Search

The prevalence of malnutrition is high in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients. The use of oral nutrition supplementation (ONS) as part of patients' nutritional therapy seems to be effective in the improvement of nutritional status. Nevertheless, oncology patients, experience several symptoms that negatively affect their compliance with ONS products. Τhe aim of this systematic review is to examine the factors affecting compliance with ONS in patients who underwent GI cancer surgery and/or adjuvant treatments. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies published until June 2023 that assessed compliance to ONS in GI cancer patients. Eleven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Postoperative compliance with ONS among GI cancer surgery patients ranged between 26.2% and 71.1%, whereas in GI cancer patients receiving chemotherapy the average reported rate was 90.2%. The main reasons for noncompliance were the presence of GI symptoms, such as early satiety, bloating, and diarrhea after ONS consumption, as well as taste alterations that result in aversion to the provided ONS. Frequent monitoring of these patients is crucial in order to record adverse effects, identify patients that are in need of personalized guidance at an early stage and motivate them to follow their ONS plan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oncologic patients often suffer from malnutrition, which might negatively affect treatment outcomes. Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM)-based malnutrition is associated with short- and long-term outcomes in cancer patients. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to determine the impact of GLIM-defined malnutrition on postoperative complications and survival in esophageal and gastric cancer patients. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies published until February 2022 that assessed the association between GLIM criteria and short- and long-term outcomes in esophageal and gastric cancer patients. We included seven observational studies reporting on a total of 3662 patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. GLIM-defined malnutrition was associated with increased overall complications (pooled HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.45–4.59, p = 0.001). Malnutrition was significantly associated with decreased overall survival (pooled HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.18–1.84, p = 0.003) as well as with decreased disease-free survival (pooled HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.36–2.33, p < 0.0001). GLIM-based malnutrition was associated with an increased risk for developing postoperative complications and impaired survival of esophageal and gastric cancer patients. Our findings support the use of GLIM criteria in clinical practice as a relatively simple and reliable tool for assessing the nutritional status of oncologic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Disease-related malnutrition is a debilitating condition frequently observed in patients with cancer. The aim of the current study was to prospectively examine postoperative changes in nutritional and functional status of patients undergoing surgery for gastric, esophageal, and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Methods: Participants were prospectively recruited from September 2015 to September 2019. The assessment of malnutrition was based on the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment tool. The functional assessment included the evaluation of muscle strength and physical performance, while muscle mass assessment was based on Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI) derived from the analysis of computed tomography scans. The follow up of patients was scheduled at six months postoperatively. Results: A total of 98 patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 60.79 ± 10.19 years and 80.6% were males. The mean unintentional weight loss at 6months was 11.7 ± 8.0%. Patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy reported the greatest weight loss postoperatively (16.2 ± 9.6%), whereas the lowest rate of weight loss was observed in patients who underwent partial gastrectomy (5.6 ± 6.7%). The rate of severe malnutrition declined at six months postoperatively (39.7% vs 27%). Muscle strength and physical performance were significantly deteriorated at 6months postoperatively, except for the group of partial gastrectomy, while SMI significantly decreased in all groups of patients except for McKewon esophagectomy group. Finally, the prevalence of low muscle mass increased significantly from 43.5% in the preoperative period to 66.7% at the follow-up. Conclusions: Our study revealed a significant deterioration in gastroesophageal cancer patient nutritional and functional status at six months postoperatively. The high prevalence of malnutrition and low muscle mass requires systematic follow-up and multidirectional monitoring in order to ensure the successful rehabilitation of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oncologic patients often suffer from malnutrition which in turn, might have negative impact on treatment outcomes. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), as an index of impaired nutritional status, has emerged as a significant prognostic factor for short-and long-term outcomes in cancer patients. The aim of the current systematic review is to determine whether the GNRI is an independent prognostic factor of postoperative complications and survival in cancer patients. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies, published from 2005 to 2019, which assessed associations between GNRI and short- and long-term outcomes in cancer patients. Eighteen studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Low scores of GNRI were associated with increased risk for developing postoperative complications and impaired survival of cancer patients in most studies. Our findings support the use of the GNRI in the clinical practice, since it is a simple and reliable tool for assessing nutritional status in oncologic patients. More prospective, multi-centered studies are warranted to confirm the current results, as well as the role of nutritional support in improving the prognosis of cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Esophageal cancer patients often suffer from malnutrition. Older people constitute a group of patients more susceptible to nutritional status deterioration. The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in nutritional status between elderly patients and patients younger than 65 years of age with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Methods The study sample consisted of 73 patients with esophageal (n = 11) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (n = 62) who were admitted for surgery in the First Department of Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece, between September 2015 and December 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their age, those younger than 65 years (n = 39) and those older than 65 years (n = 34). The preoperative assessment of nutritional status was based on Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), laboratory tests, anthropometric measurements, handgrip strength, unintentional weight loss during the last six months and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) derived from analysis of CT scans. Results Malnutrition and sarcopenia were more prevalent in the group of older patients compared to the group of younger ones (73.5% vs 41%, P  < 0.05 and 60% vs 35.3%, P  < 0.05). PG-SGA was significantly higher in elderly patients (12.35 vs 8.23, P  < 0.05), while SMI and handgrip strength were significantly lower in elderly patients (48.47 cm2/m2 vs 55.5 cm2/m2, P  < 0.05 and 31 kg vs 39.1 kg, P  < 0.05 respectively). Among the laboratory tests, albumin, hemoglobin and hematocrit were lower in the group of older patients (3.86 g/dL vs 4.15 g/dL, P  < 0.05, 12.25 g/dL vs 13.17 g/dL, P  < 0.05 and 36.5 vs 39.5, P  < 0.05, respectively), whereas platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was higher (205.4 vs 156.2, P  < 0.05). Concerning anthropometric measurements, corrected mid arm muscle area and calf circumference were lower in older patients (42.15 cm2 vs 49.26 cm2, P  < 0.05 and 34.86 cm vs 36.89 cm, P  < 0.05, respectively), whereas no significant differences were observed in Body Mass Index values and unintentional weight loss between the two groups. Conclusion Geriatric patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer have more compromised nutritional status compared to their younger counterparts. Preoperative nutritional assessment should be performed in all such patients in order to detect those who will benefit from perioperative nutritional support. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]