Search

Introduction There are conflicting data on the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) based on time of intervention. Concerns have been postulated regarding equally effective in-hospital outcomes for STEMI patients treated with PCI during normal working hours as compared to group treated off-hours. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in “real-world” patients with STEMI treated with PCI during off-hours and regular hours of work. Methods To avoid possible bias related to the non-randomized design, a propensity score was calculated to compare off- and on-hours groups. The study group consisted of 37, 469 matched pairs in STEMI treated with PCI and stent implantation between 2014 and 2018 during regular hours (weekdays 7:00 AM to 16:59 PM) and off-hours (weekdays between 17:00 PM and 06:59AM, weekends, and holidays) in 151 tertiary invasive cardiology centers in Poland (the ORPKI Polish National Registry). Results No differences were reported between both groups in baseline characteristics after the propensity score match (PSM). There were no differences in time from pain to first contact (p=0.2) and door to balloon time between both groups (p=0.7). After PSM higher radiation dose was observed in off-hours group (1055.18 (±1006.52) vs. 1081.59 (±1003.25)[mGy]; p=0.001). However, there was no difference in total amount of contrast (on-hours vs. off-hours: 175.69 (±74.71) vs. 176.48 (±74.41)[ml]; p=0.1, respectively). Similar rate of periprocedural complications was observed between both groups of patients, includind stroke, access-site-related bleeding, allergic reaction and coronary artery perforation. However, procedures performed during off-hours were associated with higher incidence of periprocedural death (1.17% (439) vs. 1.49% (559); p=0.001) and periprocedural cardiac arrest (1.76% (658) vs.1.97% (740); p=0.001) as compared to PCI conducted within normal working hours. Conclusions Percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI performed durgin off-hours might be associated with higher rate of periprocedural mortality and higher radiation dose as compared to procedures conducted during regular working hours. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Introduction The main impact of myocardial infarction is shifting from acute mortality to adverse remodeling and chronic left ventricle dysfunction. Several circulating biomarkers are explored for better risk stratification of these patients. Biomarker testing is a very attractive idea, since it is non-invasive, not operator-dependent and widely available. Aim In the present paper we analyze data from the years 2005-2020 about circulating biomarkers of remodeling after myocardial infarction. Material and methods We assessed 53 articles, which examined 160 relations between biomarkers and remodeling. We analyze inclusion criteria for individual studies, time points of serum collection and remodeling assessment as well as imaging methods. Results The main groups of assessed biomarkers included B-type natriuretic peptides, markers of cardiomyocyte injury and necrosis, markers of inflammatory response, markers of extracellular matrix turnover, microRNAs and hormones. The most common method of remodeling assessment was echocardiography and the most frequent time point for remodeling evaluation was 6 months. Conclusions The present analysis shows that although a relatively large number biomarkers were tested, selecting one ideal marker is still a challenge. A combination of biomarkers from different groups might be appropriate for predicting remodeling. Data presented in this analysis might be helpful for designing future studies, evaluating clinical use of an individual biomarker or a combination of different biomarkers.

Background: This study is to assess differences in periprocedural outcomes among diabetic and non-diabetic patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and rotational atherectomy (RA). Methods: Under assessment were 221,187 patients from the Polish Cardiovascular Intervention Society national registry (ORPKI) including all PCIs performed in Poland in 2015 and 2016. Data was extracted of 975 patients treated with RA — 336 (34.5%) diabetics and 639 (65.5%) non-diabetics. Periprocedural complications were defined as overall rate or particular complications such as deaths, no-reflows, perforations, dissections, cerebral strokes or bleedings. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess predictors of periprocedural complications. Results: The mean age was similar in diabetics and non-diabetics (70.9 ± 9.0 vs. 72.1 ± 9.9; p = 0.06). Diabetics were more often females (p < 0.01), with arterial hypertension (p < 0.01), kidney failure (p < 0.01) and prior myocardial infarction (p = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in overall or individual periprocedural complications and angiographic success was expressed as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow after PCI. At baseline, de-novo lesions accounted for 96.5% in diabetics and 99% in non-diabetics (p < 0.01), while overall rate of restenosis was 3.5% and 1%, respectively (p < 0.01). Diabetes was an independent predictor of periprocedural complications in the overall group of patients treated with PCI (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04–1.194; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The negative impact of diabetes on the incidence of periprocedural complications and angiographic effectiveness in the group of patients treated with RA is mitigated in the comparison to the non-RA group.

Resumen Introduccion y objetivos Existen pocos estudios que comparen los accesos por la radial izquierda (ARI) y por la radial derecha en intervenciones coronarias percutaneas (ICP) en poblacion general y practicadas por cirujanos con diferentes grados de experiencia en intervencionismo. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es comparar la seguridad y el beneficio clinico con cada acceso en pacientes no seleccionados con sindrome coronario agudo (SCA) y angina estable (AE). Metodos Para evitar los posibles sesgos de un estudio no aleatorizado, se uso la puntuacion de propension para comparar ambos accesos radiales. Se recogieron datos de 18.716 pares con AE y 46.241 con SCA sometidos a ICP con implante de stent entre 2014 y 2017, en 151 centros terciarios con cardiologia intervencionista en Polonia (registro nacional de Polonia [ORPKI]). Resultados No se encontraron diferencias en cuanto a mortalidad y complicaciones periprocedimiento en AE. El ARI se asocio con mayores dosis de radiacion independientemente de la presentacion clinica (AE, 1.067,0 ± 947,10 frente a 1.007,4 ± 983,5 mGy; p = 0,001; SCA, 1.212,7 ± 1.005,5 frente a 1.053,5 ± 1.029,7 mGy; p = 0,001). En los pacientes con SCA, el ARI se asocio con mayor cantidad de contraste (174,2 ± 75,4 frente a 167,2 ± 72,1 ml; p = 0,001). Ademas, en los pacientes con SCA y ARI, las complicaciones periprocedimiento como diseccion coronaria (el 0,16 frente al 0,09%; p = 0,008), fenomeno de no reflow (el 0,65 frente al 0,49%; p = 0,005) y hemorragia en el sitio de puncion (el 0,09 frente al 0,05%; p = 0,04) resultaron mas frecuentes. No hubo diferencias en la mortalidad entre los 2 grupos (p = 0,90). Conclusiones Los resultados que se presentan podrian estar en relacion con una menor experiencia en el ARI. Ambos accesos son seguros en los pacientes con AE, pero el ARI se asocio con una mayor frecuencia de complicaciones periprocedimiento de ICP en el SCA.

BACKGROUND The main impact of myocardial infarction (MI) is shifting from acute mortality to adverse remodeling, chronic left ventricle (LV) dysfunction and heart failure. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess relationships between levels of circulating biomarkers and function of LV after MI. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospective study of 80 patients with MI treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Novel biomarkers including mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), Notch-1, syndecan-4, myeloperoxidase, S-100 protein, soluble ST-2, as well as markers of inflammatory response and tissue injury: galectin-3, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dihydrogenase (LDH) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were assessed in the acute phase of MI. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS Adverse remodeling, defined as >20% increase in LV end-diastolic volume occurred in 26% of patients. Reverse remodeling (>10% reduction in LV end-systolic volume) was observed in 52% of patients. In a univariable analysis higher levels of MR-proADM and LDH were predictors of adverse remodeling and higher levels of MR-proADM, LDH, CRP and Il-6 were negative predictors of reverse remodeling. In a multivariable model LDH remained an independent predictor of adverse remodeling (OR: 3.13; 95%CI: 1.42-8.18; P=0.003) and negative predictor of reverse remodeling (OR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.17-0.8; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS LDH and MR-proADM seem to be promising biomarkers of adverse remodeling. On the other hand, higher levels of these biomarkers were associated with reduced chance of occurrence of favorable reverse remodeling in MI patients. However, further studies on larger groups of patients are necessary to confirm this data.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected access to health-care system and timeline of treatment. The fear of contamination might potentially forbear from accessing the emergency system.mFurthermore, pandemic-specific protocols require additional time to prepare medical stuff and catheterization laboratory before procedure. Thus, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) might be exposed to a longer delay for revascularization and higher risk of mortality. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment delay and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 positive and negative patients with STEMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during on- and off hours. Methods All consecutive patients with STEMI treated with PCI and stent implantation between 1st March 2020 and 31st December 2020 were enrolled into analysis. To overcome potential bias related to the non-randomized design a propensity score match (PSM) was used to compare COVID-19 positive and negative patients for both working frames hours. The study group consisted of 877 matched pairs treated during regular hours (everyday 7:00AM-16:59PM) and 418 matched pairs with PCI performed during off-hours (everyday 17:00PM and 06:59AM) in 151 tertiary invasive cardiology centers in Poland (the ORPKI Polish National Registry). Results After PSM there were no differences between COVID-19 positive and negative patients in baseline characteristics during both on- and off-hours. However, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were admitted with cardiac arrest more frequently as compared to COVID-19 negative patients during regular working hours (180 (20.5%) vs. 64 (7.30%); p=0.001). There were no differences in radiation doses and total amount of contrast between both groups. Similarly, no differences in rate of periprocedural complications were observed despite of time of intervention, including stroke, access-site-related bleeding, allergic reaction and coronary artery perforation. Furthermore, there were no differences in periprocedural mortality between both groups (on-hours: COVID-19 negative vs. COVID-19 positive: 17 (1.9%) vs. 11 (1.3%),p=0.3; off-hours: COVID-19 negative vs. COVID-19 positive: 4 (1.0%) vs. 7 (1.7%),p=0.5). However, COVID-19 positive patients were exposed to longer time from first medical contact to angiography during both on-hours (133.76 (±137.10) vs. 117.14 (±135.83) [min]; p=0.001) and off-hours (148.08 (±201.56) vs. 112.19 (±138.72) [min]; p=0.003). Time from pain to first medical contact remained similar during both working frame hours (On-hours and off-hours, respectively: p=0.7 and p=0.9). Conclusions Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 might experience a longer time from first medical contact to revascularization. There was no impact of COVID-19 diagnosis on rate of periprocedural mortality or periprocedural complication, irrespective of time of intervention. System-level changes might be crucial to improve health-care during COVID-19 pandemic. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With a growing number of PCIs in complex lesions, the problem of CAP becomes even more important nowadays. Data on CAP rates in Poland are lacking. Presented study is an analysis of 344,517 consecutive patients treated with PCI between 2014 and 2017. Data were gathered from the Polish National PCI Registry (ORPKI). During 4 years of data collection CAP was observed in 595 (0.17%) cases. Patients diagnosed with CAP were older (69 years Q1:63; Q3:78 vs 66 years Q1:60; Q3:75; p0.001), more often female (44% vs 32%; p0.001), with arterial hypertension (77% vs 71%; p = 0.002), and chronic kidney disease (8.9% vs 5.4%; p0.001). In the CAP group, a higher rate of PCIs within chronic total occlusions (8.7% vs 2.3%; p0.001) and saphenous vein graft lesions (2.7% vs 1.3%; p = 0.002), as well as rotational atherectomy procedures (2.2% vs 0.4%; p0.001) was observed. Patients with CAP had higher rate of no-reflow phenomenon (5.5% vs 0.5%; p0.001) and greater periprocedural mortality (4.2% vs 0.5%; p0.001). In conclusion, our study confirms that CAP is more common during complex PCI procedures in high-risk patients. CAP occurrence is associated with worse immediate outcomes including increased periprocedural mortality.

Introduction Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are considered as a high-risk group for hemorrhagic events. Aim To assess the safety of bivalirudin vs. unfractionated heparin (UFH) in percutaneous peripheral interventions (PPI) in short- and long-term follow-up. Material and methods The retrospective single-center, observational study included 160 patients, undergoing PPI. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the use of anticoagulation - unfractionated heparin (UFH group) or bivalirudin (Biv. group) - and observed up to 5 years. Results The UFH group consisted of 101 patients and the Biv. group consisted of 59. We registered the following end points during in-hospital observation: 1 death (0.63% Biv, p = 0.18), 12 hematomas at puncture site (0.63% Biv. vs. 7.05% UFH, p = 0.04), 2 pseudoaneurysms (1.27% UFH, p = 0.29), thrombosis (0.63% UFH, p = 0.45), 1 bleeding from puncture site (0.63% UFH, p = 0.45). The total number of hemorrhagic complications was 1.24% in the Biv. group and 8.07% in the UFH group (p = 0.04). During long-term follow-up of 65.7 ±36.4 months the all-cause mortality rate was higher in the Biv. group (8.59% Biv vs. 0% in UFH group, p = 0.009). Regression analysis showed that bivalirudin administration is a risk factor for increased mortality risk (p = 0.003, OR = 15, 95% CI: 3.3-107.8). Conclusions Usage of UFH was associated with a higher number of hemorrhagic complications, especially hematomas at the puncture site in comparison to patients receiving bivalirudin.

INTRODUCTION The beneficial outcome of the radial (RA) over femoral approach (FA) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been widely demonstrated. However, most of the studies excluded patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock (CS). OBJECTIVES We sought to evaluate periprocedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with RA and FA in patients with STEMI complicated by CS using data from the Polish National PCI Registry (ORPKI). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 3,565 consecutive patients with STEMI and CS treated with emergent PCI and stent implantation were included. Data was collected prospectively between 2014 and 2018 from 151 tertiary primary-PCI centers in Poland. To avoid possible selection bias, a propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create 945 matched pairs treated via RA or FA. RESULTS No differences were reported in baseline characteristics, clinical presentation and delays in treatment between RA and FA after the PSM. Similar radiation doses and the total amount of contrast were used in both groups. A similar rate of periprocedural complications was observed in both RA and FA. However, RA was associated with reduced periprocedural mortality (9.4% (89) vs. 18.6% (176); P=0.001) and lower incidence of cardiac arrest (9.7% (92) vs. 16.1% (152); P=0.001). In multivariable analysis, FA was the strongest independent predictor for increased periprocedural mortality (OR 2.087, 95% CI 1.629-2.674; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS The radial approach was associated with lower periprocedural mortality compared with FA in patients with STEMI complicated by CS. RA seems to be a valuable option in technically feasible situations.

IntroductionIn this study, we aimed to distinguish differences in the procedural complication rate in a group of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) between patients with isolated LMCA disease and multi-vessel disease (MVD) with LMCA involvement and to identify their predictors.Material and methodsWe assessed 221,187 patients from the Polish Cardiovascular Intervention Society national registry (ORPKI) regarding all PCI procedures performed in Poland in 2015 and 2016. We extracted data of 1,819 patients with isolated LMCA disease and 3,718 patients with MVD and LMCA involvement. We compared those two groups in terms of procedural complications and their predictors.ResultsThe overall rate of procedural complications was significantly higher in patients treated with LMCA PCI both in the group of patients with isolated LMCA (6.5%) and the group with MVD with LMCA involvement (7.3%) compared to the non-LMCA PCI group (1.9%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MVD with LMCA involvement is an independent predictor of decreased risk of procedural death in the overall group of patients undergoing PCI of the LMCA (odds ratio: 0.583; 95% confidence interval: 0.4–0.848; p = 0.005).ConclusionsThe MVD involvement in patients treated with PCI of the LMCA may play a protective role. Patients with isolated LMCA involvement undergoing PCI should be subjected to special care and protected by various methods, such as devices to support left ventricle function.

Pandemic-specific protocols require additional time to prepare medical staff and catheterization laboratories. Thus, we sought to investigate treatment delay and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 positive and negative patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during on- and off-hours. All consecutive patients with STEMI treated with PCI between 1 March and 31 December 2020 were enrolled in the analysis. A propensity score match was used to compare COVID-19 positive and negative patients for on- and off-hours. The study group was comprised of 877 paired patients treated during regular hours (every day 7:00 a.m. to 16:59 p.m.) and 418 matched pairs with PCI performed during off-hours (every day 17:00 p.m. to 06:59 a.m.) (ORPKI Polish National Registry). No difference in periprocedural mortality was observed between the two groups (on-hours: COVID-19 negative vs. COVID-19 positive: 17 (1.9%) vs. 11 (1.3%), p = 0.3, off-hours: COVID-19 negative vs. COVID-19 positive: 4 (1.0%) vs. 7 (1.7%), p = 0.5). Additionally, a similar rate of periprocedural complications was reported. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were exposed to longer time from first medical contact to angiography (on-hours: 133.8 (±137.1) vs. 117.1 (±135.8) (min), p = 0.001) (off-hours: 148.1 (±201.6) vs. 112.2 (±138.7) (min), p = 0.003). However, there was no influence of COVID-19 diagnosis on mortality and the prevalence of other periprocedural complications irrespective of time of intervention.

IntroductionThe long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) within coronary artery bypasses are still poor as compared to those within native coronary arteries. Thus, we aimed to assess predictors of long-term clinical outcomes after PCIs of coronary bypasses.Material and methodsWe enrolled 194 patients after PCIs of coronary artery bypasses at the mean age of 69.5 ±8.3 years (73.2% male). The primary study endpoint was a combination of target-vessel revascularization (TVR), target-lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and death. The mean follow-up was 964 ±799.1 days and was completed among 156 patients. Multivariate analysis was used to assess determinants of study endpoints during follow-up. Moreover, we compared survival curves according to the type of PCI and presence of anti-embolic protection.ResultsThe primary endpoint of the study occurred in 59.7% of patients after the mean time of 669.6 ±598.7 days. The TVR occurred in 37.9% of individuals, TLR in 24.2%, MI in 26.3%, stroke in 4.2%, CABG in 2.1% and death in 30.5% of patients. In Cox multivariate analysis, PCI of two or more bypasses (p < 0.01), post-dilatation (p < 0.05) and no-reflow (p < 0.05) were the independent determinants of the primary study endpoint. No significant impact of anti-embolic protection devices on long-term outcomes was observed.ConclusionsPercutaneous coronary interventions of two or more bypasses, post-dilatation and no-reflow are predictors of worse outcome in patients undergoing PCI within coronary artery bypass grafts.

Introduction and objectives There is a paucity of data comparing the left radial approach (LRA) and right radial approach (RRA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in all-comers populations and performed by operators with different experience levels. Thus, we sought to compare the safety and clinical outcomes of the RRA and LRA during PCI in “real-world” patients with either stable angina or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods To overcome the possible impact of the nonrandomized design, a propensity score was calculated to compare the 2 radial approaches. The study group comprised 18 716 matched pairs with stable angina and 46 241 with ACS treated with PCI and stent implantation between 2014 and 2017 in 151 tertiary invasive cardiology centers in Poland (the ORPKI Polish National Registry). Results The rates of death and periprocedural complications were similar for the RRA and LRA in stable angina patients. A higher radiation dose was observed with PCI via the LRA in both clinical presentations (stable angina: 1067.0 ± 947.1 mGy vs 1007.4 ± 983.5 mGy, P = .001; ACS: 1212.7 ± 1005.5 mGy vs 1053.5 ± 1029.7 mGy, P = .001). More contrast was used in LRA procedures but only in ACS patients (174.2 ± 75.4 mL vs 167.2 ± 72.1 mL, P = .001). Furthermore, periprocedural complications such as coronary artery dissection (0.16% vs 0.09%, P = .008), no-reflow phenomenon (0.65% vs 0.49%, P = .005), and puncture site bleeding (0.09% vs 0.05%, P = .04) were more frequently observed with the LRA in ACS patients. There was no difference in mortality between the 2 groups (P = .90). Conclusions Our finding of poorer outcomes with the LRA may be related to lower operator experience with this approach. While both the LRA and RRA are safe in the setting of stable angina, the LRA was associated with a higher rate of periprocedural complications during PCI in ACS patients.

Background: During the first decade following the coronary bypass grafting, at least ten percent of the patients require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) due to graft failure. Saphenous vein grafts (SVG) are innately at a higher risk of periprocedural complications. The present study aimed to investigate predictors of periprocedural complications of PCI within coronary artery bypass grafts. Methods: This study analyzed data gathered in the Polish National Registry (ORPKI) between January 2015 and December 2016. Of the 221,195 patients undergoing PCI, data on 2,616 patients after PCI of SVG and 442 patients after internal mammary artery (IMA) were extracted. The dissimilarities in periprocedural complications between the SVG, IMA and non-IMA/SVG groups and their predictors were investigated. Results: Patients in the SVG group were older (p < 0.001), with a higher burden of concomitant disease and differing clinical presentation. The rate of de-novo lesions was lower, while restenosis was higher at baseline in the SVG (p < 0.001). The rate of no-reflows (p < 0.001), perforations (p = 0.01) and all periprocedural complications (p < 0.01) was higher in the SVG group, while deaths were lower (p < 0.001). Among the predictors of no-reflows, it was found that acute coronary syndromes (ACS), thrombectomy and past cerebral stroke, while the complications included arterial hypertension, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow before PCI and thrombectomy. Conclusions: Percutaneous coronary interventions of SVG is associated with increased risk of specific periprocedural complications. The ACS, slower TIMI flow before PCI and thrombectomy significantly increase the periprocedural complication rate in patients undergoing PCI of SVG.

Background: Rapid ventricular pacing is mandatory for optimal balloon positioning during aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of direct left ventricular (LV) guidewire pacing in comparison with regular pacing induced by temporary pacemaker (PM) placement in the right ventricle. Methods: Direct rapid LV pacing was provided with a 0.035&Prime, guidewire. Baseline clinical characteristics, echocardiographic and procedural data, as well as complication rates, were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 202 patients undergoing BAV were enrolled (49.5% with direct LV guidewire pacing). The pacing success rate was 100%. In the direct LV guidewire pacing group, we found a lower radiation dose, shorter fluoroscopy and overall procedural time (0.16 vs. 0.28 Gy, p = 0.02, 5.4 vs. 10.3 min, p = 0.01, 17 vs. 25 min, p = 0.01, respectively). In addition, the complication rate was lower in that group (cardiac tamponades, vascular access site complications, blood transfusions rate, and in-hospital mortality: 0% vs. 3.9%, 4.0% vs. 15.7%, 2.0% vs. 12.7%, 2.0% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.01 for all, respectively). Conclusions: Direct rapid LV guidewire pacing is a simple, safe and effective option for BAV with a reduced complication rate compared to a temporary PM placed in the right ventricle.

Background: Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) due to the risk of cardiac tamponade. Strikingly, in contrast to numerous analyses of CAP predictors, only few studies were focused on the predictors of tamponade after PCI, once iatrogenic CAP has occurred. Our aim was to search for clinical and periprocedural characteristics, including the coronary artery involved, associated with the development of acute cardiac tamponade among patients experiencing CAP. Methods: From the medical records of nine centers of invasive cardiology in southern Poland, we retrospectively selected 81 patients (80% with acute myocardial infarction) who had iatrogenic CAP with a visible extravasation jet during angiography (corresponding to type III CAP by the Ellis classification, CAPIII) over a 15-year period (2005&ndash, 2019). Clinical, angiographic and periprocedural characteristics were compared between the patients who developed acute cardiac tamponade requiring urgent pericardiocentesis in the cathlab (n = 21) and those with CAPIII and without tamponade (n = 60). Results: CAPIII were situated in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) or its diagonal branches (51%, n = 41), right coronary artery (RCA) (24%, n = 19), left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) (16%, n = 13), its obtuse marginal branches (7%, n = 6) and left main coronary artery (2%, n = 2). Acute cardiac tamponade occurred in 24% (10 of 41), 21% (4 of 19) and 37% (7 of 19) patients who experienced CAPIII in the territory of LAD, RCA and LCx, respectively. There were no significant differences in the need for urgent pericardiocentesis (37%) in patients with CAPIII in LCx territory (i.e., the LCx or its obtuse marginal branches) compared to CAPIII in the remaining coronary arteries (23%) (p = 0.24). However, when CAPIII in the LCx were separated from CAPIII in obtuse marginal branches, urgent pericardiocentesis was more frequently performed in patients with CAPIII in the LCx (54%, 7 of 13) compared to subjects with CAPIII in an artery other than the LCx (21%, 14 of 68) (p = 0.03). The direction of this tendency remained consistent regardless of CAP management: prolonged balloon inflation only (n = 26, 67% vs. 13%, p = 0.08) or balloon inflation with subsequent stent implantation (n = 55, 50% vs. 24%, p = 0.13). Besides LCx involvement, no significant differences in other characteristics were observed between patients according to the need of urgent pericardiocentesis. Conclusions: CAPIII in the LCx appears to lead to a higher risk of acute cardiac tamponade compared to perforations involving other coronary arteries. This association may possibly be linked to distinct features of LCx anatomy and/or well-recognized delays in diagnosis and management of LCx-related acute coronary syndromes.

Conflicting data exist regarding the associations between on-site surgical backup and outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Thus, we sought to assess the impact of such a backup on periprocedural outcomes of primary PCI using data from the Polish National Registry of PCI. From 2014 to 2016 data on 66,707 patients presenting with STEMI undergoing primary PCI from 154 centers were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence of on-site surgical backup. Of 66,707 patients, 15,040 (22.6%) patients were treated in 28 centers with on-site surgical backup. On-site surgical backup was associated with a higher center PCI annual volume (662.4 ± 301.8 vs 1098.7 ± 483.5; p0.001), but a lower operator PCI annual volume (226.7 ± 126.0 vs 207.8 ± 96.6; p0.001). The periprocedural mortality (1.60% vs 1.09%; p0.001) was lower in patients from centers with on-site cardiac surgery and both on-site surgical backup (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.618 [0.517; 0.738]; p0.001) and the mean number of PCIs by operator per year (odds ratio per 10 [95% confidence interval], 0.990 [0.984; 0.996]; p = 0.001] were independent predictors of periprocedural death. In conclusion, results of our study suggest that periprocedural mortality in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI is lower in centers than without on-site cardiac surgical backup. Whether this effect on mortality is attributable to such backup itself and/or whether surgical backup is a marker of overall better medical care and adherence to professional guidelines, this needs clarification in further studies.

Introduction: Many years of experience and refinement of existing rotational atherectomy (RA) techniques have resulted in improved clinical outcomes and a tendency to broaden the spectrum of RA usage. Aim: To compare the angiographic effectiveness and periprocedural complications in patients with stable angina (SA) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated using RA. Material and methods: Data were prospectively collected using the Polish Cardiovascular Intervention Society national registry (ORPKI) on all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) performed in Poland in 2015 and 2016. In total, 975 RA procedures were recorded out of 221,187 PCI procedures. Results: We compared angiographic effectiveness and periprocedural complications in 530 patients with SA and 245 with AMI in the RA group of patients, and 60,522 patients with SA and 91,985 with AMI in the non-RA group. The overall rate of periprocedural complications did not differ between SA and AMI patients in the RA group (2.3% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.84), while it was lower in AMI patients from the RA group compared to those from the non-RA group (2.0% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.34). The percentage of patients with angiographic success in the RA group was similar to the non-RA group in SA patients (97.3% vs. 97.1%; p = 0.75), whereas in the AMI group it was significantly higher compared to the non-RA group (96.7% vs. 92.6%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The angiographic effectiveness of PCI with RA in patients with AMI was not worse than in patients with SA.

Introduction : Fifty percent of cases of peripheral artery disease are caused by chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the superficial femoral artery (SFA). Ten–fifteen percent of percutaneous SFA recanalization procedures are unsuccessful. In those cases the retrograde technique can increase the success rate of the procedure, but the long-term follow-up of such procedures is still unknown. Aim : To assess the efficacy and clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up after retrograde recanalization of the SFA. Material and methods: We included patients after at least one unsuccessful percutaneous antegrade recanalization of the SFA. Patients were evaluated for the procedural and clinical follow-up of mean time 13.9 months. Results: The study included 17 patients (7 females, 10 males) who underwent percutaneous retrograde recanalization of the SFA from June 2011 to June 2015. The mean age of patients was 63 ±7 years. Retrograde puncture of the distal SFA was successful in all cases. A retrograde procedure was performed immediately after antegrade failure in 4 (23.5%) patients and after a previously failed attempt in 13 (76.5%) patients. The procedure was successful in 15 (88.2%) patients, and unsuccessful in 2 (11.8%) patients. Periprocedural complications included 1 peripheral distal embolization (successfully treated with aspiration thrombectomy), 1 bleeding event from the puncture site and 7 puncture site hematomas. During follow-up the all-cause mortality rate was 5.8% (1 patient, non-cardiac death). The primary patency rate at 12 months was 88.2% and secondary patency 100%. Conclusions : The retrograde SFA puncture seems to be a safe and successful technique for CTO recanalization and is associated with a low rate of perioperative and long-term follow-up complications.

Aims: Early infarct-related artery patency has been associated with improved outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. However, it is unknown whether this relationship persists in contemporary practice with pre-hospital initiation of treatment, use of novel P2Y12 inhibitors and frequent use of drug-eluting stents. The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of early infarct-related artery patency on outcomes in the contemporary EUROMAX trial. Methods and results: A total of 2218 patients were enrolled. The current analysis was done on 1863 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and had infarct-related artery patency data. Thirty-day outcomes were compared according to infarct-related artery flow before percutaneous coronary intervention (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0/1 vs. TIMI flow 2/3), and interaction with antithrombotic strategy was examined. A patent infarct-related artery (TIMI flow 2/3) was present in 707 patients (37.9%) and was associated with a higher rate of final TIMI 3 flow grade (98.9 vs. 92.6%; pConclusion: Despite evolution in primary percutaneous coronary intervention strategies, early infarct-related artery patency is still associated with higher procedural success and improved clinical outcomes. The choice of antithrombotic strategy did not interact with the benefits of a patent infarct-related artery at presentation.

Introduction Radial approach (RA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with reduced mortality and access site complications. The routine use of the RA in patients should be strongly considered, keeping in mind the learning curve associated with the technique. However, promotion of RA may interfere with the equally important goal of maintaining proficiency in the femoral approach (FA), which is essential in a variety of procedures as well as when RA fails. There is possible risk of higher rate of complications in PCI with FA performed by operators mainly using radial artery as access site. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate impact of experience and proficiency with RA for clinical outcomes on PCI via FA in “real-world” patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods A total of 539 invasive cardiologists performing PCI in 151 invasive cardiology centers on the Polish territory between 2014 and 2017 were included in study analysis. Proficiency threshold has been set at >400 procedures during four consecutive years per individual operator. They were categorized to quartiles according to total volume of radial artery utilization during all PCIs. Procedures performed on patients with Killip-Kimball class IV on admission to catheterisation laboratory were excluded from analysis. Results The most of the operators performed >75% of all procedures via radial artery (326 (60.5%)), 112 (20.8%) used RA in 50–75% of cases, 67 (12.4%) in 25–50% of all PCIs and only 34 (6.3%) invasive cardiologist were using RA in less than 25% of all procedures. Mortality during PCI via FA was higher in group of invasive cardiologist with >75% of all procedures performed with radial access (>75% vs. 50–75% vs. 25–50% vs. 75% vs. 50–75% vs. 25–50% vs. Conclusions Higher experience in radial access might be linked to worse outcome in PCI via FA in ACS settings. Femoral artery is important vascular approach and should not be abandoned while learning procedures with radial artery utilization. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Introduction The use of the radial approach (RA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has gradually increased. Several studies demonstrated that radial artery is associated with significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events for both coronary angiography and PCI in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it is still unclear if the side of RA has influence on clinical outcomes in an all-comer population in ACS settings. Purpose We sought to evaluate safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of right radial approach (RRA) compared to left radial approach (LRA) during PCI in “real-world” patients with ACS. Methods A total of 234,087 consecutive patients with ACS treated with PCI and stent implantation via radial approach between 2014 and 2017 in 151 invasive cardiology centers on the Polish territory. Data was based on the ORPKI Polish National Registry. Patients treated with RRA and LRA were compared using a propensity score analysis to avoid possible selection bias. The analysis was done in an “as-treated” manner. Results Procedure was conducted using RRA and LRA in 180,378 (77.1%) and 53,709 (22.9%) patients, respectively. After propensity score matching higher total amount of contrast (174.28 (±75.56) vs. 166.95 (±70.57) [ml]; P=0.001) and radiation doses were reported in PCI with left radial artery utilization (1210.21 (±1003.53) vs. 1054.07 (±1024.17) [mGy]; p=0.001). No differences were observed between RRA and LRA in rate of periprocedural adverse events such as myocardial infarction (0.08% vs. 0.08%; p=0.9) stroke (0.02% vs. 0.01%; p=0.1), no-reflow phenomenon (0.64%vs. 0.56%; p=0.1) and death (0.25% vs. 0.24%; p=0.7). A trend towards a lower rate of access-site-related bleeding during PCI was observed in RRA group (0.08% vs. 0.05%; p=0.066). Coronary artery perforation (0.21% vs. 0.16%; p=0.05) and cardiac arrest (0.56% vs 0.42%; p=0.01) were reported more often during PCI conducted with LRA. Conclusions Both radial approaches seems to be equally effective in the setting of PCI in ACS. However, utilization of left radial artery was associated with trend toward increased risk of access-site bleeding and higher rate of periprocedural complications as compared to RRA. Higher amount of contrast and radiation doses used in LRA procedures might be equivalent of generally lower experience with this access site. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Aim There are inconsistent data on the sex-related differences in clinical outcomes after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). We aimed to investigate sex-related differences in clinical outcomes after PTA. Methods A total of 939 consecutive patients undergoing PTA were enrolled in two large volume centers. Patients were stratified by gender. Baseline characteristics, procedural and long-term clinical outcomes were compared between women and men. Results Women represented 37.4% of the study population. Women, compared to men, had more often hypertension (92% vs 86%, p=0.001) and diabetes (54% vs 46%, p=0.02). However, men presented more often with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14.8% vs 6.8%, p=0.0003), coronary artery disease (45.4% vs 32.7%, p=0.0001), smoking (60.4% vs 45%, p=0.007) and previous PTA (25% vs 17%, p=0.005). There were no differences in 120-month all-cause mortality between groups (women vs. men: 29% vs. 21%, p=0.6). Men were at higher risk of re-PTA at 5-year follow-up (40% vs. 49%; p=0.03). Moreover, male sex was an independent predictor of re-PTA (age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): 1.276 (1.015–1.614), p=0.03). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, a superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusion (SFA-CTO) (hazard ratio [HR]) (95% confidence interval [CI]): 1.68 (1.12–2.5), body mass index (BMI) (hazard ratio (HR)) (95% CI): 0.93 (0.87–0.99), baseline creatinine level hazard ratio (HR)) (95% CI): 0.95 (0.88–0.99) were identified as independent factors of re-PTA in women. Figure 1. Months to re-PTA for grouping variable male. Conclusion Male sex was identified as an independent predictor of re-PTA. SFA-CTO, BMI and baseline creatinine level were associated with re-PTA in women.

BACKGROUND Preferred technique for bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation included high pressure predilation. Data about direct BVS implantation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are scarce. METHODS Analysis of 90 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) treated with primary PCI with Absorb deployment between 2013-2016 in a single center. In 45 patients, scaffolds were implanted in the direct technique, other 45 patients underwent Absorb deployment after balloon predilation. RESULTS Follow-up was available in 100% of patients with mean duration of 32±11 months. No cardiac death or scaffold thrombosis were observed in both groups. In the direct group, no target lesion revascularization (TLR) was reported. In the predilation arm, TLR occurred in 4 (9%) patients (P=0.12). Target vessel revascularization (TVR) was observed in 1 (2%) case in the direct group and in 6 (13%) patients from the predilation group (P=0.11). Target vessel MI was reported in one patient from each group. In an intention to treat analysis, we observed significantly higher rates of TVR (15% vs. 2%; P

We sought to evaluate the impact of experience and proficiency with radial approach (RA) on clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed via femoral approach (FA) in the &ldquo, real-world&rdquo, national registry. A total of 539 invasive cardiologists performing PCIs in 151 invasive cardiology centers in Poland between 2014 and 2017 were included. Proficiency threshold was set at &gt, 300 PCIs during four consecutive years per individual operator. The majority of operators performed &gt, 75% of all PCIs via RA (449 (65.4%)), 143 (20.8%) in 50&ndash, 75% of cases, 62 (9.0%) in 25&ndash, 50% and only 33 (4.8%) invasive cardiologists were using RA in &lt, 25% of all PCIs. Operators with the highest proficiency in RA were associated with increased risk of periprocedural death, stroke and bleeding complications at access site during angiography via FA. Similarly, higher prevalence of periprocedural mortality during PCI with FA was observed in most experienced radial operators as compared to other groups. The detrimental effect of FA utilization by the most experienced radial operators was observed in both stable angina and acute coronary syndromes. Higher experience and utilization of RA might be linked to worse outcomes of PCIs performed via femoral artery in both stable and acute settings.

International audience; BACKGROUND:In the ACCOAST (A Comparison of Prasugrel at PCI or Time of Diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial, the prasugrel pre-treatment strategy versus placebo was associated with excess bleeding complications and no improved ischemic outcome in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI). Whether patients with the longest pre-treatment duration had an ischemic benefit is unknown.OBJECTIVES:This pre-specified analysis of the ACCOAST trial aimed to assess the effect of pre-treatment duration with prasugrel (time from randomization to angiography) on outcomes.METHODS:Within the 4,033 patients randomized in the ACCOAST trial, pre-treatment duration was available in 4,001 patients (99.2%). The population of the trial was divided into quartiles of pre-treatment duration (0.1 to 2.5 h, 2.5 to 3.9 h, 3.9 to 13.6 h, and >13.6 h) with an evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, urgent revascularization or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor bailout use. Secondary efficacy outcomes including cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke; all-cause death; stent thrombosis and safety outcomes (all coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] or non-CABG TIMI [Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction] major bleeding) were also evaluated at 7 days.RESULTS:The primary efficacy outcome of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, urgent revascularization or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor bailout use did not differ between the quartiles of pre-treatment duration in the trial population (p = 0.17 for interaction). None of the secondary efficacy outcomes were found to be dependent on pre-treatment duration. The safety outcome of all CABG or non-CABG TIMI major bleeding did not differ between the quartiles of pre-treatment duration (p = 0.37 for interaction).CONCLUSIONS:In non-ST-segment elevation MI patients, the excess risk of bleeding and the absence of ischemic benefit were consistent across the quartiles of increasing duration of prasugrel pre-treatment. (A Comparison of Prasugrel at PCI or Time of Diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [ACCOAST]; NCT01015287).

The most relevant comorbidities in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus (DM). However, data of long-term follow-up of patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) are scarce. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of CAD and DM on long-term follow-up patients after superficial femoral artery (SFA) CTO retrograde recanalization. In this study, eighty-six patients with PAD with diagnosed CTO in the femoropopliteal region and at least one unsuccessful attempt of antegrade recanalization were enrolled in 2 clinical centers. Mean time of follow-up in all patients was 47.5 months (±40 months). Patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence of CAD (CAD group: n=45 vs. non-CAD group: n=41) and DM (DM group: n=50 vs. non-DM group: n=36). In long-term follow-up, major adverse peripheral events (MAPE) occurred in 66.6% of patients with CAD vs. 36.5% of patients without CAD and in 50% of patients with DM vs. 55% of non-DM subjects. There were no statistical differences in peripheral endpoints in both groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality: in the DM group, there were 6 deaths (12%) (P value = 0.038). To conclude, patients after retrograde recanalization, with coexisting CTO and DM, are at higher risk of death in long-term follow-up.

Myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is an important clinical problem especially in the era of extensive utilization of coronary angiography in MI patients. Its pathophysiology is poorly understood which makes diagnostics and treatment of MINOCA challenging in everyday clinical practice. The aim of the study was to assess characteristics of MINOCA patients in Poland based on data from the Polish National ORPKI Registry. In 2016, 49,893 patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) or ST-segment elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction entered the ORPKI registry. MINOCA was defined as a non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a lack of previous coronary revascularization. MINOCA was identified in 3924 (7.8%) patients and clinical presentation was more often NSTEMI than STEMI (MINOCA: 78 vs. 22%; obstructive CAD 51.1 vs. 48.9%; p

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the indications, short- and long-term outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods A cohort of 112 patients with AS underwent 114 BAV procedures between October 2012 and July 2015 in two Polish interventional cardiology centers. Clinical and echocardiographic data were prospectively collected within 1, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Results BAV was performed as a bridge to TAVI (51.8%), surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR, 5.4%), before urgent noncardiac surgery (8.0%), for symptom relief (33.0%) and cardiogenic shock (1.8%). Periprocedural, in-hospital, 1-, 6-, 12-month mortality were 2.7%; 8.9%; 8.9%; 16.9%; 22.3%, respectively. Serious periprocedural adverse events occurred in 18.8% of patients. After the procedure, mean aortic valve area (AVA) increased from 0.59 ± 0.18 to 0.82 ± 0.24 cm2, mean peak aortic valve gradient (pAVG) decreased from 94.0 ± 27.6 to 65.4 ± 20.0 mm Hg, mean aortic gradient decreased from 58.0 ± 17.8 to 40.5 ± 14.6 mm Hg, P

Introduction: There are scarce data on the usefulness of manual thrombectomy among patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Early positive reports were not supported by the clinical outcome in the recent TATORT-NSTEMI (Thrombus Aspiration in Thrombus Containing Culprit Lesions in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) study. Aim: To analyze the long-term outcome of NSTEMI patients treated with manual thrombectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Polish multicenter National Registry of Drug Eluting Stents (NRDES) study. Material and methods: There were 13 catheterization laboratories in Poland that enrolled patients in NRDES Registry in 2010– 2011. Patients with a diagnosis of NSTEMI were divided into two groups: those that were treated with manual thrombectomy for their primary PCI (T) and those who were not (NT). Results: There were 923 patients diagnosed with NSTEMI in NRDES. Aspiration thrombectomy was used in 71 (7.7%) patients and the remaining 852 (92.3%) NSTEMI cases were treated without thrombectomy during the index PCI. Thrombectomy was more often used in patients with TIMI less than 1, thrombus grades 4 and 5 and older male patients. Percutaneous coronary interventions complications such as distal embolization and slow flow were more often observed in the thrombectomy subgroup. Overall mortality at 1 year was 1.69% in the T and 5.92% in the NT group (p = 0.24 and p = 0.32 after propensity score matching adjustment with p = 0.11 in the multivariate logistic regression model). Conclusions: There was no mortality benefit from thrombus aspiration in NSTEMI patients at 1-year follow-up.

Introduction: Endovascular revascularization (ER) techniques in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) have been developed and became more accessible in recent years. The ER is a first-line treatment in the majority of patients with symptomatic PAD. However, data on assessment of predictors of long-term outcomes of retrograde ER in patients with PAD are scarce. Aim: To evaluate predictors of long-term outcomes of retrograde ER in patients with chronic total occlusion in lower limb arteries. Material and methods: We analyzed data of 834 patients who underwent retrograde ER. Baseline clinical characteristics and procedural data were collected. Patients were followed up for 36 months, and the primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results: All patients were symptomatic and had failed antegrade ER. The procedural success rate was 92%. Cumulative all-cause mortality was 13.4% at 36-month follow-up. In multivariate analysis history of stroke, Rutherford category, chronic limb ischemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and previous ER of other lesion were independent predictors of a higher mortality rate after 36 months (hazard ratio (HR) for stroke 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55–3.66; p = 0.0002; HR for age per 10 years 1.37, 95% CI: 1.15–1.64; p = 0.0002; HR for Rutherford category 1.63, 95% CI: 1.35–1.98; p < 0.0001, HR for chronic limb ischemia 0.44, 95% CI: 0.25–0.8, p = 0.007; HR for CKD 1.73, 95% CI: 1.14–2.56, p = 0.01; HR for COPD 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5–3.7, p = 0.0004; HR for previous ER 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35–0.94, p = 0.02). Conclusions: History of stroke, Rutherford category, chronic limb ischemia, CKD, COPD, and previous ER of other lesion were independently associated with increased risk of all-cause death.

Background: Direct stent implantation is a preferred technique for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). For the deployment of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS), the current guidelines recommend aggressive predilatation. Data about direct BVS implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are scarce. Aim: We sought to assess procedural characteristics and immediate outcomes of direct Absorb BVS implantation in ACS patients. Methods: A total of 91 patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) requiring urgent coronary revascularisation were enrolled. Among them, 50 patients underwent an attempt of direct Absorb implantation. The control group consisted of 41 patients treated with PCI with BVS deployment after elective predilatation. Results: In the direct group BVS deployment was successful in 91% of lesions, and in the remaining 9% of lesions direct implantation failed. In the control group scaffolds were successfully deployed after predilatation in 98% of lesions. In one case Absorb implantation failed even after balloon angioplasty. Type C lesions with severe tortuosity and angulation > 90° were associated with failure in direct Absorb deployment. Quantitative coronary analysis showed similar final percentages of diameter stenosis in the study and control groups. Flow analyses did not show significant differences between both methods. During hospitalisation no recurrent MI, scaffold thrombosis, or target lesion revascularisation was reported in either group. Conclusions: Direct Absorb implantation in ACS patients may be feasible in a suitable lesion anatomy.

According to guidelines, it is recommended to give P2Y12 inhibitors (preferably ticagrelor or prasugrel) at the time of first medical contact in patients with STEMI. However, in real life antiplatelet treatment strategies are different among countries. We analyzed data on antiplatelet treatment in STEMI patients included into Polish ORPKI national registry. A total of 23,139 STEMI patients from 153 invasive cardiology centers were reported in ORPKI registry between September 2015 and August 2016. Finally 19,437 patients from 122 centers (immediate PCI in 94%) were included into the analysis (lack of ticagrelor or prasugrel usage reported in 31 centers). The dominant P2Y12 inhibitor was clopidogrel (69%) with a high rate of precathlab administration (51.3%). Ticagrelor was administered in 10.1% of patients (2.3% during precathlab phase) and prasugrel in 1.1% (0.4% precathlab). The periprocedural switch from clopidogrel to newer generation oral P2Y12 inhibitors was rare (to ticagrelor: 2%; to prasugrel: 0.15%). Analysis of data from top 10 centers with the highest rate of newer generation P2Y12 inhibitors usage (1295 patients) revealed ticagrelor administration in 43.1% (prasugrel in 3%). During precathlab phase higher proportion of ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel (ticagrelor 17.9%, clopidogrel 29.8%) and higher rate of periprocedural switch from clopidogrel to ticagrelor (11.9%) was found comparing to all centers data (p

Introduction: The CHA2DS2-VASc and R2-CHA2DS2-VASc scores were initially designed to evaluate the risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, these scales consist of parameters which are well known as general risk factors for cardiovascular events. Aim: To assess the role of the CHA2DS2-VASc and R2-CHA2DS2-VASc scores in predicting outcome of patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Material and methods: We enrolled 212 consecutive patients with both ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were divided into two groups depending on the CHA2DS2-VASc score: ≤ 3 (low score) and > 3 points (high score). Results: The group with a CHA2DS2-VASc score > 3 points consisted of 93 (44%) patients. Follow-up was available in 200 (94.3%) patients with median duration of 10 (Q1: 6; Q3: 13) months. During the follow-up all-cause mortality was greater in patients from the high score group (21%) compared to patients with lower scores (8%) (p = 0.009). Recurrent MI was found in 4% of patients from the low score group and in 13% of patients from the high score group (p = 0.024). The combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, recurrent non-fatal MI and non-fatal stroke occurred in 13% of lower score patients and in 30% of patients with a score > 3 points (p = 0.002). In a Cox regression model both scores were predictors of all-cause mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.31 per 1 point increase for the CHA2DS2-VASc score (p = 0.004) and 1.36 for the R2-CHA2DS2-VASc score (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The CHA2DS2-VASc and R2-CHA2DS2-VASc scores predict in-hospital and post-discharge outcome in patients with acute MI undergoing primary PCI.

Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has become an alternative for carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of carotid artery atherosclerosis, due to limited injury and comparable periprocedural risk. The impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) on long-term follow-up after CAS needs to be reconsidered due to the intensification of aggressive pharmacotherapy in CAD in recent years. Aim: To assess the impact of CAD presence on the long-term follow-up of patients after CAS. Methods: Data of 130 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS with cerebral protection systems from December 2002 to December 2010 were divided into two groups: those with and those without CAD. Major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) during follow-up were defined as the combination of death (cardiac and non-cardiac), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Long-term outcomes of patients were stratified based on the history of CAD. Results: The mean age of patients was 66 ± 9 years, and the majority of patients were male (80.2%). Long-term follow-up data were available in 86.2% of patients. During mean follow-up of 71.9 ± 31.7 months the all-cause mortality rate was 19.3%. The rates of MI, stroke/TIA, and MACCE were 16.7%, 12.3%, and 36.3%, respectively. The frequency of MACCE during long-term follow-up was higher in patients with CAD vs. without CAD (40.8% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.01), and the mortality rate in the two groups was 22.2% vs. 0%, (p = 0.07), respectively. Conclusions: Patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis are high-risk individuals. The presence of CAD increases the risk of MACCE in such patients during long-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION The incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is underestimated, and the effect of COPD on atherosclerosis and the outcomes of PCI is not fully understood. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the impact of COPD on periprocedural outcomes of PCI, as well as its relationship with clinical presentation and the type of coronary artery lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were prospectively collected using a national electronic registry of PCI procedures performed in Poland between January 2015 and December 2016. Out of the 221 187 PCIs, 5594 patients had been diagnosed with COPD before the intervention. RESULTS Patients with COPD were older than those without COPD (mean [SD] age, 70.3 [9.9] years vs 67 [10.8] years; P

The ability of stent implantation to improve indexes of reperfusion may depend on the time to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and may also vary with stent type. The purpose of this prespecified analysis from the randomized MGUARD for Acute ST Elevation Reperfusion trial was to evaluate the impact of delay to reperfusion on outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with the MGuard embolic protection stent or standard metallic stents. A total of 431 patients were divided according to symptom-onset-to-balloon time (SBT) into 2 groups: SBT ≤3 hours (167 patients; 39%) and SBT >3 hours (264 patients; 61%). Complete ST-segment resolution (STR) after percutaneous coronary intervention was more often achieved in patients with shorter SBT (58.6% vs 47%, p = 0.02). At 1 year, the all-cause mortality rate was lower in patients with shorter SBT (0% vs 3.5%, p = 0.02). STR was achieved in 58% of MGuard patients and in 45% of the control stent patients (p = 0.008). STR was 57% in the MGuard group versus 38% in the control group (p = 0.002 for SBT >3 hours) and 60% versus 57% (p = 0.72), respectively, for SBT ≤3 hours (p for interaction = 0.11). In conclusion, longer delay to mechanical reperfusion remains an important factor negatively influencing outcomes in patients with STEMI. Use of the MGuard embolic protection stent compared with conventional metallic stents resulted in superior rates of complete STR, even in patients with longer delays to reperfusion.

Introduction: A large, randomised trial (IABP-SHOCK II) confirmed no benefit of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) on clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. However, the ‘sickest’ patients are often excluded from randomised clinical trials, so it is difficult to generalise expected outcomes from random ized clinical trials to the real life setting. Aim: We sought to evaluate the impact of IABP on 1-year mortality of unselected patients with STEMI presenting in cardiogenic shock. Material and methods: Data were gathered for 1,650 consecutive patients with STEMI transferred for primary angioplasty from hospital networks in 7 countries in Europe from November 2005 to January 2007 (the EUROTRANSFER registry population). Of them, 51 patients with cardiogenic shock on admission were identified and stratified based on the use of IABP. Outcome results were adjusted for age and sex, to control possible selection bias. Results: At the discretion of the operators, IABP was applied in 30 patients (58.8%, IABP group). The remaining 21 patients were treated without IABP (no-IABP group). The use of IABP was more frequent among males, younger patients, and patients with STEMI of the anterior wall. There was no difference in 30-day mortality in patients with and without IABP (no-IABP vs. IABP: 38.1% vs. 33.3%; ad justed OR 1.79 (95% CI 0.43–7.52); p = 0.43). Similarly, IABP had no impact on 1-year mortality (42.9% vs. 33.3%; adjusted OR 1.27 (95% CI 0.32–5.09); p = 0.74). One-year mortality was comparable among patients who survived hospitalisation (14.3% vs. 13%; p = 0.64). Conclusions: We observed no benefit of IABP on short – and long-term mortality of unselected patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Objectives We sought to evaluate the impact of direct stenting technique on angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary angioplasty (PCI). Methods Data on 1,419 patients who underwent immediate PCI for STEMI with implantation of ≥1 stent within native coronary artery were retrieved from the EUROTRANSFER Registry database. Patients were stratified based on the stent implantation technique: direct (without predilatation) vs. conventional stenting. Propensity score adjustment was used to control possible selection bias. Results Direct stenting technique was used in 276 (19.5%) patients. Remaining 1,143 patients were treated with stent implantation after balloon predilatation. Direct compared with conventional stenting resulted in significantly greater rates of postprocedural TIMI grade 3 flow (conventional vs. direct stenting: 91.5% vs. 94.9%, adjusted OR 2.09 (1.13–3.89), P = 0.020), and lower risk of no-reflow (3.4% vs. 1.4%, adjusted OR 0.31 (0.10–0.92), P = 0.035). The rates for ST-segment resolution >50% after PCI were higher in patients treated with direct stenting technique (76.3% vs. 86.2%, adjusted OR 1.64 (1.10–2.46), P = 0.016). A significant reduction in 1-year mortality in patients from the direct stenting group compared with the conventional stenting group, even after adjustment for propensity score was observed (6.5% vs. 2.9%, adjusted OR 0.45 (0.21–0.99), P = 0.047). Conclusions When anatomically and technically feasible, the use of direct stenting technique may result in improved long-term survival in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background Current STEMI guidelines recommend thrombectomy should be considered during primary PCI. Multiple data from randomized clinical trials, registries, and metanalysis have confirmed the efficacy of thrombectomy in terms of surrogate endpoints like better myocardial perfusion, less pronounced distal embolization, and conflicting results on lower all-cause mortality. Our aim was to analyze long-term outcome of STEMI patients treated with manual thrombectomy during primary PCI in a contemporary national registry. Methods There were 13 catheterization laboratories in Poland that enrolled patients in NRDES Registry. Patients were divided into two groups: those that were treated with manual thrombectomy for their primary PCI vs. those who were not. Results There were altogether 2,686 patients enrolled in the NRDES Registry of whom 1,763 were diagnosed with STEMI (66%). Aspiration thrombectomy was used in 673 of these cases (38%) and 1,090 (62%) patients were treated without thrombectomy during the index primary PCI. Overall mortality at 1 year was 11.03% in thrombectomy and 7.46% in no thrombectomy group respectively (P = 0.0292 which became insignificant after propensity score matching adjustment P = 0.613). Specific subgroup analyses revealed that there was no benefit from aspiration thrombectomy in neither subgroup. Conclusions Manual aspiration thrombectomy in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI was not associated with improved long-term 1-year clinical outcome. Subgroup analysis did not reveal any specific setting in which thrombectomy would be clinically superior. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Introduction: Most endovascular techniques are associated with patient and personal exposure to radiation during the procedure. Ionising radiation can cause deterministic effects, such as skin injury, as well as stochastic effects, which increase the longterm risk of malignancy. Endovascular operators need to be aware of radiation danger and take all necessary steps to minimise the risk to patients and staff. Some procedures, especially percutaneous peripheral artery revascularisation, are associated with increased radiation dose due to time-consuming operations. There is limited data comparing radiation dose during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of peripheral arteries. Aim: To compare the radiation dose in percutaneous coronary vs. peripheral interventions in one centre with a uniform system of protection methods. Material and methods: A total of 352 patients were included in the study. This included 217 patients undergoing PCI (single and multiple stenting) and 135 patients undergoing PTA (in lower extremities, carotid artery, renal artery, and subclavian artery). Radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, and total procedural time were reviewed. Cumulative radiation dose was measured in gray (Gy) units. Results: The total procedural time was significantly higher in PTA (PCI vs. PTA: 60 (45–85) min vs. 75 (50–100) min), p < 0.001. The radiation dose for PCI procedures was significantly higher in comparison to PTA (PCI vs. PTA: 1.36 (0.83–2.23) Gy vs. 0.27 (0.13– 0.46) Gy), p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in the fluoroscopy time (PCI vs. PTA: 12.9 (8.2–21.5) min vs. 14.4 (8.0–22.6) min), p = 0.6. The analysis of correlation between radiation dose and fluoroscopy time in PCI and PTA interventions separately shows a strong correlation in PCI group (r = 0.785). However, a weak correlation was found in PTA group (r = 0.317). Conclusions: The radiation dose was significantly higher during PCI in comparison to PTA procedures despite comparable fluoroscopy time and longer total procedure time in PTA. Fluoroscopy time is a reliable parameter to control the radiation dose exposure in coronary procedures. The increasing complexity of endovascular interventions has resulted in the increase of radiation dose exposure during PCI procedures.