Search

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) are standard treatments for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring the EGFR mutation. Patients experiencing intolerable adverse events (AEs) would discontinue EGFR‐TKIs. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intolerable AEs and subsequent treatment on the survival of patients who discontinued EGFR‐TKIs. Patients: The data of advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR‐TKIs as frontline treatment at Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals from June 2014 to March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 2190 patients were enrolled and treated with frontline EGFR‐TKIs. In August 2021, 114 (5.2%) patients experienced intolerable AEs requiring discontinuation of EGFR‐TKIs. The time median of EGFR‐TKIs discontinuation was 2.56 months. Age >65 years, females, body weight, and body surface area were associated with the occurrence of intolerable AEs for patients treated with afatinib. Patients experiencing skin/paronychia/mucositis and abnormal liver function test had favorable survivals results. Patients who received subsequent EGFR‐TKIs treatment, experienced better progression‐free survival (PFS), total PFS (from frontline line EGFR‐TKIs), and overall survival (OS) compared to patients receiving chemotherapy or no treatment. Patients undergoing subsequent EGFR‐TKIs had better total PFS (median, 14.9 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.013) and OS (median, 31.3 vs. 20.1 months, p = 0.001) than patients who did not discontinue because of AEs. Favorable OS was validated by propensity score matching. Conclusion: Patients experiencing intolerable AEs during EGFR‐TKI treatment should consider switching to an alternative EGFR‐TKI, which increase the survival results as compared to those patients who did not experience intolerable AEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) are the standard treatment for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR‐TKIs and prognostic factors for patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations, which account for 10% of EGFR mutations. Methods: A total of 230 treatment‐naive patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations treated with first‐line EGFR‐TKIs between 2011 and 2018 at four hospitals (belonging to four institutions, Linkou, Kaohsiung, Keelung, and Chiayi, of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital) in Taiwan were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinicopathological characteristics, adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential prognostic factors for PFS. Results: Overall, patients who received afatinib (n = 62) had better PFS (median: 6.4 vs. 5.9 months, p = 0.022) and OS (median: 13.4 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.008) than those who received gefitinib/erlotinib (n = 124), although no significant differences were observed for ORR (46.8% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.137) or DCR (59.7% vs. 58.9%, p = 0.916). Patients who received afatinib showed significantly higher ORR (58.3% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.027) but not DCR compared with gefitinib/erlotinib for major uncommon mutations. Afatinib trended toward better PFS and OS for major uncommon mutations and compound mutations. No EGFR‐TKIs were effective for most NSCLC patients with exon 20 insertions. Performance status, metastasis of the liver and pleura, and dose reduction were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Conclusion: Afatinib demonstrated better survival outcomes than gefitinib/erlotinib for NSCLC patients harboring major EGFR uncommon mutations and compound mutations. Performance status and metastatic sites may be useful for predicting PFS for major uncommon mutations and compound mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) designed to overcome acquired T790M resistance mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 172 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib following frontline EGFR-TKIs were retrospectively reviewed and divided into three groups based on the T790M status (positive, negative, or unknown T790M). The study confirmed the greater efficacy of later-line osimertinib for NSCLC with acquired T790M mutation than for NSCLC without acquired T790M mutation. Detection of the T790M mutation after frontline treatment (first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI) is crucial for prolonging the survival of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutation. Osimertinib may be considered an option for NSCLC with unknown T790M mutations, as a certain subpopulation may benefit from osimertinib. Background: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) designed to overcome acquired T790M resistance mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of osimertinib in patients without acquired T790M mutations has not been well studied. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of osimertinib in patients treated with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs followed by later-line osimertinib treatment. Patients: The clinical data and survival outcomes of 172 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib following frontline EGFR-TKIs at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. T790M mutations were detected using tissue sequencing and/or liquid biopsy. Results: A total of 172 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated with frontline EGFR-TKI therapy followed by later-line osimertinib were enrolled in the current study and divided into three groups based on the T790M status (positive, negative, or unknown T790M). Patients with NSCLC harboring acquired T790M mutation treated with osimertinib had the best objective response rate (ORR) (52.6%, 25.0%, and 32.0%, p = 0.044), disease control rate (DCR) (79.3%, 41.7%, and 68.0%, p = 0.011), and progression-free survival (PFS, median PFS, 12.6, 3.1, 10.4 months, p = 0.001) among the three groups (positive, negative, and unknown T790M, respectively). However, a marked difference was found between positive and negative T790M mutations but not between positive and unknown T790M mutations. Univariate analysis was performed to identify potential prognostic factors for PFS in 172 patients treated with osimertinib. Lung metastasis (p < 0.001), brain metastasis (p < 0.009), number of metastatic sites (p < 0.001), PFS with frontline EGFR-TKIs (p = 0.03), and T790M status (p = 0.006) were identified as prognostic factors for PFS with osimertinib. Multivariate analysis showed that lung metastasis (p < 0.001) and PFS with frontline EGFR-TKIs and T790M status were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: This study confirmed the greater efficacy of later-line osimertinib for NSCLC with acquired T790M mutation than for NSCLC without acquired T790M mutation. Detection of the T790M mutation after frontline treatment (first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI) is crucial for prolonging the survival of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutation. Osimertinib may be considered an option for NSCLC with unknown T790M mutations, as a certain subpopulation may benefit from osimertinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to evaluate possible treatment strategies for patients with de novo T790M mutation‐positive (T790M+) non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with de novo T790M+ NSCLC and treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) between 2011 and 2018 at a regional hospital in Taiwan were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinicopathological characteristics and subsequent treatment information were collected, and potential prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: All tumors with T790M mutations coexisted with sensitizing mutations. Through the last follow‐up in May 2021, afatinib and osimertinib demonstrated better progression‐free survival (PFS, p < 0.01) and overall survival (OS, p < 0.01) than gefitinib and erlotinib. Additionally, patients with low T790M ratios had better PFS than those with high T790M ratios, implying that the proportion of T790M+ tumors determined the response to EGFR‐TKIs. Multivariate analysis confirmed that both EGFR‐TKI treatment (osimertinib hazard ratio [HR] 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01–0.30; afatinib HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02–0.39) and a low T790M ratio (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12–0.69) were independently favorable prognostic factors for patients with de novo T790M+ NSCLC. Median PFS was 6.1 (95% CI 4.4–7.8) months. In addition, patients treated with first‐generation (1G)/second‐generation (2G) EGFR‐TKIs followed by osimertinib (n = 8) demonstrated the best OS compared with patients treated with frontline osimertinib (n = 5) or 1G/2G EGFR‐TKIs without osimertinib (n = 28, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Sequential TKIs may represent an alternative option for de novo T790M mutation, particularly frontline afatinib and tumors with low T790M ratios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: No comprehensive and simple prognostic model based on pretreatment factors exists for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). A total of 11 independent prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis, including performance status, morphology, mutation, stage, EGFR-TKIs, and metastasis to liver, brain, bone, pleura, adrenal gland, and distant lymph nodes. We established a nomogram based on independent pretreatment factors and used it to stratify EGFRm+ NSCLC patients undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment into five different risk groups for survival using recursive partitioning analysis. The performance of this nomogram was good and feasible, providing clinicians and patients with additional information for evaluating therapeutic options. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the standard treatment for EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to create a novel nomogram to help physicians suggest the optimal treatment for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC. Records of 2190 patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC cancer who were treated with EGFR-TKIs (including gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) at the branches of a hospital group between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinicopathological characteristics, clinical tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential prognostic factors to create a nomogram for risk stratification. Univariate analysis identified 14 prognostic factors, and multivariate analysis confirmed the pretreatment independent factors, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, morphology, mutation, stage, EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib), and metastasis to liver, brain, bone, pleura, adrenal gland, and distant lymph nodes. Based on these factors, a novel nomogram was created and used to stratify the patients into five different risk groups for PFS and OS using recursive partitioning analysis. This risk stratification can provide additional information to clinicians and patients when determining the optimal therapeutic options for EGFRm+ NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Previous studies of first-generation EGFR-TKI erlotinib and bevacizumab combination have demonstrated superior treatment efficacy compared to erlotinib monotherapy for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Whether this combination benefit can also be observed in second-generation EGFR-TKI afatinib-treated patients remains unclear. The study presented a real-world cohort of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation treated by afatinib plus bevacizumab or single-agent afatinib. After balancing the key characteristics between the two treatment groups, the result showcased a similar therapeutic efficacy of afatinib plus bevacizumab compared to afatinib monotherapy. The incidence of drug-resistant mutation was also similar between the two groups. This study provided a clinical practice-based evidence that the additional benefit of bevacizumab is likely moderate in afatinib-treated patients. Background: Treatment outcome between afatinib alone or with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation remains insufficiently reported. Methods: A total of 405 advanced NSCLC patients with sensitizing-EGFR mutation receiving first-line single-agent afatinib or with bevacizumab were grouped and propensity score-matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutation were analyzed. Results: In the original cohort, 367 (90.6%) patients received afatinib treatment alone and 38 (9.4%) patients received afatinib plus bevacizumab. Patients who received bevacizumab combination were significantly younger (54.6 ± 10.9 vs. 63.9 ± 11.5; p < 0.001) compared to the afatinib alone group. After propensity score matching, the afatinib alone and afatinib plus bevacizumab groups contained 118 and 34 patients, respectively. A non-significantly higher objective response was noted in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group (82.4% vs. 67.8%; p = 0.133). In the propensity score-matched cohort, a bevacizumab add-on offered no increased PFS (16.1 vs. 15.0 months; p = 0.500), risk reduction of progression (HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.52–1.40]; p = 0.528), OS benefit (32.1 vs. 42.0 months; p = 0.700), nor risk reduction of death (HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.42–1.74] p = 0.660) compared to the single-agent afatinib. The secondary T790M rate in afatinib plus bevacizumab and afatinib alone groups was similar (56.3% vs. 49.4%, p = 0.794). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that EGFR L858R (OR 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26–0.97]; p = 0.044), EGFR uncommon mutation (OR 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02–0.64]; p = 0.021), and PFS longer than 12 months (OR 2.71 [95% CI, 1.39–5.41]; p = 0.004) were independent predictors of secondary T790M positivity. Conclusion: Bevacizumab treatment showed moderate efficacy in real-world, afatinib-treated NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Mutational analysis was performed in the kinase domain (exons 18–21) of the EGFR gene on tumor tissues of 65 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had received gefitinib monotherapy. The association between EGFR gene mutation, gefitinib treatment response, and the overall survival were evaluated. In total, EGFR mutations with complex patterns were identified in 32 tumors. The overall mutation rate was 49.2% (32/65). Twenty of the 32 patients were responders, 10 non-responders, and 2 not assessable. The most common mutation in non-responders was L858R. Gefitinib responsiveness was only significantly associated with EGFR mutation and adenocarcinoma. The median survival for responder (15.5 months) was much longer than non-responder (9.23 months), though the difference only had marginal significance (p =0.056). The difference of overall survival between patients with and without EGFR mutation was non-significant (p =0.7819), mainly due to the short survival of the non-responders with EGFR mutations (median survival=6.2 months). Our study revealed that the response to gefitinib treatment in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations could be quite variable even for the same EGFR mutation type. An analysis of the various EGFR mutations and the response patterns was also performed and compared with recently published reports on EGFR mutation and gefitinib responsiveness. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The experience of using consolidation durvalumab in post-concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rare in real-world clinical practice, and the factors associated with its efficacy are also unclear. We sought to analyze the efficacy of consolidation durvalumab and the factors associated with its efficacy using a multicenter observational study. Methods: The data for 61 patients with post-CCR unresectable stage III NSCLC receiving consolidation durvalumab at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals in Linkou, Keelung, Chiayi, and Kaohsiung from November 2017 to March 2020 were analyzed. (3) Results: The median post-CCRT progression-free survival (PFS) and time to metastatic disease or death (TMDD) for consolidation durvalumab were 14.0 months and 16.7 months, respectively. In multiple variant factors analysis, we found that an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was an independently unfavorable predictive factor for consolidation durvalumab therapy regarding PFS. The median post-CCRT PFS was 6.50 months for EGFR-mutated patients and 33.63 months for EGFR wild-type and unknown patients (HR = 10.47; 95% CI, 4.55–24.07; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Consolidation durvalumab is effective and safe for post-CCRT unresectable stage III NSCLC in clinical practice, but EGFR mutation is an unfavorable factor for consolidation durvalumab. Thus, searching for a better consolidation therapy for EGFR-mutated patients is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]