1. Phase I/II study of tecemotide as immunotherapy in Japanese patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
- Author
-
Katakami N, Hida T, Nokihara H, Imamura F, Sakai H, Atagi S, Nishio M, Kashii T, Satouchi M, Helwig C, Watanabe M, and Tamura T
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Cancer Vaccines therapeutic use, Cyclophosphamide therapeutic use, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Immunotherapy methods, Japan, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins therapeutic use, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage, Cancer Vaccines administration & dosage, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Membrane Glycoproteins administration & dosage
- Abstract
Objectives: Unresectable stage III NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) confers a poor prognosis and interest is growing in the use of immunotherapy to improve outcomes for patients with this disease. We investigated the safety and efficacy of maintenance tecemotide, a mucin 1 (MUC1)-specific agent that induces T-cell responses to MUC1, versus placebo in Japanese patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC and no disease progression after primary chemoradiotherapy., Materials and Methods: Patients aged ≥20 years with unresectable stage III NSCLC, stable disease or clinical response after primary chemoradiotherapy and performance status ≤1, were recruited across 25 centers in Japan. Patients were randomized 2:1 to tecemotide (930μg as lipopeptide) or placebo subcutaneously once weekly for 8 weeks, then every 6 weeks until disease progression or treatment withdrawal. Cyclophosphamide 300mg/m
2 (maximum dose 600mg) was given intravenously 3days before the first dose of tecemotide. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, time to progression, time to treatment failure and safety., Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 172 patients; 114 received tecemotide and 58 placebo. Baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment arms. Most patients (94%) received primary concurrent chemoradiotherapy. There was no apparent trend toward increased OS time with tecemotide over placebo (median 32.4 versus 32.2 months, hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.61-1.48; P=0.83). No improvements in secondary efficacy endpoints were observed. The frequency of treatment-related adverse events was similar, and serious adverse event rates were the same in both arms. There were no new safety signals., Conclusions: These results do not support those from a randomized phase III study (START) of improved OS with tecemotide in the subgroup of patients treated with primary concurrent chemoradiotherapy., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF