Search

Abstract: Objective: To study doctor–patient interaction styles in consultations with patients presenting persistent medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) and to study on which stages of the consultation patients and doctors focus within the available time. Methods: exploratory, qualitative analysis of transcripts of 20 videotaped consultations between family physicians (FP) and persistent MUS patients. Results: Patients presented many symptoms in a rather unstructured way. However, FPs hardly used structuring techniques such as agenda setting and summarizing. Patients with persistent MUS got much opportunity to tell their story, but the reasons for encounter, their beliefs and concerns were not discussed in a structured manner. Although consultations were focused on these issues, mostly patients themselves initiated discussion of their ideas, concerns and expectations. FPs’ extensive explanations of the origin of the symptoms often did not take patients’ beliefs and concerns into account. Conclusions: Due to patients’ multiple symptom presentation and the absence of FPs’ structuring techniques, consultations of persistent MUS patients proceed rather unfocused. However, patients got ample opportunity to tell their story. Practice implications: Persistent MUS patients might benefit from structured consultations focused on the exploration of the reason for encounter. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: Depression is highly prevalent in advanced cancer patients, but the diagnosis of depressive disorder in patients with advanced cancer is difficult. Screening instruments could facilitate diagnosing depressive disorder in patients with advanced cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and a single screening question as screening tools for depressive disorder in advanced cancer patients. Methods: Patients with advanced metastatic disease, visiting the outpatient palliative care department, were asked to fill out a self-questionnaire containing the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and a single screening question 'Are you feeling depressed?' The mood section of the PRIME-MD was used as a gold standard. Results: Sixty-one patients with advanced metastatic disease were eligible to be included in the study. Complete data were obtained from 46 patients. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics analysis of the BDI-II was 0.82. The optimal cut-off point of the BDI-II was 16 with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 69%. The single screening question showed a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 94%. Conclusions: The BDI-II seems an adequate screening tool for a depressive disorder in advanced cancer patients. The sensitivity of a single screening question is poor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Depressive disorder is assumed to be highly prevalent in advanced cancer patients, but the diagnosis of depressive disorder in patients with advanced cancer is difficult. The more robust the assessment instrument to diagnose depressive disorder is, the lower the reported prevalence of depressive disorder in advanced cancer patients. This study confirms a low prevalence of depressive disorder (3%) in 64 advanced cancer outpatients using a robust structured clinical assessment (SCAN 2.1). Furthermore, in this article we discuss possible implications of using predefined psychiatric labeling in the assessment of mood symptoms in advanced cancer patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]