Search

Background: Cardio‐oncology and emergency medicine are closely collaborative, as many cardiac events in cancer patients require evaluation and treatment in the emergency department (ED). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a common treatment for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). However, the immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) from ICIs can be clinically significant. Methods: We reviewed and analyzed cardiovascular diagnoses among HNC patients who received ICI during the period April 1, 2016–December 31, 2020 in a large tertiary cancer center. Demographics, clinical and cancer‐related data were abstracted, and billing databases were queried for cardiovascular disease (CVD)‐related diagnosis using International Classification of Disease‐version10 (ICD‐10) codes. We recorded receipt of care at the ED as one of the outcome variables. Results: A total of 610 HNC patients with a median follow‐up time of 12.3 months (median, interquartile range = 5–30 months) comprised our study cohort. Overall, 25.7% of patients had pre‐existing CVD prior to ICI treatment. Of the remaining 453 patients without pre‐existing CVD, 31.5% (n = 143) had at least one CVD‐related diagnosis after ICI initiation. Tachyarrhythmias (91 new events) was the most frequent CVD‐related diagnosis after ICI. The time to diagnosis of myocarditis from initiation of ICI occurred the earliest (median 2.5 months, 1.5–6.8 months), followed by myocardial infarction (3.7, 0.5–9), cardiomyopathy (4.5, 1.6–7.3), and tachyarrhythmias (4.9, 1.2–11.4). Patients with myocarditis and tachyarrhythmias mainly presented to the ED for care. Conclusion: The use of ICI in HNC is still expanding and the spectrum of delayed manifestation of ICI‐induced cardiovascular toxicities is yet to be fully defined in HNC survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This review explores hemoptysis in cancer patients. It delves into risk factors, epidemiology and clinical consequences. The need for a mortality prediction score for cancer patients with hemoptysis-related variables is needed, and this tool could aid in risk assessment, optimize the control of bleeding with critical care, implement tracheobronchial or vascular interventions, and guide treatment planning. Managing hemoptysis in cancer patients requires addressing the underlying cause and providing supportive care for improved quality of life. Hemoptysis in cancer patients can occur for various reasons, including infections, tumors, blood vessel abnormalities and inflammatory conditions. The degree of hemoptysis is commonly classified according to the quantity of blood expelled. However, volume-based definitions may not accurately reflect the clinical impact of bleeding. This review explores a more comprehensive approach to evaluating hemoptysis by considering its risk factors, epidemiology and clinical consequences. In particular, this review provides insight into the risk factors, identifies mortality rates associated with hemoptysis in cancer patients and highlights the need for developing a mortality prediction score specific for cancer patients. The use of hemoptysis-related variables may help stratify patients into risk categories; optimize the control of bleeding with critical care; implement the use of tracheobronchial or vascular interventions; and aid in treatment planning. Effective management of hemoptysis in cancer patients must address the underlying cause while also providing supportive care to improve patients' quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The increasing use of computed tomography (CT) has identified many patients with incidental adrenal lesions. Further evaluation of these lesions is often dependent on the language used in the radiology report. Compared to the general population, patients with cancer have a higher risk for adrenal abnormalities, yet data on the prevalence and type of incidental adrenal lesions reported on radiologic reports in cancer patients is limited. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and nature of adrenal abnormalities as an incidental finding reported on radiology reports of cancer patients evaluated for reasons other than suspected adrenal pathology. Methods: Radiology reports of patients who underwent abdominal CT within 30 days of presentation to a tertiary cancer center were reviewed and analyzed. We used natural language processing to perform a multi-class text classification of the adrenal reports. Patients who had CT for suspected adrenal mass including adrenal protocol CT were excluded. Three independent abstractors manually reviewed abnormal and questionable results, and we measured the interobserver agreement. Results: From June 1, 2006, to October 1, 2017, a total of 600,399 abdominal CT scans were performed including 66,478 scans obtained within 30 days of the patient's first presentation. Of these, 58,512 were eligible after applying the exclusion criteria. Adrenal abnormalities were identified in 7,817 (13.4%) reports, with adrenal nodularity (3,401 [43.5%]), adenomas (1,733 [22.2%]), and metastases (1,337 [17.1%]) being the most reported categories. Only 10 cases (0.1%) were reported as primary adrenal carcinomas and 2 as pheochromocytoma. Interobserver agreement using 300 reports yielded a Fleiss kappa of 0.893, implying almost perfect agreement between the abstractors. Conclusions: Incidental adrenal abnormalities are commonly reported in abdominal CT reports of cancer patients. As the terminology used by radiologists to describe these findings greatly determine the subsequent management plans, further studies are needed to correlate some of these findings to the actual confirmed diagnosis based on hormonal, histological and follow-up data and ascertain the impact of such reported findings on patients' outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article examines pain among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic white patients with cancer visiting emergency departments (ED) with Comprehensive Oncologic Emergencies Research Network (CONCERN). Topics include encourage research into any racial or socioeconomic gaps in the treatment of pain in ED cancer patients; and patient self report and compared using Pearson chi-square with assessed cell residuals.

Background. To improve the management of advanced cancer patients with delirium in an emergency department (ED) setting, we compared outcomes between patients with delirium positively diagnosed by both the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), or group A (n522); by the MDAS only, or group B (n522); and by neither CAMnorMDAS, or group C (n5199). Materials and Methods. In an oncologic ED, we assessed 243 randomly selected advanced cancer patients for delirium using the CAM and the MDAS and for presence of advance directives. Outcomes extracted from patients' medical records included hospital and intensive care unit admission rate and overall survival (OS). Results. Hospitalization rates were 82%, 77%, and 49% for groups A, B, and C, respectively (p5.0013). Intensive care unit rates were 18%, 14%, and 2% for groups A, B, and C, respectively (p5.0004). Percentages with advance directives were 52%, 27%, and 43% for groups A, B, and C, respectively (p5.2247). Median OS was 1.23 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-3.55) for group A, 4.70 months (95% CI 0.89-7.85) for group B, and 10.45 months (95% CI 7.46-14.82) for group C. Overall survival did not differ significantly between groups A and B (p5.6392), but OS in group C exceeded those of the other groups (p< .0001 each). Conclusion. Delirium assessed by either CAM or MDAS was associated with worse survival and more hospitalization in patients with advanced cancer in an oncologic ED. Many advanced cancer patients with delirium in ED lack advance directives. Delirium should be assessed regularly and should trigger discussion of goals of care and advance directives. INSET: 373. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Addictions to alcohol and tobacco, known risk factors for cancer, are complex heritable disorders. Addictive behaviors have a bidirectional relationship with pain. We hypothesize that the associations between alcohol, smoking, and opioid addiction observed in cancer patients have a genetic basis. Therefore, using bioinformatics tools, we explored the underlying genetic basis and identified new candidate genes and common biological pathways for smoking, alcohol, and opioid addiction. Results: Literature search showed 56 genes associated with alcohol, smoking and opioid addiction. Using Core Analysis function in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software, we found that ERK1/2 was strongly interconnected across all three addiction networks. Genes involved in immune signaling pathways were shown across all three networks. Connect function from IPA My Pathway toolbox showed that DRD2 is the gene common to both the list of genetic variations associated with all three addiction phenotypes and the components of the brain neuronal signaling network involved in substance addiction. The top canonical pathways associated with the 56 genes were: 1) calcium signaling, 2) GPCR signaling, 3) cAMP-mediated signaling, 4) GABA receptor signaling, and 5) G-alpha i signaling. Conlusions: Cancer patients are often prescribed opioids for cancer pain thus increasing their risk for opioid abuse and addiction. Our findings provide candidate genes and biological pathways underlying addiction phenotypes, which may be future targets for treatment of addiction. Further study of the variations of the candidate genes could allow physicians to make more informed decisions when treating cancer pain with opioid analgesics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a dreaded complication of both cancer and its treatment. To evaluate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of cancer patients with ICH, we identified all patients with ICH who visited The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center emergency department between 1 September 2006 and 16 February 2016. Clinical and radiologic data were collected and compared. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between clinical variables and various outcomes. During the period studied, 704 confirmed acute ICH cases were identified. In-hospital, 7-day, and 30-day mortality rates were 15.1, 11.4, and 25.6%, respectively. Hypertension was most predictive of intensive care unit admission (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.09–2.12, p = 0.013). Low platelet count was associated with both in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.94–0.99, p = 0.008) and 30-day mortality (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96–1.00, p = 0.016). Radiologic findings, especially herniation and hydrocephalus, were strong predictors of short-term mortality. Among known risk factors of ICH, those most helpful in predicting cancer patient outcomes were hypertension, low platelet count, and the presence of hydrocephalus or herniation. Understanding how the clinical presentation, risk factors, and imaging findings correlate with patient morbidity and mortality is helpful in guiding the diagnostic evaluation and aggressiveness of care for ICH in cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]