Search

GEMICOMED (SEIMC) and the Spanish CANDI-Bundle Group., [Background] Candidaemia is a leading cause of bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients all over the world. It remains associated with high mortality., [Objectives] To assess the impact of implementing an evidence-based package of measures (bundle) on the quality of care and outcomes of candidaemia., [Methods] A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify measures related to better outcomes in candidaemia. Eight quality-of-care indicators (QCIs) were identified and a set of written recommendations (early treatment, echinocandins in septic shock, source control, follow-up blood culture, ophthalmoscopy, echocardiography, de-escalation, length of treatment) was prospectively implemented. The study was performed in 11 tertiary hospitals in Spain. A quasi-experimental design before and during bundle implementation (September 2016 to February 2018) was used. For the pre-intervention period, data from the prospective national surveillance were used (May 2010 to April 2011)., [Results] A total of 385 and 263 episodes were included in the pre-intervention and intervention groups, respectively. Adherence to all QCIs improved in the intervention group. The intervention group had a decrease in early (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23–0.89; P = 0.022) and overall (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.4–0.94; P = 0.023) mortality after controlling for potential confounders., [Conclusions] Implementing a structured, evidence-based intervention bundle significantly improved patient care and early and overall mortality in patients with candidaemia. Institutions should embrace this objective strategy and use the bundle as a means to measure high-quality medical care of patients., This study was funded by a research grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS PI15/00744). This study is also co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund ‘A way to achieve Europe’ ERDF, Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD06/0008). The funding institutions had no role in the design or performance of the research. C.G.-V. is a recipient of an INTENSIFICACIÓ Grant from the ‘Strategic plan for research and innovation in health-PERIS 2016–2020’ and forms part of the FungiCLINIC Research group (AGAUR-Project 2017SGR1432 of the Catalan Health Agency).

Background Despite being considered a high-risk population for invasive fungal disease, specific features of candidemia among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remain poorly characterized. Methods We compiled prospective data from two multicenter studies on candidemia performed over two consecutive periods in Spain: the CANDIPOP Study (2010-2011) and the CANDI-Bundle Study (2016-2018). Episodes diagnosed in adult SOT recipients in 10 participating centers were included. Risk factors for clinical failure (all-cause 7-day mortality and/or persistent candidemia for >= 72 hours) and 30-day mortality were investigated by univariate analysis. Results We included 55 episodes of post-transplant candidemia (32 and 23 of which occurred during the first and second periods). Kidney (38.2%) and liver recipients (30.9%) were the most common populations. Candida albicans accounted for 27.3% of episodes. The proportion of C glabrata increased over time (18.8% vs 30.4% for the first and second periods). There were no differences in the rate of fluconazole non-susceptible isolates (50.0% vs 60.0%, respectively). Clinical failure and 30-day mortality occurred in 25.5% and 27.3% of episodes and were associated with the severity of candidemia (Pitt score and severe sepsis/septic shock). Kidney transplantation (unadjusted odds ratio [uOR]: 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.85; P-value = .020), early catheter removal (uOR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.76; P-value = .013), and appropriate early antifungal therapy (uOR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02-0.89; P-value = .041) were protective for 30-day mortality. Conclusions High rates of non-albicans species and fluconazole non-susceptibility must be taken into account to optimize therapeutic management and outcomes in SOT recipients with candidemia.

CANDIPOP Project, the CANDI‐Bundle Group GEIRAS‐GEMICOMED (SEIMC) REIPI., [Background] Despite being considered a high‐risk population for invasive fungal disease, specific features of candidemia among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remain poorly characterized., [Methods] We compiled prospective data from two multicenter studies on candidemia performed over two consecutive periods in Spain: the CANDIPOP Study (2010‐2011) and the CANDI‐Bundle Study (2016‐2018). Episodes diagnosed in adult SOT recipients in 10 participating centers were included. Risk factors for clinical failure (all‐cause 7‐day mortality and/or persistent candidemia for ≥72 hours) and 30‐day mortality were investigated by univariate analysis., [Results] We included 55 episodes of post‐transplant candidemia (32 and 23 of which occurred during the first and second periods). Kidney (38.2%) and liver recipients (30.9%) were the most common populations. Candida albicans accounted for 27.3% of episodes. The proportion of C glabrata increased over time (18.8% vs 30.4% for the first and second periods). There were no differences in the rate of fluconazole non‐susceptible isolates (50.0% vs 60.0%, respectively). Clinical failure and 30‐day mortality occurred in 25.5% and 27.3% of episodes and were associated with the severity of candidemia (Pitt score and severe sepsis/septic shock). Kidney transplantation (unadjusted odds ratio [uOR]: 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03‐0.85; P ‐value = .020), early catheter removal (uOR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03‐0.76; P ‐value = .013), and appropriate early antifungal therapy (uOR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02‐0.89; P ‐value = .041) were protective for 30‐day mortality., [Conclusions] High rates of non‐albicans species and fluconazole non‐susceptibility must be taken into account to optimize therapeutic management and outcomes in SOT recipients with candidemia., The CANDIPOP Project was supported by non‐restrictive research grants from Gilead Sciences, MSD, Astellas Pharma, and Pfizer. This study was cofounded by Fundación SEIMC‐GESIDA, by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (co‐financed by the European Development Regional Fund [ERDF] >A way to achieve Europe>), and by the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD12/0015). The CANDI‐Bundle Study was supported by “Plan Nacional de I + D+I” and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [FIS] PI15/00744), Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016). MFR holds a research contract “Miguel Servet” (CP 18/00073) from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

A case of 1-year-old male multivisceral transplant recipient with candidemia diagnosed by the T2Candida (R) test is presented. Optimal management of the candidemia complemented the treatment of the global clinical episode. Duration of treatment might be established much more precisely with the T2Candida (R) test than with blood cultures.

Background: Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast that can cause invasive infections and is associated with high mortality. It is typically resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole and, some cases, also to echinocandins and amphotericin B. This species, phylogenetically related to Candida haemulonii, is frequently misidentified by commercial identification techniques in clinical laboratories; therefore, the real prevalence of C auris infections may be underestimated. Aims: To describe the clinical and microbiological features of the first four cases of C auris fungemia episodes observed" in the European continent. Methods: The four patients were hospitalized in the adult surgical intensive care unit. A total of 8 isolates (two per patient) from blood and catheter tip were analyzed. Results: All isolates were misidentified as Saccharomyces cerevisiae by AuxaColor 2, and as Candida sake by API ID20C. VITEK MS technology misidentified one isolate as Candida lusitaniae, another,as C haemulonii and could not identify the other six. C auris identification was confirmed by ITS rDNA sequencing. All isolates were fluconazole (MIC >256 mg/I) and voriconazole (MIC 2 mg/1) resistant and susceptible to posaconazole, itraconazole, echinocandins and amphotericin B. Conclusions: C auris should be regarded as an emerging pathogen, which requires molecular methods for definitive identification. Our isolates were highly resistant to fluconazole and resistant to voriconazole, but susceptible to the other antifungals tested, which emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying this species to avoid therapeutic failures. (C) 2016 Asociacion Espanola de Micologia. Published by Elsevier Espafla, S.L.U. All rights reserved.