Search

130 Background: The socioeconomic status of patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in developing countries could in many cases limit their access to the best available therapeutic options. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and access to treatment of Mexican patients with mRCC. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma who were treated at an oncology referral center in Northeast Mexico over a 5-year period. Results: We included 233 patients in the analysis, of whom 63% were men. The mean age at diagnosis was 58.2 years; 87% of the tumors were histopathologically classified as clear cell carcinoma. Regarding laterality, 54% of the tumors originated from the right kidney. The distribution of cases by clinical stage (CS) was as follows: CS I 15%, CS II 8%, CS III 17%, CS IV 60%. All of the included patients had government health insurance coverage; however, specific treatment for renal cell cancer was not included in this coverage. In terms of access to first-line systemic management in the 139 patients with advanced kidney cancer who were candidates for treatment, 29% received treatment with a single-drug tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), 4% were treated with combined or single-drug immunotherapy (IO), and 12% were treated with TKI combined with IO. All but one patient who was treated with a single drug or a combination of IO received these drugs in the context of a clinical trial. Fifty-five percent of patients with advanced disease did not have access to standard first-line therapy. The rate of loss to medical follow-up was 69% of cases. Conclusions: Despite the proven oncological benefit of the latest generation of therapies based on IO/IO or IO/TKI for mRCC, access to first-line standard management is still poor in our country, even with single agent TKI. Public health programs should be implemented to expand therapeutic options for this group of patients.

6 Background: Penile cancer is a rare neoplasm (

Background Pathogenic variants (PVs) of BRCA genes entail a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer in 50–85% of carriers. Their prevalence in different populations has been previously reported. However, there is scarce information regarding the most common PVs of these genes in Latin-Americans. This study identified BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV frequency in a high-risk female population from Northeastern Mexico and determined the association of these mutations with the patients’ clinical and pathological characteristics. Methods Women were divided into three groups: aged ≤ 40 years at diagnosis and/or risk factors for hereditary breast cancer (n = 101), aged > 50 years with sporadic breast cancer (n = 22), and healthy women (n = 72). Their DNA was obtained from peripheral blood samples and the variants were examined by next-generation sequencing with Ion AmpliSeq BRCA1 and BRCA2 Panel using next-generation sequencing. Results PVs were detected in 13.8% group 1 patients (BRCA1, 12 patients; BRCA2, 2 patients). Only two patients in group 2 and none in group 3 exhibited BRCA1 PVs. Variants of uncertain significance were reported in 15.8% patients (n = 16). In group 1, patients with the triple-negative subtype, PV frequency was 40% (12/30). Breast cancer prevalence in young women examined in this study was higher than that reported by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology (15.5% vs. 5.5%, respectively). Conclusions The detected BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV frequency was similar to that reported in other populations. Our results indicate that clinical data should be evaluated before genetic testing and highly recommend genetic testing in patients with the triple-negative subtype and other clinical aspects. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5950-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

e19248 Background: International guidelines for genitourinary cancers recommend treatment decisions by a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB). The benefits of a MTB include greater accuracy in staging and in the probability of receiving care in compliance with international clinical practice guidelines, greater access to clinical trials, better communication between treating physicians and cost-effective care with greater patient satisfaction, which could translate into better outcomes. Our objective was to assess the impact of a MTB in the management of patients with genitourinary tumors in a tertiary referral university center of México. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all cases presented to the Genitourinary Tumor Committee of our hospital from March to August 2019. Results: A total of 84 patients were included in the analysis; of these 80% were men with a median age of 61 years. Of all the cases, 68% were first-time presentations with a median time from evaluation to presentation of 4 days. The most frequently discussed diagnoses were prostate, urothelial and renal cancer, each corresponding to about 28% of the sample. Forty-six percent of the cases presented were in metastatic disease. The median time for discussion of each case after its presentation was 10 minutes. Changes were made in the clinical stage and treatment plan proposed by the most responsible physician in 4% and 46% of the cases, respectively, achieving a unanimous consensus in 88%. After the MTB session, 29 patients were lost to medical follow-up and were not subsequently evaluated. Among the 55 patients who underwent reassessment, the recommendations of the MTB were applied in 92%. Conclusions: Discussion of urologic oncology cases at the MTB led to a change in the treatment plan in almost half of the patients. Although MTBs are an increasingly common practice in Mexico, this is the first study that describes the impact that these sessions have on the management of genitourinary tumors in our population. The high rate of loss to medical follow-up remains an important problem in developing countries, negatively affecting the prognosis of these patients.

393 Background: Notwithstanding excellent oncological outcomes reported by pivotal trials in patients with testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT), adherence to medical treatment and follow-up remains a major issue in developing countries. Studies that describe the clinical characteristics and treatment adherence of Mexican men with TGCT are lacking. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all men with newly diagnosed TGCT treated at an oncology referral center in Northeast Mexico from 2014 to 2018. Results: In the analysis, 195 patients were included. Median age at diagnosis was 28 years; median time from diagnosis to first evaluation by an oncologist was 26 days. Distribution according to the laterality of the primary tumor was right, 56%; left, 43%; and bilateral, 1%. There were 14 oncological emergencies at presentation; the most frequent was choriocarcinoma syndrome, described in 5 patients. Thirty-five percent of cases were seminomatous germ cell tumors (SGCT) and 65% nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). The clinical stages at diagnosis were I, 36%; IS, 8%; II, 18%; and III, 38%. After risk stratification according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG), 90% of SGCT had a good risk and 10% an intermediate risk. In NSGCT, the risk distribution was 65, 10, and 25% for good, intermediate, and poor-risk disease, respectively. After proposing treatment, the adherence rate was 81%. Of the total, 58% were lost to medical follow-up with a median time of adherence of 11.5 months. Conclusions: Despite coverage by the Mexican public health insurance system “Seguro Popular”, treatment adherence and medical follow-up abandonment is a problem among men with TGCT, which could negatively impact their prognosis. Measures must be implemented to optimize adherence in this group of patients.