Search

Background: Survivors of childhood cancer may face difficulties at school. We investigated whether childhood cancer affects attainment of upper secondary education, in a register-based cohort study from Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, where we limit bias from selection and participation., Methods: From the national cancer registers, we identified all long-term survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed aged 0-14 years in 1971-2005 (n = 7629), compared them to matched population comparisons (n = 35,411) and siblings (n = 6114), using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: Overall, 6127 survivors (80%) had attained upper secondary education by age 25, compared to 84% among comparison groups. Elevated OR for not attaining this level were mainly confined to survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumours (OR Surv_PopComp 2.05, 95%CI: 1.83-2.29). Other risk groups were survivors who had spent more time in hospital around cancer diagnosis and those who had hospital contacts in early adulthood, particularly psychiatric. Survivors of all cancer types were less likely to have attained upper secondary education without delay., Conclusions: Although survivors of childhood cancer experienced delays in their education, many had caught up by age 25. Except for survivors of CNS tumours, survivors attained upper secondary education to almost the same extent as their peers., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Childhood cancer survivors face various adverse consequences. This Nordic register-based cohort study aimed to assess whether survivors of childhood cancer are more likely to have low income than their peers., Methods: We identified 17,392 childhood cancer survivors diagnosed at ages 0 to 19 between 1971 and 2009 with 83,221 age-, sex-, and country-matched population comparisons. Annual disposable income at ages 20 to 50 years was retrieved from statistical offices (for 1990-2017) and categorized into low income and middle/high income. The number of transitions between income categories were assessed using binomial regression analyses., Results: The prevalence of annual low income among childhood cancer survivors was 18.1% and 15.6% among population comparisons (risk ratio [RR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.18). Compared to population comparisons, childhood cancer survivors were 10% (95% CI 8%-11%) less likely to transition from low to middle/high income and 12% (10%-15%) more likely to transition from middle/high to low income during follow-up. Among those initially in the low income category, survivors were 7% (95% CI 3%-11%) more likely to remain in the low income category. If the initial category was middle/high income, childhood cancer survivors were 10% (95% CI 8%-11%) less likely to remain in the middle/high income and 45% (37%-53%) more likely to transition to the low income category permanently., Conclusions: Childhood cancer survivors are at higher risk for low income in adulthood than their peers. These disparities might be reduced by continued career counseling along with support in managing within the social security system., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: A childhood cancer diagnosis and treatment-induced somatic late effects can affect the long-term mental health of survivors. We aimed to explore whether childhood cancer survivors are at higher risk of psychiatric disorders later in life than their siblings and the general population., Methods: In this register-based cohort study (part of the Socioeconomic Consequences in Adult Life after Childhood Cancer [SALiCCS] research programme), we included 5-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed before 20 years of age between Jan 1, 1974 and Dec 31, 2011, in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. In Denmark and Sweden, 94·7% of individuals were born in a Nordic country (ie, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, or Sweden); similar information was not available in Finland. Data on ethnicity were not collected. Survivors were compared with their siblings and randomly selected individuals from the general population who were matched to the survivors by year of birth, sex, and geographical region. We followed up our study population from 5 years after the childhood cancer diagnosis or corresponding calendar date for matched individuals (the index date) until Aug 11, 2017, and assessed information on hospital contacts for any and specific psychiatric disorders. For siblings, the index date was defined as 5 years from the date on which they were of the same age as their sibling survivor when diagnosed with cancer., Findings: The study population included 18 621 childhood cancer survivors (9934 [53·3%] males and 8687 [46·7%] females), 24 775 siblings (12 594 [50·8%] males and 12 181 [49·2%] females), and 88 630 matched individuals (47 300 [53·4%] males and 41 330 [46·6%] females). The cumulative incidence proportion of having had a psychiatric hospital contact by 30 years of age between Jan 1, 1979, and Aug 11, 2017, was 15·9% (95% CI 15·3-16·5) for childhood cancer survivors, 14·0% (13·5-14·5) for siblings, and 12·7% (12·4-12·9) for matched individuals. Despite a small absolute difference, survivors were at higher relative risk of any psychiatric hospital contact than their siblings (1·39, 1·31-1·48) and matched individuals (hazard ratio 1·34, 95% CI 1·28-1·39). The higher risk persisted at the age of 50 years. Survivors had a higher burden of recurrent psychiatric hospital contacts and had more hospital contacts for different psychiatric disorders than their siblings and the matched individuals., Interpretation: Childhood cancer survivors are at higher long-term risk of psychiatric disorders than their siblings and matched individuals from the general population. To improve mental health and the overall quality of life after childhood cancer, survivorship care should include a focus on early signs of mental health problems, especially among high-risk groups of survivors., Funding: NordForsk, Aarhus University, Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation, Danish Health Foundation, and Swiss National Science Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Study Question: Does the probability of a live birth after fresh IVF/ICSI cycles with autologous oocytes differ in early onset female cancer survivors compared to their siblings?, Summary Answer: The probability of a live birth was similar in female cancer survivors and siblings after four fresh IVF/ICSI cycles., What Is Known Already: Fertility preservation strategies are rapidly being developed to help female cancer patients who wish to have children later. However, there are only a few studies available on fertility treatments and following live births in female cancer survivors before fertility preservation strategies became available. In one of them, the probability of a live birth was reduced after assisted reproductive technology with autologous oocytes in cancer survivors compared to siblings., Study Design, Size, Duration: In this retrospective, register-based study, data from Finnish registers on cancer, birth and prescribed medications were merged to identify 8944 female cancer survivors (diagnosed with cancer between 1953 and 2012 at the age of 0-40 years) and 9848 female siblings of survivors eligible for IVF/ICSI treatments between January 1993 and December 2012., Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: Fresh IVF/ICSI cycles and following live birth rates (LBRs) within 22-48 weeks in cancer survivors and siblings at the age of 20-41 years were identified. A binomial regression model with log-link function was used to calculate risk ratio (RR) for live births after fresh IVF/ICSI cycles in survivors compared to siblings, adjusting for attained age and calendar time. A Poisson regression model was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for an IVF/ICSI treatment, as well as overall live births, including both pregnancies after fertility treatments and spontaneous pregnancies, in survivors compared to siblings., Main Results and the Role of Chance: We observed an overall decreased LBR, irrespective of IVF/ICSI treatments, in cancer survivors compared to siblings (IRR 0.68, 95% CI 0.64-0.71). All in all, 179 (2.0%) survivors and 230 (2.3%) siblings were prescribed fertility drugs for IVF/ICSI treatments (IRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.84). For the first fresh IVF/ICSI cycle, the LBR was 17.2% among survivors and 15.7% among siblings (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.72-1.87). The mean LBR after four fresh IVF/ICSI cycles was not statistically different in survivors compared to siblings., Limitations, Reasons for Caution: In this study, only IVF/ICSI treatments with autologous oocytes were included. The probability of a live birth after a frozen embryo transfer or oocyte donation could not be evaluated in this study. Information on miscarriages, extrauterine pregnancies or termination of pregnancies was not available., Wider Implications of the Findings: For those early onset cancer survivors, who received IVF/ICSI treatments, the probability of live birth was not different from siblings who received IVF/ICSI treatments. However, an overall decreased LBR, irrespective of IVF/ICSI treatments, was observed in cancer survivors compared to siblings, indicating that cancer survivors receiving IVF/ICSI treatments in our study consisted of a selected group with at least a moderate ovarian reserve., Study Funding/competing Interest(s): This study was supported by a grant from the Cancer Foundation (Finland) (grant number 130079) and by a grant from LähiTapiola. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest., Trial Registration Number: N/A., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Advances in multimodality cancer treatments have increased the risk of long-term complications in early-onset cancer survivors. For female cancer survivors, these include diminished reproductive function, often resulting in a narrowed fertile window. The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of fertility treatments in cancer survivors (aged 0-39 years at diagnosis) compared to siblings. Data from Finnish registers on cancer, birth and prescribed medications were merged to identify 8,929 survivors and 9,495 siblings without previous deliveries. Fertility drug purchases from 1993 to 2012 at the age of 16-41 years were included. A Poisson regression model was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for the use of fertility drugs, adjusting for age and calendar time at fertility drug purchase. Fertility treatments were more common in survivors compared to siblings, as 6.1% of survivors compared to 3.8% of siblings had bought fertility drugs (IRR 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.65). A subclassification of fertility treatments into ovulation inductions and assisted reproductive technology (ART), showed increased use of ART (IRR 2.41, 95% CI 1.97-2.96), whereas the use of ovulation induction was similar in survivors and siblings. Analyses by calendar time periods showed the use of ART to be significantly higher in the most recent decade, from 2003 onwards. We conclude that cancer survivors have an increased risk for subfertility, which is why fertility counseling is important. However, our results mirror a more active approach among clinicians towards fertility treatments in cancer survivors during the most recent years., (© 2019 UICC.)