery of new cancer targets affecting the clinical development of novel agents and immunotherapies in malignant mesothelioma, the objective of this meeting was to assemble a consensus on at least two or three practice-changing multimodality clinical trials to be conducted through NCI's National Clinical Trials Network.

Retrospective clinical data and laboratory studies point to metformin having a potential role in cancer treatment; however, the efficacy of this drug in cancer treatment therapy has not been validated in prospective trials. In particular, limited data evaluating the effects of metformin in lung cancer has been available. Responding to this need, a prospective phase II clinical trial was conducted, and this article evaluates response rate and progression‐free survival of platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy with or without metformin in chemotherapy‐naïive advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer., Background. In the absence of a targeted oncogenic driver mutation or high programmed death‐ligand 1 expression, systemic therapy with platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab has been the standard treatment in advanced or metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Metformin has been shown to have antitumor effects via a variety of insulin‐dependent and insulin‐independent mechanisms and to be potentially synergistic with chemotherapy. Materials and Methods. This open‐label single‐center phase II study (NCT01578551) enrolled patients with chemotherapy‐naïve advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC and randomized them (3:1) to receive carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab with (Arm A) or without (Arm B) concurrent metformin for four to six cycles followed by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab ± metformin continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or study withdrawal. The primary outcome was 1‐year progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival, response to therapy, and toxicity. Results. A total of 25 patients were enrolled from August 2012 to April 2015, of whom 24 received at least one cycle of therapy administration. The study was stopped early due to slow accrual and changes in standard first‐line therapy of advanced NSCLC. The 1‐year PFS on Arm A (n = 18) was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25%–88%), which exceeded the historical control 1‐year PFS of 15%. Median overall survival of patients treated on Arm A was 15.9 months (95% CI: 8.4–not available [NA]) and 13.9 months (95% CI: 12.7–NA) on Arm B. There were no significant differences in toxicity between the study arms. Conclusion. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to show a significant benefit in PFS with the use of metformin in this patient population and is a signal of efficacy for metformin in advanced NSCLC. Implications for Practice. The anticancer effects of metformin continue to be elucidated. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first trial in nondiabetic advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients to show a significant change in outcome with the addition of metformin to standard first‐line chemotherapy. Well tolerated and widely available, metformin is a drug that should be considered for further study in the lung cancer treatment landscape.

Veliparib (V) potentiated therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin (C) and etoposide (E) in preclinical models of SCLC. We conducted this phase 1 study to establish the safety of the combination in human subjects.The study employed the 3+3 dose escalation design to establish the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of V when combined with fixed doses of C (75 mg/m(2) on day 1) and E (100mg/m(2) on days 1-3) in a 21-day cycle. The starting dose of V was 60 mg (bid days 1-7) with plan to escalate to 100mg (days 1-7) or de-escalate to 40 mg (days 1-7) depending on the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) experience during cycle 1. Patients with treatment-naïve, extensive stage SCLC were included.The study enrolled 9 patients: M/F (4/5); median age (60); White/African American (8/1). V was tolerated at the 60 mg (DLT in 0 of 3 patients) and 100mg dose (DLT in 1 of 6 patients; grade 5 cardiac failure). Veliparib at 100mg in combination with standard doses of C and E was established as the RP2D. Grades 3-5 adverse events irrespective of attribution during cycle 1 included: dehydration (1), diarrhea (1), fatigue (1), febrile neutropenia (1), heart failure (1), leukopenia (6), lymphopenia (1), nausea (2), neutropenia (8), respiratory failure (1), and thrombocytopenia (2). Investigator-assessed efficacy outcome in 7 evaluable patients were stable disease in 2/7 (28.6%), partial response in 4/7 (57.1%), and complete response in 1/7 (14.3%) patients.This study demonstrated the safety of combining veliparib with cisplatin and etoposide in previously untreated SCLC patients.

Introduction: We previously reported that progression-free survival (PFS) may be a candidate surrogate end point for overall survival (OS) in first-line extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) using data from three randomized trials (Foster, Cancer 2011). In this validation study (N0424-Alliance), we assessed the patient-level and trial-level surrogacy of PFS using data from seven new first-line phase II/III ES-SCLC trials and across all 10 trials as well (seven new, three previous). Methods: Individual patient data were utilized across the seven new trials (2259 patients) and all 10 trials (2855 patients). Patient-level surrogacy (Kendall’s τ) was assessed using the Clayton copula bivariate survival model. Trial-level surrogacy was assessed through association of the log hazard ratios on OS and PFS across trials, including weighted (by trial size) least squares regression (WLS R 2 ) of Cox model effects and correlation of the copula effects (copula R 2 ). The minimum effect on the surrogate (MES) needed to detect a nonzero treatment effect on OS was also calculated. Results: The median OS and PFS across all 10 trials were 9.8 and 5.9 months, respectively. PFS showed strong surrogacy within the 7 new trials (copula R 2 = 0.90 [standard error = 0.27], WLS R 2 = 0.83 [95% confidence interval: 0.43, 0.95]; MES = 0.67, and Kendall’s τ = 0.58) and across all 10 trials (copula R 2 = 0.81 [standard errors = 0.25], WLS R 2 = 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.91], MES = 0.70, and Kendall’s τ = 0.57). Conclusions: PFS demonstrated strong surrogacy for OS in first-line ES-SCLC based on this external validation study of individual patient data. PFS is a good alternative end point to OS and should be considered when resource constraints (time or patient) might make it useful or desirable in place of OS. Additional analyses are needed to assess its appropriateness for targeted agents in this disease setting.

Clinical trial design strategies have evolved over the past few years as a means to accelerate the drug development process so that the right therapies can be delivered to the right patients. Basket, umbrella, and adaptive enrichment strategies represent a class of novel designs for testing targeted therapeutics in oncology. Umbrella trials include a central infrastructure for screening and identification of patients, and focus on a single tumor type or histology with multiple subtrials, each testing a targeted therapy within a molecularly defined subset. Basket trial designs offer the possibility to include multiple molecularly defined subpopulations, often across histology or tumor types, but included in one cohesive design to evaluate the targeted therapy in question. Adaptive enrichment designs offer the potential to enrich for patients with a particular molecular feature that is predictive of benefit for the test treatment based on accumulating evidence from the trial. This review will aim to discuss the fundamentals of these design strategies, the underlying statistical framework, the logistical barriers of implementation, and, ultimately, the interpretation of the trial results. New statistical approaches, extensive multidisciplinary collaboration, and state of the art data capture technologies are needed to implement these strategies in practice. Logistical challenges to implementation arising from centralized assay testing, requirement of multiple specimens, multidisciplinary collaboration, and infrastructure requirements will also be discussed. This review will present these concepts in the context of the National Cancer Institute's precision medicine initiative trials: MATCH, ALCHEMIST, Lung MAP, as well as other trials such as FOCUS4.

Interstitial lung diseases are associated with increased risk of lung cancer. The prevalence of ILA at diagnosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its impact on overall survival (OS) remain to be investigated.The study included 120 treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC patients (53 males, 67 females). ILA was scored on CT prior to any systemic therapy using a 4-point scale [0=no evidence of ILA, 1=equivocal for ILA, 2=suspicious for ILA, 3=ILA] by a sequential reading method previously reported. ILA scores of 2 or 3 indicated the presence of ILA.ILA was present in 17 patients (14%) with advanced NSCLC prior to any treatment (score3: n=2, score2: n=15). These 17 patients were significantly older (median age: 69 vs. 63, p=0.04) and had a heavier smoking history (median: 40 vs. 15.5 pack-year, p=0.003) than those with ILA score 0 or 1. Higher ILA scores were associated with shorter OS (p=0.001). Median OS of the 17 patients with ILA was 7.2 months [95%CI: 2.9-9.4] compared to 14.8 months [95%CI: 11.1-18.4] in patients with ILA score 0 or 1 (p=0.002). In a multivariate model, the presence of ILA remained significant for increased risk for death (HR=2.09, p=0.028) after adjusting for first-line systemic therapy (chemotherapy, p0.001; TKI, p0.001; each compared to no therapy) and pack years of smoking (p=0.40).Radiographic ILA was present in 14% of treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients. Higher ILA scores were associated with shorter OS, indicating that ILA could be a marker of shorter survival in advanced NSCLC.

BACKGROUND Erlotinib is a highly active epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase inhibitor that is approved for first-line use in lung cancers harboring EGFR mutations. Anecdotal experience suggests that this drug may provide continued disease control after patients develop objective progression of disease (PD), although this has not been systematically studied to date. METHODS Patients who had Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors-defined PD who were participating in 3 prospective trials of first-line erlotinib in advanced lung cancer were studied retrospectively, and the progression characteristics were compared between patients with and without EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Factors were studied that influenced the time until treatment change (TTC), defined as the time from PD to the start of a new systemic therapy or death. The rate of tumor progression was assessed by comparing tumor measurements between the computed tomography scan obtained at the time of PD and the preceding scan. RESULTS In total, 92 eligible patients were studied, including 42 with and 50 without an EGFR-sensitizing mutation. The EGFR-mutant cohort had a slower rate of progression (P = .003) and a longer TTC (P 3 months; only 2 patients received local debulking therapy during that period. Multivariate analysis of the patients with EGFR-mutant tumors demonstrated that a longer time to progression, a slower rate of progression, and a lack of new extrathoracic metastases were associated with a longer TTC. CONCLUSIONS A change in systemic therapy commonly can be delayed in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer who objectively progress on first-line erlotinib, particularly in those with a longer time to progression, a slow rate of progression, and a lack of new extrathoracic metastases. Cancer 2015;121:2570–2577. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Brain metastases (BM) are common in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the baseline incidence and evolution of BM over time in oncogene-driven NSCLCs are seldom reported. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of BM in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged NSCLC.The presence of BM, clinicopathologic data, and tumor genotype were retrospectively compiled and analyzed from a cohort of 381 patients.We identified 86 EGFR-mutated (90.7% with metastatic disease; 85.9% received an EGFR inhibitor) and 23 ALK-rearranged (91.3% with metastatic disease; 85.7% received an ALK inhibitor) NSCLCs. BM were present in 24.4% of EGFR-mutated and 23.8% of ALK-rearranged NSCLCs at the time of diagnosis of advanced disease. This study did not demonstrate a difference in the cumulative incidence of BM over time between the two cohorts (EGFR/ALK cohort competing risk regression [CRR] coefficient of 0.78 [95% CI 0.44-1.39], p=0.41). In still living patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, 34.2% had BM at 1 year, 38.4% at 2 years, 46.7% at 3 years, 48.7% at 4 years, and 52.9% at 5 years. In still living patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC, 23.8% had BM at 1 year, 45.5% at 2 years, and 58.4% at 3 years.BM are frequent in advanced EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged NSCLCs, with an estimated45% of patients with CNS involvement by three years of survival with the use of targeted therapies. These data point toward the CNS as an important unmet clinical need in the evolving schema for personalized care in NSCLC.

There have been significant advances in the understanding of the biology and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past few years. A number of molecularly targeted agents are in the clinic or in development for patients with advanced NSCLC (Table 1). We are beginning to understand the mechanisms of acquired resistance following exposure to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with oncogene addicted NSCLC. The advent of next generation sequencing has enabled to study comprehensively genomic alterations in lung cancer. Finally, early results from immune checkpoint inhibitors are very encouraging. This review summarizes recent advances in the area of cancer genomics, targeted therapies and immunotherapy.

On the basis of the data suggesting that adolescents and young adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved outcomes when treated on pediatric protocols, we assessed the feasibility of treating adult patients aged 18-50 years with ALL with the DFCI Pediatric ALL Consortium regimen utilizing a 30-week course of pharmacokinetically dose-adjusted E. coli L-asparaginase during consolidation. Between 2002 and 2008, 92 eligible patients aged 18-50 years were enrolled at 13 participating centers. Seventy-eight patients (85%) achieved a complete remission (CR) after 1 month of intensive induction therapy. With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, the 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) for the patients achieving a CR was 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56-78%) and the 4-year overall survival (OS) for all eligible patients was 67% (95% CI 56-76%). The 4-year DFS for the 64 patients who achieved a CR and were Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) was 71% (95% CI 58-81%), and for all 74 Ph- patients the 4-year OS was 70% (95% CI 58-79%). We conclude that a pediatric-like treatment strategy for young adults with de novo ALL is feasible, associated with tolerable toxicity, and results in improved outcomes compared with historical regimens in young adult patients with ALL.