Search

Background and purpose For tumor tracking, a correlation model is used to estimate internal tumor position based on external surrogate motion. When patients experience an internal/external surrogate drift, an update of the correlation model is required to continue tumor tracking. In this study, the accuracy of the internal tumor position estimation for both the clinical available update at discrete points in time (rebuild) and an in-house developed non-clinical online update approach was investigated. Methods A dynamic phantom with superimposed baseline drifts and 14 SBRT patients, treated with real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) on the Vero system, were retrospectively simulated for three update scenarios, respectively no update, clinical rebuild and 0.5 Hz automated online update of the correlation model. By comparing the target positions based on 0.5 Hz verification X-ray images with the estimated internal tumor positions regarding all three update scenarios, 95th percentile modeling errors (ME 95 ), incidences of full geometrical coverage of the CTV by a 5 mm extended PTV ( P 5mm ) and population-based PTV margins were calculated. Further, the treatment time reduction was estimated when switching from the clinical rebuild approach to the online correlation model update. Results For dynamic phantom motion with baseline drifts up to 0.4 mm/min, a 0.5 Hz intra-fraction update showed a similar accuracy in terms of ME 95 and P 5mm compared to clinical rebuild. For SBRT patients treated on Vero with RTTT, accuracy was improved by 0.5 Hz online update compared to the clinical rebuild protocol, yielding smaller PTV margins (from 3.2 mm to 2.7 mm), reduced ME 95,3D (from 4.1 mm to 3.4 mm) and an increased 5th percentile P 5mm (from 90.7% to 96.1%) for the entire patient group. Further, 80% of treatment sessions were reduced in time with on average 5.5 ± 4.1 (1 SD) min. Conclusion With a fast (0.5 Hz) automated online update of the correlation model, an efficient RTTT workflow with improved geometrical accuracy was obtained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: TomoBreast is a unicenter, non-blinded randomized trial comparing conventional radiotherapy (CR) vs. hypofractionated Tomotherapy (TT) for post-operative treatment of breast cancer. The purpose of the trial is to compare whether TT can reduce heart and pulmonary toxicity. We evaluate early toxicities. Methods: The trial started inclusion in May 2007 and reached its recruitment in August 2011. Women with stage T1-3N0M0 or T1-2N1M0 breast cancer completely resected by tumorectomy (BCS) or by mastectomy (MA) who consented to participate were randomized, according to a prescribed computer-generated randomization schedule, between control arm of CR 25x2 Gy/5 weeks by tangential fields on breast/chest wall, plus supraclavicular-axillary field if node-positive, and sequential boost 8x2 Gy/2 weeks if BCS (cumulative dose 66 Gy/7 weeks), versus experimental TT arm of 15x2.8 Gy/3 weeks, including nodal areas if node-positive and simultaneous integrated boost of 0.6 Gy if BCS (cumulative dose 51 Gy/3 weeks). Outcomes evaluated were the pulmonary and heart function. Comparison of proportions used one-sided Fisher's exact test. Results: By May 2010, 70 patients were randomized and had more than 1 year of follow-up. Out of 69 evaluable cases, 32 were assigned to CR (21 BCS, 11 MA), 37 to TT (20 BCS, 17 MA). Skin toxicity of grade ≥1 at 2 years was 60% in CR, vs. 30% in TT arm. Heart function showed no significant difference for left ventricular ejection fraction at 2 years, CR 4.8% vs. TT 4.6%. Pulmonary function tests at 2 years showed grade ≥1 decline of FEV1 in 21% of CR, vs. 15% of TT and decline of DLco in 29% of CR, vs. 7% of TT (P = 0.05). Conclusions: There were no unexpected severe toxicities. Short course radiotherapy of the breast with simultaneous integrated boost over 3 weeks proved feasible without excess toxicities. Pulmonary tests showed a slight trend in favor of Tomotherapy, which will need confirmation with longer follow-up of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]