Search

Purpose: To evaluate daily physical-rest activities in cancer patients losing weight in relation to disease progression., Experimental Design: Physical activity-rest rhythms were measured (ActiGraph, armband sensor from BodyMedia) in relation to body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), energy metabolism, exercise capacity (walking test), and self-scored quality of life (SF-36, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) in weight-losing outpatients with systemic cancer (71 +/- 2 years, n = 53). Well-nourished, age-matched, and previously hospitalized non-cancer patients served as controls (74 +/- 4 years, n = 8). Middle-aged healthy individuals were used as reference subjects (49 +/- 5 years, n = 23)., Results: Quality of life was globally reduced in patients with cancer (P < 0.01), accompanied by significantly reduced spontaneous physical activity during both weekdays and weekends compared with reference subjects (P < 0.01). Spontaneous physical activity declined over time during follow-up in patients with cancer (P < 0.05). However, overall physical activity and the extent of sleep and bed-rest activities did not differ between patients with cancer and age-matched non-cancer patients. Spontaneous physical activity correlated weakly with maximum exercise capacity in univariate analysis (r = 0.41, P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that spontaneous physical activity was related to weight loss, blood hemoglobin concentration, C-reactive protein, and to subjectively scored items of physical functioning and bodily pain (SF-36; P < 0.05-0.004). Anxiety and depression were not related to spontaneous physical activity. Patient survival was predicted only by weight loss and serum albumin levels (P < 0.01), although there was no such prediction for spontaneous physical activity., Conclusions: Daily physical-rest activities represent variables which probably reflect complex mental physiologic and metabolic interactions. Thus, activity-rest monitoring provides a new dimension in the evaluation of medical and drug interventions during palliative treatment of patients with cancer.

Purpose: The present study was designed to evaluate whether daily insulin treatment for weight-losing cancer patients attenuates the progression of cancer cachexia and improves metabolism and physical functioning in palliative care., Experimental Design: One hundred and thirty-eight unselected patients with mainly advanced gastrointestinal malignancy were randomized to receive insulin (0.11 +/- 0.05 units/kg/d) plus best available palliative support [anti-inflammatory treatment (indomethacin), prevention of anemia (recombinant erythropoietin), and specialized nutritional care (oral supplements + home parenteral nutrition)] according to individual needs. Control patients received the best available palliative support according to the same principles. Health-related quality of life, food intake, resting energy expenditure, body composition, exercise capacity, metabolic efficiency during exercise, and spontaneous daily physical activity as well as blood tests were evaluated during follow-up (30-824 days) according to intention to treat., Results: Patient characteristics at randomizations were almost identical in study and control groups. Insulin treatment for 193 +/- 139 days (mean +/- SD) significantly stimulated carbohydrate intake, decreased serum-free fatty acids, increased whole body fat, particularly in trunk and leg compartments, whereas fat-free lean tissue mass was unaffected. Insulin treatment improved metabolic efficiency during exercise, but did not increase maximum exercise capacity and spontaneous physical activity. Tumor markers in blood (CEA, CA-125, CA 19-9) did not indicate the stimulation of tumor growth by insulin; a conclusion also supported by improved survival of insulin-treated patients (P<0.03)., Conclusion: Insulin is a significant metabolic treatment in multimodal palliation of weight-losing cancer patients.

This study was aimed at comparing the blocking of beta-adrenoceptor activity to changes in the resting energy metabolism of 10 cancer patients with progressive weight loss due to solid malignant tumours. Resting energy expenditure (REE) as well as whole body carbohydrate and fat oxidation were investigated and related to plasma substrate levels (glucose, glycerol, free fatty acids (FFA)) before and after 5 days of oral administration of specific beta1 receptor blocker (atenolol, 50 mg/day) and non-specific beta1,beta2-adrenoceptor (propranolol, 80 mg/day) blockade. The administration order of the drugs was random, and a 3-day washout period was used in all individuals between the provision of the first and the second drug in order to minimise the risk of carry-over effects. Resting measurements in the morning after an overnight fast were performed by indirect calorimetry. Atenolol treatment reduced REE by 77+/-14 kcal/day and propranolol by 48+/-13 kcal/day, respectively (P<0.05 versus pretreatment values). Whole body oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production were decreased similarly by both atenolol and propranolol treatment (P<0.05). Carbohydrate oxidation was increased by atenolol and decreased by propranolol, whilst fat oxidation was decreased by atenolol and unchanged by propranolol. The decrease in REE, accounting for the decline in heart rate, was significantly more pronounced following treatment with propranolol compared with atenolol (P<0.05). Atenolol and propranolol had no effect on blood glucose, plasma glycerol and FFA. We conclude that wastage in cancer patients is in part explained by increased beta(1) and beta(2)-adrenoceptor activity, in part secondary to elevated cardiovascular activity as a result of anaemia, loss of cardiac contractile capacity and altered host metabolism.

This study was aimed at evaluating whether anemia could be prevented in unselected weight-losing cancer patients on anti-inflammatory treatment by early and prophylactic treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) and whether such a benefit could be translated into improved physical function and metabolic efficiency. One hundred eight cancer patients who experienced progressive cachexia due to solid, mainly gastrointestinal tumors were randomized to receive twice daily a cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor (controls; indomethacin, 50 mg twice a day) or indomethacin and erythropoietin, provided on individual basis to prevent development of progressive anemia (study patients; indomethacin, 50 mg twice a day plus rhEPO; range, 12,000-30,000 units per week). All patients were treated and followed up until death or to preterminal stage. Biochemical tests (blood, liver, kidney, and thyroid), nutritional state assessment (food intake and body composition), and exercise testing with simultaneous measurements of respiratory gas exchanges before and during exercise were performed before institution of treatments and then at regular intervals during the treatment period (2-30 months after start). Study and control patients did not differ in survival. rhEPO prevented development of anemia during the entire observation period. This was associated with a significantly more preserved maximum exercise capacity in study patients compared to control patients during the follow-up period (101 +/- 10 versus 66 +/- 6 W; P < 0.0001), based on more effective ventilation and whole-body respiratory gas exchanges. These improvements were also evident when exercise performance was normalized to lean body mass, an indirect measure of the skeletal muscle mass. The metabolic efficiency, expressed as oxygen uptake per watt produced, was also significantly preserved in rhEPO-treated patients compared to controls (14.1 +/- 1.1 versus 16.3 +/- 0.9 ml O2/W, P < 0.05). Our results demonstrate that institution of early and prophylactic rhEPO treatment to patients with progressive cancer prevents development of tumor-induced anemia. This achievement was associated with a better preserved exercise capacity, which is explained in part by improved whole-body metabolic and energy efficiency during work load.

Cancer patients (n = 106) and non-cancer subjects (n = 96) were classified as weight stable (n = 70) or weight-losing (n = 132). Cancer patients had elevated resting energy expenditure (REE) compared with either weight-losing (23.6 [0.4] vs. 20.5 [0.5] kcal/kg per day, P less than 0.001) or weight-stable controls (22.0 [0.6] vs. 17.9 [0.4], P less than 0.001). Cancer patients had increased fat oxidation irrespective of weight loss (1.24 [0.07] vs. 0.87 [0.04] mg/kg per min; 1.07 [0.04] vs. 0.78 [0.04], P less than 0.001). Elevated energy expenditure was counter-regulated by a decrease in thyroid hormones. Abnormal liver function had no impact on REE in either group. Heart rate was the most powerful factor for prediction of high energy expenditure in both patients and controls. Elevated energy expenditure was related to the increased heart rate in cancer patients in a significantly higher proportion than that in controls. Increased metabolic rate is a significant component behind weight loss in cancer disease, independent of malnutrition and an elevated adrenergic state may be a likely explanation.