Search

Background: In the Phase III ‘GRETA’ trial 474 women aged ≥70 years with early breast cancer were randomly assigned to surgery plus tamoxifen for 5 years or tamoxifen alone for 5 years. This is a long-term update. Patients & methods: Focusing on patients still alive in 2003, outcome end points has been recalculated. Results: Median distant metastases disease-free survival is longer with tamoxifen alone for 5 years; (48.8 vs 37.9 months; p = 0.009). No difference was found in distant metastases rate, disease-free survival, breast cancer and overall survival. Conclusion: Primary endocrine treatment until the the best response, followed by minimal surgery and prosecution endocrine treatment for 5–10 years is a suitable option for elderly breast cancer patients. Delayed surgery does not prejudice overall survival.

Purpose Unresponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, occurring in 30% to 50% of patients, is a major limitation to the treatment of chemotherapy-related anemia. We have prospectively evaluated whether intravenous iron can increase the proportion of patients with chemotherapy-related anemia who respond to darbepoetin. Patients and Methods Between December 2004 and February 2006, 149 patients with lung, gynecologic, breast, and colorectal cancers and ≥ 12 weeks of planned chemotherapy were enrolled from 33 institutions. Patients were required to have hemoglobin ≤ 11 g/L and no absolute or functional iron deficiency. All patients received darbepoetin 150 μg subcutaneously once weekly for 12 weeks and were randomly assigned to sodium ferric gluconate 125 mg intravenously (IV) weekly for the first 6 weeks (n = 73) or no iron (n = 76). Primary end point of the study was the percentage of patients achieving hematopoietic response (hemoglobin ≥ 12 g/dL or ≥ 2 g/dL increase). Results Hematopoietic response by intention-to-treat analysis was 76.7% (95%CI, 65.4% to 85.8%) in the darbepoetin/iron group and 61.8% (95%CI, 50.0% to 72.7%) in the darbepoetin group (P = .0495). Among patients fulfilling eligibility criteria and having received at least four darbepoetin administrations, hematopoietic responses in the darbepoetin/iron group (n = 53) and in the darbepoetin-only group (n = 50) were 92.5% (95% CI, 81.8% to 97.9%) and 70% (95% CI, 55.4% to 82.1%), respectively (P = .0033). Increase of hemoglobin during treatment period showed a time profile favoring darbepoetin/iron with statistically significant effect from week 5 on. The safety profile was comparable in the two arms. Conclusion In patients with chemotherapy-related anemia and no iron deficiency, IV iron supplementation significantly reduces treatment failures to darbepoetin without additional toxicity.

Background Osteopetrosis or Albers-Schonberg's disease is a heterogeneous group of rare hereditary troubles of the bone characterized by bone sclerosis due to an alteration of the bone reabsorption mediated by osteoclasts. The defect in the osteoclastic activity is responsible for complete or partial medullary cavities occlusion, with consequent reduced hemopoiesis, and for the excessive fragility of the affected bone segments. Case report We reported the case of a young man of 31 years affected by osteopetrosis in which a small cell lung cancer developed. Results Small cell lung cancer is a particularly rare neoplasm in the young, and even though it is highly sensitive to chemotherapeutic treatment its prognosis remains poor. The greatest clinical problem connected with chemotherapeutic treatment of patients affected by osteopetrosis is the variability of the reduction of their bone marrow reserve, which could expose them to an excessive hematological toxicity caused by the therapy. Conclusions The adoption of suitable prophylactic measures, such as the use of growth factors and drugs selected in relation to their toxicity or given in reduced doses, should be appropriately considered in these subjects.

The aims of this multicentre, randomised phase III trial were to evaluate: (1) the role of levamisol (LEV); and (2) the role of folinic acid (FA), added to 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. Patients with histologically proven, radically resected stage II or III colon or rectal cancer were eligible. The study had a 2x2 factorial design with four treatment arms: (a) 5FU alone, (b) 5FU+LEV, (c) 5FU+FA, (d) 5FU+LEV+FA, and two planned comparisons, testing the role of LEV and of FA, respectively. From March 1991, to September 1998, 1327 patients were randomised. None of the two comparisons resulted in a significant disease-free (DFS) or overall (OAS) survival advantage. The hazard ratio (HR) of relapse was 0.89 (95\% confidence intervals (CI): 0.73-1.09) for patients receiving FA and 0.99 (95\% CI 0.80-1.21) for those receiving LEV; corresponding HRs of death were 1.02 (95\% CI: 0.80-1.30) and 0.94 (95\% CI 0.73-1.20). Nonhaematological toxicity (all grade vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis, congiuntivitis, skin, fever and fatigue) was significantly worse with FA, while all other toxicities were similar. In the present trial, there was no evidence that the addition of FA or LEV significantly prolongs DFS and OAS of radically resected colorectal cancer patients..

BACKGROUND Factors that are predictive of carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in patients with breast carcinoma are awaited widely. The genetically homogeneous Sardinian population may be useful for defining the role of such genetic alterations further through a clinical evaluation program. METHODS One hundred two of 659 patients with breast carcinoma (15.5%) who were collected consecutively had a family history of breast carcinoma and were screened for BRCA1/2 mutations by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and DNA sequencing. RESULTS Three deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutations were detected in 15 of 102 families (14.7%), including 13 families (86.7%) with BRCA2 mutations and 2 families (13.3%) with BRCA1 mutations. A single variant, BRCA2-8765delAG, was the most recurrent mutation in the series and was found in 12 of 102 families (11.8%) and in 18 of 657 patients (2.7%). The average age at diagnosis was significantly younger in families with BRCA1/2 mutations (48.6 yrs) compared with the age of patients who had no detectable mutation (52.9 yrs; P = 0.039). Moreover, BRCA1/2 mutations were found at a significantly higher rate in families who had at least 1 member with ovarian carcinoma or male breast carcinoma (5 of 12 families; 41.7%) than in families without such an association (10 of 90 families; 11.1%; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS BRCA2 mutations were approximately 6 times more prevalent than BRCA1 mutations. A diagnosis of breast carcinoma before age 50 years, ovarian carcinoma, male breast carcinoma, and 3 affected generations all were associated significantly with BRCA1/2 mutations. Although the current findings provided further support for the hypothesis that additional breast carcinoma susceptibility genes remain to be identified, such indicators of the presence of BRCA1/2 mutations may be useful in counseling patients about undergoing genetic testing. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) iv on day 1, and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) orally bid from day 1 (evening) to day 11 (morning) were administered every 2 weeks (OXXEL regimen) to 38 patients as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. A total of 318 cycles were administered, with a median of 8 (range, 4-12) cycles per patient. Response rate (RR) was 45% (95% confidence interval (CI), 29%-62%), with 7 complete responses and 10 partial responses; furthermore, 12 patients showed a stable disease, so that a disease control was achieved in 29 (76%) patients. RR was greater among patients with performance status 0 (52%), without weight loss (52%), younger than 65 years (50%), and previously unexposed to adjuvant chemotherapy (48%), while no correlation was found with the actually delivered oxaliplatin dose intensity. Overall, haematological side effects were negligible, with no case of grade 4 toxicity, and only one patient suffering from an episode of grade 3 neutropenic fever. Severe anaemia occurred in 4 (11%) patients, and grade 3 neuropathy affected 9 (24%) patients. Median progression-free survival was 7.9 (95% CI, 6.2-9.6) months, and median overall survival has not been reached yet. In conclusion, the OXXEL regimen resulted safe and active, and it deserves further evaluation in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

The sequential doxorubicin → CMF (CMF = cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) regimen has never been compared to CMF in a randomised trial. The role of adding goserelin and tamoxifen after chemotherapy is unclear. In all, 466 premenopausal node-positive patients were randomised to: (a) CMF × 6 cycles (CMF); (b) doxorubicin × 4 cycles followed by CMF × 6 cycles (A → CMF); (c) CMF × 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen × 2 years (CMF → GT); and (d) doxorubicin × 4 cycles followed by CMF × 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen × 2 years (A → CMF → GT). The study used a 2 × 2 factorial experimental design to assess: (1) the effect of the chemotherapy regimens (CMF vs A × CMF or arms a + c vs b + d) and (2) the effect of adding GT after chemotherapy (arms a + b vs c + d). At a median follow-up of 72 months, A → CMF as compared to CMF significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a multivariate hazard ratio (HR) = 0.740 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.556-0.986; P = 0.040) and produced a nonsignificant improvement of overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.764; 95% CI: 0.489-1.193). The addition of GT after chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.555-0.987; P = 0.040), with a nonsignificant improvement of OS (HR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.54-1.32). A → CMF is superior to CMF. Adding GT after chemotherapy is beneficial for premenopausal node-positive patients. © 2005 Cancer Research UK.

This study compares two cytotoxic regimens comprising the same dose and schedule of cisplatin (CP) plus vinorelbine (VNR) or gemcitabine (GEM) administered under the same schedule to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). From April 1998 to February 2003, 285 patients were randomised to receive either VNR 25 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus plus CP 75 mg/m 2 on day 1 (regimen A) or GEM 1200 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 as an i.v. 30-min infusion plus CP 75 mg/m 2 on day 1 (regimen B). Both treatments were recycled every 21 days. If no progression had occurred after six cycles, the patients continued to receive VNR or GEM monochemotherapy weekly. Cross-over of the two single agents was considered if disease progression occurred. Objective response (OR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. 272 patients were ultimately eligible (137 on A and 135 on B). Their main characteristics were: male/female ratio 214/58; median age 63 (range 32-77) years; median Karnofsky Performance Status (PS) 80 (range 70-100); stage IIIB 34%, stage IV 61%, recurrent disease 5%; histology - epidermoid 29%, adenocarcinoma 53%, other NSCLC 18%. The characteristics of the patients in the two arms were well matched. The following response rates were observed in regimens A and B, respectively: complete response (CR) 0.7% and 3.7%, partial response (PR) 31.9% and 22.2% (P = 0.321). Median CR + PR duration was 8 months in both arms. Clinical benefit represented by an improvement in symptoms was evident in 25.7% and 28.1%, respectively. Median TTP was 5 months in both arms and median OS 11 months in both arms. Grade III-IV neutropenia occurred in 30.7% and 17.7% of the patients in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.017); thrombocytopenia occurred in 0% and 9.3% (P = 0.004), respectively. No difference in the incidence of anaemia was observed. Non-haematological toxicity was generally mild: a higher incidence of grade 1-2 peripheral neurotoxicity and grade 1-2 local toxicity with regimen A and grade 1-2 liver toxicity with regimen B was reported. A pharmaco-economic comparison showed a difference between the two doublets, principally due to the different costs of VNR and GEM. Under the study conditions the combination of VNR or GEM with the same dose and schedule of CP produced similar OR, clinical benefits, TTP and OS in advanced NSCLC, and only mild toxicological differences were observed. Pharmaco-economic evaluation favoured the CP + VNR doublet. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of biweekly irinotecan plus leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus in metastatic colorectal carcinoma according to the age of patients. For this purpose, we have analysed 108 patients randomly allocated to receive irinotecan 200 mg m(-2) i.v. (1-h infusion) on day 1, and L-leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) i.v. (1-h infusion) plus 5-fluorouracil 850 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2 every 2 weeks (IRIFAFU) in our previous SICOG 9801 trial. According to age, patients were retrospectively divided into three groups: younger (/=54 years, n=37), middle-aged (55-69 years, n=64), and elderly (/=70 years, n=17). Apart from gender, pretreatment characteristics were well balanced across the three groups. WHO grade/=3 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected on the whole 46 and 16 patients, respectively, without any significant difference according to age-grouping. Patients aged/=54 years stayed on therapy for a longer time (median 24 vs 14-15 weeks), and received more cycles (median 9 vs 7), than the older ones. Only one patient in the young group withdrew consent to therapy as opposed to four patients each in the aged and elderly one. Response rate was 38% for younger patients, 34% for aged, and 35% for the elderly ones. Median time to progression was 7.4, 8.0, and 5.3 months, and median survival time was 13.4, 15.3, and 13.9 months, respectively. We conclude that IRIFAFU given every other week may represent a suitable therapeutic option also for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of the addition of either cisplatin (CDDP) or lonidamine (LND) to epirubicin (EPI) in the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-one metastatic breast cancer patients with no prior systemic chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomized to receive either EPI alone (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 every 21 days), EPI and CDDP (30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 every 21 days), EPI and LND (450 mg orally daily, given continuously), or EPI, CDDP, and LND. Time to progression, response rates, side effects, and survival were compared according to the 2 × 2 factorial design of this study. RESULTS: The groups were well balanced with respect to prognostic factors. Time to progression did not differ in the comparison between CDDP arms and non-CDDP arms (median, 10.9 months v 9.4 months, respectively; P = .10) or between that of LND arms and non-LND arms (median, 10.8 months v 9.9 months, respectively; P = .47), nor did overall survival. The response rate did not significantly differ in the comparison between LND arms and non-LND arms (62.9% v 54.0%, P = .08). No difference in treatment activity was observed between CDDP arms and non-CDDP arms. Toxicity was significantly higher in the CDDP arms, leading to CDDP dose adjustment in 40% of cases. The most frequent side effects were of a hematologic and gastrointestinal nature. The addition of LND produced more myalgias and fatigue. CONCLUSION: Neither CDDP nor LND was able to significantly improve the time to progression obtained by EPI. CDDP, however, significantly worsened the drug’s tolerability.

Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-levels of Gem Vin, administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, were (mg m–2): level I = 1000/25; level II = 1200/25; level III = 1000/30; level IV = 1200/30. A feasibility study was performed at each dose-level, followed by a single-stage phase II study. Dose-level IV was unfeasible because of grade 4 neutropenia. Overall, out of 126 patients enrolled in phase II studies, there were one complete and 32 partial responses (response rate 26%: 95% CI 18–34%). Response rates were 27.9%, 21.4% and 29.3% at levels I, II and III, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxicity was less frequent and severe at level I. Overall median survival was 33 weeks (95% CI 28–40). Descriptive quality of life analysis showed that patients with a worse baseline global health status score tended to drop out of the study earlier than those with a better score. Gem Vin is feasible at different doses. It is sufficiently active and well tolerated. A phase III study to compare the effect on quality of life of Gem Vin (level I) vs cisplatin-based chemotherapy is ongoing. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

BACKGROUND The combination of vinorelbine (VNR), cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has previously been shown to be active in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCHNC). This multicenter Phase II study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of this combination in patients with previously untreated, unresectable locally advanced SCHNC. METHODS Sixty patients with previously untreated, unresectable SCHNC were treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 on Days 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 4-hour infusion on Days 2-5, and VNR 25 mg/m2 iv bolus on Days 2 and 8. There were 15 patients with laryngeal carcinoma, 19 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma, 15 with carcinoma in the oral cavity, 5 with carcinoma in the hypopharynx, and 4 with carcinoma in the maxillary sinus. Most patients (78%) had Stage IV disease. After achievement of the best possible objective response, patients were subjected to definitive locoregional treatment, i.e., radiotherapy and/or surgery, as appropriate. RESULTS All patients completed the induction chemotherapy. After a mean of 3.86 cycles per patient, the overall response rate was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-94%), with a complete response rate of 23% (95% CI, 14-26%). Complete responses were more frequently seen in patients with N0-1 disease than in those with N2-3 disease (P = 0.037). No other statistically significant correlation between type of response and extent of disease was noted. Toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal side effects. After definitive locoregional treatment, 58% of patients were clinically free of disease. These patients included those who had complete response after induction chemotherapy, 19 of 39 patients who had partial response, and 2 with stable disease. Median disease free survival was 16 months, and median overall survival was 23 months. CONCLUSIONS The combination regimen of CDDP, 5-FU, and VNR was very active in previously untreated SCHNC. It was well tolerated in most cases, and neurotoxicity was not a major side effect. This regimen, which does not require hospitalization, should be compared with standard chemotherapy, such as the combination of CDDP and continuous-infusion 5-FU. Cancer 1997; 79:1394-400. © 1997 American Cancer Society.

A multicentric randomized trial was performed in premenopausal women with node-positive, estrogen-receptor-negative breast tumors to assess the potential superiority of alternating adjuvant chemotherapy over ‘standard’ CMF chemotherapy. Between January 1989 and June 1992, 107 patients were entered into the study and randomly allocated to receive either cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 per os on days 1-14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8 (CMF), every 4 weeks for a total of 6 cycles, or the following regimens: CMF as previously; epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m2 IV on day I and vincristine 0.75 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 (EV); mitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and vindesine 2 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 (MVs). The three regimens were given every 4 weeks for a total of 6 cycles according to the following schedule: CMF, EV, MVs, CMF, EV, MVs. At a median follow up of 48 months (range 30-72), 40 patients have relapsed and 17 have died overall. More patients in the triple-combination arm ...

Among primary liver cancers occurring worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the major histological type accounting for 70–85% of all cases. Phase III trials in patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib (SO), a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed significant improvements in both overall and progression-free survival. We report the cases of two elderly patients with advanced HCC who had prolonged stable disease following treatment with SO (400 mg bid). Patient 1 was treated with SO for a period of 16 months until evidence of right sacral metastases was noted. Patient 2 received SO 400 mg bid from January 2009 to October 2009 until radiological evidence of disease progression was noted. Both patients experienced minimal toxicity, suggesting that SO can be safely administered to elderly patients.

We present the rationale and study design of the Tarceva Italian Lung Optimization trial phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial on efficacy of second-line therapies in different subgroups of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients identified using molecular and clinical evaluations. To date, we can assume that advanced NSCLC epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated patients benefit from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib and erlotinib, whereas their role in the treatment of patients who do not have EGFR mutations is controversial. The aim of this study is to assess whether it is possible to optimize second-line treatment in NSCLC patients with absence of EGFR mutations. Moreover, the predictive value of the K-ras mutation, EGFR protein expression, and EGFR gene copy number, as well as a smoking habit and histotype for determining a different effect of erlotinib compared with chemotherapy will be assessed in patients who do not have EGFR mutations. The primary endpoint is overall survival; the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, response rate, quality of life, and toxicity. We have planned to collect blood samples to identify different prognosis-related polymorphisms and to assess their sensitivity and specificity in the detection of EGFR and K-ras mutations with respect to histologic samples.

Objective: Breast cancer patients with >3 involved nodes (N+) have a poor outcome. Chemotherapy (CT), alone or combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor (HOR)-positive patients, is the standard for these women. However, there are still questions surrounding the optimal adjuvant CT regimen. Methods: 244 patients with >3 N+ were randomized to receive either four 3-weekly courses of epirubicin (E: 100 mg/m2, day 1) followed by four 4-weekly cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF: 600, 40, 600 mg/m2, days 1, 8: n = 122) or four 3-weekly courses of paclitaxel (T: 175 mg/m2, day 1) followed by four 3-weekly cycles of epirubicin and vinorelbine (E: 75 mg/m2, day 1; V: 25 mg/m2, days 1, 8: n = 122). After CT, tamoxifen (plus an LH-RH analog in menstruating women) was given to all HOR-positive patients over a period of 5 years. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and toxicity were secondary end points. Results: At a median follow-up time of 102 months (range 3–146), OS and RFS did not differ significantly between groups (E-CMF vs. T-EV: OS, HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59–1.48, p = 0.8; RFS, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57–1.29, p = 0.45). The lack of any difference between assigned treatments was confirmed by multivariate analysis (E-CMF vs. T-EV: RFS, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.64–1.48, p = 0.9). The 2 regimens showed different toxicity profiles. In fact, significantly more women assigned to E-CMF were affected by stomatitis (p = 0.001) while significantly more women in the T-EV group developed peripheral neuropathy (p < 0.0001) and musculoskeletal disorders (p < 0.0001). However, side effects were moderate and manageable and no toxic death occurred in either arm of the study. Conclusions: T-EV was safe and moderately toxic but was not superior to E-CMF.

Background In recent years, numerous studies have assessed the prevalence of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in various cohorts. We here extensively investigated the prevalence and geographical distribution of BRCA1-2 mutations in the entire genetically-homogeneous Sardinian population. The occurrence of phenotypic characteristics which may be predictive for the presence of BRCA1-2 germline mutations was also evaluated. Methods Three hundred and forty-eight breast cancer patients presenting a familial recurrence of invasive breast or ovarian carcinoma with at least two affected family members were screened for BRCA1-2 mutations by DHPLC analysis and DNA sequencing. Association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutational status with clinical and pathological parameters was evaluated by Pearson's Chi-Squared test. Results and Conclusion Overall, 8 BRCA1 and 5 BRCA2 deleterious mutations were detected in 35/348 (10%) families; majority (23/35;66%) of mutations was found in BRCA2 gene. The geographical distribution of BRCA1-2 mutations was related to three specific large areas of Sardinia, reflecting its ancient history: a) the Northern area, linguistically different from the rest of the island (where a BRCA2 c.8764_8765delAG mutation with founder effect was predominant); b) the Middle area, land of the ancient Sardinian population (where BRCA2 mutations are still more common than BRCA1 mutations); and c) the South-Western area, with many Phoenician and Carthaginian locations (where BRCA1 mutations are prevalent). We also found that phenotypic features such as high tumor grading and lack of expression of estrogen/progesterone receptors together with age at diagnosis and presence of ovarian cancer in the family may be predictive for the presence of BRCA1-2 germline mutations.

The aim of the present study is to confirm the antitumor activity of orally administered idarubicin (IDA) in patients with advanced breast cancer. Doxorubicin (ADRIA) was chosen as control treatment and the patients were randomized to receive either IDA or ADRIA according to a 2:1 ratio. Sixty-three patients, 77% of whom were pretreated with chemotherapy excluding anthracyclines, entered the study. The doses were: IDA 45 mg/m2 orally on 3 consecutive days every 28 days: ADRIA 75 (60) mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days. A complete + partial response (CR + PR) was observed in 11/37 (30%) evaluable cases treated with IDA and in 6/19 (32%) cases treated with ADRIA. If all the patients were included, the CR + PR remission rates were 27.5 and 27%, respectively. There were no significant differences as regards time to remission, duration of remission and survival. None of 10 cases who crossed over the treatments responded to the second therapy. The most frequent side effects of IDA were myelosuppression and nausea/vomiting. The only significant statistical difference between the two anthracyclines was the lower incidence of alopecia after IDA. Although there were 3 cases of cardiotoxicity after ADRIA, 2 of which severe, no case of clinical cardiotoxicity was observed after IDA. The present study confirms that orally administered IDA is an active agent in advanced breast cancer.

Background The BRCA2-8765delAG mutation was firstly described in breast cancer families from French-Canadian and Jewish-Yemenite populations; it was then reported as a founder mutation in Sardinian families. We evaluated both the prevalence of the BRCA2-8765delAG variant in Sardinia and the putative existence of a common ancestral origin through a haplotype analysis of breast cancer family members carrying such a mutation. Methods Eight polymorphic microsatellite markers (D13S1250, centromeric, to D13S267, telomeric) spanning the BRCA2 gene locus were used for the haplotype analysis. Screening for the 8765delAG mutation was performed by PCR-based amplification of BRCA2-exon 20, followed by automated sequencing. Results Among families with high recurrence of breast cancer (≥ 3 cases in first-degree relatives), those from North Sardinia shared the same haplotype whereas the families from French Canadian and Jewish-Yemenite populations presented distinct genetic assets at the BRCA2 locus. Screening for the BRCA2-8765delAG variant among unselected and consecutively-collected breast cancer patients originating from the entire Sardinia revealed that such a mutation is present in the northern part of the island only [9/648 (1.4%) among cases from North Sardinia versus 0/493 among cases from South Sardinia]. Conclusion The BRCA2-8765delAG has an independent origin in geographically and ethnically distinct populations, acting as a founder mutation in North but not in South Sardinia. Since BRCA2-8765delAG occurs within a triplet repeat sequence of AGAGAG, our study further confirmed the existence of a mutational hot-spot at this genomic position (additional genetic factors within each single population might be involved in generating such a mutation).

BACKGROUND The superiority of new generation aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen in the adjuvant treatment of early breast carcinoma has emerged from several randomized trials. However, until now not all previous studies have shown a mortality benefit. METHODS A pooled analysis of 2 prospective multicentric trials, sharing the same study design and nearly identical inclusion criteria, was performed. In both trials, women treated previously with tamoxifen for 2 or 3 years were randomly assigned to either continuing tamoxifen for an additional 2 or 3 years or to having their treatment switched to aminoglutethimide or anastrozole for a comparable time period. Mortality was analyzed according to allocated treatment and other patient and tumor variables. RESULTS In all, 828 postmenopausal women, mostly with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and node-positive tumors who had been monitored for a median time of 78 months (range, 6–141 months) were analyzed. Of these women, 415 were randomly selected to continue tamoxifen and 413 switched to aminoglutethimide or anastrozole. All-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality were significantly improved by the switch: all-cause mortality: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61 (0.42–0.88) P = .007; breast cancer-specific mortality: HR = 0.61 (0.39–0.94) P = .025. No increase was recorded in breast cancer-unrelated mortality in women after switching. Multivariate analysis showed that patient age, tumor size, allocated treatment, and nodal status, in that order, were independent mortality predictors. CONCLUSIONS Switching to an aromatase inhibitor after 2 or 3 years of tamoxifen therapy significantly improves survival compared with continuing 2 or 3 years of additional tamoxifen treatment. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Background: Primary chemotherapy as part of multidisciplinary approach is the established treatment for inoperable stage III B breast cancer. The primary endpoints were conversion to operable disease and feasibility of conservative surgery (breast-conserving therapy: BCT); secondary were clinical and pathological complete response rate, local and distant control and safety of the primary regimen. Methods: Between 1998 and 2001, 40 inoperable breast cancer patients ≤60 years, 72% T4abc and 28% T4d, received 6 cycles of primary PEV dose-dense regimen: cisplatin 50 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, i.v. (q 14). Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or BCT was performed, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy. Results: All patients were converted to operable disease, and BCT was feasible in 24% of T4abc patients. After a median follow-up of 84 months (range 58–96), local and distant relapses were 7.5% (0% in BCT ) and 25% (25% in BCT), respectively. Clinical response was 80% (clinical complete response [cCR]: 20%); pathological complete response (pCR) was 40% in breast, 50% in axilla (pLN0); 32% both in breast and axilla. Neutropenia (G4, 30%), leukopenia (G4, 25%), alopecia (G2, 100%), nausea and vomiting (G4, 20%) were the most common toxicities. Conclusions: The PEV dose-dense regimen seems to be highly effective in terms of resectability and pCR. Toxicity, mainly hematological, was acceptable. Successful BCT is feasible, in selected patients, without compromising local and distant control.

Tumor response to first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer offers prognostic information and may be used as a surrogate marker for evaluating treatment efficacy. With this study we wanted to determine whether changes in circulating serum CA 15-3 levels during chemotherapy provided additional information for prognostic prediction. Serum CA 15-3 was measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months during anthracycline-based first-line chemotherapy in 526 patients with advanced breast cancer prospectively enrolled in five phase II-III trials. Changes in marker levels were correlated with disease response, time to progression and overall survival. In all, 336 patients attained a disease response. A significant relationship was found between disease response and CA 15-3 variations, although many individual discrepancies were also observed. At the 6-month time point, the median time to progression was 15.3 months in patients with normal marker levels throughout the study, 11.7 months in those with a CA15-3 reduction >25%, 9.6 months in those with elevated baseline CA 15-3 levels which did not change during therapy and 8.6 months in those with increased marker levels (p < 0.001). The median survival was 42.3, 29.7, 28.5, and 24.8 months, respectively (p < 0.002). The prognostic role of changes in CA 15-3 levels was maintained in the patient subset attaining disease response or stabilization to treatment (p < 0.001) and after adjusting for clinical response and major prognostic parameters in the multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). In conclusion, monitoring serum CA 15-3 levels during first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer patients provides prognostic information independently from tumor response.

BACKGROUND In patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCC), capecitabine has demonstrated a superior response rate (RR), equivalent disease progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and an improved overall tolerability profile compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV). The FOLFOX4 regimen, combining oxaliplatin with LV and bolus plus infusional 5-FU (LV5FU2), has been shown to improve RR and PFS versus LV5FU2, and it was more effective and less toxic than irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/LV. Capecitabine (an oral fluoropyrimidine) may be an effective, well tolerated, and more convenient alternative to 5-FU/LV in combination with oxaliplatin, especially in older patients. METHODS Elderly (≥ 70 years) patients with MCC were treated with a 3-weekly regimen of oxaliplatin at an initial dose of 85 mg/m2 intravenously on Day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily from Days 2 to 15 (XELOX regimen). In the absence of Grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity, oxaliplatin was increased to 100 mg/m2 in the second cycle, and in the absence of Grade ≥ 2 nonhematologic adverse events during Cycle 2, capecitabine was increased to 1250 mg/m2 twice daily in the third and subsequent cycles. After the first 35 patients (first series), the treatment protocol was amended so that only an oxaliplatin increase to 110 mg/m2 and 130 mg/m2 during Cycles 2 and 3, respectively, was planned in the remaining 41 patients (second series). RESULTS Seventy-six patients with a median age of 75 years (range, 70–82 years) entered the current study. In the first series, the oxaliplatin dose was increased in 18 (51%) patients, and the capecitabine dose was increased in 4 (11%) patients. In the second series, the oxaliplatin dose was increased to 110 mg/m2 in 26 (63%) patients, and to 130 mg/m2 in 19 (46%) patients. In all, 2 complete and 29 partial responses were observed, for an overall RR of 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30–53%). The median PFS was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.7–10.3 months), and the median OS was 14.4 months (95% CI, 11.9–16.9 months). In a multivariate analysis, the presence of disease symptoms affected both PFS and OS, whereas OS also was independently affected by male gender and disease spread. Age had no independent effect on PFS or OS. Five percent of patients developed Grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity during treatment, Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 8% of patients, and severe hand-foot syndrome in 13% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Fit elderly patients with MCC showed a good RR to XELOX with only mild toxicity observed in most patients. XELOX, should, therefore be considered as an important therapeutic option for elderly patients with MCC. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Objectives: We conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the clinical efficacy, toxicity, and dose intensity of a new weekly schedule of docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: We enrolled 58 patients, 52% of whom had received a previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. The treatment schedule was: docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days. Results: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 56 for efficacy. Overall response rate was 64.3% with 16.1% of complete responses and 48.2% of partial responses. Median survival was 22.10 months (95% CI: 15.53–28.67) and median time to tumor progression was 13.6 months (95% CI: 10.71–16.49). The most common hematological toxicity was neutropenia (no febrile neutropenia), which occurred in 28 patients (48.3%) but grade 3–4 in only 8 patients (14%). Alopecia, the most common nonhematological toxicity, occurred in 20 (34.5%) patients, but only 5 patients (8.6%) experienced grade 3 alopecia. Conclusion: The activity of docetaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer is confirmed. The promising results of the employed schedule, in agreement with other published studies, need to be further confirmed within a phase III study.

We investigated the activity and toxicity of a combination of vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel (PTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion administered as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with adjuvant anthracyclines. A total of 61 patients received a regimen consisting of VNB 25 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 15, PTX 60 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 and continuous infusion of 5-FU at 200 mg m(-2) every day. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Disease response was evaluated by both RECIST and World Health Organization ( WHO) criteria. Objective responses were recorded in 39 of 61 patients (64.0%) assessed by WHO and in 36 of 50 patients (72.0%) assessable by RECIST criteria. Complete remission occurred in 15 (24.6%) and 14 patients (28.0%), respectively. The median time to progression and overall survival of entire population was 10.6 and 27.3 months, respectively, and median duration of complete response was 14.8 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression (leucopenia grade 3/4 in 52.5% of patients). Grade 3/4 nonhaematologic toxicities included mucositis/diarrhoea in 13.1%, skin in 3.3% and cardiac in 1.6% of patients. Grade 2/3 neurotoxicity was observed in five patients (7.2%). The VNB, PTX and 5-FU continuous infusion combination regimen was active and manageable. Complete responses were frequent and durable.

We investigated the activity and toxicity of a combination of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15; epirubicin 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15; and 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion at 200 mg/m2 every day, administered as first-line chemotherapy in anthracycline-naive metastatic breast cancer patients. Fifty-three patients entered the study. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Objective response was 60% by World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria and 63% by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST). The median time to progression was 12.7 months (17.6 months in responders) and the median survival duration was 32.9 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was leucopenia (grade 3/4 in 36% of patients). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities included mucositis in 11% of patients, skin and cardiac toxicity in 4% and 2%, respectively. The combination of vinorelbine, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion was found to be an active and manageable first-line regimen for metastatic breast cancer patients.

605 Background: Primary chemotherapy, as part of multimodality treatment, has become the standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to increase DFS, OS and conservative surgery. Stage III B is renowned as the worst of LABC, and despite appropriate therapy the majority of patients (pts) will experience distant metastases and death within 2–3 years. The optimal regimen and schedule of primary chemotherapy is uncertain. Aim of our study was to verify the efficacy of an original cisplatin-based regimen (PEV) in terms of response and survival. Methods: Between 1996 and 2001 72 consecutive III B pts were treated with primary chemotherapy: Cisplatin 50 mg/m2, Epirubicin 100 mg/m2, Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 every 14 (44%) or 21 (66%) days for 4 (33%) or 6 (67%) cycles, followed by surgery, radiation, adjuvant CMF 1, 8 q28 x 6 cycles + - TAM. Median age was 50 y (29–70); 47% premenopausal; 75% T4 abc, 25% T4 d; 45% ER-; 69% PgR-; 46% Ki 67+; 40% G3; 87,5% clinical axillary nodes positive. Results: All p...

PURPOSE: To determine whether switching patients from tamoxifen to antiaromatase treatment would prevent some of the relapses or deaths that we assume would occur if tamoxifen were continued. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred eighty postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for 3 years were randomized to either continue tamoxifen for 2 more years or to switch to low-dose aminoglutethimide (250 mg daily) for 2 years. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 61 months (range, 5 to 94 months), 59 events occurred in the tamoxifen group, and 55 occurred in the aminoglutethimide group. More treatment failures at distant sites, such as viscera (P = .02), were observed in the tamoxifen group. Although no differences in disease-free survival between the two groups have emerged so far, a significant trend favors aminoglutethimide in overall survival (P = .005) and breast cancer–specific survival (P = .06). Even if more patients in the antiaromatase group complained of drug-related side effects and more of them discontinued treatment (P = .0001), the number of cardiovascular events and, in general, of life-threatening adverse events was higher in the tamoxifen arm. CONCLUSION: Switching patients from tamoxifen to aminoglutethimide treatment resulted in comparable event-free survival, but longer overall survival was achieved in patients who were switched to aminoglutethimide as compared with those who continued to receive tamoxifen. Should these preliminary results be confirmed by larger studies with a similar design, which are now testing the effectiveness of the new, more active, and tolerable aromatase inhibitors, sequencing tamoxifen with an aromatase inhibitor could become a preferable alternative to tamoxifen alone in early breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of chemotherapy versus that of tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression in pre-/perimenopausal estrogen receptor–positive patients with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either six cycles of a standard regimen of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8 (CMF), with all drugs restarted on day 29, or 5 years of tamoxifen, 30 mg/d, plus ovarian suppression with surgical oophorectomy, ovarian irradiation, or monthly goserelin 3.6-mg injections. Disease-free survival was the main study end point. Overall survival and toxicity were additional end points. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1997, 120 patients were assigned to CMF and 124 to tamoxifen and ovarian suppression (oophorectomy, n = 6; ovarian irradiation, n = 31; and goserelin injections, n = 87). At the time of analysis (median follow-up time, 76 months; range, 9 to 121 months), 82 patients had relapsed and 39 had died. No difference between groups had emerged with respect to either disease-free or overall survival. Treatments were comparable even in respect to age, tumor size, and nodal status, although a nonsignificant trend favored patients with poorly differentiated tumors treated with CMF. Leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and alopecia were significantly more common in patients treated with CMF. There were few patients who developed benign gynecologic changes in either group, and numbers were comparable. CONCLUSION: The combination of tamoxifen with ovarian suppression seems to be safe and to yield comparable results relative to standard CMF.

Background : High dose Epirubicin (HD-EPI) (>90 mg/m 2 ) and Vinorelbine (VNR) demonstrated antitumor activity as single agent (about 20%) in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. This trial compares these two agents combined with cisplatin (CP). Patients and methods : From August 1992 to February 1996, 228 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized to receive either EPI 120 mg/m 2 as i.v. bolus plus Cisplatin (CP) 60 mg/m 2 on day 1 (regimen A) or VNR 25 mg/m 2 as i.v. bolus on day 1 and 8 plus CP 60 mg/m 2 on day 1 (regimen B). Both treatments were recycled every 21 days up to a maximum cumulative dose of EPI of 840 mg/m 2 or 12 cycles. Eligible patients were 212 and 198 patients were evaluable for objective response (95 in arm A and 103 in arm B). The main characteristics of eligible patients were: male/female 179/33; median age 61 (42–72); median Karnofsky PS 80 (70–100); stage IIIA 12%, stage IIIB 40%, stage IV 41%, recurrence 7%; histotype: epidermoid 48%, adenoca 36%, others 16%. Results : The following response rates were observed in regimens A and B, respectively; CR, 1 and 2%, PR, 32 and 25% ( P =0.4567). Median CR+PR duration was 9 and 8 months, respectively. Median survival was 10.5 and 9.6 months, respectively. Grade III–IV leucopenia occurred in 38 and 21% in arm A and arm B, respectively ( P =0.01), thrombocytopenia in 6 and 0% ( P =0.02), anemia in 8 and 7% (n.s.). Non-hematological toxicity was moderate and the only difference between the treatments was alopecia (88 vs. 33% in arm A and B, respectively). Supraventricular arrhythmia occurred in three patients on regimen A; a>15% LVEF absolute decrease was observed in 9 (22.5%) and three (14%) patients on arm A and arm B, respectively (n.s.). No congestive heart failure was observed. Conclusion : HD−EPI+CP and VNR+CP are both active combinations in advanced NSCLC with a similar response rate, response duration and survival but regimen A was significantly more toxic (myelosuppression and alopecia).

We assessed the activity and tolerability of a cisplatin, epirubicin, and lonidamine combination regimen as first-line chemotherapy in 28 advanced breast cancer patients. The schedule of treatment was as follows: 60 mg/m2 epirubicin followed by 40 mg/m2 cisplatin given on days 1 and 2 every 21 days, with 450 mg lonidamine being given per os (three tablets) on days of chemotherapy administration and in the period intervening between one cycle and the next. Patients received a median of 5 (range 1 – 6) cycles. Overall, 22 patients were evaluable for response and 28, for toxicity. Four patients refused to continue the treatment after the first course, one was lost to follow-up, and one died due to toxicity (septic shock). The incidence of grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting was found to be greater than that expected with epirubicin and lonidamine alone. The addition of cisplatin resulted in an increase in platelet and hemoglobin toxicities, whereas the WBC toxicity did not differ from that expected with epirubicin and lonidamine. The hematological toxicity was found to be cumulative, leading to treatment delay in about 50% of patients at the fifth and sixth courses. The activity of this cytotoxic regimen was noteworthy, with the overall response rate being 81.8% (31.8% complete responses and 50.0% partial responses) in evaluable patients. This response rate decreased to 64.2% when all registered patients were included according to an intent-to-treat analysis. In conclusion, the association of cisplatin, epirubicin, and lonidamine given on the schedule described herein, appears to be very active but substantially toxic. We are now testing this combination in a randomized comparison, with the cisplatin dose being reduced to 30 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 2.

The aim was to compare the efficacy of ondansetron and a combination of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis over three consecutive courses of chemotherapy. Cancer patients scheduled to receive for the first time cisplatin (>50 mg/m(2)) in combination with other cytotoxic agents, were recruited in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study and treated with ondansetron 8 mg i.v. and dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. Twenty-four hours after the start of chemotherapy, patients were randomised to treatment either with oral ondansetron 8 mg bd plus placebo on days 2-5 (group A) or with oral ondansetron 8 mg bd plus oral dexamethasone 8 mg bd on days 2-3, and 4 mg bd on days 4 and 5 (group B). Two hundred and thirty-six cancer patients were recruited into the study. Complete protection from delayed vomiting/nausea in group A and group B was Obtained in 50/39% and in 63/42% of patients, respectively in the first course; in 55/34% and in 64/40% in the second and in 49/31% and 60/37% in the third. Logistic regression analysis reveals a statistically significant difference in incidence of emesis between the combination of ondansetron plus dexamethasone and ondansetron alone (P

In order to study the relationship between circulating levels of CA 15-3 and the disease extent in predicting survival, we prospectively followed 312 breast cancer (BC) patients, from October 1988 to March 1995, from the time of first relapse. CA 15-3 values were assessed before treatment onset. Disease extent was defined as the percentage of liver or lung involvement and the number of bone segments positive at scintigraphy. The covariates were primary tumour characteristics (T, N and hormone receptor status) and patient characteristics at recurrence (menopause, performance status and age). Higher CA 15-3 serum levels were found in patients with visceral metastases or with pleural effusion. A logistic regression model selected disease extent in liver, lung and bone as independent variables for the determination of abnormal CA 15-3 values. Univariate survival analysis confirmed the positive prognostic influence of low CA 15-3 serum levels, absence of visceral metastases and the presence of only one metastatic site. Multivariate Cox's survival analysis selected disease extent in liver, lung, bone and soft tissue but not level of CA 15-3 as prognostic factors. In conclusion, CA 15-3 is not an independent variable in determining survival, its prognostic role being linked to the disease extent. This association suggests that CA 15-3 may be useful in assessing disease extent when this is not easily assessable.

PURPOSE Some evidence in vitro and in vivo shows that lonidamine (LND) can positively modulate the activity of doxorubicin and epirubicin (EPI). On this basis, a multicenter prospective randomized trial was performed in patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) to determine if the addition of LND to EPI could increase the response rate of EPI alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS From May 1991 to May 1993, 207 patients were enrolled onto this study and randomized to receive intravenous (IV) EPI (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2) alone or with LND (600 mg orally daily). EPI administration was repeated every 21 days until tumor progression or for a maximum of eight cycles. LND was administered continuously until chemotherapy withdrawal. RESULTS Response rate was significantly superior for the EPI plus LND scheme compared with the single-agent EPI either considering assessable patients (60.0% v 39.8%; P < .01) or including all registered patients according to an intention-to-treat analysis (55.3% v 37.5%; P < .02). The distribution of the response rate according to the site of disease did not show any significant difference between the treatment arms, except for the patient subgroup with liver metastases in which the combination EPI plus LND resulted in a significant improvement of responses than EPI alone. Toxicity was moderate, and except for myalgia, no adjunctive side effects were observed in the EPI plus LND arm. Overall survival and time to progression were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION This study confirms in vivo that the administration of EPI is enhanced by the concomitant LND administration.

This phase II study was aimed to evaluate the activity of a combination of megestrol acetate (MA) and alpha 2a interferon (IFN) in a group of tamoxifen-responsive breast cancer patients. Thirty patients with metastatic breast cancer either previously treated with adjuvant tamoxifen for at least 24 months or treated with tamoxifen for metastatic disease and showing an objective response or stability of disease, were given MA (single daily dose of 160 mg per os) and alpha 2a IFN (3 million units - MU - three times per week intramuscularly -i.m. -). Of the 29 evaluable patients, 2 (6.8%) achieved a complete response and 4 (13.8%) a partial response for an overall response rate of 20.6% (95% confidence limits = 5.9%-35.4%). Treatment toxicity was mild and no patient had to discontinue or delay the treatment due to IFN side effects. Our results seem to rule out that alpha 2a IFN is able to improve the activity of MA as second-line therapy in tamoxifen-responsive patients.

e22215 Background: Germline mutations in BRCA1-2 genes have been demonstrated to increase the risk of developing breast cancer. Conversely, the impact of BRCA1–2 mutations on prognosis and survival of breast cancer patients is still debated. In this study, we extensively investigated the prevalence and geographical distribution of BRCA1–2 mutations in the entire genetically-homogeneous Sardinian population as well as tried to clarify the influence of such mutations on breast cancer-specific survival. Methods: Among incident cases during the period 1997–2002, a total of 512 breast cancer patients gave their consent to undergo BRCA1–2 mutation screening by DHPLC analysis and automated DNA sequencing. The Hakulinen, Kaplan- Meier, and Cox regression methods were used for both relative survival assessment and statistical analysis. Results: A lower breast cancer-specific overall survival rate was observed in BRCA1–2 mutation-positive patients after the first two years from diagnosis. However, survival rates were similar in both groups after five years from diagnosis. No significant difference was found for age of onset, disease stage, and primary tumour histopathology between the two subsets. The geographical distribution of BRCA1–2 mutations was related to specific three large areas of Sardinia: a) the northern area, linguistically different from the rest of the island (where a BRCA2–8765delAG mutation with founder effect was predominant); b) the central-eastern area, land of the ancient Sardinian population (where BRCA2 mutations are still largely more common thanBRCA1 mutations); and c) the south-western area, with many Phoenician and Carthaginian locations (where BRCA1 mutations are prevalent). Conclusions: In Sardinian breast cancer population, the effects of BRCA1–2 germline mutations on patients' survival were demonstrated to vary within the first two years from diagnosis. After a longer follow-up observation, breast cancer-specific rates of death were instead similar for BRCA1–2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. Finally, we identified some probands' phenotypic features which may be predictive for the presence of BRCA1–2 germline mutations and should be therefore considered when counselling patients about undergoing genetic testing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

e11521 Background: > 3 N+ pts have a poor outcome, even in the presence of otherwise favourable phenotypic features. CT, alone or combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor (HOR)+ pts, is the gold standard for these women. However questions still exist about the optimal CT regimen. Methods: 244 >3N+ pts were randomized to either four 3-weekly courses of E (100 mg/sqm,d 1)followed by four 4-weekly cycles of CMF (600, 40, 600 mg/sqm, dd 1,8)(E-CMF:N=122)or four 3-weekly courses of T (175 mg/sqm, d1) followed by four 3-weekly cycles of EV (E:75 mg/sqm, da 1; V: 25 mg/sqm dd 1,8;.) (T-EV:N=122). After CT, tamoxifen (plus a LH-RH analog in menstruating women ) was given for 5 years to all HOR+ pts.S was the primary end-point. Results: At 82 mos median f-up, S and RFS did not differ significantly between groups (7-yr S: E-CMF:76%,T- EV:74%;adjust. HR: 0.89;0.54–1.49;p=0.7; 7-yr RFS: E-CMF:67%,T-EV:63%;adjust. HR: 0.95;0.61–1.47;p=0.8;).Cox analysis confirmed no difference between treatments. However RFS forest plots showed some heterogenity in CT effect according to HOR and HER2 status: E- CMF was superior to E-TV in HOR + pts (HR=0.43; CI 0.20–0.93 p=0.03),irrespective of HER2 status, but it was inferior (HR=1.91;CI 0.48- 7.64;p=0.4) in triple negative pts. The two regimens showed different toxicity profiles;however toxicities were manageable and there were no difference in the %of pts receiving all the 8 planned CT cycles (E-CMF: 87.6%;T-EV:81.1% p=0.2) or who discontinued CT (E-CMF: 12.8%; T-EV: 18.9% p=0.2). Conclusions: T-EV was not superior to E-CMF which,combined with ET, still represents an adequate choice for this high risk pts subset, especially for HOR+ pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

4542 Background: 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) still remains the mainstay for the management of patients (pts) with metastatic gastric carcinoma, but long term results are still unsatisfacto...

10518 Background: Recent data showed that anthracycline-based chemotherapy with increased dose-intensity improves clinical outcomes as compared to conventional regimens in adjuvant setting, particularly in high risk patients with HR negative tumors. Nevertheless dose-intensity in neoadjuvant setting remain controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome between two different primary regimens and, furthermore, among soubgroups identified by HR status. Methods: Between 1996 and 2001, 72 consecutive LABC patients, (77% T4abc; 23% T4d; 88% axillary nodes involvement) median age 51 (29–70), ER neg 39%; PgR neg 71%, were treated with PEV regimen (cisplatin 50 mg/m2; epirubicin 100 mg/m2; vinorelbine 25 mg/m2) as primary chemotherapy. The regimen was delivered with different number of cycles and treatment intervals (3 wks × 4 cycles in the first 24 pts as PEV21 × 4; 2 wks × 6 cycles in the subsequent 48 pts as PEV14 × 6); the entire treatment in both groups lasted 12 weeks. All 72 patients received adjuvant CMF, RT and Hormonal treatment when indicated. Results: after a median follow up of 76 months (46–111), higher DFS and OS were observed in the intensified PEV14 × 6 group as compared to the counterpart (69% vs 42% p = 0.02 and 78% vs 58% p = 0.05 respectively). Statistically better DFS and OS were observed in the group ER/ PgR negative which received intensified PEV 14 × 6, whereas no statistically difference was found among ER/ PgR postive patients, regardless of the type of regimen. Conclusions: Our results suggest that primary intensified chemotherapy is associated with a better clinical outcome in poor prognosis LABC T4 patients,and that HR negative tumors benefit greatly from intensified regimen. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm our data. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

3590 Background: We have previously reported that OXAFAFU regimen significantly prolonged the overall survival of MCC patients (pts) in comparison with IRIFAFU regimen (Comella, Ann Oncol 2005). Moreover, the OXXEL regimen showed promising activity in phase II study (Comella, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2005). Comparison of these two regimens in terms of safety and activity is the aim of the present trial. Methods: Pts with MCC were randomly treated with: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 iv on day (D) 1, levo-folinic acid 250 mg/m2 plus 5-fluorouracil 850 mg/m2 bolus iv on D 2 (OXAFAFU); or oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv on D 1, Xeloda 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily po from D 1 (evening) to D 11 (morning). Treatment was delivered every 2 weeks up to progression, or for a maximum of 12 cycles. Results: From May 2004 to December 2005, 191 eligible pts were recruited (OXAFAFU, 96 pts; OXXEL, 95 pts). Characteristics of pts were well balanced in OXAFAFU vs OXXEL arm: primary colon, 74% vs 72%; PS 0/1–2, 57/43% vs 65/35%; previous adjuvant CT, 24% vs 20%; liver metastases, 80% vs 83%; ≥ 2 metastatic sites, 54% vs 49%. At this interim analysis, with a median number of 8 (range, 1–12) cycles delivered in both arms, 143 pts (OXAFAFU, 73; OXXEL, 70) were assessed for safety. In OXAFAFU vs OXXEL arm, occurrence of WHO grade ≥ 3 toxicity was: neutropenia, 29% vs 3%; anemia, 2% vs 7%; thrombocytopenia 3% vs 7%; diarrhea, 4% vs 13%; vomiting, 4% vs 3%; hand-foot syndrome, 1% vs 7%. Conclusions: At this interim analysis, the OXXEL regimen appeared to produce significantly less neutropenia than the OXAFAFU regimen, at a price of an acceptable non-hematologic toxicity. Accrual will continue up to reaching the final sample size of 300 pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

10689 Background: In the late 90s two large phase III trials (GRETA & CRC) showed that tamoxifen as sole treatment was a possible alternative to surgery in old women. Two Phase III neoadjuvant trials showed recently that letrozole is superior and anastrozole is not inferior to tamoxifen.A few phase II and a small fase III trials showed interesting results also with the steroidal inactivator exemestane. Methods: We are running a fase II open trial in early breast cancer patients aged over 70 with receptor rich tumors, treated with exemestane 25 mgs/day for 6 months before surgery. Primary endpoints are clinical response, breast conservative surgery (BCS) rate and safety. Results: Of the planned 100 patients we report preliminary results on 50 patients (mean age 81 , range 70–92) evaluable for clinical and mammographic response. 33/50 had a partial response (66%), 2/50 PD on treatment. Clinical basal mean size of tumors was 4.4 cms (4,81 in responders) and 2,67 cms the final in responders patients. Eight patients refused surgery, 12 are too early, 23/30 underwent BCS where 17 of them (74%) were unfit for BCS at basal evaluation. No remarcable exemestane related toxicity was recorded. Conclusions: As expected from published data of phase III trials in metastatic and adjuvant setting, exemestane appears to be very active also in the neoadjuvant setting. Probably there is no more need of large phase III trials in order to consider exemestane in the preoperative setting in rich receptor tumors. In old and frail patients this could also be considered as sole treatment. [Table: see text]