Search

Background: Cardio‐oncology and emergency medicine are closely collaborative, as many cardiac events in cancer patients require evaluation and treatment in the emergency department (ED). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a common treatment for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). However, the immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) from ICIs can be clinically significant. Methods: We reviewed and analyzed cardiovascular diagnoses among HNC patients who received ICI during the period April 1, 2016–December 31, 2020 in a large tertiary cancer center. Demographics, clinical and cancer‐related data were abstracted, and billing databases were queried for cardiovascular disease (CVD)‐related diagnosis using International Classification of Disease‐version10 (ICD‐10) codes. We recorded receipt of care at the ED as one of the outcome variables. Results: A total of 610 HNC patients with a median follow‐up time of 12.3 months (median, interquartile range = 5–30 months) comprised our study cohort. Overall, 25.7% of patients had pre‐existing CVD prior to ICI treatment. Of the remaining 453 patients without pre‐existing CVD, 31.5% (n = 143) had at least one CVD‐related diagnosis after ICI initiation. Tachyarrhythmias (91 new events) was the most frequent CVD‐related diagnosis after ICI. The time to diagnosis of myocarditis from initiation of ICI occurred the earliest (median 2.5 months, 1.5–6.8 months), followed by myocardial infarction (3.7, 0.5–9), cardiomyopathy (4.5, 1.6–7.3), and tachyarrhythmias (4.9, 1.2–11.4). Patients with myocarditis and tachyarrhythmias mainly presented to the ED for care. Conclusion: The use of ICI in HNC is still expanding and the spectrum of delayed manifestation of ICI‐induced cardiovascular toxicities is yet to be fully defined in HNC survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common and clinically impactful side effect of cytotoxic cancer treatment, particularly in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who undergo radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy. The etiology and pathogenic mechanisms of OM are complex, multifaceted and elicit both direct and indirect damage to the mucosa. In this narrative review, we describe studies that use various omics methodologies (genomics, transcriptomics, microbiomics and metabolomics) in attempts to elucidate the biological pathways associated with the development or severity of OM. Integrating different omics into multi-omics approaches carries the potential to discover links among host factors (genomics), host responses (transcriptomics, metabolomics), and the local environment (microbiomics). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This review explores hemoptysis in cancer patients. It delves into risk factors, epidemiology and clinical consequences. The need for a mortality prediction score for cancer patients with hemoptysis-related variables is needed, and this tool could aid in risk assessment, optimize the control of bleeding with critical care, implement tracheobronchial or vascular interventions, and guide treatment planning. Managing hemoptysis in cancer patients requires addressing the underlying cause and providing supportive care for improved quality of life. Hemoptysis in cancer patients can occur for various reasons, including infections, tumors, blood vessel abnormalities and inflammatory conditions. The degree of hemoptysis is commonly classified according to the quantity of blood expelled. However, volume-based definitions may not accurately reflect the clinical impact of bleeding. This review explores a more comprehensive approach to evaluating hemoptysis by considering its risk factors, epidemiology and clinical consequences. In particular, this review provides insight into the risk factors, identifies mortality rates associated with hemoptysis in cancer patients and highlights the need for developing a mortality prediction score specific for cancer patients. The use of hemoptysis-related variables may help stratify patients into risk categories; optimize the control of bleeding with critical care; implement the use of tracheobronchial or vascular interventions; and aid in treatment planning. Effective management of hemoptysis in cancer patients must address the underlying cause while also providing supportive care to improve patients' quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The increasing use of computed tomography (CT) has identified many patients with incidental adrenal lesions. Further evaluation of these lesions is often dependent on the language used in the radiology report. Compared to the general population, patients with cancer have a higher risk for adrenal abnormalities, yet data on the prevalence and type of incidental adrenal lesions reported on radiologic reports in cancer patients is limited. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and nature of adrenal abnormalities as an incidental finding reported on radiology reports of cancer patients evaluated for reasons other than suspected adrenal pathology. Methods: Radiology reports of patients who underwent abdominal CT within 30 days of presentation to a tertiary cancer center were reviewed and analyzed. We used natural language processing to perform a multi-class text classification of the adrenal reports. Patients who had CT for suspected adrenal mass including adrenal protocol CT were excluded. Three independent abstractors manually reviewed abnormal and questionable results, and we measured the interobserver agreement. Results: From June 1, 2006, to October 1, 2017, a total of 600,399 abdominal CT scans were performed including 66,478 scans obtained within 30 days of the patient's first presentation. Of these, 58,512 were eligible after applying the exclusion criteria. Adrenal abnormalities were identified in 7,817 (13.4%) reports, with adrenal nodularity (3,401 [43.5%]), adenomas (1,733 [22.2%]), and metastases (1,337 [17.1%]) being the most reported categories. Only 10 cases (0.1%) were reported as primary adrenal carcinomas and 2 as pheochromocytoma. Interobserver agreement using 300 reports yielded a Fleiss kappa of 0.893, implying almost perfect agreement between the abstractors. Conclusions: Incidental adrenal abnormalities are commonly reported in abdominal CT reports of cancer patients. As the terminology used by radiologists to describe these findings greatly determine the subsequent management plans, further studies are needed to correlate some of these findings to the actual confirmed diagnosis based on hormonal, histological and follow-up data and ascertain the impact of such reported findings on patients' outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article examines pain among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic white patients with cancer visiting emergency departments (ED) with Comprehensive Oncologic Emergencies Research Network (CONCERN). Topics include encourage research into any racial or socioeconomic gaps in the treatment of pain in ED cancer patients; and patient self report and compared using Pearson chi-square with assessed cell residuals.

Background: The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index has been utilized to determine the risk for poor clinical outcomes in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) in an emergency center (EC). However, this index comprises subjective elements and elaborated metrics limiting its use in ECs. We sought to determine whether procalcitonin (PCT) level (biomarker of bacterial infection) with or without lactate level (marker of inadequate tissue perfusion) offers a potential alternative to MASSC score in predicting the outcomes of patients with FN presenting to an EC. Methods: We retrospectively identified 550 cancer patients with FN who presented to our EC between April 2018, and April 2019, and had serum PCT and lactate levels measured. Results: Compared with patients with PCT levels <0.25 ng/ml, those with levels ≥0.25 ng/ml had a significantly higher 14‐day mortality rate (5.2% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.002), a higher bloodstream infection (BSI) rate, and a longer hospital length of stay (LOS). Logistic regression analysis showed that patients with PCT levels ≥0.25 ng/ml and lactate levels >2.2 mmol/L were more likely to be admitted and have an LOS >7 days, BSI, and 14‐day mortality than patients with lower levels. PCT level was a significantly better predictor of BSI than MASSC score (p = 0.003) or lactate level (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Procalcitonin level is superior to MASCC index in predicting BSI. The combination of PCT and lactate levels is a good predictor of BSI, hospital admission, and 14‐day mortality and could be useful in identifying high‐risk FN patients who require hospital admission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The frequency of delirium among patients with cancer presenting to the emergency department (ED) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine delirium frequency and recognition by ED physicians among patients with advanced cancer presenting to the ED of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.Methods: The study population was a random sample of English-speaking patients with advanced cancer who presented to the ED and met the study criteria. All patients were assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) to screen for delirium and with the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) to measure delirium severity (mild, ≤15; moderate, 16-22; and severe, ≥23). ED physicians were also asked whether their patients were delirious.Results: Twenty-two of the 243 enrolled patients (9%) had CAM-positive delirium, and their median MDAS score was 14 (range, 9-21 [30-point scale]). The median age of the enrolled patients was 62 years (range, 19-89 years). Patients with delirium had a poorer performance status than patients without delirium (P < .001); however, the 2 groups did not differ in other characteristics. Ten of the 99 patients who were 65 years old or older (10%) had CAM-positive delirium, whereas 12 of the 144 patients younger than 65 years (8%) did (P = .6). According to the MDAS scores, delirium was mild in 18 patients (82%) and moderate in 4 patients (18%). Physicians correctly identified delirium in 13 of the CAM-positive delirious patients (59%).Conclusions: Delirium is relatively frequent and is underdiagnosed by physicians in patients with advanced cancer who are visiting the ED. Further research is needed to identify the optimal screening tool for delirium in ED. Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2918-2924. © 2016 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. To improve the management of advanced cancer patients with delirium in an emergency department (ED) setting, we compared outcomes between patients with delirium positively diagnosed by both the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), or group A (n522); by the MDAS only, or group B (n522); and by neither CAMnorMDAS, or group C (n5199). Materials and Methods. In an oncologic ED, we assessed 243 randomly selected advanced cancer patients for delirium using the CAM and the MDAS and for presence of advance directives. Outcomes extracted from patients' medical records included hospital and intensive care unit admission rate and overall survival (OS). Results. Hospitalization rates were 82%, 77%, and 49% for groups A, B, and C, respectively (p5.0013). Intensive care unit rates were 18%, 14%, and 2% for groups A, B, and C, respectively (p5.0004). Percentages with advance directives were 52%, 27%, and 43% for groups A, B, and C, respectively (p5.2247). Median OS was 1.23 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-3.55) for group A, 4.70 months (95% CI 0.89-7.85) for group B, and 10.45 months (95% CI 7.46-14.82) for group C. Overall survival did not differ significantly between groups A and B (p5.6392), but OS in group C exceeded those of the other groups (p< .0001 each). Conclusion. Delirium assessed by either CAM or MDAS was associated with worse survival and more hospitalization in patients with advanced cancer in an oncologic ED. Many advanced cancer patients with delirium in ED lack advance directives. Delirium should be assessed regularly and should trigger discussion of goals of care and advance directives. INSET: 373. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Septic shock may be associated with myocardial damage; however, the prognostic value of cardiac enzymes in cancer patients with septic shock is unknown. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic significance of cardiac enzymes in combination with established prognostic factors in predicting the 7-day mortality rate of patients with septic shock, and we constructed a new scoring system, Septic Oncologic Patients in Emergency Department (SOPED), which includes cardiac enzymes, to predict 7-day mortality rates. Methods and Findings: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 375 adult cancer patients with septic shock who visited the emergency department of a comprehensive cancer center between 01/01/2004 and 12/31/2013. The 7-day and 28-day mortality rates were 19.7% and 37.6%, respectively. The creatine kinase myocardial band fraction and troponin-I were significantly higher in patients who died in ≤7 days and ≤28 days than in those who did not. In Cox regression models, troponin-I >0.05 ng/mL plus Predisposition, Infection, Response, and Organ Failure (PIRO2011) or Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score was a significant predictor of survival for ≤7 days. With our new SOPED scoring system, the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was 0.836, higher than those for PIRO2011 and MEDS. Conclusions: Troponin-I >0.05 ng/mL was an important predictor of short-term mortality (≤7 days). The SOPED scoring system, which incorporated troponin-I, was more prognostically accurate than were other scores for 7-day mortality. Large multicenter studies are needed to verify our results and prospectively validate the prognostic performance of the SOPED score. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a dreaded complication of both cancer and its treatment. To evaluate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of cancer patients with ICH, we identified all patients with ICH who visited The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center emergency department between 1 September 2006 and 16 February 2016. Clinical and radiologic data were collected and compared. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between clinical variables and various outcomes. During the period studied, 704 confirmed acute ICH cases were identified. In-hospital, 7-day, and 30-day mortality rates were 15.1, 11.4, and 25.6%, respectively. Hypertension was most predictive of intensive care unit admission (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.09–2.12, p = 0.013). Low platelet count was associated with both in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.94–0.99, p = 0.008) and 30-day mortality (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96–1.00, p = 0.016). Radiologic findings, especially herniation and hydrocephalus, were strong predictors of short-term mortality. Among known risk factors of ICH, those most helpful in predicting cancer patient outcomes were hypertension, low platelet count, and the presence of hydrocephalus or herniation. Understanding how the clinical presentation, risk factors, and imaging findings correlate with patient morbidity and mortality is helpful in guiding the diagnostic evaluation and aggressiveness of care for ICH in cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, a dramatic breakthrough in cancer treatment has arisen with the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, these therapies are accompanied by multiple unique immune-related adverse effects that can present as an oncologic emergency to emergency department (ED). Here we describe the characteristics of cancer patients with no previous diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency who present to the emergency with low adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol levels following ICI therapy. Using data from a comprehensive cancer center, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years and older who received ICI between April 1 st, 2018, and December 31st, 2022, and presented to the ED with low ACTH and total cortisol levels. The billing database was used to exclude patients with prior diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency based on the ICD-10 codes. Demographics, clinical and cancerrelated data were collected from the institution's data warehouse. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. A total of 101 cancer patients were identified based on the eligibility criteria, with a median age of 63 years (interquartile range= 58-72 years), who were mostly White race (83.2 %) and Not Hispanic or Latino ethnic group (86.1%). Melanoma, lung, renal and head and neck cancer were the most common cancer types for these patients. The median Charlson comorbidity index was 8 (interquartile range: 7–9). Most (98%) of the patients presented as level 2 or 3 on the emergency severity index. Almost all patients (94%) were admitted, of these, 26 patients (25.7%) were placed in the observation unit. Of the patients who got admitted, around 10% were placed in the intensive care unit during their hospital stay. The clinical use of ICI is continually broadening and certain ICI-induced toxicities including endocrinopathies requires immediate medical attention. We found that most patients presenting to the ED with low ACTH and cortisol levels with no previous diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency after ICI therapy require admission and close monitoring. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the incidence and outcomes of ICI-induced adrenal insufficiency among cancer patients after ICI therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with a known cancer diagnosis are frequent visitors to general emergency departments (ED) Since MD Anderson Cancer Center is a dedicated oncologic hospital, new patients present with symptoms suspected to be attributable to a yet unconfirmed cancer diagnosis. The aim was to examine and characterize the oncologic ED presentation of new patients with a suspicion of cancer. Our institutional database was quired for all ED visits for subjects aged 18 and older with no prior cancer diagnosis (using tumor registry and billing database) between 11/1/2020 and 01/01/2022. Chart review was conducted to confirm the absence of previous cancer diagnosis in the identified subjects and to verify they received follow-up in our institution. Demographics, ED presentation and clinical data were collected. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square test of independence were used to analyze, compare and report the presentation and the outcomes of final eligible patients. During the study period, of the 2727 subjects identified, 358 met the final eligibility criteria. The median age was 57 years (interquartile range: 45-66 years). The majority were male (51.1%), White or Caucasian race (57.0%) and not Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (74.0%). Almost all the patients (99.2%) were presented as emergent or urgent acuity level (i.e., Emergency Severity Index levels 2 or 3 respectively). The most frequent presenting complaint(s) were: Abnormal laboratory results (16.8%); Hypertension (9.8%); infection and/or suspected sepsis (7.5%); nausea/vomiting (7.3%); fatigue (7.0%); shortness of breath (6.7%) or headache (5.9%). Most of the patients were admitted either to the hospital (59.2%) or the observation unit (18.2%). Of the 212 admitted patients, 35 (16.5%) died within one year of the ED presentation, which was significantly (P=0.003) higher than the 5.5% one-year mortality rate for the patients who were discharged or placed in the observation unit. Most patients presenting to an oncologic emergency with unconfirmed suspicion of cancer require hospitalization. The admitted group have higher mortality for reasons that need further elucidation. Further research is also needed to understand why the fairly large segment that do not require hospitalization seek care in the ED setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]