1. Stereotactic body radiotherapy using a hydrogel spacer for localized prostate cancer: A dosimetric comparison between tomotherapy with the newly‐developed tumor‐tracking system and cyberknife
- Author
-
Yuta Shibamoto, Yoshihiko Manabe, Seiji Hashimoto, and Hideki Mukouyama
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_treatment ,tomotherapy ,Rectum ,Radiosurgery ,Tomotherapy ,Prostate cancer ,Cyberknife ,Prostate ,cyberknife ,Radiation Oncology Physics ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Instrumentation ,Radiation ,business.industry ,Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Hydrogels ,Radiotherapy Dosage ,prostate cancer ,medicine.disease ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Urethra ,tumor‐tracking system ,Tumor tracking ,stereotactic radiotherapy ,Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,Stereotactic body radiotherapy - Abstract
Purpose With a new tumor‐tracking system (Synchrony®) for tomotherapy (Radixact®), the internal and set‐up margins can be tightened, like cyberknife (CyberKnife®), in the planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. Recently, the usefulness of placing a hydrogel spacer between the prostate and rectum has been established in prostate radiotherapy. We evaluated the characteristics of tomotherapy plans with the tumor‐tracking system and compared them with cyberknife SBRT plans for localized prostate cancer using a hydrogel spacer. Methods In 20 patients, two plans were created and compared using tomotherapy and cyberknife. All patients underwent hydrogel spacer injection behind the prostate before simulation CT and MRI for fusion. For all plans, 36.25 Gy in 7.25‐Gy fractions for a minimum coverage dose of 95% of planning target volume (PTV) (D95%) was prescribed. The D99% of PTV and D0.1 ml of the PTV, urethra, bladder, and rectum were intended to be > 90%, 110–130%, 100–110%
- Published
- 2021