Search

We examined whether a key psychological trait-resilience, defined as one's ability to recover quickly from difficulties-contributes to the frail phenotype in patients with cirrhosis. Included were 300 adult patients with cirrhosis who underwent outpatient physical frailty testing using the Liver Frailty Index and resilience testing using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The Liver Frailty Index was categorized as robust, prefrail-robust, prefrail-frail, and frail; CD-RISC was categorized using population norms as: least, less, more, and most resilient. Linear regression was used to assess factors associated with frailty (by the Liver Frailty Index per 0.1 unit change). Among the most resilient, only 10% were frail; among the least resilient, 29% were frail. In univariable analysis, resilience was strongly associated with the Liver Frailty Index (coef = -0.13 per point increase; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.20 to -0.60; P .001) and remained significantly associated with frailty in multivariable adjustment (coef = -0.13, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.07; P .001). Low resilience is strongly associated with the frail phenotype in patients with cirrhosis. Given that resilience is modifiable, our data suggest that effective interventions to mitigate frailty should include strategies to build resilience in patients with low baseline resilience.

Introduction We developed the strength training intervention (STRIVE), a home-based exercise program targeting physical function in patients with cirrhosis. In this pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of STRIVE. Methods Eligible were adult patients with cirrhosis at 3 sites. Patients were randomized 2:1-12 weeks of STRIVE, a 30-minute strength training video plus a health coach or standard of care (SOC). Physical function and quality of life were assessed using the Liver Frailty Index (LFI) and Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ), respectively. Results Fifty-eight and 25 were randomized to STRIVE and SOC arms, respectively: 43% women, median age was 61 years, MELDNa, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium was 14, and 54% were Child-Pugh B/C. Baseline characteristics were similar in the STRIVE vs SOC arms except for rates of hepatic encephalopathy (19 vs 36%). LFI @ 12 weeks was available in 43 STRIVE and 20 SOC participants. After 12 weeks, the median LFI improved from 3.8 to 3.6 (ΔLFI -0.1) in the STRIVE arm and 3.7 to 3.6 (ΔLFI -0.1) in the SOC arm (P = 0.65 for ΔLFI difference). CLDQ scores improved from 4.6 to 5.2 in STRIVE participants (ΔCLDQ 0.38) and did not change in SOC participants (4.2-4.2; ΔCLDQ -0.03) (P = 0.09 for ΔCLDQ difference). One patient died (SOC arm) of bleeding. Only 14% of STRIVE participants adhered to the strength training video for 10-12 weeks. No adverse events were reported by STRIVE participants. Discussion STRIVE, a home-based structured exercise program for patients with cirrhosis, was safely administered at 3 sites, but adherence was low. Although all participants showed minimal improvement in the LFI, STRIVE was associated with a substantial improvement in quality of life.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cirrhosis leads to malnutrition and muscle wasting that manifests as frailty, which may be influenced by cirrhosis aetiology. We aimed to characterize the relationship between frailty and cirrhosis aetiology. METHODS: Included were adults with cirrhosis listed for liver transplantation (LT) at 10 US centrer who underwent ambulatory testing with the Liver Frailty Index (LFI; ‘frail’ = LFI ≥ 4.4). We used logistic regression to associate aetiologies and frailty, and competing risk regression (LT as the competing risk) to determine associations with waitlist mortality (death/delisting for sickness). RESULTS: Of 1,623 patients, rates of frailty differed by aetiology: 22% in chronic hepatitis C, 31% in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), 32% in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), 21% in autoimmune/cholestatic and 31% in ‘other’ (P < .001). In univariable logistic regression, ALD (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12-2.09), NAFLD (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.18-2.29) and ‘other’ (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1. 06-2.36) were associated with frailty. In multivariable logistic regression, only ALD (OR 1.40; 95% 1.01-1.94) and ‘other’ (OR 1.59; 95% 1.05-2.40) remained associated with frailty. A total of 281 (17%) patients died/were delisted for sickness. In multivariable competing risk regression, LFI was associated with waitlist mortality (sHR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06), but aetiology was not (P > .05 for each). No interaction between frailty and aetiology on the association with waitlist mortality was found (P > .05 for each interaction term). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is more common in patients with ALD, NAFLD and ‘other’ aetiologies. However, frailty was associated with waitlist mortality independent of cirrhosis aetiology, supporting the applicability of frailty across all cirrhosis aetiologies.

Author(s): Xu, Chelsea Q; Yao, Frederick; Mohamad, Yara; Wong, Randi; Kent, Dorothea; Seetharaman, Srilakshmi; Srisengfa, Yanin; Lai, Jennifer C | Abstract: Frailty has emerged as a critical determinant of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Currently, the United Network for Organ Sharing registry only includes the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale, which captures a single component of frailty. We determined the associations between frailty, as measured by the Liver Frailty Index (LFI), and KPS with waitlist mortality.MethodsIncluded were 247 adult patients with cirrhosis listed for liver transplantation without hepatocellular carcinoma from February 2014 to June 2019, who underwent outpatient assessments using the LFI and KPS within 30 days of listing. "Frail" was defined using the established LFI cutoff of ≥4.4. Competing risk models assessed associations between the LFI and KPS with waitlist mortality (death/delisting for sickness).ResultsAt a median 8 months follow-up, 25 (10%) patients died/were delisted. In this cohort, median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium was 17, LFI was 3.9 (interquartile range 3.4-4.5), and KPS was 80 (interquartile range 70-90). In multivariable analysis, LFI (sub-hazard ratio 1.07, per 0.1 unit; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.12) was associated with waitlist mortality while KPS was not (sub-hazard ratio 1.00, per 10 units; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.29).ConclusionsOur data suggest that frailty, as measured by the LFI, may be more appropriate at capturing mortality risk than KPS and provide evidence in support of using the LFI more broadly in clinical transplant practice in the outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Accumulation of visceral adipose tissue is associated with hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, suggestive of its metabolic and inflammatory properties. We aimed to examine the histologic findings of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue and to associate these findings with clinical and radiologic characteristics in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Included were 55 adults with cirrhosis who underwent liver transplantation from 3/2017–12/2018 and had an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan within 6 months prior to transplant. Visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio (VSR) was calculated using visceral (VATI) and subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI) quantified by CT at the L3-vertebral level and normalized for height (cm(2)/m(2)). VAT (greater omentum), SAT (abdominal wall), and skeletal muscle (rectus abdominis) biopsies were collected at transplant. RESULTS: Majority of patients had VAT inflammation (71%); only one patient (2%) had SAT inflammation. Patients with VAT inflammation had similar median VATI (42 vs 41 cm(2)/m(2)), lower median SATI (64 vs 97 cm(2)/m(2)), and higher median VSR (0.63 vs 0.37, p = 0.002) than patients without inflammation. In univariable logistic regression, VSR was associated with VAT inflammation (OR 1.47, 95%CI 1.11–1.96); this association remained significant even after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, HCC, or MELD-Na on bivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation, histologic VAT inflammation was common, but SAT inflammation was not. Increased VSR was independently associated with VAT inflammation. Given the emerging data demonstrating the prognostic value of VSR, our findings support the value of CT-quantified VSR as a prognostic marker for adverse outcomes in the liver transplant setting.

Background. Frailty is a syndrome of decreased physiologic reserve that results from compromise of multiple physiologic systems including cardiovascular system. We aimed to determine the association between the frail phenotype and cardiac abnormalities in liver transplant (LT) candidates through evaluation of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) indices. Methods. Included were consecutive outpatients listed for LT who underwent a frailty assessment from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016 (using the Liver Frailty Index) and a 2-dimensional/Doppler TTE examination. Patients were categorized as robust, intermediate frail, or frail by the Liver Frailty Index based on scores of less than 3.2, between 3.2 and 4.5, or 4.5 or greater. Linear regression assessed associations between the Liver Frailty Index and TTE indices. Results. Of 335 patients, 19% were robust, 65% intermediate frail, and 16% frail. TTE indices of left atrial (LA) dilatation differed significantly by frailty status: median LA dimension (P = 0.03), LA volume index (LAVI mL/m(2); P < 0.001) and % LAVI > 34 mL/m(2) (P = 0.001). In linear regression adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, and diabetes, the Liver Frailty Index was positively associated with LA dimension (coeff, 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.34), LAVI mL/m(2) (coeff, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.005-0.02), ejection fraction (coeff, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.32-2.85), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (coeff, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.003-0.02), and negatively associated with LV hypertrophy (coeff, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.06). Conclusions. In LT candidates, frailty is associated with cardiac structural and functional changes, independent of known risk factors. Our study provides evidence to support that measures of frailty in cirrhotic patients encompass abnormalities of the cardiovascular system and may inform assessments of cardiovascular reserve in this population.

Frailty, a state of decreased physiological reserve, has been associated with dysregulation of the immune system. We hypothesized that frailty is associated with differential rates of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Our study included LT recipients from 2014 to 2016 who had a pre-LT frailty assessment using the liver frailty index (LFI). Frailty was defined as an LFI ≥4.5. ACR at 3months was ascertained from pathology reports, and immunosuppression regimens were collected from chart review. There were 241 LT recipients who were included: 46 (19%) were classified as frail before LT. Median tacrolimus trough levels, mycophenolate doses, and corticosteroid doses at discharge and 3months were similar between frail and nonfrail patients. Within 3months after LT, 7 (15%) frail patients versus 10 (5%) nonfrail patients experienced ACR (P=0.02). In the univariate analysis, frailty was associated with a higher odds of ACR at 3months (OR, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-9.3; P=0.02). Bivariate analyses were conducted with covariates that were associated with ACR in the univariate analysis or that were previously associated with either frailty (age and female sex) or ACR (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and ascites), as well as relevant immunosuppression variables. In the bivariate analyses, frailty remained significantly associated with ACR at 3months with an odds ratio relatively similar to the unadjusted value. In conclusion, frailty is associated with an increased rate of ACR within 3months, despite similar immunosuppression regimens, suggesting that frailty should be considered in immediate post-LT management.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: There is currently a gap in the literature regarding the relationship between acute cellular rejection and frailty in LT patients. We aimed to evaluate the association between frailty and acute cellular rejection in LT patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Included were LT recipients from 2014-16 at a single center who had a frailty assessment prior to LT using the Liver Frailty index consisting of grip strength, chair stands, and balance. Frailty was defined by a Liver Frailty Index > 4.5. Data on acute cellular rejection at 3 months (primary outcome) and immunosuppression regimens were collected from medical chart review. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression assessed the associations between frailty and acute cellular rejection. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 241 LT recipients were included. Of these, 37% were female, 55% had Hepatitis C, and the median (IQR) age was 60 (54-65); 46 (19%) were classified as frail. 98% of patients were on a combination of mycophenolate, corticosteroids and tacrolimus on discharge compared to 80% by 3 months. Within the first 3 months post-LT, 7 (15%) of frail patients versus 10 (5%) (p = 0.02) of non-frail patients experienced acute cellular rejection. In univariable logistic regression, frailty was associated with a 3.3 times higher odds of acute cellular rejection at 3 months (95%CI 1.19, 9.26, p = 0.02); age (OR 0.91), Black race (OR 3.2), autoimmune disease (OR 2.3), and diabetes (OR 0.3) were also associated with acute cellular rejection at 3 months with a p-value