Search

Meningiomas comprise 33% of all CNS tumors. The World Health Organization (WHO) describes meningiomas as benign (BM), atypical (AM), and malignant/anaplastic (MM). High-grade meningiomas such as AMs and MMs are more aggressive, recur more frequently, and portend a worse prognosis than BMs. Currently, the standard treatment for high-grade meningiomas, especially AMs, is ill-defined. In particular, the benefit to survival outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy post-surgical resection remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) post-surgery on survival outcomes compared to surgery alone for high-grade meningiomas. PRISMA guidelines were a foundation for our literature review. We screened the PubMed database for studies reporting overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and tumor recurrence for intracranial, primary AM and MMs treated with surgery+ART or surgery alone. Fixed and random effect models compared tumor control rate for AM aforementioned groups. Mean 5-year PFS was 76.9% for AM (surgery+ART) and 55.9% for AM (surgery alone) patients. Mean 5-year OS was 81.3% and 74% for AM (surgery+ART) and AM (surgery alone) groups, respectively. Overall, the mean 5-year PFS for aggregated high-grade meningiomas AM+MM (surgery+ART) was 67.6%. Fixed effect models revealed tumor control rate as 76% for AM (surgery+ART) and 69% for AM (surgery alone) groups. ART induced toxicity incidence ranged from 12.0% to 35.5% for AM and MM patients. Our analysis suggests that (surgery+ART) may increase PFS, OS, and tumor control rates in high-grade meningiomas. However, further studies involving surgery+ ART should be conducted to fully evaluate the ideal radiosurgical candidate, modality, and dosage.

BACKGROUND High-grade gliomas (HGG) comprise the most common primary adult brain cancers and universally recur. Combination re-radiation therapy (reRT) and bevacizumab (BVZ) therapy for recurrent HGG is common, but its reported efficacy is mixed. OBJECTIVE To assess clinical outcomes after reRT±BVZ in recurrent HGG patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), hypo-fractionated (HFSRT), or fully fractionated RT (FSRT). METHODS We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified studies reporting outcomes for patients with recurrent HGG treated via reRT±BVZ. Cohorts were stratified by BVZ treatment status and reRT modality (SRS, HFSRT, and FSRT). Outcome variables were overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS 34 of 1,742 identified articles survived inclusion criteria (2%) and reported data on 954 patients receiving reRT alone and 445 patients receiving reRT+BVZ. All patients initially underwent standard-of-care therapy for their primary HGG. In a multivariate analysis that adjusted for median patient age, WHO Grade, RT dosing, reRT fractionation regimen, time between primary and reRT, and reRT target volume, BVZ therapy was associated with significantly improved OS (2.51 [0.11, 4.92] months, P=.041) but no significant improvement in PFS (1.40 [-0.36, 3.18] months, P=.099). Patients receiving BVZ also had significantly lower rates of RN (2.2% vs 9.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Combination reRT+BVZ may improve OS and reduce rates of RN in recurrent HGG, but further controlled studies are needed to confirm these effects.

BACKGROUND Meningiomas, the most common primary brain tumor, account for more than one third of all primary CNS tumors. High-grade meningiomas, WHO grade II and III, comprise between 16%-24% of total meningiomas and are more aggressive, recur more frequently, and portend a worse prognosis than WHO grade I meningiomas. Adjuvant radiation of high-grade meningiomas, while not uncommon, remains variably described in current literature. To assess our institution’s radiation protocol, we examined our cohort of over 200 high-grade meningiomas. METHODS We queried our hospital’s EHR system for surgically resected meningiomas from January 2013 to December 2019. Of 286 results identified, 24 patients met the inclusion criteria: 1) histologically confirmed WHO grade II or III meningioma, 2) primary resection coupled with adjuvant radiation therapy, and 3) no chemotherapy. Only one WHO grade III meningioma met inclusion criteria. Patients with NF2 were excluded. Patient demographics, radiation dosage, fraction number, and dates of surgery, radiation onset, recurrence, and most recent follow-up were recorded. RESULTS Median age at surgery was 56.2 years (± 11.1, range 37.8 – 81.7), and males comprised 70.8% (n = 17) of the population. Only FSRT or IMRT were employed. The most frequent dosage was 55.8 Gy across 31 fractions with a median time to radiation of 2.7 months (± 3.0, range 1.0 – 12.6). 5 out of 24 patients experienced recurrence, which did not include the WHO III tumor. Median time to recurrence was 3.0 years (± 2.0, range .3 – 5.8). Median follow up was 3.5 years (± 2.2, range .3 – 9.3). CONCLUSIONS A fraction of our population experienced recurrence, regardless of grade II or grade III pathology. FSRT remains a safe and effective adjuvant therapy for high-grade meningioma after surgical resection. Future prospective studies comparing differing radiation modalities should be conducted.

BACKGROUND Although microsurgical resection (MR) remains the gold-standard for the treatment of symptomatic cavernous malformations, some authors have proposed the use of radiosurgical Gamma-Knife Surgery (GKS) for lesions that are deep or eloquent, such as those located in the brainstem. OBJECTIVE Here were analyze the literature regarding patient outcomes following MR or GKS for brain stem cavernous malformations. METHODS This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic literature review. A database search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted in September 2019. This review included studies evaluating the outcomes of MR or GKS for cavernous malformations located in the brainstem. RESULTS Gross total resection was achieved in the majority of patients and effectively eliminated the risk of recurrent hemorrhage from the operative lesion in studies following the outcomes of MR. GKS reduces the annual hemorrhage rate for patients, although it does not eliminate the cavernous malformation. Both treatment modalities were effective in reducing prior symptomatology. Unlike resection, GKS only reduces the risk of future hemorrhage and does prevent it. CONCLUSIONS Both MR and GKS can improve or stabilize symptoms in patients. However, the therapeutic benefit of GKS may take months to years to take full-effect, resulting in a potential for subsequent hemorrhagic events. MR remains the best treatment option due to its ability to eliminate future bleeding events entirely and should be performed whenever gross total resection is possible.