Search

BACKGROUND Personalized peptide vaccine therapy is regarded as a well-tolerated, safe and effective immunotherapy for patients with advanced cancers. Herein we report an exceptional case of a patient with advanced pancreatic cancer who developed delayed lobular panniculitis at sites corresponding to vaccine injections. CASE REPORT A 64-year-old Japanese female visited our clinic due to thirst and polydipsia; she was diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes. Simultaneously, she was diagnosed as having advanced pancreatic cancer; and a distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were performed. Afterwards, she received adjuvant chemotherapy with titanium silicate-1 and personalized peptide vaccination using Montanide® ISA-51 by a subcutaneous injection to her abdomen over a total of 30 times. Thirteen months after the vaccine therapy had come to an end, lobular panniculitis appeared at the vaccination sites. At this point, corticosteroid was administered, resulting in significant improvement in the condition of the subcutaneous nodules. CONCLUSIONS This case report highlights the importance of careful patient explanation before initiation of cancer vaccine therapy about the possibilities of lobular panniculitis as an adverse event. It also highlights that it is important that physicians have a greater awareness of the possibility of panniculitis in patients with concerns regarding subcutaneous indurations even long after the end of peptide vaccine therapy.

Peptide-based cancer vaccines are able to induce strong immune responses, but their clinical results are unsatisfactory. To determine clinically correlated peptides, we analyzed survival data from urological cancer patients treated by personalized peptide vaccination (PPV), in which different multiple peptides were used for individual patients based on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type and pre-existing immunity. Survival data were obtained from a database of 265 urological cancer patients treated in 5 clinical PPV trials comprising 154 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and 111 patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC). Expression of tumor-associated antigens (TAA) was evaluated in 10 prostate cancer tissues, 4 metastatic lymph nodes from prostate cancer, and 10 UC tissues using immunohistochemical staining. Clinical efficacy of individual peptides for overall survival was evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. All TAA coding candidate peptides used in PPV treatment were expressed in tumor cells from prostate cancer and UC samples except for p56Lck in both, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in the UC samples. Patients with the following peptides had a significantly longer survival than patients without the peptides (hazard ratio <1.0, 95% confidence intervals <1.0 and P < .05): SART3-109, PTHrP-102, HNPRL-140, SART3-302 and Lck-90 in CRPC patients, and EGF-R-800, Lck-486, PSMA-624, CypB-129 and SART3-734 in advanced UC patients, respectively. Correlated peptides selected using both survival data and pre-existing immunity for PPV treatment may enhance the clinical benefits for urological cancer patients., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

This study investigated the applicability of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (mUTUC) after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. In this single arm, open-label, phase II clinical trial, patients with mUTUC received PPV at a single institution. Personalized peptide vaccination treatment used a maximum of four peptides chosen from 27 candidate peptides according to human leukocyte antigen types and peptide-reactive IgG titers, for six s.c. injections weekly as one cycle. The safety of PPV, as well as its influence on host immunity and effect on overall survival were assessed. Forty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Personalized peptide vaccinations were well tolerated without severe adverse events. Median survival time was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3-13.1) with 13.0 months for patients receiving combined salvage chemotherapy (95% CI, 5.7-17.5) and 4.5 months for patients receiving PPV alone (95% CI, 1.7-10.1) (P = 0.080). Patients with positive CTL responses showed a significantly longer survival than patients with negative CTL responses (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.85; P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that lower numbers of Bellmunt risk factors and lower levels of B-cell activating factor were significantly associated with favorable overall survival for patients under PPV treatment. This study indicated that PPV for patients with mUTUC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy induced substantial peptide-specific CTL responses without severe adverse events and has the potential to prolong survival when combined with salvage chemotherapy. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID: 000001854., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to locoregional therapy is dismal, even following treatment with sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor. To develop a more efficacious treatment, we undertook a feasibility study of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for HCC, in which the peptides were selected from 31 peptide candidates based on the pre-existing immunity. Twenty-six HCC patients refractory to locoregional therapies (cohort 1) and 30 patients refractory to both locoregional and systemic therapies (cohort 2) were entered into the study. There were no severe adverse events related to PPV except for one injection site reaction. At the end of the first cycle of six vaccinations, successful CTL or IgG boosting was observed in 57% or 46% of patients in cohort 1 and in 54% or 52% of patients in cohort 2, respectively. Successful IgG boosting at the end of the second cycle was observed in the majority of patients tested. Median overall survival was 18.7 months (95% confidence interval, 12.2-22.5 months) in cohort 1, and 8.5 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9-12.2 months) in cohort 2. Based on the higher rates of immune boosting and the safety profile of PPV, further clinical studies of PPV would be warranted for patients with HCC refractory to not only locoregional therapy but also both locoregional and systemic therapies. The protocol of this study was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000001882 and UMIN000003590)., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Since the prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) still remains very poor, new therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapies, need to be developed. In the current study, we conducted an open-label randomized phase II study to test whether low dose cyclophosphamide (CPA) could improve antigen-specific immune responses and clinical efficacy of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) in 49 previously treated aBTC patients. Patients with aBTC refractory to at least one regimen of chemotherapies were randomly assigned to receive PPV with low dose CPA (100 mg/day for 7 days before vaccination) (PPV/CPA, n = 24) or PPV alone (n = 25). A maximum of four HLA-matched peptides were selected based on the pre-existing peptide-specific IgG responses, followed by subcutaneous administration. T cell responses to the vaccinated peptides in the PPV/CPA arm tended to be greater than those in the PPV alone arm. The PPV/CPA arm showed significantly better progression-free survival (median time: 6.1 vs 2.9 months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.427; P = 0.008) and overall survival (median time: 12.1 vs 5.9 months; HR: 0.376; P = 0.004), compared to the PPV alone arm. The PPV alone arm, but not the PPV/CPA arm, showed significant increase in plasma IL-6 after vaccinations, which might be associated with inhibition of antigen-specific T cell responses. These results suggested that combined treatment with low dose CPA could provide clinical benefits in aBTC patients under PPV, possibly through prevention of IL-6-mediated immune suppression. Further clinical studies would be recommended to clarify the clinical efficacy of PPV/CPA in aBTC patients., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

The HLA-A11 or -A33 allele is found in approximately 18% or 10% of the Asian population, respectively, but each of which is a minor allele worldwide, and therefore no clinical trials were previously conducted. To develop a therapeutic peptide vaccine for each of them, we investigated immunological responses of advanced cancer patients with the HLA-A11 + /A11 + (n = 18) or -A33 + /A33 + (n = 13) allele to personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) regimens. The primary sites of HLA-A11+/A11+ or -A33+/A33+ patients were the colon (n = 4 or 2), stomach (2 or 3), breast (3 or 2), lung and pancreas (2 or 2), and so on. For PPV, a maximum of four peptides were selected from nine different peptides capable of binding to HLA-A11 and -A33 molecules based on the pre-existing peptide-specific IgG responses. There were no severe adverse events related to PPV. At the end of the first cycle, peptide-specific CTL responses were augmented in 4/12 or 2/9 of HLA-A11 + /A11 + or -A33 + /A33 + patients, while peptide-specific IgG responses were augmented in 6/14 or 4/10 patients, respectively. Clinical responses consisted of four stable diseases and 14 progressive diseases in HLA-A11 + /A11 + patients, versus seven and six in -A33 + /A33 + patients, respectively. Further clinical study of PPV could be recommended because of the safety and positive immunological responses., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

The immunological characteristics of carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) are not well established due to inclusion of heterogeneous types of metastatic tumors with the absence of any detectable primary site. We evaluated the immune responses in patients with histologically unfavorable CUP during personalized peptide vaccination (PPV). Ten patients with histologically unfavorable CUP who had been treated by PPV after chemotherapy failure were analyzed. In PPV treatment, up to four human leukocyte antigen-matched peptides of a total 31 peptides were selected according to preexisting host immunity before vaccination and administered subcutaneously. Peptides derived from the Lck antigen were most often chosen for use among all patients. CTL responses were increased in 8 of the 10 and 5 of the five patients tested at the end of the first and second PPV cycles, respectively. Increases in humoral responses after vaccination, including IgG, IgG1, IgG3, IgA, and IgM, were observed against not only the vaccinated peptides but also the non-vaccinated peptides. Severe adverse events due to PPV were not observed. Median overall survival was 13.9 months (95 % CI 4.0-22.5 months). PPV activated both cellular and humoral immune responses to short peptides derived from CTL epitopes in the majority of CUP patients. PPV with Lck-derived peptides may be a feasible, new treatment modality for histologically unfavorable CUP patients due to its safety and strong ability to boost immune responses, although its clinical efficacy remains to be investigated in larger-scale trials.

To develop a peptide vaccine for cancer patients with the HLA-A26 allele, which is a minor population worldwide, we investigated the immunological responses of HLA-A26(+) /A26(+) cancer patients to four different CTL epitope peptides under personalized peptide vaccine regimens. In personalized peptide vaccine regimens, two to four peptides showing positive peptide-specific IgG responses in pre-vaccination plasma were selected from the four peptide candidates applicable for HLA-A26(+) /A26(+) cancer patients and administered s.c. Peptide-specific CTL and IgG responses along with cytokine levels were measured before and after vaccination. Cell surface markers in PBMCs and plasma cytokine levels were also measured. In this study, 21 advanced cancer patients, including seven lung, three breast, two pancreas, and two colon cancer patients, were enrolled. Their HLA-A26 genotypes were HLA-A26:01 (n = 24), HLA-A26:03 (n = 10), and HLA-A26:02 (n = 8). One, 14, and 6 patients received two, three, and four peptides, respectively. Grade 1 or 2 skin reactions at the injection sites were observed in the majority of patients, but no severe adverse events related to the vaccination were observed. Peptide-specific CTL responses were augmented in 39% or 22% of patients after one or two cycles of vaccination, respectively. Notably, peptide-specific IgG were augmented in 63% or 100% of patients after one or two cycles of vaccination, respectively. Personalized peptide vaccines with these four CTL epitope peptides could be feasible for HLA-A26(+) advanced cancer patients because of their safety and higher rates of immunological responses., (© 2015 The Authors. Cancer Science published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Since cancer vaccines do not always elicit beneficial effects in treated patients, identification of biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes would be highly desirable. We previously reported that abnormal granulocytes present in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) may contribute to poor prognosis in advanced prostate cancer patients receiving personalized peptide vaccination (PPV). In the current study, we examined whether soluble factors derived from granulocytes, such as matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and arginase 1 (ARG1), and inhibitory cytokine TGFβ in pre-vaccination plasma were useful for predicting prognosis after PPV in advanced cancer patients. In biliary tract cancer (n=25), multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that patients with higher plasma MMP-9 levels had a significantly worse overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.637, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.670 - 12.877, P = 0.003], whereas MPO, ARG1, or TGFβ levels were not correlated with OS. Similarly, patients with higher MMP-9 levels showed worse prognosis than those with lower MMP-9 levels in other types of advanced cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (n=32, P = 0.037 by log-rank test), and pancreatic cancer (n=41, P = 0.042 by log-rank test). Taken together, plasma MMP-9 levels before vaccination might be potentially useful as a biomarker for selecting advanced cancer patients who would benefit from PPV.

Objective. To evaluate safety and immune responses of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for hepatitis C virus- (HCV-) positive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods. Patients diagnosed with HCV-positive advanced HCC were eligible for this study. A maximum of four HLA-matched peptides were selected based on the preexisting IgG responses specific to 32 different peptides, which consisted of a single HCV-derived peptide at core protein positions 35-44 (C-35) and 31 peptides derived from 15 different tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), followed by subcutaneous administration once per week for 8 weeks. Peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) and IgG responses were measured before and after vaccination. Results. Forty-two patients were enrolled. Grade 3 injection site skin reaction was observed in 2 patients, but no other PPV-related severe adverse events were noted. Peptide-specific CTL responses before vaccination were observed in only 3 of 42 patients, but they became detectable in 23 of 36 patients tested after vaccination. Peptide-specific IgG responses were also boosted in 19 of 36 patients. Peptide-specific IgG1 responses to both C-35 and TAA-derived peptides could be potentially prognostic for overall survival. Conclusion. Further clinical study of PPV would be warranted for HCV-positive advanced HCC, based on the safety and strong immune induction.

The prognosis of advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) remains poor, and development of new therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy, is needed urgently. Herein we report on our phase II study of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) in 60 previously treated patients with aCRC, who had failed at least one regimen of standard chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. For PPV, a maximum of four HLA-matched peptides were individually selected from a pool of 31 different peptide candidates based on preexisting host immunity, and administered subcutaneously without severe adverse events. Boosting of IgG and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses specific to the administered peptides was observed in 49% and 63%, respectively, of the patients, who completed the first cycles of six vaccinations. Median overall survival (OS) time was 498 days, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 53% and 22%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of prevaccination factors showed that plasma IL6, IP-10, and BAFF levels were significantly prognostic for OS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.508, P = 0.043; HR, 1.579, P = 0.024; HR, 0.509, P = 0.002, respectively]. In addition, increased peptide-specific CTL responses after vaccination were significantly predictive of favorable OS (HR, 0.231; P = 0.021), suggesting a causal relationship between biologic and clinical efficacy of PPV. On the basis of the safety profile and potential clinical efficacy, we believe that clinical trials of PPV would be warranted for previously treated patients with aCRC., (©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive cancers with a median survival time (MST) of <6 months in chemotherapy-resistant patients. Therefore, the development of novel treatment modalities is needed. In the present study, a phase II study of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) was conducted, in which vaccine antigens were selected and administered based on the pre-existing IgG responses to 31 different pooled peptides, for 41 chemotherapy-resistant advanced pancreatic cancer patients. No vaccine-related severe adverse events were observed. IgG responses specific to at least one of the vaccine peptides were augmented in 14 of 36 patients (39%) and in 18 of 19 patients (95%) tested after the 5th and 11th vaccination, respectively. MST from the first vaccination was 7.9 months with a 1-year survival rate of 26.8%. Higher serum amyloid A (SAA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in pre-vaccination plasma were unfavorable factors for overall survival (OS). Due to the safety profile and the potential clinical efficacy, the conduction of additional clinical trials of PPV for chemotherapy-resistant advanced pancreatic cancer patients is warranted.

The purpose of this study was to investigate severe adverse events (SAEs) after therapeutic peptide vaccination for advanced cancer patients. We investigated SAEs following personalized peptide vaccinations in 500 advanced cancer patients, including 174 prostate, 74 colon, 51 pancreatic and 43 gastric cancer patients. The number of vaccination cycles varied widely, from 3 to 112. The severity of adverse events was scored according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3, and events with a grade of >3 were defined as SAEs and were evaluated by the Institutional Safety Evaluation Committee. A total of 215 SAEs in 102 patients were recorded during the vaccine trials. The main causes for these events were cancer progression (152 SAEs in 78 patients), combined cancer treatments other than vaccination (35 in 21 patients), diseases other than cancer (20 in 19 patients), peptide vaccines (6 in 6 patients) and suicide (1 in 1 patient). The 6 vaccine-related SAEs, all grade 3, consisted of skin reactions at each injection site, cellulitis around the injection site, edemas of the head and neck regions, colitis, rectal bleeding and bladder-vaginal fistulae. Both cellular and humoral responses to the vaccinated peptides were highly boosted in all 6 of these patients, indicating the involvement of augmented immune responses in these SAEs. The clinical responses in these 6 patients consisted of 2 partial responses and 4 stable diseases. The majority of SAEs after peptide vaccination for advanced cancer patients were caused by cancer progression. The appearance of vaccine-related SAEs, except inflammatory injection site reactions, was unexpected, and fortunately the incidence was very low. Our results suggest that physicians should be on guard for these rare SAEs associated with augmented immune responses.

To investigate immunological biomarkers to predict overall survival of advanced cancer patients under treatment with personalized peptide vaccination, correlations between overall survival and biomarkers, including cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to the vaccinated peptides, were investigated in 500 advanced cancer patients who received personalized peptide vaccination from October 2000 to October 2008. The best clinical response was assessed for in 436 patients, 43 patients (10%) had partial response, 144 patients (33%) had stable disease and 249 patients (57%) had progressive, with a median overall survival of 9.9 months. Both lymphocyte counts prior to the vaccination (P = 0.0095) and increased IgG response (P = 0.0116) to the vaccinated peptides, along with performance status (P < 0.0001), well correlated with overall survival. To confirm the superiority of IgG response to CTL response, the samples from advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who survived more than 900 days (n=20) and those who died within 300 days (n=23) were analyzed further. As a result, both the numbers of peptides, to which increased IgG responses were observed, and the fold increases in IgG levels were significantly higher in long-term survivors (P = 0.000282 and P = 0.00045). In contrast, CTL responses were not statistically different between the two groups. Both lymphocyte numbers and IgG response were thus suggested to be biomarkers of cancer vaccine for advanced cancer patients.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has a high risk of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma at later stages. We recently identified a peptide derived from the HCV core protein capable of inducing both cellular and humoral responses to nearly all HCV-positive patients in Japan with different human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-class I-A alleles. To assess the safety and immune responses to this novel peptide, we conducted a phase I dose-escalation study of the vaccination for 26 HCV-positive patients who were either non-responders to the interferon-based therapy (n = 23) or refused it (n = 3). The regimen was well tolerated, with no severe vaccine-related toxicity. Twenty-five and 22 patients completed the first and second cycle vaccination (6 and 12 vaccine injections), respectively. After a series of six vaccine injections, peptide-specific CTL activity was augmented in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 15 of 25 patient samples, with an expected optimal dose of 1 mg peptide. After 12 vaccine injections, peptide-specific IgG production was augmented in plasma from the majority of patients (15 of 22 patients) tested, but not in a dose-dependent fashion. There were two HCV RNA responders with >1 log declines. Among patients whose pre-vaccination levels of alanine aminotransferase and alpha feto-protein exceeded the normal ranges, a <30% decrease was found in 7 of 24 and three of six patients, respectively. Because of its tolerability and higher rate of immune boosting, this protocol is recommended for a phase II study to investigate its clinical efficacy.

To determine biomarkers predictive of overall survival (OS) in advanced cancer patients treated with a peptide-based cancer vaccine. The samples from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials of personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) for advanced prostate cancer patients (n = 306) and recurrent glioblastoma (n = 88) patients, those from one single arm phase II trial of PPV for various types of advanced cancer patients (n = 2588), and those from one randomized placebo-controlled non-personalized phase II trial (n = 51) were provided for this retrospective biomarker study. No significant differences in clinical benefit (overall survival, OS) were found between the patients receiving PPV and those receiving placebo in each of the two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials. The neutrophil or lymphocyte proportion in advanced prostate cancer patients prior to study entry was a biomarker discriminating the PPV patients (70%) who showed significantly shorter OS relative to placebo patients from the remaining PPV patients who showed significantly longer OS relative to placebo patients. The CCL2 level prior to the study entry in recurrent glioblastoma patients was the other biomarker discriminating the PPV patients (40%) who showed significantly shorter OS relative to placebo patients from the remaining PPV patients who showed significantly longer OS relative to placebo patients. The neutrophil or lymphocyte proportion prior to study entry was also a biomarker discriminating the PPV patients (60%) with significantly shorter OS from the remaining PPV patients entered in the single arm phase II study in all the advanced cancer patients other than gastric cancer or glioblastoma patients. This marker could also discriminate patients who showed significantly shorter OS from the remaining patients in the non-personalized peptide vaccine phase II study for prostate cancer patients. Peptide-based cancer vaccine shortened the OS of a large portion, but not all, of advanced cancer patients with various types of cancer. Prospective clinical studies of peptide-based cancer vaccines using the newly defined prognostic markers may be warranted. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, 6970, 113088, 11028, 1482, 1839, 1844, 1847, 1850, 1854, 1855, 1856, 1875, 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 2282, 3590, 5631, 6249, 6295, 6493, 7493, 8126, 8823, 8824, 8825, 8826, 8827, 8828, 10068, 19390, 2906, 2907, 2908, 2984, 2985, 2987, 3027, 3028, 3029, 3059, 3060, 3081, 3082, 3083, 5329, 10290, 11593, 14855, 19802, 19879, 6927,11230. President Kyogo Itoh,M.D., Ph.D., Cancer vaccine center, Kurume University School of Medicine, Japan. Grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (16ck0106086h0003, 18im0110802h0008), the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, and FUJIFILM Corporation. M. Noguchi: Advisory / Consultancy: BrightPath Biotherapeutics Co. Ltd. A. Yamada: Advisory / Consultancy: BrightPath Biotherapeutics Co. Ltd. K. Itoh: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Company. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]