Search

Background: Proactive management of plaque psoriasis with twice-weekly topical calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD) foam has a demonstrated clinical benefit in preventing disease relapse compared to reactive management, where Cal/BD foam is only given as rescue therapy once-daily for four weeks after relapse. The impact of proactive management with Cal/BD foam on a wider range of clinical responses is not yet known, nor is its potential cost-effectiveness in the healthcare system of Finland., Methods: This study involved a post-hoc analysis exploring the clinical and patient-reported benefits of proactive versus reactive management with Cal/BD foam observed in the PSO-LONG trial (NCT02899962). A range of response criteria based on modified psoriasis area and severity index (mPASI) and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) were analyzed, and the cost-effectiveness of proactive versus reactive management was estimated in a Finnish healthcare setting., Results and Conclusion: The analysis found a consistent clinical benefit of proactive management compared to reactive management on all response criteria, and a markedly lower cost-per-responder for the response criteria of mPASI 75, mPASI ≤ 2 and DLQ1 ≤ 1. The analysis was robust to sensitivity analyses on key inputs and demonstrates the cost and clinical benefits of proactive over reactive management of plaque psoriasis with Cal/BD foam in the Finnish healthcare setting.

Reduction of psoriasis body surface area (BSA) is associated with improved patient quality of life. Post-hoc analyses of the PSO-LONG study compared impact on BSA of proactive management versus reactive management strategies using calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD) foam. Mean BSA values, as well as normalized area under the curves (AUCs) for patient BSA were assessed. Analyses found that after the PSO-LONG study’s four-week open-label lead-in phase, when all patients received once-daily Cal/BD foam, mean BSA was significantly reduced. Thereafter, mean BSA remained at lower levels in patients on proactive management compared to reactive management. This was reflected in AUC BSA, which was consistently lower in the proactive management arm. Treatment-related differences were statistically significant when analyzing the full analysis set (FAS) population, as well as when restricting the analysis to study completers. Additional analyses restricted the dataset to include only observations from psoriasis remission periods, or periods of disease relapse. Treatment-related differences in AUC were statistically significant in observations during remission, but not during relapse. This could be expected given the trial’s design, wherein all patients who relapsed were offered the same rescue therapy with once daily Cal/BD foam. Similarly, for patients who dropped out, there was no treatment-related difference in mean BSA during the two weeks preceding dropout, likely due to the common occurrence of relapse in these patients. This paper found that proactive management, in addition to preventing more relapses as previously shown, also maintained BSA at a lower level during remission than reactive management. J Drugs Dermatol. 20(5):567-570. doi:10.36849/JDD.5870.