Search

Background: Currently, survival benefit of immunotherapy in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) is controversial, though it generally indicates poor response and activity. Compared with standard chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab, first‐line chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins remains elusive and lacks real‐world evidence. Patients and Methods: A retrospective real‐world study was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes of chemotherapy alone (C), chemotherapy plus ICI (C + I), or chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors (C + A) as first‐line strategies for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins. Investigator‐assessed response and survival outcomes were compared between subgroups. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis was conducted to reveal concomitant alterations and explore the molecular landscape of ex20ins. Results: A total of 164 patients were screened, identifying 35 kinds of ex20ins, and 122 cases treated with C, C + I, and C + A were finally included in the first‐line analysis. C + A achieved much better objective response rate (ORR, 38.1% vs. 18.2%) and significant progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit compared with C (median, 7.73 vs.5.93 months, HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40–0.90, p = 0.014), and it showed similar ORR (38.1% vs. 40.0%), but higher disease control rate (DCR, 96.8% vs. 80.0%) and numerically longer median PFS (7.73 vs. 6.53 months, HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.44–1.56, p = 0.30) than C + I. There was no PFS difference between C + I and C, despite of PD‐L1 expression or tumor mutational burden. KEGG analysis revealed concomitant upregulation of PI3K/AKT signaling might mediate intrinsic resistance to ICI in ex20ins. Conclusion: First‐line chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors might yield more survival benefits than chemotherapy alone for NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins, whereas, it suggests that chemotherapy in combination with ICI might not obtain a better survival benefit for this subset of patients. Activation of PI3K/AKT signaling might mediate intrinsic immunosuppression in NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

aims to quantify patients' risk-benefit preferences for chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to elicit their willingness to pay (WTP) for treatment outcomes. Methods: A face-to-face discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted on NSCLC patients in four tertiary hospitals each from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Chengdu in China. Patients were invited to complete choice questions that constructed by seven attributes: progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), rash, nausea and vomiting, tiredness, mode of administration and out-of-pocket costs. A mixed logit model was used to evaluate the choice model. Estimates of relative preferences and marginal willingness to pay for each attribute were then explored. Results: A total of 361 patients completed the survey. Improvements in PFS (10, 95% CI: 8.4–11.6) were the most important attribute for patients, followed by increase in DCR (4.6, 95% CI: 3.4–5.8). Tiredness (3.9, 95% CI: 2.9–5.1) was judged to be the most important risk. While remaining attributes were ranked in decreasing order of importance: nausea and vomiting (1.9, 95% CI: 0.9–3.0), mode of administration (0.8, 95% CI: 0.2–1.4) and rash (0.5, 95% CI: −0.6–1.5). There was little variation in preferences among patients with different sociodemographic characteristics. Patients were monthly willing to pay $2304 (95% CI, $1916–$2754) that guaranteed 11 months of PFS, followed by $1465 (95% CI, $1163-$1767) per month to improve their disease control rate by 90%. Conclusion: The results suggested that efficacy was the most important attribute for patients. Side effects, mode of administration and treatment cost significantly influenced patient preferences. Patient engagement in prioritizing their treatment preferences should be emphasized during the clinical decision-making process and regimen implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poor prognosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer ( NSCLC) patients and the promising therapeutic effect of platinum urge the oncologists to evaluate the role of platinum doublet as second-line chemotherapy and establish the definition of platinum sensitivity in NSCLC. We retrospectively analyzed 364 advanced NSCLC patients who received platinum-doublet regimens as second-line chemotherapy after platinum-based first-line treatment. Patients were divided into four groups by their time-to-progression ( TTP) after first-line chemotherapy: 0-3, 4-6, 7-12, and >12-month group, respectively. Treatment efficacy of patients' overall survival ( OS), progression-free survival ( PFS), and response rate ( RR), as well as treatment-related toxicity, were compared among the four groups. A prognosis score system and a nomogram were established by Cox proportional hazard model, and validated by concordance index (c-index). Median OS was 14.0, 16.0, 20.0, 25.0 months for patients in the 0-3, 4-6, 7-12, >12-month group, respectively. Age ≤60 years ( P = 0.002), female ( P = 0.019), and TTP>12 months ( P = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors. Prognostic score was calculated by adding 1 point each for any of the above three indicators, with a c-index of 0.590 (95% confidential interval [ CI], 0.552-0.627). Median OS were equal to 25.0, 16.0, and 11.0 months for best (2-3 points), intermediate (1 point) and worst (0 point) category, respectively ( P < 0.0001). A nomogram that integrated patient's age, gender, and TTP for OS has a c-index of 0.623 (95% CI, 0.603-0.643). Female, younger than 60 years, and TTP greater than 12 months may indicate prolonged survival after platinum-doublet second-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLCpatients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]