Search

Introduction Unlike the established evidence to use chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, presently there are insufficient data to inform a recommendation on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treatment. The prognosis for patients with stage T4 and positive lymph nodes is poor; however, primary tumors in the renal pelvis are associated with favorable prognoses compared to those located in the ureter. Our study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with pT3N0M0 renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas (RPUC) who have relative favorable prognosis. Methods Patients with pT3N0M0 tumors who underwent radical nephroureterectomy combined with bladder cuff excision between 2005 and 2014 and registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were eligible for inclusion (n = 939). Baseline characteristics between the chemotherapy and observation groups were controlled for with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)‐adjusted analysis. Results After the IPTW‐adjusted analysis, the 5‐year IPTW‐adjusted rates of overall survival (OS) for the chemotherapy and observation groups were 53.1% and 44.9%, respectively. The IPTW‐adjusted Kaplan‐Meier curves suggested that chemotherapy was associated with increased OS compared with observation (P = .028). In the IPTW‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model, chemotherapy was associated with favorable survival benefits compared with observation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% CI 0.52‐0.92, P = .031), and this was maintained after bootstrapping (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49‐0.93). Chemotherapy had a protective effect on OS benefits, which were found in a majority of the results of the subgroup analysis and were consistent with the main results (all P‐interactions > 0.05). Conclusion Chemotherapy may provide significant OS benefits for patients with pT3N0M0 RPUC. The results of our study could strengthen the evidence for using adjuvant chemotherapy in this rare group of patients., Chemotherapy appears to provide significant overall survival benefits for patients with pT3N0M0 renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas. Our results showed that the effectiveness of chemotherapy is not related to the tumor size and pattern of invasion. The findings of our study could strengthen the evidence for using adjuvant chemotherapy for this rare group of patients.

Purpose To indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Methods The relevant randomized controlled trials were retrieved from PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Network meta-analyses were used to compare multiple drugs simultaneously for the outcomes of nmCRPC. Direct evidence in trials and indirect evidence across trials were combined by the network meta-analyses to estimate the treatment efficiency. Outcome Eight studies were included in our research. For prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival, the rate of progression was significantly decreased following apalutamide, enzalutamide, bicalutamide+dutasteride, and bicalutamide treatment compared with placebo. Compared with placebo treatment, metastases-free survival was significantly increased in patients who received apalutamide (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.35), enzalutamide (HR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.24-0.35), and darolutamide (HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.35-0.50). Direct comparison showed significant survival benefits in patients who received second-generation anti-androgen therapy (apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide: HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.91) compared with patients who received placebo. With respect to metastases-free survival, based on SUCRA analysis, there was 80% and 78% probability that apalutamide and enzalutamide were preferred treatment, while darolutamide was likely to be second-best choice. Compared with placebo, all agents were not associated with significantly higher likelihood of serious adverse events and grade 3 to 4 adverse events. Conclusion Our outcomes support equivalent efficacy and similar risk of adverse effects between apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide, supporting the use of these antiandrogen agents in high-risk of progression nmCRPC.

Background: A great number of metabolic genes have been discovered in gastric cancer (GC); however, their prognostic roles remain incompletely clear so far. Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas-stomach adenocarcinoma, and GSE84437 dataset collected via the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were utilized for retrieving those clinicopathological data and RNA expression patterns. Besides, the signature was obtained through the lasso Cox regression model and univariate Cox regression analysis. A novel 13-gene metabolic signature (including GSTA2, POLD3, GLA, GGT5, DCK, CKMT2, ASAH1, OPLAH, ME1, ACYP1, NNMT, POLR1A, and RDH12) was constructed for predicting the prognosis for gastric adenocarcinoma. Results: The results suggested that, the survival in high risk group was remarkably dismal compared with that in low risk group. In addition, that as-constructed signature had been identified as a factor to independently predict the prognosis for gastric adenocarcinoma patients. Moreover, the signature-based nomogram showed certain benefits in predicting the overall survival (OS). Besides, results of gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) suggested that some pathways were markedly enriched, which help to illustrate the possible mechanisms. Conclusions: The new 13-gene metabolic model is constructed in this study to predict the prognosis for GC. It probably reflects dysregulation in the metabolic microenvironment, in the meantime of providing metabolic treatment biomarkers, and predicting the treatment response to gastric adenocarcinoma.

Owing to the aggressive nature of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), it is extremely important for the diagnostic modalities to be accurate. The European Association of Urology guidelines recommend that diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) and biopsy be performed for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUTCs). But that diagnostic URS adversely affects oncologic outcomes still exist. In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we had attempted to evaluate oncologic outcome of diagnostic URS before RNU.All relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Endpoint events were recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival.Compared with patients who underwent RNU alone, those who underwent diagnostic URS before RNU had significantly higher intravesical recurrence rate (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.24-1.61, IDiagnostic URS before RNU does not seem to compromise long-term survival outcomes, even though it is associated with a higher rate of intravesical recurrence (IVR). Our findings suggest that further investigation, especially through prospective studies, should focus on decreasing the rate of IVR by administration of intravesical chemotherapy immediately after diagnostic URS.

In the original article, the word IMMUNOSCORE® was not displayed to reflect its trademark status. At every mention, IMMUNOSCORE® should be in all caps and with a registered trademark symbol.

To investigate the effects of intra-arterial chemotherapy on T1 stage bladder cancer (Bca) and evaluate patient outcome with bladder-preserving treatment approaches. A total of 238 patients with T1 stage Bca were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 35 patients were categorized into the subgroup of highest-risk T1 stage according to the European Association of Urology guidelines and received immediate radical cystectomy (RC group), whereas 62 were classified as being highest-risk T1 patients but were unwilling to undergo RC and were treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin intra-arterial chemotherapy (GC group). There were 141 T1 patients who had bladder-preserving surgery with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC group). For patients with T1 stage Bca, the GC group had a higher estimated recurrence-free survival rate (44.4 vs. 13.9%, P = 0.087), progression-free survival rate (75.4 vs. 32.8%, P = 0.006), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate (78.7 vs. 67.5%, P = 0.399) when compared with the IVC group, respectively. Using the multivariable regression model, the GC intra-arterial chemotherapy was significantly related to bladder preservation (P = 0.004), lower recurrence (P = 0.012), and less progression (P = 0.004). For patients with the highest-risk T1 stage, GC group did not have a poorer CSS rate in comparison with the RC group (P = 0.383). Moreover, immediate RC did not confer a survival benefit in terms of CSS when compared with those who underwent deferred RC after failing GC intra-arterial chemotherapy (P = 0.283). Gemcitabine plus cisplatin intra-arterial chemotherapy may be an effective bladder-preserving alternative adjuvant treatment for patients with T1 stage Bca with oncologic benefits, good compliance, and low toxicity.

Background The 7th Tumor-Node-Metastasis system for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) classified renal sinus fat invasion (SFI), perirenal fat invasion (PFI), or renal vein invasion (RVI) as stage pT3a. However, their close interactions and prognostic value of them remain controversial. The goal of this study is to further analyze their prognostic values for patients with T3aN0M0 ccRCC. Methods The data of 1,869 pT3aN0M0 ccRCC patients receiving the radical nephrectomy surgery were collected from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database of United states from 2010 to 2014. These Patients were grouped as SFI, PFI, SFI + RVI, SFI + PFI, PFI + RVI, and SFI + PFI + RVI according to their corresponding manifestations. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was determined using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and Multivariate cox proportional-hazards regression methods were used to evaluate the impacts of clinical pathologic parameters on CSS. Results Patients with SFI or PFI alone had the similar CSS (P = 0.286) and patients with SFI + PFI + RVI had the worst outcomes. Moreover, significantly more patients with SFI + PFI + RVI had tumor diameter ≥7cm than patients with PFI + RVI, SFI + PFI (68.80% vs. 65.32%, 58.77%, and 55.04%, P = 0.026), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that RVI + PFI (P = 0.013) and PFI + SFI + RVI (P = 0.011) were the independent factors of CSS. Conclusions The results suggest that invasion location can help distinguish patients with T3aN0M0 ccRCC with increased risk of cancer-related mortality.