Search

Background: This study compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with erlotinib plus pazopanib versus erlotinib plus placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: Patients with progressive-stage IV NSCLC after either 1 or 2 previous chemotherapy regimens were randomized to receive erlotinib (150 mg by mouth daily) with either pazopanib (600 mg by mouth daily) or placebo. During treatment, patients were evaluated every 8 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After a study amendment, pretreatment serum specimens for the VeriStrat assay were collected. The predictive value of the VeriStrat score (good vs poor) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in the overall population and in each treatment group.Results: One hundred ninety-two eligible patients were randomized between February 2010 and February 2011. PFS was prolonged with erlotinib plus pazopanib versus erlotinib plus placebo (median, 2.6 vs 1.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.58; P = .001). There was no difference in the OS of the 2 groups. A good VeriStrat score predicted longer PFS and OS in the entire group and predicted longer PFS in the subgroup receiving erlotinib plus pazopanib. The addition of pazopanib increased toxicity, and this was consistent with the known toxicity profile.Conclusions: The addition of pazopanib to erlotinib in an unselected group of patients with previously treated NSCLC improved PFS and increased treatment-related toxicity, but it had no influence on OS. The efficacy of both regimens was modest. Patients receiving erlotinib plus pazopanib had longer PFS if they had a good VeriStrat score versus a poor one. Cancer 2018;124:2355-64. © 2018 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The best treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a poor performance status is not well defined. In this phase 2 trial, patients were randomized to receive treatment with either single-agent pemetrexed or 1 of 2 combination regimens.Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed nonsquamous NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 were stratified by age and serum albumin level and were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 regimens: pemetrexed (arm 1), pemetrexed and bevacizumab (arm 2), or pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab (arm 3). The response to treatment was assessed every 2 cycles; responding and stable patients continued treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity.Results: One hundred seventy-two patients were randomized, 162 patients began the study treatment, and 146 patients completed 2 cycles and were evaluated for their response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months in arm 1, 4.0 months in arm 2, and 4.8 months in arm 3. The overall response rates were 15% in arm 1, 31% in arm 2, and 44% in arm 3. The overall survival was similar in the 3 treatment arms. All 3 regimens were relatively well tolerated. Patients receiving bevacizumab had an increased incidence of hypertension, proteinuria, and bleeding episodes, but most events were mild or moderate.Conclusions: All 3 regimens were feasible for patients with advanced NSCLC and an ECOG performance status of 2. The addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed increased the overall response rate. The efficacy of pemetrexed/carboplatin/bevacizumab (median PFS, 4.8 months) approached the prespecified study PFS goal of 5 months. Larger studies will be necessary to define the role of bevacizumab in addition to standard pemetrexed and carboplatin in this population. Cancer 2018;124:1982-91. © 2018 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We added panitumumab to standard combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced KRAS WT non-squamous NSCLC.Methods: Patients received panitumumab 9 mg/kg IV, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV, and carboplatin AUC = 6 IV every 21 days. After 6 cycles, maintenance therapy with panitumumab and pemetrexed was administered every 21 days until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.Results: 29 of 66 patients (44%) had objective responses. The median TTP was 6 months; median overall survival (OS) was 17 months. Panitumumab increased treatment-related toxicity, notably skin rash.Conclusions: The addition of panitumumab increased toxicity, and had no discernible impact on efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Inhibition of angiogenesis may be effective in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Sunitinib, an oral agent that inhibits the VEGF signaling pathway, may delay progression in sequence with chemotherapy. This phase II trial was designed to evaluate the role of sunitinib monotherapy following 6 cycles of irinotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage (ES) SCLC. Method: Patients aged ≥18years with previously untreated ES-SCLC were eligible. Additional criteria included: ECOG PS 0–1, no active brain metastases, and adequate organ function. Patients received 28-day cycles of irinotecan (60mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15) and carboplatin (AUC=4, day 1), and were assessed for response every 8weeks. After 6 cycles of chemotherapy, patients with stable disease or responding disease proceeded to sunitinib monotherapy (25mg orally daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS). Results: Between 2/09 and 10/09, 34 patients (median age 65years [range, 41–80]) were enrolled. 53% of patients were male, 47% had ECOG PS 0.21 patients (62%) completed 6 cycles of chemotherapy, and 17 (50%) initiated sunitinib monotherapy (median duration: 9weeks; range, 2–28+weeks). After a median follow-up of 50weeks (range: 37–68weeks), 22 (62%) of the patients remain alive. The objective response rate with chemotherapy was 59%, and an additional 20% had stable disease. 1-year OS was 54% and median time to progression was 7.6months. Grade 3/4 toxicity was rare during sunitinib monotherapy. Conclusions: This phase II trial provides support for further study of sunitinib maintenance therapy following platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. The 1year OS of 54% is encouraging, and a randomized trial would be appropriate to assess sunitinib''s impact following chemotherapy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Romidepsin is a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor; preclinical studies showed potential synergy with the nucleoside analog gemcitabine. This phase 1 trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose for two schedules of romidepsin plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors in which gemcitabine had previously demonstrated clinical activity. The recommended phase 2 dose was 12 mg/m2 romidepsin plus 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. Results suggest additive hematologic toxicities of romidepsin plus gemcitabine, but the level of antitumor activity observed warrants more formal trials of this combination to further assess safety and efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the treatment of advanced malignancies is well established. Imatinib and vatalanib are oral TKIs with different mechanisms of action. This trial sought to establish the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the two agents in combination. Secondary objectives included determination of potential pharmacologic interactions among vatalanib and imatinib and observation of antitumor activity. Patients with biopsy-proven advanced refractory solid tumors were enrolled in this single-center dose-escalation trial. Patients initially received imatinib and vatalanib once daily following a 14-day run-in period of daily oral vatalanib only, and were observed for a full 28-day treatment cycle prior to dose escalation. An amendment divided the vatalanib dose into two daily doses and gradually escalated the dose over a 2--3 week period. Patients continued combination therapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Forty-five patients were enrolled between September 2004 and November 2007. As of September 2009, a total of 247 cycles of treatment had been administered (range: 1 --44++, median == 2). The MTD was determined to be vatalanib 1250 mg daily and imatinib 400 mg daily. Thirty-five patients (78%%) were evaluable for response; 2 patients achieved PR, while 14 patients had SD (10 had stable disease ≥≥6 cycles). The combination of vatalanib and imatinib was well tolerated. Twice-daily vatalanib dosing improved tolerability and ease of full-dose administration. These results suggest that vatalanib-containing combinations may be active and tolerable, warranting further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examined the toxicity/efficacy of capecitabine with thalidomide, administered over 21-day cycles, in 24 previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. This regimen was poorly tolerated: grade 3/4 neutropenia (13%); grade 3 nausea (22%), vomiting (17%), and diarrhea (13%); and grade 2/3 hand–foot syndrome (38%). In addition, the response rate was lower than expected: partial response (13%), stable disease (17%), and progressive disease at first evaluation (35%). The median time to progression and overall survival were 2.7 and 11.0 months, respectively. These results do not support further investigation of thalidomide for MBC. The role of angiogenesis inhibition in breast cancer treatment should continue to be defined using more efficacious and specific inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer resistant to hormones and docetaxel were treated with vinflunine (320 mg/m2 every 21 days), a new vinca alkaloid with improved preclinical activity. Only 1 of 36 patients (3%) had partial response; the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months. Treatment was well tolerated, with myelosuppression as the only frequent toxicity. Vinflunine has a low level of activity in the treatment of refractory metastatic prostate cancer, and should not be further developed for this indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, bevacizumab, and erlotinib in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP). Methods. Patients with previously untreated CUP (adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma) without clinical or pathologic characteristics of a well-defined treatable subset were eligible. All patients received paclitaxel, carboplatin, bevacizumab, and erlotinib. Treatment cycles were repeated at 21-day intervals. After four cycles, paclitaxel and carboplatin were discontinued; bevacizumab-erlotinib treatment was continued until tumor progression. Patients were initially evaluated for response after completion of two treatment cycles; re-evaluations occurred every 6 weeks thereafter. Results. Forty-nine of 60 patients (82%) completed four cycles of therapy, and 44 patients (73%) subsequently received maintenance bevacizumab and erlotinib. Thirty-two patients (53%) had major responses to treatment; an additional 18 patients had stable disease. After a median follow-up of 19 months, the median progression- free survival time was 8 months, with 38% of patients progression free at 1 year. The median survival time and 2-year overall survival rate were 12.6 months and 27%, respectively. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with a toxicity profile as predicted based on the known toxicities of each treatment component. Conclusions. Empiric treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin, bevacizumab, and erlotinib is effective and well tolerated as first-line treatment for patients with CUP. Further development of this regimen is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the study which evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib taken weekly to treat patients with recurrent multiple myeloma. It states that a schedule of weekly bortezomib is effective in patients with previously treated myeloma. The study shows that the weekly treatment is a reasonable alternative for patients that have difficulties in receiving twice-weekly treatment.

Summary: Background: Preclinical pharmacological properties of mapatumumab (agonistic human monoclonal antibody to TRAIL-R1) suggest that this antibody reduces cell viability, induces cell death in many types of cancer cell lines in vitro, inhibits or reduces tumor growth in xenograft models of solid tumors, and can induce significant tumor regression in some models. The receptor for mapatumumab, TRAIL-R1, is expressed on NSCLC cell lines. This pharmacologic profile suggests that mapatumumab may have therapeutic benefit in the treatment of NSCLC. Methods: This Phase 2 multi-center study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mapatumumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with at least 1 platinum-based regimen. Each patient was to receive mapatumumab at a dose of 10mg/kg administered intravenously (IV) every 21 days in absence of disease progression. Results: A total of 32 patients with relapsed or refractory Stage IIIB or IV or recurrent NSCLC were enrolled. Patients had received a median of 3 previous therapeutic regimens (range 1–7). Mapatumumab was well tolerated by the patients in this study with no discontinuations due to adverse events. The most common adverse events reported, regardless of relationship, were fatigue, cough, nausea, dyspnea, constipation, and vomiting. Laboratory analyses revealed no appreciable evidence of hepatic or renal toxicity among the study patients. No patients developed anti-mapatumumab antibodies. The plasma mapatumumab concentrations observed in this study were consistent with the predicted exposures, based on Phase 1 pharmacokinetic results. None of the 32 treated patients showed a response according to the RECIST criteria. Nine patients (29%) had stable disease (SD). Conclusion: In a group of heavily pretreated NSCLC patients, no objective single agent activity of mapatumumab was demonstrated, but the drug was safe and well tolerated. Based on this favorable safety profile, and preclinical evidence of potential synergy in combination with agents commonly used to treat NSCLC, future evaluation of mapatumumab in combination with chemotherapy is warranted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article compares the efficacy of weekly docetaxel with the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine in elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on a randomized clinical trial in the U.S. The study involved 350 patients who were randomized and 345 of them received treatment. It found that treatment with docetaxel/gemcitabine produced a modest improvement but had no impact on survival when compared with single-agent weekly docetaxel.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer. Between March 1998 and February 1999, 30 patients with relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer who had received treatment with one previous combination chemotherapy regimen entered this multicenter, community-based clinical trial. All patients had received previous platinum/etoposide combination chemotherapy; in addition, 12 patients had received paclitaxel as part of their first-line therapy. All patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Patients were reevaluated for response after two cycles of therapy; those with objective response or stable disease continued treatment for six courses or until disease progression. Three of 28 evaluable patients (10%) had partial responses to treatment. None of the 17 patients with refractory disease responded, while 3 of 12 patients (25%) with relapsed disease had partial responses. Median survival was 5 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated; myelosuppression was the major toxicity, but only two patients developed febrile neutropenia, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Non-hematologic toxicity was uncommon; alopecia did not occur with this regimen. The activity of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with previously treated small cell lung cancer is modest and is limited to patients with relapsed (versus refractory) disease. In patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer, this regimen provides an additional treatment option, with decreased toxicity when compared to other second-line options. However, novel treatment approaches are necessary before substantial improvements in treating this patient population will be realized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity of single-agent gemcitabine in previously treated patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Between January 1997 and October 1998, 39 patients were enrolled in this multicenter Phase II trial performed in the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. Twenty-seven patients (69%) had adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; 35 patients (90%) had previously received treatment with chemotherapy regimens containing both a platinum agent and a taxane. Only 21% of patients had ever responded to previous therapy. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day course. Three of 36 evaluable patients (8%) had partial responses, and 9 patients (25%) had minor responses or stable disease with improved symptoms. The median time to progression for patients with partial responses or stable disease/improved symptoms was 5 months. Treatment was well tolerated, with uncommon grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Gemcitabine produced a low objective response rate in this refractory patient population, although approximately one-third of patients experienced symptomatic improvement. Treatment with gemcitabine was well tolerated. Because gemcitabine has activity against a variety of adenocarcinomas, further evaluation of this agent as part of first-line therapy for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site is appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Determines the efficacy of a course of combination chemotherapy with hexamethylmelamine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma. Characteristics of patients with advanced ovarian cancer; Importance of combination therapy in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma; Basis of the rationale for administering prolonged courses of chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma.

Focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancer of an unknown primary site. Diagnosis of patients in this group; Pathological evaluation; Search for the primary site; Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis; Men with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen concentrations or tumor staining for prostate-specific antigen; Poorly differentiated carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; More.

Objectives The combination of pemetrexed and carboplatin is a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. In this pilot phase II trial, we evaluated the feasibility of using pemetrexed and carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy, prior to definitive surgical resection, for patients with localized NSCLC. Patients and methods Patients with potentially resectable, previously untreated, clinical stage IB-III, nonsquamous NSCLC were eligible for this trial. All patients received 4 cycles of pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 ) and carboplatin (AUC 6.0) administered at 21 day intervals. Three to 6 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, definitive surgical resection was attempted. The primary endpoint of this trial was the 3-year survival rate. Results Forty-six patients began protocol treatment, and 40 completed 4 courses of pemetrexed/carboplatin. Surgical resection was performed in 27 patients (59%); all had pathologic partial responses. The estimated 3-year survival rate for the entire group was 46%. Toxicity of neoadjuvant therapy was consistent with toxicity previously reported with pemetrexed/carboplatin. Conclusions Administration of 4 courses of pemetrexed/carboplatin was feasible. The efficacy was similar to neoadjuvant regimens previously investigated. A significant number of patients 19 of 46 (41%) in this trial did not have surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy. Further investigation of the role of neoadjuvant pemetrexed/carboplatin requires a larger, randomized clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib, continued after tumor progression, plus sorafenib versus sorafenib alone in patients with refractory metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who previously benefitted from single-agent erlotinib. Patients and Methods Patients with progressive refractory NSCLC who had previously benefitted from erlotinib (objective response or stable disease >8 weeks) were randomized to receive treatment with either erlotinib and sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) or sorafenib alone. Patients were evaluated for response every 8 weeks, and continued treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Results Fifty-three patients were randomized (erlotinib/sorafenib, 25; sorafenib, 28) and 52 patients received study treatment. Patients in both groups received a median of 8 weeks of treatment. The median PFS was 3.1 months for erlotinib/sorafenib versus 1.7 months for sorafenib alone; response rates were 8% and 4%, respectively. Both regimens were tolerable, but toxicity was more frequent with erlotinib/sorafenib. Conclusions These results do not suggest any benefit in continuing erlotinib after tumor progression in patients with refractory metastatic NSCLC. Both regimens tested had limited efficacy, consistent with results from other studies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT00609804 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: To identify clinical and biometric features associated with overall survival of patients with advanced refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib. Experimental design: One hundred and nine diagnostic NSCLC samples were analysed for EGFR mutation status, EGFR immunohistochemistry, histologic morphometry and quantitative immunofluorescence of 15 markers. Support vector regression modelling using the concordance index was employed to predict overall survival. Results: Tumours from 4 of 87 patients (5%) contained EGFR tyrosine kinase domain mutations. A multivariate model identified ECOG performance status, and tumour morphometry, along with cyclin D1, caspase-3 activated, and phosphorylated KDR to be associated with overall survival, concordance index of 0.74 (hazard ratio (HR) 5.26, p-value 0.0002). Conclusions: System-based models can be used to identify a set of baseline features that are associated with reduced overall survival in patients with NSCLC treated with gefitinib. This is a preliminary study, and further analyses are required to validate the model in a randomised, controlled treatment setting. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]