Search

Background We conducted a comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of poloxamer 407-based ropivacaine hydrogel at the wound site (Gel) and continuous thoracic paravertebral block (On-Q) for postoperative pain following thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. Methods This prospective, randomized, noninferiority study included 89 patients randomized into the two groups; Gel (poloxamer 407-based 0.75% ropivacaine, 22.5 mg) and On-Q (0.2% ropivacaine, 4 mg/hour for 48 hours). The primary outcome measure was total fentanyl consumption and secondary outcome measures were the need for rescue analgesia and pain intensity using the numeric rating scale (NRS). Results There was no significant difference in total fentanyl consumption between the Gel group and the On-Q group (1504.29 ± 315.72 mcg vs 1560.32 ± 274.81 mcg, p = 0.374). Pain intensity using the NRS between the Gel group and the On-Q group demonstrated no statistical differences (6 hours: 3.56 vs 3.55, p = 0.958; 24 hours: 3.21 vs 3.00, p = 0.250; 48 hours: 2.75 vs 2.49, p = 0.233; and 72 hours: 2.39 vs 2.33, p = 0.811), and there was no significant difference in the frequency of analgesic rescue medication use (3.70 vs 3.33, p = 0.417). Conclusions We confirm the noninferiority of Gel compared with On-Q for acute postoperative pain following thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. Considering a technical simplicity and low systemic toxicity of the local injection of Gel, this analgesic modality may be worthy of further research and is thus considered to have potential as a viable alternative to On-Q for regional analgesia.

Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can provide an effective analgesia for managing pain after thoracic surgery and compare the efficacy of ESPB with that of other regional analgesic techniques. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Setting PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Participants Patients undergoing thoracic surgeries. Intervention Erector spinae plane block with local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia. Measurement and Main Results Seventeen studies, including 1,092 patients, were included in the final analysis. Erector spinae plane block reduced 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (mean difference [MD] –17.49, 95% CI –26.87 to –8.12), pain score at rest (MD –0.82, 95% CI –1.31 to –0.33), and pain score at movement (MD –0.77, 95% CI –1.20 to –0.3) compared to no block. Compared with other regional blocks, various results have been observed. Although statistical results showed that ESPB is inferior to thoracic paravertebral block and intercostal nerve block and superior to serratus anterior plan block in postoperative analgesia, clinical differences remain unclear. The incidence of hematoma was lower in the ESPB group than in the other groups (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.73). Conclusion Erector spinae plane block may provide effective analgesia after thoracic surgery. Compared with other techniques, it is a safer method, without clinically important differences, for postoperative pain control. Therefore, ESPB may be considered as a valuable option for postoperative pain management after thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy of preoperative bilateral paravertebral block (PVB) with general anesthesia (GA) in contributing to early extubation and decreasing opioid consumption in cardiac surgery. DESIGN A propensity score-matched retrospective study. SETTING A single tertiary medical center between January 2018 and December 2020. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients undergoing isolated first-time aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting with full sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS A cohort of 44 patients who received PVB with GA (PVB group) was matched with 44 patients who underwent similar surgery with GA only (GA only group). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The completion rate of extubation in the operating room was significantly greater in the PVB group (65.9%) than in the GA only group (43.2%; p = 0.032). The completion rate of extubation within eight hours after surgery also was significantly greater in the PVB group (86.4%) than in the GA only group (68.2%; p = 0.042). The median amount of intraoperative fentanyl administered was significantly less in the PVB group (4.8 µg/kg; interquartile range [IQR], 3.3-7.2) than in the GA only group (8.4 µg/kg; IQR, 5.4-12.7; p < 0.001). The median amount of postoperative fentanyl administered was significantly less in the PVB group (6.8 µg/kg; IQR, 3.9-10.6) than in the GA only group (8.1 µg/kg; IQR, 6.2-15.9; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that preoperative bilateral PVB combined with GA contributed to early extubation in isolated first-time aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting and in the reduction of intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl consumption.

Surgical resection is the treatment of choice both for early-stage lung cancer and pulmonary metastatic disease. For patients with lung tumors who are not eligible for surgery, the minimally invasive modality of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be curative and, thus, should be considered. However, opinions regarding the optimal anesthetic technique for pulmonary RFA differ. Here the authors report their experience with the use of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block in minimally-sedated patients undergoing pulmonary RFA. This retrospective study was conducted at a single institution. The 17 consecutive patients underwent 19 pulmonary RFA procedures for primary lung tumor or lung metastases. In all patients, RFA was performed according to the protocol of the hospital. Anesthesia in patients receiving RFA for lung tumors consisted of a thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), performed between T4 and T8, with minimal sedation. This approach allowed intraoperative communication with the patient and apnea pauses as needed. There were no complications after TPVB, which was well-tolerated by all patients. Only two patients required an alfentanil bolus during RFA because of pleuritic pain. No patient required conversion from sedation to general anesthesia. There were no episodes of hemodynamic instability or desaturation (SaO2 ≤95%), and excessive sedation prevented patient collaboration in only one patient. In conclusion, ultrasound-guided single-injection TPVB is a safe and effective anesthetic technique for high-risk patients undergoing RFA for a primary lung tumor or lung metastases.

Herpes zoster (HZ) is a disease caused by the reactivation of the varicella zoster virus. Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common complication of HZ.Repetitive paravertebral block with local anaesthetics and dexmedetomidine for the prevention of PHN in patients with acute herpes zoster.104 patients with acute herpes zoster were randomly divided into two groups. Group Rop received repetitive paravertebral block with 0.25% ropivacaine 20 ml per 72 h three times. Group Dex received repetitive paravertebral block with a mixture of 0.25% ropivacaine 20 ml and dexmedetomidine 20 µg per 72 h three times. Patients were permitted to take tramadol when the visual analogue scale (VAS) ≥ 4. The incidence of zoster-related pain was recorded at 1, 3, and 6 months after the end of treatments; VAS scores and the dose of rescue drug were recorded at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the end of treatments.At 1 month post therapy, the incidence of zoster-related pain was 11% in Group Dex, compared with 35% in Group Rop (Repetitive paravertebral block with local anaesthetics and dexmedetomidine in patients with acute herpes zoster can significantly reduce the incidence of zoster-related pain.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has become increasingly popular due to faster recovery times and reduced postoperative pain compared with thoracotomy. However, analgesic regimens for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vary significantly. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. A systematic review was undertaken using procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology. Randomised controlled trials published in the English language, between January 2010 and January 2021 assessing the effect of analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified. We retrieved 1070 studies of which 69 randomised controlled trials and two reviews met inclusion criteria. We recommend the administration of basic analgesia including paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitors pre-operatively or intra-operatively and continued postoperatively. Intra-operative intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion may be used, specifically when basic analgesia and regional analgesic techniques could not be given. In addition, a paravertebral block or erector spinae plane block is recommended as a first-choice option. A serratus anterior plane block could also be administered as a second-choice option. Opioids should be reserved as rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. ispartof: ANAESTHESIA vol:77 issue:3 pages:311-325 ispartof: location:England status: published

Background The optimal modality for postoperative analgesia after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS) for the treatment of lung cancer has not yet been determined. Both ultrasound-guided paravertebral block (PVB) and retrolaminar block (RLB) have been reported to be successful in providing analgesia after UVATS. However, which block technique provides superior analgesia after UVATS is still unclear. This randomized study was designed to compare the postoperative analgesic effects and adverse events associated with ultrasound-guided PVB and RLB after UVATS. Methods Sixty patients with lung cancer were randomized to undergo ultrasound-guided PVB (group P) or ultrasound-guided RLB (group R). In group P, 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected at the T3 and T5 levels via ultrasound-guided PVB (15 mL at each level on the operative side). In group R, 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected at the T3 and T5 levels via ultrasound-guided RLB (15 mL at each level on the operative side). The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score within 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were total postoperative sufentanil consumption, time to first analgesic request and adverse events. Results At 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h postoperatively, the NRS score at rest in group P was lower than that in group R (p p < 0.05). The total postoperative sufentanil consumption in group P was significantly lower than that in group R (p p p Conclusions In patients with lung cancer undergoing UVATS, ultrasound-guided PVB with 0.5% ropivacaine provides better analgesia and results in less nausea than ultrasound-guided RLB. Compared with ultrasound-guided RLB, ultrasound-guided PVB seems to be a better technique for analgesia in UVATS. Trial registration The name of this study is the Effect And Mechanism Of Ultrasound-guided Multimodal Regional Nerve Block On Acute And Chronic Pain After Thoracic Surgery. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100044060). The date of registration was March 9, 2021.

Background: To evaluate the safety, efficacy and cost of paravertebral block anesthesia for ureteral stones patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Methods: Four hundred and eighty-two patients who underwent ureteroscopy for unilateral ureteral stones were incorporated into our retrospective study. A propensity-matched comparison in patients with paravertebral nerve block anesthesia (PVB) group and general anesthesia (GA) group was performed. Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, operative time, visual analog scale for pain, stone-free rate, anesthetic cost and postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results: Sixty-one GA cases were propensity matched to 61 PVB cases. In the PVB group, all the procedures were completed successfully without anesthesia conversion. Significantly less intraoperative severe hypotensive (P = 0.002) and arrhythmia (P

Background Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a refractory complication of herpes zoster (HZ). To prevent PHN, various strategies have been aggressively adopted. However, the efficacy of these strategies remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the relative efficacy of various strategies used in clinical practice for preventing PHN using a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods We performed a systematic and comprehensive search to identify all randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the incidence of PHN at 3 months after acute HZ. We performed both frequentist and Bayesian NMA and used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values to rank the interventions evaluated. Results In total, 39 studies were included in the systematic review and NMA. According to the SUCRA value, the incidence of PHN was lower in the order of continuous epidural block with local anesthetics and steroids (EPI-LSE), antiviral agents with subcutaneous injection of local anesthetics and steroids (AV + sLS), antiviral agents with intracutaenous injection of local anesthetics and steroids (AV + iLS) at 3 months after acute HZ. EPI-LSE, AV + sLS and AV + iLS were also effective in preventing PHN at 1 month after acute HZ. And paravertebral block combined with antiviral and antiepileptic agents was effective in preventing PHN at 1, 3, and 6 months. Conclusions The continuous epidural block with local anesthetics and steroid, antiviral agents with intracutaneous or subcutaneous injection of local anesthetics and a steroid, and paravertebral block combined with antiviral and antiepileptic agents are effective in preventing PHN.

Although thoracoscopy has characteristics such as a small surgical incision and low stress response, post-surgical pain after a thoracoscopic operation is no less than that after a thoracotomy. Moreover, poor post-surgical pain management is likely to cause an increased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and chronic post-surgical pain. The serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a regional anesthesia method whereby local anesthetics (LAs) are injected into the serratus anterior space to block the lateral cutaneous branch of the intercostal nerve, long thoracic nerve, and dorsal thoracic nerve. The block range of the SAPB covers the incisions of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and the site of the chest tube, which are often located in the antero-lateral chest wall. Therefore, the SAPB can achieve effective analgesia in VATS. For example, 0.125% to 0.25% levobupivacaine (20-25 ml) is widely used for thoracic surgery, which can achieve effective analgesia and avoid adverse reactions. Moreover, it has advantages compared with thoracic segmental epidural block (TEA) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), such as simple operation, increased safety, fewer complications, and hemodynamic stability. In addition, adequate analgesia is helpful for pulmonary function recovery and reduces the incidence of PPCs. This article introduces the anatomical mechanism of the SAPB, diverse operation approaches, how to choose drugs and adjuvants, and the resulting impacted area range. It summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the SAPB compared with other analgesic methods and posits that the SAPB is beneficial to the recovery of postoperative lung function, which provides more options for postoperative analgesia after VATS.

Objectives Thoracic surgery often causes postoperative delirium (POD) in geriatric patients. This study aimed to explore the effect of ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block (UG-TPVB) on POD in geriatric patients undergoing pulmonary resection. Methods Total 128 patients who underwent pulmonary resection were randomly allocated to either the conventional patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) group or the UG-TPVB group (n = 64 per group). The consumption of opioid agents (propofol and remifentanil), postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pulmonary atelectasis, postoperative nausea/vomiting, and postoperative itchiness were recorded. The diagnosis of delirium was dependent on the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale. The postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The serum levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α were used to evaluate the postoperative neuroinflammation. Results The consumption of propofol and remifentanil, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pulmonary atelectasis, postoperative nausea/vomiting, and postoperative itchiness in the UG-TPVB group were lower than that in the PCA group. Compared with the PCA group, the prevalence of POD was decreased in the UG-TPVB group. In addition, use of UG-TPVB not only reduced postoperative pain (VAS score) but also decreased postoperative neuroinflammation compared with PCA in geriatric patients undergoing pulmonary resection. Conclusions This study determined the benefits of UG-TPVB over PCA, providing an effectiveness approach to alleviate POD in geriatric patients undergoing pulmonary resection.

Objective: We evaluated the effect of the addition of 100 ng of naloxone to fentanyl–bupivacaine mixture used in thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) on the duration and the quality of post-mastectomy analgesia. Design: A randomized double-blinded trial. Setting: Oncology surgery unit. Patients and participants: This study included 135 patients, aged 40-60 years of either sex presented for elective unilateral-modified radical mastectomy. Interventions: Patients were divided randomly into three groups: group I, received 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25 percent bupivacaine; group II, received 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25 percent bupivacaine, fentanyl 50 μg, and naloxone 100 ng; group III, received 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25 percent bupivacaine and fentanyl 50 μg. Main outcome measure(s): The visual analog scale was assessed immediately post-operative, every 2 hours till 12 hours, and then every 6 hours for 24 hours; the time of first and total amount of rescue analgesia and side effects during the first 24 hours were recorded. Results: Group II showed a significant prolonged analgesia with a delayed first request of rescue analgesia and lower amount of morphine (592.1 ± 14.9 minutes and 7.28 ± 7.81 mg, respectively) than groups I (127.7 ± 35.1 minutes and 19.84 ± 2.56 mg, respectively) and III (232.2 ± 9.27 minutes and 13.52 ± 1.74 mg, respectively) as p < 0.001. Conclusion: Using naloxone as additives in PVB has been promising and effective in controlling post-mastectomy pain.

BACKGROUND Inguinal hernia is a frequently encountered surgical problem. General anaesthesia carries the risk of possible airway complications. Regional blocks improve acute post-operative pain, decrease post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) score and patient can mobilise early. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block vs. paravertebral (PVB) block for post-operative analgeia in inguinal hernia surgeries. METHODS We conducted a research on 64 patients of age > 18 years with American society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA I – III) to undergo unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group T received TAP block in which 20 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine was injected and Group P underwent PVB in which 5 ml of bupivacaine (0.25 %) at each segment from T10-L1 was injected slowly (total dose of 20 ml). Post-operative VAS score, time for first rescue analgesia, total diclofenac requirement, total anti-emetic requirement and complications if any was noted. RESULTS The demographic data of both the groups were comparable. Also, pre and postoperative heart rate, blood pressure, IV fluids, ephedrine use, operative time and complications were statistically insignificant. As compared to group T, group P had lower VAS score from 2nd – 12th hour which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Although more time is required to perform paravertebral block but the time for request of first rescue analgesia was quite prolonged in paravertebral block. Time of ambulation in group P was significantly lower than group T. CONCLUSIONS PVB requires more time to perform due to multiple site of injection, the comparison of both techniques in the present study revealed that PVB showed relatively higher efficacy in the management of post-operative pain, early ambulation and had significant reduction in dose requirement of additional analgesia (diclofenac) and antiemetics (ondansetron) over tap block. KEYWORDS Paravertebral Block, Transversus Abdominis Block, Inguinal Hernia

Purpose of Review This review focuses on describing the procedural and anesthetic management of patients undergoing nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery. Recent Findings Most thoracic surgery is performed under general endotracheal anesthesia with either a double lumen endotracheal tube or a bronchial blocker. In an attempt to lessen the incidence and severity of postoperative complications, the nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic technique was developed, where the surgical procedure is performed under regional anesthesia with sedation. Currently, this technique is recommended for the elderly and in patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease who are at increased risk of complications after general anesthesia. It is the role of the anesthesia team to assist in the decisions whether the patient is a candidate and which block should be performed and to carefully monitor these patients in the operating room. Summary Nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery is an emerging technique with the goal of reducing postoperative complications. The anesthetic technique is highly variable and ranges from general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway with a truncal block to thoracic epidural anesthesia with minimal to no block. It is important to have excellent communication with the surgical team and the patient to ensure a safe, successful procedure.

PURPOSE Vertebral body tethering is increasingly being performed, yet postoperative pain management has not yet been optimized. We sought to determine whether the addition of a thoracic paravertebral block in addition to a standard multimodal postoperative pain management program could provide greater pain relief, reduced analgesic requirement, and reduced length of stay. METHODS Patients who underwent VBT at a single tertiary referral center were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received a single-shot intrathecal (IT) injection at the completion of the procedure in addition to a standardized multimodal pain management program. 45 patients received a thoracic paravertebral catheter with lidocaine infusion (TPVB) which was left in place for 4-6 days, whereas 24 control patients did not have a TPVB. Length of stay, maximum postoperative Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS), and total dose of opioids, ibuprofen, ketorolac and acetaminophen administered during hospitalization were evaluated. RESULTS 69 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean cumulative dose of opioids administered during hospitalization was 148 oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) in the control group vs. 47 MME in the TPVB group (p

BACKGROUND Intraoperative low-dose ketamine infusion has been reported to be an effective adjuvant to opioids for postoperative pain control without major side effects, but it has not been tested in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). The aim of this study was to examine the effect of low-dose intraoperative intravenous ketamine infusion on 24-hour morphine requirement and acute postoperative pain following VATS for lung resection. METHODS This study was a single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Thirty-two patients undergoing elective VATS for lung resection in a university hospital were included. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to receive either intraoperative low-dose ketamine (0.2 mg/kg/h) or normal saline infusion starting from intubation to the beginning of chest closure. All patients received multilevel thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and morphine was administered postoperatively via the patient-controlled analgesia pump using the same protocol. Time to first analgesia, postoperative cumulative morphine doses at 10, 30 minutes, and the consecutive 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours were recorded. Pain intensity during rest and deep breathing were also assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS) score at 1- and 24-hour postoperatively. RESULTS There was no significant difference in median (P25, P75) cumulative 24-hour morphine requirement between the ketamine and the control groups [15 (5.5, 29.5) vs. 22.5 (15.3, 40.8) mg, P=0.090]. Patients in ketamine group had significantly longer median pain free time than the control group (27 vs. 2 minutes, P=0.006). No difference in overall NRS score at rest or during deep breathing at 1- and 24-hour postoperatively was demonstrated (P=0.861). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative low dose ketamine infusion in addition to TPVB does not reduce postoperative morphine consumption or pain intensity but may prolong pain free time in patients undergoing VATS for lung resection.

Background Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) has emerged as an effective and feasible mode of providing analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Though a variety of local anaesthetic combinations are used for providing TPVB, literature is sparse on use of dexmedetomidine in TPVB. We aimed to compare levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine-dexmedetomidine combination in ultrasound guided TPVB in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology 70 ASA I/II patients, aged 18–60 years, scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia were enrolled and divided into two groups. Before anaesthesia induction, group A patients received unilateral right sided ultrasound guided TPVB with 15 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine plus 2 ml normal saline while group B patients received unilateral right sided ultrasound guided TPVB with 15 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine plus 2 ml solution containing dexmedetomidine 1 μg.kg-1. Patients were monitored for pain using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at rest, on movement, coughing and comfort scores post surgery. Total analgesic consumption in first 48 hour postoperative period, time to first request analgesic and pain scores were recorded. Results Total amount of rescue analgesia (injection tramadol plus injection tramadol intravenous equivalent dose) consumed during 48 hours postoperatively in group A was 146.55 mg while in group B was 111.30 mg (p = 0.026). Mean time for demanding rescue analgesia was 273 minutes in group A while in group B was 340 minutes (p = 0.00). Conclusion TPVB using dexmedetomidine 1 μg.kg-1 added to levobupivacaine 0.25% in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly reduced total analgesic consumption in first 48 hours and provided longer duration of analgesia postoperatively compared to levobupivacaine 0.25% alone.

Objective Regional anesthesia techniques are gaining traction in cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block catheters (ESPBC), serratus anterior plane block catheters (SAPBC), and paravertebral single-shot block (PVB) versus no block after robotic minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB). Design This was a retrospective observational study of routinely recorded data. Setting The study was performed at a single healthcare system. Participants All patients underwent robotic MIDCAB. Intervention Data were analyzed from 346 patients during a 53-month period. The clinical data warehouse was queried for all robotic MIDCAB surgeries. Variables abstracted included type of nerve block, age, sex, use of adjuncts, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted short length of stay (PSLOS), total opioid consumption during the 72 hours after surgery, and postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS). The primary outcome was total oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumed during the first 72 hours after surgery. The secondary outcome was hospital LOS. Measurements and Main Results In a model adjusting for PSLOS, the authors did not observe an association between ESPBC and the reduction of total administered oral MME within 72 hours after surgery. There was no significant difference in MME when comparing patients who received PVB to patients with ESPBC. Older age and female sex were associated with significantly lower MME. Patients who received ESPBC had a significantly shorter hospital LOS than patients with SAPBC. Conclusions These findings suggested that postoperative pain after MIDCAB surgery might not be completely covered by ESPBC. Prospective studies are needed to further elucidate the value of this technique for robotic MIDCAB.

Ultrasound has now become an eye of anaesthesiologist and has encouraged for its pervasive use. Its considerable use in the perioperative period for various invasive purposes has added an extra caution to prevent unforeseen complications over blind blocks. The ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block provides excellent perioperative analgesia following thoracic surgery. It can be given as a single shot or a continuous infusion technique placing a catheter. Here the local anesthetic agent is deposited in the paravertebral space from where the spinal nerve emerges which are devoid of coverings and are sensitive to local anesthetics. Even a single-shot block provides analgesia of 4-6 dermatomal levels. The use of local anesthetics using ultrasound not only adds safety measures to minimize procedural complications but also reduces the perioperative requirement of opioids. It also helps in the reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications and early extubation following thoracic surgery. We report a case series where single-shot ultrasound-guided unilateral paravertebral blocks were used as an analgesic technique for the repair of tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates. After delivering anesthesia and confirming the correct placement of the endotracheal tube the neonate was kept on the left lateral position to undergo right thoracotomy and repair of fistula. Scanning at T4 level with a linear probe was done to identify the transverse process, pleura, costotransverse ligament, intercostal muscle, and the paravertebral space where the local anesthetic agent was deposited under aseptic precautions. Tenting of pleura was the endpoint for the completion of the block. The extensive use of various regional anesthetic technique has significantly improved the postoperative outcome of the patients along with adequate perioperative pain management.

This prospectively designed, clinical quality improvement project compared pain scores and opioid consumption between ultrasound-guided, erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB) and thoracic paravertebral blocks (PVB) in patients undergoing total bilateral mastectomies without reconstruction. Twenty-five patients were included in an enhanced recovery pathway and received an ESPB on one side and a PVB on the contralateral side. Numeric rating scores at rest and with movement for each side were recorded in the recovery room at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours and on days 3 to 7. There were no significant differences in the resting or movement-evoked pain scores between sides receiving ESPB or PVB at any time point up to day 7 after surgery. Both ESPB and PVB confer equal analgesic effects in patients undergoing mastectomies. ESPB provides an alternative to PVB in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing mastectomy as part of an enhanced recovery pathway.

BACKGROUND Using nonopioid analgesics may decrease the risk of patients chronically using opioids postoperatively. The authors evaluated the relationship between paravertebral block and pain score at the time of hospital discharge. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 89 women with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I to III undergoing oncoplastic breast surgery with 20 to 50 percent breast tissue removal and immediate contralateral reconstruction between August of 2015 and August of 2018. The primary outcome was pain score at hospital discharge with or without paravertebral block. The secondary outcome was postoperative length of stay. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, t test, Fisher's exact test, univariable and multivariable regression, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and Cox regression. RESULTS Median pain score at hospital discharge was lower with paravertebral block [2 (interquartile range, 0 to 2) compared to 4 (interquartile range, 3 to 5); p < 0.001]. Multivariable regression revealed that pain score at the time of hospital discharge was inversely associated with paravertebral block after adjusting for age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, extent of lymph node surgery, and duration of surgery (p < 0.001). Pain score at hospital discharge was also associated with total opioid consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery (p = 0.001). Patients who received paravertebral blocks had median total 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption in morphine equivalents of 7 mg (interquartile range, 3 to 10 mg) compared with 13 mg (interquartile range, 7 to 18 mg) (p < 0.001), and median length of stay of 18 hours (interquartile range, 16 to 20 hours) compared with 22 hours (interquartile range, 21 to 27 hours) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Paravertebral blocks are associated with decreased pain score at the time of hospital discharge. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.

INTRODUCTION Paravertebral block (PVB) is generally used in breast cancer surgery in combination with general anesthesia. Only multi-injection PVB can decrease the volume of local anesthetic (LA) while maintaining the efficacy of the block. The use of small LA volumes in PVB prevents its undesirable distribution from the injection site. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of multi-injection paravertebral block for anesthesia in radical mastectomy in breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study analyzed 130 cases of anesthesia in radical mastectomy. The patients were randomized to two groups: Group 1 (n = 65) received general anesthesia (GA), and Group 2 (n = 65) received PVB (Th1 to Th6) with GA. In Group 2, 0.75% ropivacaine solution at 1.5 to 3.0 mL per level was used. Serum cortisol levels were measured. The post-operative acute pain perception was measured using a 100-point visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS Fentanyl consumption in Group 1 was 70% higher than in Group 2 (P < 0.05). No increase in intra-operative cortisol levels was seen; 2 hours after surgery, cortisol levels were 3.3 times and 2.7 times higher than the baseline in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P < 0.05). VAS scores in Group 2 were lower at 2, 6, 12, and 48 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Supplementation of GA with multilevel PVB decreased the intra-operative fentanyl consumption. In radical mastectomy, the intra-operative cortisol levels do not increase. The highest VAS pain scores are seen within the first 24 hours after mastectomy.

Introduction: The ultrasound (US)-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a new regional anesthetic technique that offers significant advantages over paravertebral block as it is easy and safe to perform. We aim to compare the efficacy of US-guided paravertebral block with ESP block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Methods: Eighty female patients of age group 18–70 years, belonging to physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II, undergoing MRM were included in the study. In Group P, patients received paravertebral block and in Group E, patients received ESP block before induction of general anesthesia. Both the groups received 0.5% 20 mL ropivacaine. The time to first rescue analgesia and total doses of rescue analgesics were recorded in the postoperative period. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores at 0 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h were noted, and patient satisfaction was evaluated at 24 h. Unpaired t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare quantitative variables while Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare qualitative variables. Results: The time for the first analgesic request was 232.5 min (140-1200) in ESP group as compared to paravertebral group in which the duration was 205 min (135-1190) (P value = 0.29). The total dose of rescue analgesics and NRS scores in postoperative period were comparable. However, the time to perform ESP block was significantly shorter than that of paravertebral block. Conclusion: ESP block can be used as a safe and easy to perform alternative analgesic technique over paravertebral block in breast cancer surgeries.

Background: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) produces ipsilateral somatic and sympathetic nerve blockade in multiple contiguous dermatomes both above and below the site of injection. The Aim of This Study: was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided TPVB versus intravenous (IV) sedative analgesic using midazolam / fentanyl in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) procedure. Patients and Methods: This prospective, randomized study was carried out on sixty patients aged 20-60 years, with radio-opaque renal stone not more than1.5cm. TPVB group (30 patients) received ipsilateral ultrasound-guided TPVB at the level T9-T10 using bupivacaine 0.25% (20 mL) about 30 minutes before the ESWL. Midazolam/fentanyl group (30 patients) received sedatives analgesic drugs using IV midazolam (0.05 mg / kg) and fentanyl (1 µg/kg) about 5 min before the ESWL. The VAS score during and 30 min post procedure, total dose of rescue analgesic consumption during ESWL procedure, the success rate of ESWL, the time needed to stone clearance, patient and operator satisfaction scores were recorded. Result: During and after ESWL procedure, the VAS scores were significantly higher in midazolam/fentanyl group than TPVB group (P < 0.05). The number of patients required rescue analgesic during ESWL was significantly higher in midazolam/fentanyl group compared to TPVB group (P < 0.05).The success rate of ESWL was insignificantly different between both groups (P > 0.05). The time needed to stone clearance was significantly shorter in TPVB group compared to midazolam/fentanyl group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided TPVB provided more effective analgesia with reduced number of ESWL sessions and shorter time to renal stone clearance than IV midazolam/fentanyl.

Background: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) entails injecting a local anesthetic inside the thoracic paravertebral space (TPVS). Loss of resistance to air injection (air-LOR) was the first technique described in humans to locate the TPVS. To date, no study has investigated the spread of any substance after injection into the TPVS using the air-LOR technique nor has described the cranial and caudal limits of the space. Aim: To identify the boundaries of the TPVS, to determine whether the air-LOR technique is reliable for the identification of the TPVS and to examine the relationship between the volume of injectate and its spread. Methods: After a preliminary phase, the thorax of five cat and five dog cadavers was accessed and eviscerated. After TPVS probing, the polyurethane foam was injected, and the cranial and caudal borders were recorded after its maximum spread. Different volumes of a mixture of new methylene blue and ioversol were injected in the TPVS after its localization with a Tuohy needle and air-LOR technique in fourteen dog and six cat cadavers. Lateral radiographs of the vertebral column were used to document needle positioning, spread pattern and extension. The thorax of these subjects was then accessed and eviscerated to observe and record the spread of the mixture. Results: Injecting a dye into the TPVS, localized by an air-LOR technique, resulted in multi-segmental and often bilateral subpleural staining of paravertebral, intercostal, and dorsal mediastinal structures in dog and cat cadavers. The lateral radiographs most often showed a mixed cloud-like and linear spread pattern, which could be a predictor of the longitudinal spread of the dye. The foam injected into the TPVS at the cranial and the caudal level revealed anatomical communication with the cervical, axillar, and lumbar paravertebral regions. Conclusion: TPVS localization by air-LOR technique and injection results in a longitudinal multi-segmental spread in dog and cat cadavers. The communication of the TPVS with the axillary and lumbar regions could be of clinical interest for the brachial plexus and the lumbar intercostal nerve blocks in a clinical setting.

Background: Erector spinae plane block could be a potential alternative to paravertebral block or other analgesic techniques for breast surgery, but the current evidence on erector spinae plane block in breast surgery is conflicting. Objective: To compare the analgesic effectiveness between erector spinae plane block, systemic analgesic, and paravertebral block for breast surgery. Study Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: The literature search was performed from 2016 to August 2020 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Methods: Clinical trials comparing erector spinae plane block to systemic analgesic and paravertebral block were included from the aforementioned databases. Primary outcomes were 24-hour postoperative opioid administration and postoperative pain score. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction levels, post-anesthesia care unit and hospital stay, block-related side effects, and opioid-related side effects. Systematic search, critical appraisal, and pooled analysis were performed according to the PRISMA statement. Results: We analyzed 495 cases in 8 randomized controlled trials. Compared with a systemic analgesic, the use of erector spinae plane block resulted in a reduced 24-hour postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent dose by a mean difference of 7.59 mg (P < 0.00001). Compared with paravertebral block, no statistical difference was found in opioid administration. No differences were observed in pain score, opioid-related side effects, or analgesic technique-related complications. Between the trials, heterogeneity existed and could not be evaluated using metaregression owing to inadequate reported data. Limitations: Moderate heterogeneity among the included trials could not be assessed by potential covariates owing to the limited reported data in each trial. Conclusion: Erector spinae plane block is superior to systemic analgesic within 24 hours after breast surgery and can serve as an alternative to paravertebral block with similar analgesic effects. Key words: Erector spinae plane block, paravertebral block, breast surgery, perioperative analgesia, randomized controlled trial, meta-analysis

Xiao-Long Liang, Ran An, Qi Chen, Hong-Liang Liu Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Hong-Liang LiuChongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, No. 181, Hanyu Road, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 13883686721Email liuhl75@163.comBackground: To date, there is no definitive evidence for the analgesic effects and side effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) versus thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) after thoracoscopic surgery. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to analyze the analgesic effects of TEA versus TPVB after thoracoscopic surgery.Methods: We systematically searched RCTs published by October 26, 2020, in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library and conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the analgesic effects of TEA versus TPVB after thoracoscopic surgery. The primary measure was postoperative pain score, and the secondary measures were postoperative 24-hour usage of opioids, hypotension, postoperative nausea, and vomiting.Results: A total of 458 patients from five RCTs were included in this study. After thoracoscopic surgery, the numerical rating scale (NRS) score for resting pain was higher in the TPVB group than in the TEA group at 1– 2 hours and 4– 6 hours after surgery (MD = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.64, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%; MD = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.70, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). The postoperative 24-hour usage of morphine was higher in the TPVB group than in the TEA group (SMD = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.31; P = 0.04; I2 = 84%). The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the TEA group (OR = 4.52; 95% CI = 2.03 to 10.10; P = 0.0002; I2 = 0%). No significant between-group difference was observed in postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).Conclusion: Compared with TPVB, TEA provides statistically significant but clinically unimportant short-term benefits following thoracoscopic surgery.Keywords: thoracic paravertebral block, thoracic epidural anesthesia, thoracoscopic surgery, meta-analysis

Background and Aims: Conventionally, surgery for breast carcinoma is done under general anaesthesia (GA). Recently thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is gaining popularity because it produces unilateral block and minimal haemodynamic changes. It also facilitates post-op analgesia, early ambulation, and reduces hospital stay. Aim was to observe effectiveness of single needle TPVB with bupivacaine as the sole anaesthetic technique for Modied radical mastectomy (MRM). Methods: 60 consenting female patients of ASA I & II, aged 18-60 years scheduled for modied radical mastectomy were randomly assigned into two groups: Gr. P (n=30), Gr. G(n=30). For Gr. P: TPVB was given at T4 vertebral level with 18G Tuohy needle and an epidural catheter inserted 2- 3cm inside the paravertebral space. Bupivacaine 0.5% isobaric 15-20ml (not exceeding 2 mg/kg b.w.) injected through the epidural catheter. Dexmedetomidine infusion given for sedation. Gr. G: GA was given with Midazolam, Fentanyl, Propofol and Atracurium. Measured parameters were baseline and intraoperative haemodynamics , induction time, recovery time, fentanyl requirement, average blood loss, post-op pain score by VAS at 0,1/2,1,2,4,8,12,24hrs, duration of analgesia, patient and surgeon satisfaction scores(PSS,SSS),and incidence of post-op nausea vomiting(PONV). RESULTS: Group P patients had prolonged induction ( ) and recovery was faster ( ) in comparison to 12.25±3.66 1.61±0.69 group G. Intraoperatively Group P patients required less Fentanyl & also had less blood loss. Post op VAS score, incidence of PONV were more in group G. Conclusion: TPVB may be used as an alternate anaesthetic technique for MRM as it provides adequate analgesia both in intra and post op period with minimal adverse effects.

Background: Whether continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and continuous paravertebral block (PVB) have similar analgesic effects in patients undergoing video- assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy was compared in this study. Methods: In all, 86 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were enrolled in the prospective, randomized clinical trial. Group E received TEA. Group P received PVB. The primary endpoint was postoperative 24-hour visual rating scale (VAS) on coughing. Side effects and postoperative complications were also analyzed. Results: Pain scores at rest or on coughing at 24 and 48 h postoperatively were significantly lower in group E than in group P (P 0.05). The length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays were not significantly different. Conclusions: Though TEA has more adverse events than PVB, it may be superior to PVB in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy.

Introduction:Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer morbidity and mortality in women across the world. One concerning problem that affects breast cancer patients after surgery is pain. Regional anesthesia may reduce cancer propagation by attenuation of the surgical stress response, reduced opioid usage and by the direct protective action of local anaesthetics on cancer cells migration. Therefore regional anesthesia should be considered for all breast cancer surgeries. Aim:The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an adjunct to 0.5% Ropivacaine in thoracic paravertebral block, along with general anesthesia, in modified radical mastectomy surgeries. Methods: A total of forty patients were included in the study. All patients received the paravertebral block at 3 levels from T2-T4 with 15 ml of drug solution. Perioperative vitals and any complications wererecorded. Postoperative pain was assessed using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Results: Statistics did not reveal any significant difference in the degree of intraoperative analgesia, postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting among the two study groups. Conclusion:Among the two drugs, dexmedetomidine offers better hemodynamic stability and hence can be used in place of fentanyl for opioid free anaesthesia management.

Formerly management of malignant tumors of lower limb was mainly through amputation. After advancement in neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, saving the limb through lower limb-sparing surgery became t...

Mastectomy is mostly performed as definitive management for resectable breast cancer. Implementing paravertebral nerve block for patients with metastasis features of cancer to lungs and other organs, patients with co-morbidity, geriatrics, and malnourished individuals will eliminate the risks and complications of general anesthesia. Though thoracic paravertebral block is an established technique as postoperative pain management for breast surgery, there is no conclusive evidence on its use as a sole anesthetic for modified radical mastectomy. In this case report, we present a 33-year-old woman who underwent a successful modified radical mastectomy for stage IIIb breast cancer associated with clinical and radiological features of metastasis to the lung under a multiple injection landmark technique paravertebral nerve block. We believe that the anatomic landmark technique paravertebral nerve block can be used as an alternative anesthetic technique for modified radical mastectomy in a resource-limited setting for patients who are expected to have a high risk of perioperative complications under general anesthesia.

Background We observed the feasibility and effectiveness of multi-injection thoracic paravertebral block (TPB) via the intrathoracic approach under thoracoscopic direct vision for analgesia after thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE). Methods Sixty patients undergoing TLE were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group. All patients underwent TPB via the intrathoracic approach at the three levels of T2, 5, and 8 with a scalp needle before closing the chest. The patients in the observation group received 10 ml 0.375% ropivacaine at each level, and the patients in the control group received 10 ml of 0.9% saline at each level. A patient-controlled intravenous analgesic (PCIA) pump with sufentanil was attached to all patients after surgery. The sufentanil consumption, number of PCIA presses and use of rescue analgesia in the first 24 h after surgery were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (rest and coughing) were recorded at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. The duration of postoperative hospital stay, active cough rate, first ambulation, and the incidence of adverse reactions after surgery was recorded. Results The sufentanil consumption in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (34.7 ± 1.9 µg vs. 52.1 ± 2.1 µg; P P Conclusions Multi-injection TPB via the intrathoracic approach under thoracoscopic direct vision is easy to perform and can effectively alleviate postoperative pain after TLE with fewer adverse reactions and contributing to improved postoperative recovery.

Introduction: Fast tracking plays a crucial role in reducing perioperative morbidity and financial burden by facilitating early extubation and discharge from hospital. Paravertebral block (PVB) is becoming more popular in paediatric surgeries as an alternative to epidural and caudal analgesia. There is scarcity of data regarding the efficacy and safety of PVB in paediatric cardiac surgery. Methods: We performed a review of records of paediatric cardiac patients who underwent cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia with single shot PVB and compared the analgesia and postoperative outcomes with matched historical controls who underwent cardiac surgery with same anaesthesia protocol without PVB. Results: The data from 200 children were analysed. 100 children who received paravertebral block were compared with a matched historical controls. The median time to extubation was shorter in the PVB group (0 hr, IQR 0-3 hrs) compared to the control group (16 hrs, IQR 4-20 hrs) (P value 0.017*). Intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl requirement was much lower in the PVB group (3.49 (0.91)) compared to the control group (9.86 (1.37)) P value

Perioperative pain control is of increasing importance as awareness regarding the risks of under-controlled pain and opioid abuse rise. Enhanced recovery protocols and multimodal analgesia, including regional blocks, are useful tools for the plastic surgeon. The thoracic paravertebral block, pectoralis nerve I and pectoralis nerve II blocks, and proximal intercostal blocks are 3 described methods that provide regional anesthesia for breast surgery. The widespread use of these methods may be limited by the requirements for ultrasound equipment and anesthesiologists skilled in regional blocks. This article describes a novel technique of the intercostal field block under direct visualization that is safe and efficient.

Purpose Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is an interfascial blockade used in different clinical scenarios. This study investigated the ventral extent of dye diffusion in ESP block. Methods The ultrasound-guided ESP block was bilaterally performed with an injection at the T5 vertebral level (21-Gauge, 50 mm needle), using diluted black tissue marking dye (20 mL; 1:4 ratio with standard saline solution) instead of local anesthetic on two fresh-frozen corpses within the body donation program of the University of Padova. Subsequently, the gross anatomical dissection was performed by a combined posterior plus anterior approach, and the histotopographic examination completed. Results Macroscopically by gross anatomical dissection, the dye spreading ranged on the dorsal side of the chest from T2/3 to T10/11 with an extension up to 10 cm laterally, and on the ventral side of the chest from T2/3–T9/10. Microscopically by histotopographic examination, the dye diffused ventrally to the intercostal spaces (2–3 and 5–6 spaces on the right and left, respectively) by following the blood vessels coupled to the dorsal nerve passing through the costotransverse foramen. Conclusions The anterior pathway of dye diffusion from the site of injection within the erector spinae muscle group during an ESP block seems to follow the blood vessels and dorsal rami of spinal nerves, suggesting the passing through the costotransverse foramen to reach the anterior paravertebral space and the intercostal nerves. These findings display an anterior histotopographic diffusion of dye resembling a paravertebral block.

This study compares the safety and efficacy of multiple level thoracic paravertebral block and modified Pecs block for postoperative pain relief after Modified Radical Mastectomies. After Institutional Review Board [IRB] and Human Ethics Committee [HEC approval, the study was conducted on 41 patients who were scheduled to undergo modified radical mastectomy. Written informed consent was taken. Female patients in the age group of 18-75 years who were ASA grade I and II were randomly allocated to two groups to either receive Ultrasound guided Thoracic paravertebral block TPVB at T2 and T4 levels (Group 2) or an ultrasound guided modified PECS block (Group 1) preoperatively in the block room. Paravertebral block was given at two vertebral levels T2 (10 ml) and T4 level (10 ml) under ultrasound guidance utilising the parasagital in-plane technique. Modified PEC block was administered to patients in the PEC group.10 ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine for Pec1 and 20ml for Pec 2. In all patients surgery was done under GA. Pain was assessed with Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a 0 to 10 scale, for 24 hours after surgery, at 0,0.5,1,1.5,2,4,6,12 and 24 hours after surgery by a blinded observer. Rescue opioid and Paracetamol requirement was recorded. The patients were also monitored for any specific block related complications. Primary outcome measures were the numerical rating scores for pain and rescue analgesic requirement. Secondary outcome measures was looking for any block related complications. Demographic categorical variables were expressed in frequency and percentage, and the continuous variables were reported in terms of mean and standard deviation. The comparison of pain scores between the thoracic paravertebral nerve block and modified pectoral nerve block was done using Mann-Whitney U test. Mean duration of analgesia and mean 24 hour Morphine, Paracetamol consumption was compared using Student's t test. There was no statistically significant difference between th

Off-pump coronary artery bypass has emerged as a popular method of coronary revascularization to mitigate the harmful effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. It requires surgical and anaesthetic expertise for good results. Newer minimally invasive approaches to off pump coronary bypass provide attractive alternatives to conventional off pump surgery, especially in achieving better cosmetic results and early extubation. They require good perioperative pain management, with epidural and paravertebral block being good choices. Emergency conversion of off-pump bypass to on-pump bypass is associated with poor outcomes, so preventive measures to avoid it should be employed. Keywords: Off-pump coronary artery bypass, Anaesthetic implications.

Purpose Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (US-TPVB) is considered a treatment option for the management of acute pain in various pain-related conditions. We conducted a prospective pilot study to evaluate the possibility of US-TPVB as a sympathetic blockade in patients with neuropathic pain disorders in the upper extremities. Patients and Methods A total of 12 patients underwent US-TPVB between the T2 and T3 paravertebral space with 10 mL of 1% mepivacaine. The temperature change (°C) before and after the procedure was compared between the ipsilateral and contralateral hands. We counted the proportion of patients showing a temperature increase ≥1.5°C and compared a change in the pain intensity before and after the procedure. Results The median increase in the temperature change between the ipsilateral and contralateral hands was 1.54°C (interquartile range, 1.28–2.20). There were seven patients (58.3%) who showed a temperature difference ≥1.5°C between both hands after the US-TPVB. Eleven patients (91.7%) reported a reduction in pain according to the score on the 11-point numerical rating scale. No serious complications relevant to the procedure were reported. Conclusion US-TPVB could be a useful technique for sympathetic blockade in patients with upper extremity pain.

Background Persistent or recurring radicular pain after lumbar surgery is a clinical condition of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) that seriously affects the life quality of patients. Conventional medication and physiotherapy do not fully relieve this pain. A simpler, safer, and less invasive option is lumbar selective nerve root block or paravertebral block. Here, we share our experience regarding lumbar paravertebral block for a patient with FBSS, which successfully alleviated radicular pain after lumbar surgery. Case presentation An 80-year-old man with left lower limb radicular pain diagnosed as L4-5, L5-S1 intervertebral disc protrusion, spinal canal stenosis, and degenerative scoliosis underwent lumbar surgery. Four months after surgery, he experienced left lower limb radicular pain. After designing the puncture route based on X-ray film, we performed a combined ultrasound-guided L4 and L5 paravertebral block. With his improved pain control, his functional status and ability to perform daily activities also markedly improved. Conclusion Real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar paravertebral block performed with a pre-designed route on X-ray film can provide a simple and safe way to relieve radicular pain in FBSS.

Background Paravertebral block can be performed with the aid of surgical landmarks, ultrasound, or a thoracoscope. This study was designed to compare ultrasound-guided paravertebral block with the thoracoscopic technique. Methods This prospective randomized comparative study included 40 adults scheduled for elective thoracic surgery. Study participants were randomized to an ultrasound group or a thoracoscope group. A catheter for paravertebral block was inserted prior to thoracotomy with real-time ultrasound visualization in the ultrasound group, and under thoracoscopic guidance in the thoracoscope group. Total analgesic consumption, visual analogue pain score, technical difficulties, and complications were compared between the 2 groups. Results Total analgesic consumption in the first 24 hours was less in the ultrasound group than in the thoracoscope group (rescue intravenous fentanyl 121.25 ± 64.01 µg in the ultrasound group vs. 178.75 ± 91.36 µg in the thoracoscope group; p = 0.027). Total paravertebral bupivacaine consumption was 376.00 ± 33.779 mg in the ultrasound group and 471.50 ± 64.341 mg in the thoracoscope group ( p Conclusion Ultrasound-guided paravertebral catheter insertion is more effective, technically easier, and safer than the thoracoscope-assisted technique.

Background Many analgesic methods have been used to control post-mastectomy pain. Both thoracic paravertebral and serratus anterior blocks are recent regional techniques with promising results. The aim of this study was to compare safety and analgesic efficacy of both techniques in controlling post-mastectomy pain. Methods The study was conducted from January 1, 2019, till January 10, 2019, on 60 female patients ASA class ≤ 2 undergoing modified radical mastectomy. After induction of balanced general anesthesia patients received either continuous thoracic paravertebral block (group P) or continuous serratus anterior block (group S). Twenty milliliters of levobupivacaine 0.25% were injected in each technique under ultrasound guidance followed by continuous infusion of 5 ml/h levobupivacaine 0.125% through a 22-gage catheter. IV morphine was given postoperatively by patient-controlled analgesia. In both groups, we measured time to first dose morphine, total 24 and 48 h morphine consumption, vital signs, visual analog scale, and side effects of each technique. Results The demographic data (age, body mass index, and duration of surgery) were comparable in both groups. The time for first dose of morphine was significantly longer in group P (368 ± 36 min) than group S (270 ± 37.65 min) with P value Conclusion Both continuous paravertebral and serratus anterior plane blocks are safe good alternatives to control post-mastectomy pain. However continuous paravertebral block provides better analgesic profile.

Background: The thoracic paravertebral block is an effective analgesic technique for postoperative pain management after breast surgery. The ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block (RLB) is a safer alternative to conventional paravertebral block. Thus, we assessed the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided RLB for postoperative pain management after breast surgery. Methods: Patients requiring breast surgery were randomly allocated to group C (retrolaminar injection with saline) and group R (RLB with local anesthetic mixture). The RLB was performed at the level of T3 with local anesthetic mixture (0.75% ropivacaine 20 mL + 2% lidocaine 10 mL) under general anesthesia before the skin incision. The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) at 24 hour postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 1, 6, 24, and 48 hour postoperatively and the occurrence of adverse events and patient satisfaction after the surgery. Results: Forty-six patients were included, 24 in group C and 22 in group R. The cumulative morphine consumption using IV-PCA did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.631). The intraoperative use of remifentanil was higher in group C than in group R (P = 0.025). The resting and coughing VAS scores at 1 hour postoperatively were higher in group R than in group C (P = 0.011, P = 0.004). The incidence of adverse events and patient satisfaction was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: A single injection of ultrasound-guided RLB did not reduce postoperative analgesic requirements following breast surgery.

Background Mechanical pleurodesis can prevent recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax but is associated with significant postoperative pain. Adequate pain control is not only beneficial for patient comfort but also critical for mobilization and pulmonary recovery. Thoracic epidural catheters and paravertebral blocks have been used to alleviate pain after thoracoscopic surgery. However, no studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of paravertebral block vs epidural analgesia vs no block in children undergoing pleurodesis. Methods In this retrospective case series review, data were extracted from a single institution's integrated patient outcome database on children who underwent thoracoscopic pleurodesis from 2013 to 2018. Demographics, operative indication, procedure performed, and perioperative pain management were assessed by chart review. Patients whose operation was converted to thoracotomy, who had an underlying diagnosis of chronic pain, or who underwent pleurodesis for other indications were excluded. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included psot anesthesia care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, functional outcomes during recovery, and any adverse events. Results 66 patients met inclusion criteria: 23 received thoracic epidurals, 34 received paravertebral blocks, and 9 received no epidural/paravertebral block. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ among groups. Although mean pain scores were statistically significantly lower in the epidural group on post-op day 1, all three groups' pain scores were in the 1 to 3 out of 10 range during the entire postoperative period. Thus, this statistical significance had little clinical significance as all groups had good pain control. The epidural group had significantly lower opioid consumption on post-op days 0 - 2 compared to paravertebral block. No adverse events related to epidural or paravertebral block were noted. Discussion We present the an analysis of epidural vs paravertebral block (with comparison to no regional analgesia) following pleurodesis in children. Pain is well managed, regardless of the method; however, additional systemic opioid consumption was decreased in the epidural analgesia cohort. Prospective trials and comparisons with other analgesic techniques for pediatric thoracic surgeries are needed. Conclusions Thoracic epidural analgesia offers a reduction in opioid use in the first two post-op days after pleurodesis but did not produce a clinically significant reduction in pain scores in comparison with paravertebral block or no block.

Purpose Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is an established analgesic technique for breast surgery although it is technically challenging. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) requires less technical expertise and may be an alternative to TPVB. However, whether ESPB has similar analgesic effects to TPVB for breast surgery is still inconclusive. Moreover, information on sensory blockade of ESPB is scarce. Accordingly, we conducted this retrospective propensity-matched study to see if ESPB could provide comparable analgesic effects to TPVB in patients undergoing breast surgery. We also compared cutaneous sensory block levels after the two techniques. Patients and methods In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data saved in our database and compared the two techniques using a propensity matching method. The data of patients who underwent unilateral breast surgery under general anesthesia with the addition of either TPVB or ESPB were identified. We considered that the analgesic efficacy of ESPB was noninferior to TPVB if both postoperative fentanyl consumption and area under the curve (AUC) for pain scores within 24 h were within 50 µg and 240 mm･h margins, respectively. Cutaneous sensory block levels, additional analgesic requirements, and complications were also compared between the two groups. Results Among 93 patients, 30 patients for each group were matched. Both postoperative fentanyl consumption and AUC for pain scores after ESPB were noninferior to those after TPVB. ESPB did not produce sensory blockade consistently, and the number of dermatomes was smaller after ESPB [1 (0-3)] [median (interquartile range)] than after TPVB [4 (2-5)] (P=0.002). No serious complications related to blocks were observed. Conclusion ESPB and TPVB provided comparable postoperative analgesia for 24 h in patients undergoing breast surgery. Dermatomal sensory blockade was, however, less apparent and narrower after ESPB than after TPVB.