Search

Summary: Background: Effective targeted treatment is unavailable for most sarcomas and doxorubicin and ifosfamide—which have been used to treat soft-tissue sarcoma for more than 30 years—still have an important role. Whether doxorubicin alone or the combination of doxorubicin and ifosfamide should be used routinely is still controversial. We assessed whether dose intensification of doxorubicin with ifosfamide improves survival of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma compared with doxorubicin alone. Methods: We did this phase 3 randomised controlled trial (EORTC 62012) at 38 hospitals in ten countries. We included patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma, age 18–60 years with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1. They were randomly assigned (1:1) by the minimisation method to either doxorubicin (75 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus on day 1 or 72 h continuous intravenous infusion) or intensified doxorubicin (75 mg/m2; 25 mg/m2 per day, days 1–3) plus ifosfamide (10 g/m2 over 4 days with mesna and pegfilgrastim) as first-line treatment. Randomisation was stratified by centre, performance status (0 vs 1), age (<50 vs ≥50 years), presence of liver metastases, and histopathological grade (2 vs 3). Patients were treated every 3 weeks till progression or unacceptable toxic effects for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00061984. Findings: Between April 30, 2003, and May 25, 2010, 228 patients were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin and 227 to receive doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Median follow-up was 56 months (IQR 31–77) in the doxorubicin only group and 59 months (36–72) in the combination group. There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups (median overall survival 12·8 months [95·5% CI 10·5–14·3] in the doxorubicin group vs 14·3 months [12·5–16·5] in the doxorubicin and ifosfamide group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·83 [95·5% CI 0·67–1·03]; stratified log-rank test p=0·076). Median progression-free survival was significantly higher for the doxorubicin and ifosfamide group (7·4 months [95% CI 6·6–8·3]) than for the doxorubicin group (4·6 months [2·9–5·6]; HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·60–0·90], stratified log-rank test p=0·003). More patients in the doxorubicin and ifosfamide group than in the doxorubicin group had an overall response (60 [26%] of 227 patients vs 31 [14%] of 228; p<0·0006). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxic effects—which were all more common with doxorubicin and ifosfamide than with doxorubicin alone—were leucopenia (97 [43%] of 224 patients vs 40 [18%] of 223 patients), neutropenia (93 [42%] vs 83 [37%]), febrile neutropenia (103 (46%) vs 30 [13%]), anaemia (78 [35%] vs 10 [5%]), and thrombocytopenia (75 [33%]) vs one [<1%]). Interpretation: Our results do not support the use of intensified doxorubicin and ifosfamide for palliation of advanced soft-tissue sarcoma unless the specific goal is tumour shrinkage. These findings should help individualise the care of patients with this disease. Funding: Cancer Research UK, EORTC Charitable Trust, UK NHS, Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Amgen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soft tissue sarcomas, although sharing a mesenchymal origin, are a heterogeneous group of diseases. Nevertheless they are studied and frequently treated as if they were all the same. Recent developments suggest that a different approach may be more adequate. Genetic profiling studies have indicated that some soft tissue sarcoma subtypes, despite a distinct histo-pathological difference, may be closely related. Molecular biology research in addition has identified several subtype-specific oncogenes and their protein products that could serve as treatment targets. Since many of the new molecularly targeted agents do not induce tumour regression, but mainly result in growth inhibition, it is therefore necessary also to change the study end-point in screening studies in the search for active treatments. In view of all these it is proposed to consider using alternative end-points such as progression-free rates at pre-set times, or progression arrest at first evaluation. By using databases from large cooperative groups it should be possible to identify progression arrest rates for each specific subtype, and these could serve as reference for future trial design. Soft tissue sarcoma treatment and research will require a change of approach and necessitate global cooperation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Clinical experience with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) targeting angiogenesis inhibitors is rapidly increasing, and some compounds have already been approved for regular anticancer treatment. Apart from their activity, much attention has been focussed on the clinical toxicity profile of these compounds. This review describes the most frequently occurring side-effects of both antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors and discusses some of the underlying mechanisms. Some practical guidelines for treatment of the side-effects are given. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for toxicity to treatment with imatinib. The study was based on 942 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) randomised to receive imatinib at different doses. The correlation between toxicities occurring with a Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 2 or more (non-haematological) or grade 3 or 4 (haematological) and imatinib dose, age, sex, performance status, original disease site, site and size of lesions at trial entry, baseline haematological and biological parameters was investigated. Anaemia was correlated with dose and baseline haemoglobin level, and neutropaenia with baseline neutrophil count and haemoglobin level. The risk of non-haematological toxicities was dose dependent and higher in females (oedema, nausea, diarrhoea), and in patients of advanced age (oedema, rash fatigue), poor performance status (fatigue and nausea), prior chemotherapy (fatigue), tumour of identified gastrointestinal origin (diarrhoea) and small lesions (rash). A multivariate risk calculator that can be used in the clinic for individual patients is proposed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The anti-cancer agent docetaxel is approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and for the treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer. At the recommended dose of 60–100mg/m2 given every 3 weeks, severe neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity and a major concern especially when treating patients at high-risk from myelotoxic complications. A less toxic schedule, involving weekly docetaxel administration was developed for patients with poor performance status, multiple comorbidities, poor haematological reserves or those who were heavily pre-treated, elderly or patients for whom palliation is the focus of treatment. Recent randomised trials allow a comparison of efficacy and toxicity between weekly and 3-weekly treatments. Efficacy appears to be similar for the two schedules regardless of the disease while weekly docetaxel is significantly less myelotoxic. However, this benefit comes at the cost of cumulative increases in hyperlacrimation, skin- and nail-toxicity and negatively affects quality of life. Currently, 3-weekly docetaxel remains the standard schedule for treatment, whereas the weekly schedule offers a possibility of treatment individualisation for those patients where the risk of myelosuppression is considered unacceptable. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Background: The optimum treatment for high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults is unclear. Regional hyperthermia concentrates the action of chemotherapy within the heated tumour region. Phase 2 studies have shown that chemotherapy with regional hyperthermia improves local control compared with chemotherapy alone. We designed a parallel-group randomised controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of regional hyperthermia with chemotherapy. Methods: Patients were recruited to the trial between July 21, 1997, and November 30, 2006, at nine centres in Europe and North America. Patients with localised high-risk STS (≥5 cm, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer [FNCLCC] grade 2 or 3, deep to the fascia) were randomly assigned to receive either neo-adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of etoposide, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (EIA) alone, or combined with regional hyperthermia (EIA plus regional hyperthermia) in addition to local therapy. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) was the primary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 00003052. Findings: 341 patients were enrolled, with 169 randomly assigned to EIA plus regional hyperthermia and 172 to EIA alone. All patients were included in the analysis of the primary endpoint, and 332 patients who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy were included in the safety analysis. After a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR 20–67), 132 patients had local progression (56 EIA plus regional hyperthermia vs 76 EIA). Patients were more likely to experience local progression or death in the EIA-alone group compared with the EIA plus regional hyperthermia group (relative hazard [RH] 0·58, 95% CI 0·41–0·83; p=0·003), with an absolute difference in LPFS at 2 years of 15% (95% CI 6–26; 76% EIA plus regional hyperthermia vs 61% EIA). For disease-free survival the relative hazard was 0·70 (95% CI 0·54–0·92, p=0·011) for EIA plus regional hyperthermia compared with EIA alone. The treatment response rate in the group that received regional hyperthermia was 28·8%, compared with 12·7% in the group who received chemotherapy alone (p=0·002). In a pre-specified per-protocol analysis of patients who completed EIA plus regional hyperthermia induction therapy compared with those who completed EIA alone, overall survival was better in the combined therapy group (HR 0·66, 95% CI 0·45–0·98, p=0·038). Leucopenia (grade 3 or 4) was more frequent in the EIA plus regional hyperthermia group compared with the EIA-alone group (128 of 165 vs 106 of 167, p=0·005). Hyperthermia-related adverse events were pain, bolus pressure, and skin burn, which were mild to moderate in 66 (40·5%), 43 (26·4%), and 29 patients (17·8%), and severe in seven (4·3%), eight (4·9%), and one patient (0·6%), respectively. Two deaths were attributable to treatment in the combined treatment group, and one death was attributable to treatment in the EIA-alone group. Interpretation: To our knowledge, this is the first randomised phase 3 trial to show that regional hyperthermia increases the benefit of chemotherapy. Adding regional hyperthermia to chemotherapy is a new effective treatment strategy for patients with high-risk STS, including STS with an abdominal or retroperitoneal location. Funding: Deutsche Krebshilfe, Helmholtz Association (HGF), European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology (ESHO), and US National Institute of Health (NIH). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Lifestyle may have serious consequences for cancer treatment outcome, which is a fact that both physicians and patients are often not explicitly aware of, thereby unwillingly exposing the patient to possible danger. In certain cases, patient behaviour can lead to potentially life-threatening adverse events, whilst in other cases the clinical benefit of anti-cancer therapy can be diminished. In this review, we focus on the role of certain habits (like cigarette smoking, alcohol use and the use of complementary and alternative medicine) and discuss the effects they may have on anti-cancer medication. Also patient compliance to prescribed anti-cancer drugs is a factor frequently overlooked if treatment does not follow the expectations, which gains importance with the increasingly frequent prescription of oral anti-cancer agents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of brostallicin, a new DNA minor groove binder, at a dose of 10mg/m2, intravenous (i.v.) every three weeks, in patients with advanced or inoperable soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) failing first line therapy. Two groups were recruited: (1) GIST following treatment with imatinib; (2) other STS following treatment with single agent doxorubicin or ifosfamide or a single line of combination therapy. The primary end-point was overall response rate (ORR) as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST). Progression free survival (PFS) was a secondary end-point. In the GIST group, a Simon two step design was planned: first step 18 patients, total 32 patients (p1=20% p0=5% alpha=beta=0.1). In the non-GIST group, planned sample size was 40 in a standard Fleming one-step design (p0=10%, p1=25%, alpha=beta=0.1). Forty-three patients with non-GIST and 21 patients with GIST were recruited. In general, the drug was well tolerated. Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 3 or grade 4 toxicity was granulocytopenia: 70% of patients, 50% of cycles; fatigue: 25% of patients, 8% of cycles; febrile neutropenia: 14% of patients, 4% of cycles. There was one confirmed toxic death due to neutropenic septicaemia. Three patients had clinically significant allergic reactions in 249 cycles delivered. In the GIST group, no patients had a confirmed response and recruitment was discontinued at the first step. In the non-GIST group, there were two confirmed partial responses. The 3 month PFS was 46% in the non-GIST group and 33% in the GIST group. In the non-GIST group, this PFS is in the range of other agents considered active in STS, and may predict for more substantial first line activity. Further investigation in STS other than GIST appears warranted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: In the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, irinotecan has become one of the most important drugs, despite its sometimes unpredictable adverse effects. To understand why some patients experience severe adverse effects (diarrhea and neutropenia), while others do not, the metabolic pathways of this drug have to be unraveled in detail. Individual variation in expression of several phase I and phase II metabolizing enzymes and ABC-transporters involved in irinotecan metabolism and excretion, at least partly explains the observed pharmacokinetic interpatient variability. Although the difference in expression-level of these proteins to a certain amount is explained by physiologic and environmental factors, the presence of specific genetic determinants also does influence their expression and function. In this review, the role of genetic polymorphisms in the main enzyme-systems (carboxylesterase, cytochrome P450 3A, and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase) and ABC-transporters (ABCB1, ABCC2, and ABCG2) involved in irinotecan metabolism, are discussed. Since at this moment the field of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics is rapidly expanding and simultaneously more rapid and cost-effective screening methods are emerging, a wealth of future data is expected to enrich our knowledge of the genetic basis of irinotecan metabolism. Eventually, this may help to truly individualize the dosing of this (and other) anti-cancer agent(s), using a personal genetic profile of the most relevant enzymes for every patient. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is generally an incurable disease with variable response to imatinib. We aimed to develop prognostic nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients treated with imatinib. Methods Nomograms were developed in a training cohort ( n = 330) of patients treated in a randomised trial (EORTC-ISG-AGITG 62005 phase III study) using Cox regression models, and validated in patients ( n = 236) treated in routine clinical care from six referral centres. Nomogram performance was assessed by calculating the c statistic. A classification based on the nomograms’ scores was generated to group patients according to risk. Results Nomogram risk factors for OS and PFS were size of the largest metastasis, tumour genotype, primary tumour mitotic count, haemoglobin and blood neutrophil count at commencement of imatinib. The nomograms predicted survival with a c statistic of 0.75 (training) and 0.62 (validation) for OS, and 0.69 (training) and 0.62 (validation) for PFS. When tested in the validation cohort, the nomograms discriminated well the high and intermediate risk from low risk patients (hazard ratio [HR] for OS 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71–8.56; and 2.48, 95% CI 1.12–5.50; for PFS 2.84, 95% CI 1.66–4.87; and 1.45, 95% CI 0.87–2.41, respectively). Conclusion The nomograms predicted the risk of GIST progression and death with good discrimination of risk groups, and may be of value for patient counselling and risk stratification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Designing combination drug phase I trials has become increasingly complex, due to the increasing diversity in classes of agents, mechanisms of action, safety profiles and drug-administration schedules. With approximately 850 agents currently in development for cancer treatment, it is evident that combination development must be prioritised, as based on a specific hypothesis, as well as a projected development path for the involved combination. In this manuscript the most relevant issues and pitfalls for combination drug phase I trial design are discussed. Several phase I study designs that incorporate controls to circumvent bias due to imbalances in observed background toxicity are discussed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Aprepitant, a selective neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist approved for the treatment and prevention of emesis caused by moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, is an inhibitor, inducer, and substrate of the cytochrome P450 3194 pathway. The CYP3A4 pathway is the major pathway of the metabolism of vinorelbine, a vinca alkaloid frequently used in combination with cisplatin. Therefore, we studied the potential interaction of the aprepitant 3-day antiemetic regimen on the pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine. Fourteen patients with metastatic solid tumors were included in this open-label, balanced, 2-period crossover study. In treatment arm A, vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 weekly) was administered alone, while in treatment arm B the same dose of vinorelbine was administered following the administration of the aprepitant antiemetic regimen on day 1 and alone on day 8. The antiemetic regimen of aprepitant was comprised of the following; on day 1: 125 mg aprepitant, 12 mg dexamethasone, and 32 mg ondansetron; on days 2 and 3: 80 mg aprepitant and 8 mg dexamethasone and on day 4: 8 mg dexamethasone. Blood samples for vinorelbine pharmacokinetic analysis were collected over 96 h. Two patients discontinued the study due to adverse events that were judged not to be drug-related. Complete pharmacokinetic data of vinorelbine administered alone and with the aprepitant antiemetic regimen were obtained in 12 patients. The mean plasma concentration profile of vinorelbine administered with aprepitant was identical to that following vinorelbine administered alone, with geometric mean vinorelbine plasma AUC ratios of treatment B day 1/treatment A day 1 and of treatment B day 8/treatment A day of 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) and 1.00 (0.92, 1.08), respectively. As the aprepitant antiemetic regimen has no detectable inhibitory or inductive effect on the pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine, aprepitant when added to a standard antiemetic regimen consisting of ondansetron and dexamethasone can be safely combined with vinorelbine at clinically recommended doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: A recent randomized EORTC phase III trial, comparing two doses of imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), reported dose dependency for progression-free survival. The current analysis of that study aimed to assess if tumour mutational status correlates with clinical response to imatinib. Pre-treatment samples of GISTs from 377 patients enrolled in phase III study were analyzed for mutations of KIT or PDGFRA by combination of D-HPLC and direct sequencing of tumour genomic DNA. Mutation types were correlated with patients’ survival data. The presence of exon 9-activating mutations in KIT was the strongest adverse prognostic factor for response to imatinib, increasing the relative risk of progression by 171% (P <0.0001) and the relative risk of death by 190% (P <0.0001) when compared with KIT exon 11 mutants. Similarly, the relative risk of progression was increased by 108% (P <0.0001) and the relative risk of death by 76% (P =0.028) in patients without detectable KIT or PDGFRA mutations. In patients whose tumours expressed an exon 9 KIT oncoprotein, treatment with the high-dose regimen resulted in a significantly superior progression-free survival (P =0.0013), with a reduction of the relative risk of 61%. We conclude that tumour genotype is of major prognostic significance for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated with imatinib for advanced GISTs. Our findings suggest the need for differential treatment of patients with GISTs, with KIT exon 9 mutant patients benefiting the most from the 800mg daily dose of the drug. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Statins are known to reduce mortality related to cardiovascular diseases. In recent years, evidence has accumulated that statins also exert anti-tumour activity for which numerous potential underlying mechanisms of action have been suggested. Accordingly, several case-control studies showed a reduction in cancer incidence in patients treated with statins. Furthermore, statins interact synergistically with several anti-tumour treatments in preclinical studies. Until now, only a few clinical studies are available that explore the optimal dose, feasibility, and efficacy of statins applied as single agents to control the growth of existing tumours. Studies investigating statins as part of a multi-drug regimen are completely lacking. Nevertheless, the interesting pre-clinical anti-tumour activity of statins combined with a favourable toxicity profile warrant their further development as anti-tumour agents, in particular as part of multi-drug regimens. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has been approved for use as a first- and second-line treatment for colorectal cancer. The response to irinotecan is variable, possibly because of interindividual variation in the expression of the enzymes that metabolize irinotecan, including cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase IA1 (UGT1A1). We prospectively explored the relationships between CYP3A phenotype, as assessed by erythromycin metabolism and midazolam clearance, and the metabolism of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38. Methods: Of the 30 white cancer patients, 27 received at least two treatments with irinotecan administered as one 90-minute infusion (dose, 600 mg) with 3 weeks between treatments, and three received only one treatment. Before the first and second treatments, patients underwent an erythromycin breath test and a midazolam clearance test as phenotyping probes for CYP3A4. Erythromycin metabolism was assessed as the area under the curve for the flux of radioactivity in exhaled CO2 within 40 minutes after administration of [N-methyl-14C]erythromycin. Midazolam and irinotecan were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Genomic DNA was isolated from blood and screened for genetic variants in CYP3A4 and UGT1A1. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: CYP3A4 activity varied sevenfold (range = 0.223%-1.53% of dose) among patients, whereas midazolam clearance varied fourfold (range = 262-1012 mL/min), although intraindividual variation was small. Erythromycin metabolism was not statistically significantly associated with irinotecan clearance (P = .090), whereas midazolam clearance was highly correlated with irinotecan clearance (r = .745, P<.001). In addition, the presence of a UGT1A1 variant with a (TA)7 repeat in the promoter (UGT1A1*28) was associated with increased exposure to SN-38 (435 ng · h/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 339 to 531 ng · h/mL in patients who are homozygous for wild-type UGT1A1; 631 ng · h/mL, 95% CI = 499 to 762 ng · h/mL in heterozygous patients; and 1343 ng · h/mL, 95% CI = 0 to 4181 ng · h/mL in patients who are homozygous for UGT1A1*28) (P = .006). Conclusion: CYP3A4 phenotype, as assessed by midazolam clearance, is statistically significantly associated with irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Evaluation of midazolam clearance combined with UGT1A1*28 genotyping may assist with optimization of irinotecan chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. Doxorubicin (dox) still appears to be one of the most active drugs in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. However, treatment duration is limited due to cumulative cardiotoxicity. A number of small studies from single institutions have suggested activity of other analogues. In two studies the EORTC STBSG tested whether epirubicin (epi) is an alternative to standard dose dox in the treatment of chemonaive patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. The present report gives the final results of these studies. Patients/Methods. In the first study 210 patients were randomized to receive either dox or epi both at a dose of 75 mg/m2 given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals. In the second study 334 patients were randomized to dox 75 mg/m2, epi 150 mg/m2 or epi 50 mg/m2 days 1-3, all given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals. Results. In the first study no differences in median survival and duration of response were found. Of 167 evaluable patients the response rate was slightly in favour of dox (23% vs 18%) but at the expense of more toxicity. These data could suggest that increasing the epi dose may lead to a greater antineoplastic effect with acceptable toxicity. In the second study 15% of 314 evaluable patients had an objective tumour response. There were no differences between the three groups with regard to response rate, progression-free and overall survival, but both dose schedules of epi were more myelotoxic than dox. Conclusion. Regardless of schedule and dose, epi is not superior to dox in the treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. In addition, the results illustrate that the data from small studies of single institutions should always be confirmed by large multi-institutional studies before being taken for granted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Investigates anticancer cytotoxic agents. Philosophical background to clarify the various purposes of response evaluation; Model by which a combined assessment of all existing lesions is used to extrapolate an overall response to treatment Other aspects of response evaluation.