Search

BackgroundPediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) aid in identification of deterioration in hospitalized children with cancer but are underutilized in resource-limited settings. Proyecto EVAT is a multicenter quality improvement (QI) collaborative in Latin America to implement PEWS. This study investigates the relationship between hospital characteristics and time required for PEWS implementation.MethodsThis convergent mixed-methods study included 23 Proyecto EVAT childhood cancer centers; 5 hospitals representing quick and slow implementers were selected for qualitative analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 71 stakeholders involved in PEWS implementation. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and translated to English, then coded using a priori and novel codes. Thematic content analysis explored the impact of hospital characteristics and QI experience on time required for PEWS implementation and was supplemented by quantitative analysis exploring the relationship between hospital characteristics and implementation time.ResultsIn both quantitative and qualitative analysis, material and human resources to support PEWS significantly impacted time to implementation. Lack of resources produced various obstacles that extended time necessary for centers to achieve successful implementation. Hospital characteristics, such as funding structure and type, influenced PEWS implementation time by determining their resource-availability. Prior hospital or implementation leader experience with QI, however, helped facilitate implementation by assisting implementers predict and overcome resource-related challenges.ConclusionsHospital characteristics impact time required to implement PEWS in resource-limited childhood cancer centers; however, prior QI experience helps anticipate and adapt to resource challenges and more quickly implement PEWS. QI training should be a component of strategies to scale-up use of evidence-based interventions like PEWS in resource-limited settings.

BackgroundPediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) reduce clinical deterioration, improve interdisciplinary communication, and provide cost savings; however, little is known about how these impacts are achieved or related. This study evaluates the multi-level impacts of PEWS in resource-limited pediatric oncology centers.MethodsWe conducted 71 semi-structured interviews including physicians (45%), nurses (45%), and administrators (10%) from 5 resource-limited pediatric oncology centers in 4 Latin American countries. Interviews were conducted in Spanish, transcribed, and translated into English. A code book was developed using a priori and inductively derived codes. Transcripts were independently coded by 2 coders, achieving a kappa of 0.8-0.9. Thematic content analysis explored perceived impacts of PEWS at the level of the patient, clinician, healthcare team, and institution.ResultsPEWS improved the quality of attention for patients, reducing morbidity and mortality. Clinicians felt more knowledgeable, confident, and empowered providing patient care, resulting in greater job satisfaction. PEWS affected team dynamics by improving interdisciplinary (ward and intensive care unit) and interprofessional (physicians and nurses) relationships and communication. This ultimately led to institutional culture change with emphasis on patient safety, collaboration with other centers, and receipt of institutional awards. Together, these impacts led to hospital-wide support of ongoing PEWS use.ConclusionsIn resource-limited hospitals, PEWS use results in multi-level positive impacts on patients, clinicians, teams, and institutions, creating a feedback loop that further supports ongoing PEWS use. These findings can guide advocacy for PEWS to various stakeholders, improve PEWS effectiveness, and inform assessment of other interventions to improve childhood cancer outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Low-grade gliomas (LGG) are the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumors in children. Peru is an index country for the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC). As part of the Initiative, a multidisciplinary brain tumor team was formed in 2020 that includes five national reference centers: National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, National Children’s Health Institute-San Borja, National Children’s Health Institute-Breña, Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital and Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen National Hospital. This multicenter study sought to evaluate the survival and prognostic factors of patients younger than 18 years diagnosed with LGG, an index cancer for the GICC. METHODS: A retrospective study included all patients diagnosed with LGG in the five centers between 2014 and 2018. We analyzed clinical characteristics, histology, and treatment modalities. We used the Kaplan-Meier method for survival. RESULTS: 194 patients were registered; 136 patients were included. M/F ratio was 1.2, mean age 7 years old. The most frequent location was infratentorial (42.2%), supratentorial (34.9%), optic/chiasm/sellar (11%) and brainstem (11.9%). The most frequent histological types were pilocytic astrocytoma (61%), diffuse astrocytoma (10.3%), oligodendroglioma (5.2%), and other low-grade neoplasms (23.5%). Surgery was performed in 109 patients (83.2%). Chemotherapy alone was used in 17 (12.5%), while radiotherapy in 20 (14.7%). Overall survival at 5 years was 82.9% (95% CI 73.3 - 89.4). Age younger than 3 years (p=0.002), diffuse histological type (p=0.04), and location in the brainstem (p=0.001) were factors associated with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Within the framework of the GICC, this work is one of the first steps to understand the current context of pediatric CNS tumor care in Peru. Although the reported survival rate is about the GICC goal of 60%, further improvements in care are needed to increase survival to level closer to high-resource setting and decrease long term morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. While survival has improved in high-income countries (HIC), the outcomes for patients in low-middle-income countries (LMIC) are unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine the survival of children with Medulloblastoma at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (INEN) between 1997 and 2013 in Peru. METHODS: Between 1997-2013, data from 103 children older than three years with Medulloblastoma were analyzed. Fourteen patients were excluded. The patients were split into two distinct cohorts, 1997 – 2008 and 2009 – 2013, corresponding with chemotherapy regimen changes. Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, while prognostic factors were determined by univariate analysis (log-rank test). RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included; median age was 8.1 years (range: 3-13.9 years). The five-year OS was 62% (95% CI: 53 – 74%) while EFS was 57% (95% CI: 48 – 69%). The variables adversely affecting survival were anaplastic histology [compared to desmoplastic; OS: HR=3.4, p=0.03], metastasis [OS: HR=3.5, p=0.01; EFS: HR=4.3, p=0.004], delay in radiation therapy of 31-60 days [compared to ≤30 days; EFS: HR=2.1, p=0.04], and treatment 2009 – 2013 cohort[OS: HR=2.2, p=0.02; EFS: HR=2.0; p=0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for Medulloblastoma at INEN were low compared with HIC. Anaplastic sub-type, metastasis at diagnosis, delay in radiation therapy, and treatment in the period 2009 - 2013 negatively affected the outcomes in our study. Multidisciplinary teamwork, timely delivery of treatment and partnerships with loco-regional groups and colleagues in HIC is likely beneficial.