1. Repression of exogenous gene expression by the retinoic acid target gene G0S2
- Author
-
Ethan Dmitrovsky, Yun Lu, David Sekula, Sarah J. Freemantle, William W. Lamph, Dennis Liang Fei, Michael B Henderson, Steven R. Blumen, Jessica P. Dong, and Tian Ma
- Subjects
G0/G1 switch gene 2 ,Cancer Research ,Receptors, Retinoic Acid ,Retinoic acid ,Cell Cycle Proteins ,Tretinoin ,Ubiquitin-Activating Enzymes ,Biology ,Retinoid X receptor ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute ,Cell Line, Tumor ,transcriptional repression ,Gene expression ,retinoic acid ,medicine ,Humans ,RNA, Small Interfering ,Psychological repression ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,Gene knockdown ,Articles ,Lipase ,Transfection ,Molecular biology ,Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ,Retinoic acid receptor ,Oncology ,chemistry ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,medicine.drug - Abstract
The G0/G1 switch gene 2 (G0S2) is rapidly induced by all-trans-retinoic acid (RA)-treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and other cells. G0S2 regulates lipolysis via inhibition of adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL). This study found that retinoic acid receptor (RAR), but not retinoid X receptor (RXR) agonists induced G0S2 expression in APL cells. Novel G0S2 functions were uncovered that included repression of exogenous gene expression and transcriptional activity. Transient G0S2 transfection repressed the activities of multiple reporter constructs (including the retinoid-regulated species RARβ, UBE1L and G0S2); this occurred in diverse cell contexts. This inhibition was antagonized by siRNA-mediated G0S2 knockdown. To determine the inhibitory effects were not due to transient G0S2 expression, G0S2 was stably overex-pressed in cells without appreciable basal G0S2 expression. As expected, this repressed transcriptional activities. Intriguingly, transfection of G0S2 did not affect endogenous RARβ, UBE1L or G0S2 expression. Hence, only exogenously expressed genes were affected by G0S2. The domain responsible for this repression was localized to the G0S2 hydrophobic domain (HD). This was the same region responsible for the ability of G0S2 to inhibit ATGL activity. Whether an interaction with ATGL accounted for this new G0S2 activity was studied. Mimicking the inhibition of ATGL by oleic acid treatment that increased lipid droplet size or ATGL siRNA knockdown did not recapitulate G0S2 repressive effects. Engineered gain of ATGL expression did not rescue G0S2 transcriptional repression either. Thus, transcriptional repression by G0S2 did not depend on the ability of G0S2 to inhibit ATGL. Subcellular localization studies revealed that endogenous and exogenously-expressed G0S2 proteins were localized to the cytoplasm, particularly in the perinuclear region. Expression of a mutant G0S2 species that lacked the HD domain altered cytosolic G0S2 localization. This linked G0S2 subcellular localization to G0S2 transcriptional repression. The potential mechanisms responsible for this G0S2 repression are examined.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF