Search

Background: Many men with prostate cancer will be exposed to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). While evidence-based ADT use is common, ADT is also used in cases with no or limited evidence resulting in more harm than benefit, i.e., overuse. Since there are risks of ADT (e.g., diabetes, osteoporosis), it is important to understand the behaviors facilitating overuse to inform de-implementation strategies. For these reasons, we conducted a theory-informed survey study, including a discrete choice experiment (DCE), to better understand ADT overuse and provider preferences for mitigating overuse. Methods: Our survey used the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behavior (COM-B) Model, and a DCE to elicit provider de-implementation strategy preferences. We surveyed the Society of Government Service Urologists listserv in December 2020. We stratified respondents based on the likelihood of stopping overuse as ADT monotherapy for localized prostate cancer ("yes"/"probably yes," "probably no"/"no"), and characterized corresponding Likert scale responses to seven COM-B statements. We used multivariable regression to identify associations between stopping ADT overuse and COM-B responses. Results: Our survey was completed by 84 respondents (13% response rate), with 27% indicating "probably no"/"no" to stopping ADT overuse. We found differences across respondents who said they would and would not stop ADT overuse in demographics and COM-B statements. Our model identified 2 COM-B domains (Opportunity–Social, Motivation–Reflective) significantly associated with a lower likelihood of stopping ADT overuse. Our DCE demonstrated in-person communication, multidisciplinary review, and medical record documentation may be effective in reducing ADT overuse. Conclusions: Our study used a behavioral theory-informed survey, including a DCE, to identify behaviors and context underpinning ADT overuse. Specifying behaviors supporting and gathering provider preferences in addressing ADT overuse requires a stepwise, stakeholder-engaged approach to support evidence-based cancer care. From this work, we are pursuing targeted improvement strategies. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03579680 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Interdisciplinary teams are often leveraged to improve quality of cancer care in the perioperative period. We aimed to identify the team structures and processes in interdisciplinary interventions that improve perioperative patient-reported outcomes for patients with cancer. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL for randomized control trials published at any time and screened 7,195 articles. To be included in our review, studies needed to report patient-reported outcomes, have interventions that occur in the perioperative period, include surgical cancer treatment, and include at least one non physician intervention clinical team member: advanced practice providers, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, and registered nurses. We narratively synthesized intervention components, specifically roles assumed by intervention clinical team members and interdisciplinary team processes, to compare interventions that improved patient-reported outcomes, based on minimal clinically important difference and statistical significance. Results: We included 34 studies with a total of 4,722 participants, of which 31 reported a clinically meaningful improvement in at least one patient-reported outcome. No included studies had an overall high risk of bias. The common clinical team member roles featured patient education regarding diagnosis, treatment, coping, and pain/symptom management as well as postoperative follow up regarding problems after surgery, resource dissemination, and care planning. Other intervention components included six or more months of continuous clinical team member contact with the patient and involvement of the patient's caregiver. Conclusions: Future interventions might prioritize supporting clinical team members roles to include patient education, caregiver engagement, and clinical follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies have demonstrated that Black men may undergo definitive prostate cancer (CaP) treatment less often than men of other races, but it is unclear whether they are avoiding overtreatment of low‐risk disease or experiencing a reduction in appropriate care. The authors' aim was to assess the role of race as it relates to treatment benefit in access to CaP treatment in a single‐payer population. Methods: The authors used the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Corporate Data Warehouse to perform a retrospective cohort study of veterans diagnosed with low‐ or intermediate‐risk CaP between 2011 and 2017. Results: The authors identified 35,427 men with incident low‐ or intermediate‐risk CaP. When they controlled for covariates, Black men had 1.05 times the odds of receiving treatment in comparison with non‐Black men (P <.001), and high‐treatment‐benefit men had 1.4 times the odds of receiving treatment in comparison with those in the low‐treatment‐benefit group (P <.001). The interaction of race and treatment benefit was significant, with Black men in the high‐treatment‐benefit category less likely to receive treatment than non‐Black men in the same treatment category (odds ratio, 0.89; P <.001). Conclusions: Although race does appear to influence the receipt of definitive treatment in the VHA, this relationship varies in the context of the patient's treatment benefit, with Black men receiving less definitive treatment in high‐benefit situations. The influence of patient race at high treatment benefit levels invites further investigation into the driving forces behind this persistent disparity in this consequential group. Race appears to influence the receipt of definitive treatment in the Veterans Health Administration, and this relationship varies in the context of the patient's treatment benefit, with Black men receiving less definitive treatment in high‐benefit situations. The influence of patient race at high treatment benefit levels invites further investigation into the driving forces behind this persistent disparity in this consequential group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is up-regulated in many human cancers, and agents targeting the mTOR pathway are in various stages of clinical development. The goal of the study was to evaluate the potential and limitations of targeting the mTOR pathway in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Methods: Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies against pAkt, PTEN, p27, and pS6 was performed on a tissue microarray constructed from paraffin-embedded specimens from 375 patients treated by nephrectomy for RCC. The expression was associated with pathological parameters and survival.Results: The mTOR pathway was more significantly altered in clear-cell RCC, high-grade tumors, and tumors with poor prognostic features. PS6 and PTEN showed the strongest associations with pathological parameters. Survival tree analysis regarding expression of cytoplasmic pAkt, nuclear pAkt, PTEN, cytoplasmic p27, and pS6 identified staining percentages of 40%, 10%, 75%, 7%, and 70%, respectively, as ideal cutoff values for stratification, with corresponding P-values of .03, .001, .02, .005, and <.0001, respectively. Interestingly, high nuclear pAkt expression was associated with a favorable prognosis, whereas high cytoplasmic pAkt expression was associated with a poor prognosis. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, ECOG PS, T classification, N classification, M classification, cytoplasmic Akt, nuclear pAkt, PTEN, and pS6 were independent prognostic factors of DSS.Conclusions: Components of the mTOR pathway are significantly associated with pathological features and survival. Not all RCC tumor types seem to be equally amenable to mTOR targeted therapy. PTEN, pAkt, p27, and pS6 may serve as surrogate parameters for patient selection and predicting prognosis. Patients with a highly activated mTOR pathway should benefit most from this therapy. External validation of our results is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reports on the open surgical management of renal cell carcinoma in the era of minimally invasive kidney surgery. Evidence showing that nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for patients with small tumors is equivalent to total radical nephroctomy in terms of long-term survival; Safety and efficacy of NSS; Clinical factors determining prognosis and survival in the management of the disease.

Reports on the adjuvant therapy of renal cell carcinoma in patient selection and therapeutic options. Renal cell carcinoma, survival and prognostic factors; Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma; Risk group assessment and clinical outcome algorithm to predict the natural history of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma; Correlations with tumor oxygen measurements and prognostic in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

The authors discusses the use of partial nephrectomy in the health care system of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Guidelines issued by the American Urological Association describe nephron sparing surgery (NSS) as the preferred treatment modality for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). An overview of the Veteran's Affairs Central Cancer Registry (VACCR) data repository is provided. The authors conclude that current partial nephrectomy rates in the VA health care system are comparable to those in the SEER-Medicare tumor registry studies.

The article discusses issues related to the emergence of targeted molecular therapies as mainstays of treating advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). According to the article, the discovery of specific genes, gene products and aberrant molecular pathways associated with RCC has fueled the development of targeted therapies and clinical trials examining their efficacy. The article also discusses the rationale and evidence for targeted therapy strategies.