Search

Objectives To evaluate biochemical non-evidence of disease and adverse events of salvage intensity-modulated radiotherapy using an endorectal balloon for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. Methods Data of 107 patients (median age 65 years) with persistent (>0.1 ng/mL) or rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dose to clinical target volume was 70 Gy in 32 fractions (the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction is 73.2 Gy based on α:β = 2). Biochemical non-evidence of disease and predictive factors were assessed. Genitourinary toxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity were also evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity criteria. Results The median follow up was 37 months (range 6-126 months). A total of 48 patients developed biochemical recurrence. The 3- and 5-year biochemical non-evidence of disease rates of all patients were 52.6% and 48.8%, respectively. The Gleason score (≥4 + 3, ≤3 + 4) and pre-intensity-modulated radiotherapy prostate-specific antigen level (≥0.5 ng/mL, <0.5 ng/mL) were significant predictive factors for biochemical non-evidence of disease in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only the Gleason score was detected as a significant variable. The highest late genitourinary toxicities were grade 2 in 13% and grade 3 in 6% of patients. The highest late gastrointestinal toxicities were grade 2 in 6% and grade 3 in 3% of patients. Conclusion Despite a relatively high radiation dose, intensity-modulated radiotherapy with an endorectal balloon can be delivered with acceptable toxicity and efficacy for patients developing biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To review the literature regarding the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of patients with radiation-induced malignant gliomas (RIMGs). Methods and Materials: A PubMed search of English-language articles dealing with RIMG was performed, yielding 52 articles with 92 patients available for review. Results: Initial tumor types treated with RT included brain tumor in 37 patients (40%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 33 (36%), benign disease in 11 (12%), and other in 11 (12%). Median time from RT to development of an RIMG was 8.75 years (range, 2.5–61 years). The RIMG occurred within 10 years after RT in 81% of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, 59% of patients with brain/other, and 18% of patients with benign conditions (p = 0.002). Type of RIMG was glioblastoma in 69 (75%) and anaplastic astrocytoma in 23 (25%). One-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 29.3%, 7.3%, and 0% for patients with glioblastoma and 59.7%, 30.3%, and 20.2% for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. For the 85 patients with data regarding treatment for RIMG, 35 underwent reirradiation to a median dose of 50 Gy (range, 30–76 Gy). For patients undergoing reirradiation, 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 58.9%, 20.5%, and 6.8%. For those not undergoing reirradiation, they were 15.1%, 3%, and 0% (p = 0.0009). Conclusions: The RIMG appeared earlier in patients treated for leukemia and lymphoma and latest for those treated for a benign condition. Patients who underwent reirradiation for RIMG have longer survival times compared with those not receiving RT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Investigates the role of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization and rectal toxicity reduction in patients receiving dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Revelation of the dose-volume histogram analysis; Reduction in prostate motion by the use of rectal balloon during intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Allowance of safer and smaller planning target volume margin by use of the method.

Objectives: To report prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) alone. Previous studies have reported PSA bounce in prostate cancer patients treated with conventional radiotherapy, 3D conformal radiotherapy, and permanent seed brachytherapy. Methods: From January 1997 to July 2002, 102 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with IMRT alone. No patients received androgen ablation. PSA bounce was defined as a PSA increase of at least 0.4 ng/mL, followed by any PSA decrease. Biochemical failure was defined by both the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 1996 and 2006 consensus definitions. Results: The median follow-up was 76 months. The median length of time until the first PSA bounce was 13.6 months. Thirty-three patients (32.4%) had at least 1 PSA bounce, with 25 (24.5%) having 1 bounce; 6 (5.9%), 2 bounces; and 2 (2.0%), 4 bounces. PSA bounce was not significantly associated with biochemical no evidence of disease survival, clinical stage, pretreatment PSA, Gleason combined score, prostate planning target volume, PSA nadir, or mean dose to the prostate. The rate of PSA bounce in patients aged ≤ 70 and > 70 years was 44.4% and 22.8%, respectively (P = .032). Conclusions: Our patient series is the first report on PSA bounce in patients treated with IMRT. Our study confirms that the majority of patients with a bouncing PSA remain biochemically and clinically free of disease with extended follow-up. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The use of an air-filled rectal balloon has been shown to decrease prostate motion during prostate radiotherapy. However, the perturbation of radiation dose near the air-tissue interfaces has raised clinical concerns of underdosing the prostate gland. The aim of this study was to investigate the dosimetric effects of an air-filled rectal balloon on the rectal wall/mucosa and prostate gland. Clinical rectal toxicity and dose-volume histogram (DVH) were also assessed to evaluate for any correlation. A film phantom was constructed to simulate the 4-cm diameter air cavity created by a rectal balloon. Kodak XV2 films were utilized to measure and compare dose distribution with and without air cavity. To study the effect in a typical clinical situation, the phantom was computed tomography (CT) scanned on a Siemens DR CT scanner for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning. A target object was drawn on the phantom CT images to simulate the treatment of prostate cancer. Because patients were treated in prone position, the air cavity was situated superiorly to the target. The treatment used a serial tomotherapy technique with the Multivane Intensity Modulating Collimator (MIMiC) in arc treatment mode. Rectal toxicity was assessed in 116 patients treated with IMRT to a mean dose of 76 Gy over 35 fractions (2.17-Gy fraction size). They were treated in the prone position, immobilized using a Vac-Lok™ bag and carrier-box system. Rectal balloon inflated with 100 cc of air was used for prostate gland immobilization during daily treatment. Rectal toxicity was assessed using modifications of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and late effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT) scales systems. DVH of the rectum was also evaluated. From film dosimetry, there was a dose reduction at the distal air-tissue interface as much as 60% compared with the same geometry without the air cavity for 15-MV photon beam and 2 × 2-cm field size. The dose beyond the interface recovered quickly and the dose reductions due to air cavity were 50%, 28%, 11%, and 1% at 2, 5, 10, and 15 mm, respectively, from the distal air-tissue interface. Evaluating the dose profiles of the more clinically relevant situation revealed the dose at air-tissue interface was approximately 15% lower in comparison to that without an air cavity. The dose built up rapidly so that at 1 and 2 mm, there was only an 8% and 5% differential, respectively. The dosimetric coverage at the depth of the posterior prostate wall was essentially equal with or without the air cavity. The median follow-up was 31.3 months. Rectal toxicity profile was very favorable: 81% (94/116) patients had no rectal complaint while 10.3% (12/116), 6.9% (8/116), and 1.7% (2/116) had grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicity, respectively. There was no grade 4 rectal toxicity. DVH analysis revealed that none of the patients had more than 25% of the rectum receiving 70 Gy or greater. Rectal balloon has rendered anterior rectal wall sparing by its dosimetric effects. In addition, it has reduced rectal volume, especially posterior and lateral rectal wall receiving high-dose radiation by rectal wall distension. Both factors may have contributed to decreased rectal toxicity achieved by IMRT despite dose escalation and higher than conventional fraction size. The findings have clinical significance for future very high-dose escalation trials whereby radiation proctitis is a major limiting factor. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]