Search

Literature is convincing regarding the efficacy of capsaicin nasal treatment in idiopathic rhinitis (IR). However, up to 50% of IR patients do not meet the strict inclusion criteria of the trials conducted so far. As a consequence, the efficacy of capsaicin is unknown in a significant number of IR patients that do not meet the strict inclusion/exclusion criteria (J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:1332, J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017; [Epub ahead of print]). "Mixed rhinitis" (MR) patients have more than one major etiologic factor involved in the mucosal pathology. We have no idea about the efficacy of capsaicin nasal spray in these patients nor about the time interval to seek a second application. We report here that capsaicin nasal spray is effective in a broader group of IR than the purely selected ones described before, that subjective nasal hyper-reactivity is a good predictor of positive outcome, and that the time interval for seeking a second treatment is likely to be shorter in MR patients than in the strictly selected IR patients., (© 2017 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.)

Background: The therapeutic action of capsaicin treatment in patients with idiopathic rhinitis (IR) is based on ablation of the transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V, receptor 1 (TRPV1)-substance P nociceptive signaling pathway. However, the functional consequences of capsaicin treatment on nasal nerve activation and the association between the reduction in nasal hyperreactivity (NHR) and response to capsaicin treatment remain unknown., Objective: We sought to study the effects of capsaicin nasal spray on the afferent innervation of the nasal mucosa by monitoring trigeminal nerve activity in patients with IR and healthy control (HC) subjects., Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial with capsaicin nasal spray was performed involving 33 patients with IR and 12 HC subjects. Before and at 4, 12, and 26 weeks after treatment, nasal mucosal potentials (NMPs) were measured while exposing the nasal mucosa of patients with IR and HC subjects to aerosols with increasing doses of the chemical irritants allyl isothiocyanate (AITC; also known as mustard oil) or capsaicin. The threshold for each compound was determined for each subject. The results of the NMP measurements were evaluated in parallel with the therapeutic response, visual analog scale scores for nasal symptoms, self-reported NHR, and mRNA expression of PGP9.5; TRPV1; transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily A, receptor 1 (TRPA1); TRPV4; transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M, member 8 (TRPM8); and nerve growth factor (NGF) in nasal biopsy specimens., Results: AITC turned out to be the best stimulus because the coughing induced by capsaicin interfered with measurements. At baseline, the threshold for evoking changes in NMPs based on AITC was significantly lower for patients with IR compared with HC subjects (P = .0423). Capsaicin treatment of IR patients increased the threshold for the response to AITC at 4 and 12 weeks compared with placebo (P = .0406 and P = .0325, respectively), which returned to baseline by week 26 (P = .0611). This increase correlated with changes in visual analog scale major symptom (P = .0004) and total symptom (P = .0018) scores. IR patients with self-reported NHR at baseline showed a trend to being better responders to capsaicin treatment compared with patients with IR but without NHR (P = .10)., Conclusion: The lower threshold for AITC based on NMPs in patients with IR compared with HC subjects and the increased threshold for AITC after capsaicin treatment in patients with IR demonstrate the crucial role of TRPA1 and TRPV1 in IR pathophysiology. The strong correlation between the increase in AITC threshold in patients with IR and symptom reduction after capsaicin treatment demonstrates the clinical relevance of these findings., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)