Search

Colorectal cancer remains the third most common malignancy in Australia with the peritoneum being the second most common metastatic site. Colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC) can be treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy but this is only limited to a small subset of patients. Those with inoperable disease have a particularly poor prognosis. While the ideal systemic regimen has not been defined, 5‐fluorouracil‐based chemotherapy regimens appear to provide overall and progression free survival benefits. The role of targeted agents such as bevacizumab (vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor) or cetuximab (epidermal growth factor inhibitor) in the setting of CPC is still evolving. Currently, retrospective analyses have shown promising results for the use of bevacizumab in addition to systemic chemotherapy but similar results have not been seen with cetuximab or panitumumab. However, there is significant heterogeneity in the trial data, lack of prospective randomized controlled trials and demonstrated treatment variability based on age and tumour characteristics. This review summarises the current literature in regard to treatment in the unresectable CPC setting as well as discussing issues with the current data and highlighting the need for further trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Overall survival (OS) results from randomized control trials (RCT) provide the strongest evidence for efficacy of anti-cancer treatments but can take a considerable amount of time to mature. Progression free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) are used as an early surrogate of OS treatment effect however their validity remains unclear. Our study aims to comprehensively evaluate ORR and PFS as surrogates for OS treatment effect across tumor groups and treatment types. Phase 3 RCTs in solid malignancies that reported OS/PFS and ORR published between 1st of January 2010 and 30th of June 2022 were evaluated. The relationship of surrogate endpoints and OS treatment effect was assessed via weighted linear regression. The coefficient of determination (R2) quantified the fit of the regression model. 675 phase 3 RCT comprising of 350 112 patients were analysed. ORR (R2 of 0.10) and PFS (R2 of 0.38) were poor surrogate markers of OS treatment effect. The strength of surrogacy differed within treatment and tumour groups. PFS had the highest R2 for chemotherapy (0.56) and lowest for targeted therapy (0.40). PFS had the highest level of surrogacy for melanoma (R2 = 0.72) and pancreatic cancer (R2 = 0.70) compared to other tumour groups. Importantly ORR and PFS were also poorly correlated to each other (R2 = 0.33). ORR and PFS were poor trial-level surrogate markers of OS. The surrogacy performance of ORR and PFS differed by treatment and malignancy sub-type. • ORR and PFS are not strong surrogates of OS treatment effect. • Surrogacy of ORR and PFS for OS differs based on treatment and tumor. • surrogacy of ORR and PFS for OS treatment effect was highest for chemotherapy. • PFS was a better surrogate of OS treatment for melanoma and pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]