Search

Background: Fewer studies have been conducted on the diagnostic value of capsule endoscopy, CT enterography and enteroscopy in suspected small bowel bleeding. This study aimed at analyzing the diagnostic and clinical value of capsule endoscopy, CT enterography and enteroscopy for suspected small bowel bleeding., Methods: This retrospective study compared the diagnostic rate and consistency of findings among groups. In addition, diagnostic rates were compared between combined enteroscopy versus uncombined enteroscopy associated with capsule endoscopy or CT enterography, as well as the influencing factors of diagnostic outcomes. The complete enteroscopy rates and diagnostic rates were analyzed for the one-day enteroscopy group and the non-one-day enteroscopy group., Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic rates between capsule endoscopy (n = 70) and CT enterography (n = 122) (χ 2  = 3.334; p = 0.068), while the diagnostic rate of enteroscopy (n = 396) is higher than capsule endoscopy (χ 2  = 10.064; p = 0.002) and CT enterography (χ 2  = 42.661; p < 0.001). Diagnostic rates were much higher in patients with a successful completion of docking inspection (n = 64) than in undocked patients (n = 60) (85.9% vs 46.7%; p < 0.001), even though these patients still had combined capsule endoscopy or CT enterography. The complete enteroscopy rates (χ 2  = 0.364; P = 0.546) and diagnostic rates (χ 2  = 2.511; P = 0.113) of enteroscopy in the one-day group (n = 55) were not significantly different from those in the non-one-day group (n = 25)., Conclusions: Enteroscopy is the more reliable method of diagnosing suspected small bowel bleeding among enteroscopy, capsule endoscopy and CT enterography. Moreover, uncompleted enteroscopy combined with capsule endoscopy or CT enterography may not yet be a substitute for successful completion of docking enteroscopy in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declarations. Disclosures: Yiling Xiong, Ruiri Jin, Sheng Chen, Xingxing Liu, Zhenyu Wu, Die Zhang, Chunyan Zeng and Youxiang Chen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Ethical approval: The present study was approved by the ethics committees., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) are recommended for the management of patients with nonresponsive or refractory coeliac disease (CD). However, there is a paucity of data regarding the clinical profiles and outcomes of patients undergoing these investigations., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of two databases of adult patients with CD who underwent CE and/or DBE between 2017 and 2022 at the National Centre for Refractory CD in England. Patient demographic, clinical and endoscopic data were collected, and clinically relevant outcomes were reported., Results: A total of 132 patients (median age 53 years, 64.4 % female) underwent 146 CEs and 25 DBEs. The most common symptoms were diarrhoea (51.5 %), abdominal pain (37.8 %), bloating (34.8 %), and weight loss (29.5 %). The overall detection rate of CE and DBE was 87.6 % and 92 %, respectively. Following CE and DBE, 14 patients (10.6 %) were diagnosed with CD-related complications such as ulcerative jejunitis, strictures and malignancy. Seven patients (5.3 %) died during follow-up, with five of these deaths directly attributed to CD. Older age, weight loss and anaemia were associated with poor outcomes., Conclusions: The sequential approach of CE and DBE identified CD-related complications in almost 1 in 10 patients with nonresponsive or refractory CD. Older patients with persistent villous atrophy, weight loss and anaemia require close monitoring to help with the early diagnosis and management of complications., (Copyright © 2024 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obscure gastrointestinal bleed (OGIB), now called small bowel bleed (SBB), comprises 5% to 10% of all gastrointestinal (GI) bleed episodes and capsule endoscopy (CE) is a tool for its evaluation. Studies on CE in a large sample of SBB patients from the tropics are limited., Methods: We did a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with SBB undergoing CE using PillCam or MiroCam CE., Results: Of 350 patients (age 52.4 ± 17.4 years; 248 [70.9%] male) undergoing CE, 243 (69.4%) and 107 (30.6%) had overt and occult SBB, respectively. CE detected lesions in 244 (69.7%) patients (single lesion in 172 [49.1%]; multiple in 72 [20.6%]). The single lesions included vascular malformations (52, 14.9%), ulcer/erosion (47, 13.4%), tumor (24, 6.9%), hookworm (19, 5.4%), stricture (15, 4.3%), hemobilia (1, 0.3%) and blood without identifiable lesion (9, 2.6%). Of 72 with multiple lesions, ulcer with stricture was the commonest finding (n = 43, 12.3%). No abnormality was detected in 106 (30.3%) patients. The frequency of lesion detection was comparable among patients with overt and occult SBB (173/243, 71.2% vs. 71/107, 66.3%, respectively; p = 0.4). Younger patients (0 to 39 years) more often had multiple lesions on CE than the older (≥ 40 years) ones (26/76, 34.2% vs. 46/228, 20.2%, respectively; p = 0.001)., Conclusion: CE has a high diagnostic yield in SBB in the tropics, regardless of the type of bleed or of CE brand and the duration of recording. Multiple lesions associated with SBB are commoner among younger (< 40 years) patients., (© 2024. Indian Society of Gastroenterology.)

We present the case of a 62-year-old patient who developed melenas and in whom conventional endoscopic tests could not detect any bleeding lesion. In our case, capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy were the pivotal elements in establishing the diagnosis of a neuroendocrine tumour with an atypical location. As a result, it was possible to surgically remove the lesions at an early stage of the malignancy without metastatic disease and without the need for adjuvant therapy. Our case demonstrates the need for these new techniques in tumours of atypical location and aggressive course. Otherwise, this malignancy may be underdiagnosed until an advanced stage.

Gastrointestinal bleeding of undetermined origin (GBUO) is defined as gastrointestinal bleeding without an identified cause or location despite an endoscopic assessment including an esogastroduodenal endoscopy (EOGD) and a total colonoscopy. A distinction is made between exteriorized GBUO and non-exteriorized occult GBUO. The causes in the majority of cases (vascular, inflammatory and tumoral) are located in the small intestine. The diagnostic strategy aiming to locate the origin of the GBUO is a real challenge. Innovation in endoscopic and imaging techniques has enabled minimally invasive exploration of the small intestine. In Europe, there is a strong consensus to recommend a video-capsule endoscopy (VCE) as the first-intention study. If there is reason to suspect intestinal obstruction, VCE is contraindicated and a CT-enteroscopy is then performed as first intention. Enteroscopy is performed as a second-line treatment, either for therapeutic purposes after a positive VCE or CT-enteroclysis, or for diagnostic purposes after a negative VCE. Finally, intraoperative enteroscopy (IOE) coupled with surgical exploration should be reserved either for therapeutic purposes in the event of impossibility or failure of preoperative enteroscopy, or for diagnostic purposes in the event of recurrent GBUO after failure of all other studies and explorations of the small intestine., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Small-bowel (SB) bleeding is a challenging problem for the clinician, presenting many pitfalls in both diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) have revolutionized the approach to the patient with SB bleeding, allowing for the endoscopic diagnosis and management of what was previously only a surgical matter. The patients' assessment in SB bleeding is of foremost importance, as treatment success relies on a detailed evaluation of clinical history, suspicion for underlying lesions, and a careful selection and timing of diagnostic and therapeutic tools. This review will summarize current state-of-the-art evidence and practice points, to provide the clinician with a comprehensive guide towards the management of SB bleeding., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Professor Ian M. Gralnek has potential COI with the following: Astra-Zeneca, Check Cap, Boston Scientific, Clexio Biosciences, Motus GI, Vifor Pharma, Medtronic., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Small bowel evaluation has been transformed by capsule endoscopy and advances in small bowel imaging, which provide reliable and noninvasive means for assessing the mucosal surface. Device-assisted enteroscopy has been critical for histopathological confirmation and endoscopic therapy for a wide range of small bowel pathology that conventional endoscopy cannot reach. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the indications, techniques, and clinical applications of capsule endoscopy; device-assisted enteroscopy; and imaging studies for small bowel evaluation in children., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: With the global increase in life expectancy, there is an increase in gastrointestinal presentations in the elderly. Small bowel bleeding (SBB) is a cause of significant morbidity in the elderly requiring multiple hospital visits, investigations, and potentially expensive therapy., Areas Covered: In this review, we will outline the different modalities which are used for the diagnosis and management of SBB. We will also discuss the common causes of SBB in the elderly., Expert Opinion: SBB in elderly has a significant impact on the quality of life of the elderly. Larger randomized studies in the elderly are urgently required to help guide clinicians on the best and most cost-effective treatment algorithm in this challenging cohort.

Background: Difficulties in establishing diagnosis of small bowel (SB) disorders, prevented their effective treatment. This problem was largely resolved by wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE), which has since become the first line investigation for suspected SB disorders. Several types of WCE pills are now used in clinical practice, despite their limitations and complications. WCE pills are large, rigid and immotile capsules. When swallowed, they provide SB enteroscopy downloaded to a data logger carried by the patient. Most of the complications of WCEs result from lack of intrinsic locomotion: incomplete examination, capsule retention and impaction within strictures. In addition, the rigid nature and size of current generation of WCE pills is accompanied by 0.1% inability to swallow the pill by patients with normal esophageal motility., Methods: The aim of this communication is to describe the initial prototype, P 1 , which is thinner and slightly longer than the current generation of WCEs. In addition, it exhibits intrinsic active locomotion, produced by vibrating silicon legs. These generate a controlled-skid locomotion on the small bowel mucosal surface, rendered slippery by surface mucus and intraluminal surfactant bile salts. We demonstrate the mechanism responsible for the active locomotion of P 1 , which we consider translatable into a working prototype, suitable for further R&D for eventual clinical translation., Results: The shape and attachment of the rubber vibrating legs to vibrating actuators, have been designed specifically to produce a tight clockwise circular motion. When inserted inside a circular tube in vitro of equivalent diameter to human small intestine, the intrinsic circular clockwise motion of P 1 translates into a linear locomotion by the constraints imposed by the surrounding circular walls of SB and rest of the gastrointestinal tract. This design ensures device stability during transit, essential for imaging and targeting lesions encountered during the enteroscopy. We preformed two experiments: (i) transit of P 1 through a phantom consisting of a segment of PVC tube placed on a horizontal surface and (ii) transit through a transparent slippery nylon sleeve insufflated with air. In the PVC tube, its transit rate averages 15.6 mm/s, which is too fast for endoscopy: whereas inside the very slippery nylon sleeve insufflated with air, the average transit rate of P 1 is reduced to 5.9 mm/s, i.e., ideal for inspection endoscopy., Conclusions: These in-vitro experiments indicate that the P 1 hybrid soft robot prototype has the potential specifically for clinical translation for SB enteroscopy., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background & Aims: Complicated celiac disease (CCD) is a rare but severe condition with a poor prognosis. Guidelines recommend use of capsule endoscopy (CE) to explore the small bowel (SB), followed by a double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in selected cases with suspected CCD. Our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield (DY) of CE and DBE in identifying and monitoring CCD., Methods: Consecutive suspected CCD patients were enrolled prospectively to undergo CE and/or DBE in the presence of: persistent symptoms despite a correct gluten-free diet (GFD), increased anti-transglutaminase antibodies titer, lack of adherence to the GFD, and CCD monitoring. The DY of CE and DBE were calculated. The incidence of neoplastic complications and mortality were assessed., Results: In total, 130 patients (97 women; age, 49 ± 16 y) underwent 151 CEs and 23 DBEs. The DY of CE was 46%. Patients older than age 50 years (at CE examination or at CD diagnosis) with a CD duration shorter than 5 years were at higher risk of positive CE (relative risk, 1.6 and 1.7 in case of enrollement or CD diagnosis after 50 years of age, and 1.5 in case of short CD duration; P < .05) than their counterparts. Up to 40% of SB lesions were unreachable by upper endoscopy. At the end of the diagnostic work-up, 25 patients with premalignant/malignant lesions were identified: 12 type 1 refractory CD (RCD-1), 7 type 2 RCD (RCD-2), and 6 enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL). Six patients died: 2 patients with RCD-2 and 4 patients with EATL., Conclusions: In case of suspected CCD, CE should be the first-line approach to detect complications and to identify patients deserving DBE. Older and symptomatic patients with suspected CCD deserve a careful evaluation of the SB, especially during the first years after diagnosis., (Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Suspected small bowel bleeding (SSBB) is the main indication for videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) and double balloon enteroscopy (DBE). We assessed the impact of both modalities in a large cohort of SSBB patients in a European tertiary center., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with SSBB undergoing VCE and/or DBE from March 2001 to July 2020. Demographic/clinical parameters, anticoagulant therapies, technical characteristics and adverse events were collected, as well as diagnostic yield (DY), VCE-DBE concordance, hemoglobin (Hb) values before and after DBE, and complications., Results: 807 VCEs and 407 DBEs were performed in 751 patients. The DY was significantly higher in DBE compared with VCE (68.8% vs 57.7%), with the highest (75%) yield for overt active SB bleeding. The agreement between VCE and DBE was generally suboptimal (k = 0.059). This improved in cases where both procedures were done within 1-5 days of the other (k = 0.323). Post-procedural Hb values were significantly higher. In patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), there were no differences in DY, complications or Hb values compared with non-DOAC patients., Conclusion: VCE and DBE play a pivotal role in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to SSBB, having a high clinical impact even in patients treated with DOACs., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Video capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy are complementary technologies. Capsule endoscopy is a highly acceptable technology with high diagnostic yield that can guide a subsequent enteroscopy approach. This article aims to focus on the role of video capsule endoscopy as a prelude to deep enteroscopy with a focus on the strengths and limitations of either approach., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis and unclassified entities. CD commonly involves the terminal ileum and colon but at the time of diagnosis it can be confined to the small bowel (SB) in about 30% of the patients, especially in the young ones. Management of isolated SB-CD can be challenging and objective evaluation of the SB mucosa is essential in differentiating CD from other enteropathies to achieve therapeutic decisions and to plan the follow-up. The introduction of cross-sectional imaging techniques and capsule endoscopy (CE) have significantly expanded the ability to diagnose SB diseases providing a non-invasive test for the visualization of the entire SB mucosa. The main CE limitations are the low specificity, the lack of therapeutic capabilities and the impossibility to take biopsies. Device assisted enteroscopy (DAE) enables histological confirmation when traditional endoscopy, capsule endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging are inconclusive and also allows therapeutic interventions such as balloon stricture dilation, intralesional steroid injection, capsule retrieval and more recently stent insertion. In the current review we will discuss technical aspect, indications and safety profile of DAE in children and adults with IBD., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article., (©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Capsule enteroscopy (CE) is recommended in the management of complicated celiac disease (CD). However, published data are derived from axial-view capsule systems. No data are available on the use of lateral/panoramic view capsules. This study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic yield and efficacy of the lateral/panoramic versus the axial view capsule system in CD., Methods: Consecutive CD patients were enrolled in a prospective monocentric study. Each patient ingested an axial (PillCam SB3) and a lateral/panoramic (CapsoCam Plus) view capsule with a 3-h interval in a randomized order. Two experts blindly evaluated the CE carried out. A third expert reviewed the videos in cases of discordance., Results: Twenty-five CD patients were enrolled (four males, age at CE 51.2 ± 16.6 years, age at CD diagnosis 41.7 ± 20.6, years on a gluten-free diet [GFD] 9.6 ± 9.4). Indications at CE were refractory CD in nine cases, non-responsiveness to GFD in 10 and GFD non-compliance in six. A positive finding was evidenced in 15 (60%) and 13 (52%) cases by CapsoCam and PillCam respectively (not significant). Atrophy was detected by both capsules. Considering the percentage of the small-bowel mucosa presenting atrophy signs, mean values were 22% ± 35 and 20% ± 29 for lateral/panoramic and axial systems, respectively (not significant). Compared to duodenal histology, PillCam correctly identified 80% of patients with SB atrophy, whereas CapsoCam identified 73% of cases., Conclusions: Lateral/panoramic view CE is effective in the detection of small-bowel atrophy in CD and presents good sensitivity and specificity when compared to histology., (© 2019 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background: A new capsule endoscopy (CE) system featuring two advanced optics for 344°-viewing and a prolonged operative time has been recently developed for Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Hence, we evaluated, for the first time, the performance of this novel CE and the add-on value of the 344°-viewing in a multi-center real-life setting., Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected or established CD received the PillCam™ Crohn's System as supplementary diagnostic work-up focused on the small-bowel between June 2017 and June 2018. Technical and clinical data, including the panenteric CE diagnostic yield, the Lewis score and the impact of small-bowel findings on clinical management during a 6-months follow-up (new diagnosis, staging or treatment upgrade) were collected, thereby evaluating the added value of the 344° panoramic-view (lesions detected by camera A and B) over the standard 172°-view (lesions detected by one camera only)., Results: Among 41 patients (aged 43 ± 20 years), 73% underwent CE for suspected CD and 27% for established CD. The rate of complete enteroscopy was 90%. No technical failure or retention occurred. Compared to the standard 172° view, the panoramic 344°-view revealed a greater number of patients with a relevant lesion (56.1% vs. 39.0%; P = 0.023), resulting in higher Lewis score (222,8 vs. 185.7; P = 0.031), and improved clinical management (48.8% vs. 31.7%, P = 0.023)., Conclusions: The panoramic 344°-view increases small-bowel CE accuracy, thereby improving the clinical management of CD patients with mild small-bowel active disease. This system should be regarded as a new standard for both small-bowel diagnosis and monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases.

The advent of video capsule endoscopy into clinical routine more than 15 years ago led to a substantial change in the diagnostic approach to patients with suspected small bowel diseases, often indicating a deep enteroscopy procedure for diagnostical confirmation or endoscopic treatment. Device assisted enteroscopy was developed in 2001 and for the first time established a practicable, safe and effective method for evaluation of the small bowel. Currently with double-balloon enteroscopy, single-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy three different platforms are available in clinical routine. Summarizing, double-balloon enteroscopy seems to offer the deepest insertion depth to the small bowel going hand in hand with the disadvantage of a longer procedural duration. Manual spiral enteroscopy seems to be a faster procedure but without reaching the depth of the DBE in currently available data. Finally, single-balloon enteroscopy seems to be the least complicated procedure to perform. Despite substantial improvements in the field of direct enteroscopy, even nowadays deep endoscopic access to the small bowel with all available methods is still a complex procedure, cumbersome and time-consuming and requires high endoscopic skills. This review will give an overview of the currently available techniques and will further discuss the role of the upcoming new technology of the motorized spiral enteroscopy (PowerSpiral)., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Schneider M and Höllerich J have nothing to disclose; Beyna T reports personal fees from Olympus, personal fees from Medronic, personal fees from Falk, personal fees from Cook, personal fees from Boston Scientific, during the conduct of the study.

Celiac disease predominantly involves the proximal small bowel, but villus atrophy can be patchy, spare the duodenum, and be present more distally. Video capsule endoscopy is more sensitive than standard endoscopy to detect villus atrophy, and can define extent of disease, though it cannot obtain biopsies. Duodenal biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis. Video capsule endoscopy assists in special circumstances when biopsy is not possible, and in equivocal diagnosis. Video capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy are recommended for evaluating complicated celiac disease, especially refractory celiac disease type II. Future developments include computer-assisted capsule programs and advanced capsule and enteroscope design., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a reliable noninvasive method for examination of small-bowel mucosa. However, it has some limitations. The aim of this article was to review the approach in patients with negative VCE. It is clear that a negative VCE should be interpreted based on the indication. In suspected small bowel bleeding (SSBB), patients with ongoing/recurrent overt bleeding, or occult bleeders who experience significant declines in hemoglobin after a negative VCE should proceed small bowel study; on the other hand, patients with occult SSBB and only mild-moderate anemia should be managed with supportive care. In inflammatory bowel disease, a normal VCE has a very high sensitivity and negative predictive value. In small bowel tumor suspicion there is a high risk of false negative results, so another imaging modality should be considered. In polyposis syndromes, if VCE is negative, patients should continue screening within 2-3 years., (Copyright © 2018. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) can identify macroscopic changes of coeliac disease and assess the extent of disease in the small bowel beyond the duodenum. SBCE has a good sensitivity for the detection of coeliac disease in comparison to histology owing to several ideal features such as a high magnification. It also plays a useful role in detecting complications in patients with refractory coeliac disease. Several studies have been carried out on transforming images obtained from small bowel capsule endoscopy to enable the automated detection of features related to coeliac disease. This review discusses the current roles played by small bowel capsule endoscopy in coeliac disease. It identifies future potential roles of this technique and describes in great detail the role of computational analysis in the detection of coeliac disease and how it can be adapted to current available technology., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This prospective single-centre study aims to evaluate a new diagnostic algorithm using capsule endoscopy, colon capsule endoscopy and single-balloon enteroscopy in the work-up of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in children., Methods: The usefulness of a new diagnostic algorithm was assessed comparing the clinically relevant findings revealed by each technique, and evaluating the clinical outcomes during the follow-up., Results: A total of 22 paediatric patients were evaluated (14 male; mean age 12.5 years ± 3.9). Capsule endoscopies were positive in 14 (63.6%), suspicious in 5 (22.7%) and negative in 3 (13.6%). A second look with colon capsule identified new lesions in 2/3 (67%) of previous negative cases. Enteroscopies were able to reach the positive and suspicious findings in all but 2, in which an intraoperative enteroscopy was needed. This combined approach showed positive findings in 21/22 of cases with a diagnostic yield of 95%. Eighteen patients (82%) had a complete resolution after therapy. One patient resolved his symptoms spontaneously. Despite diagnosis, in three patients (13.6%) the gastrointestinal bleeding was not resolved after therapy., Conclusion: This algorithm achieves optimal levels of diagnostic yield (95%) and therapeutic outcome (82%). This approach deserves to be studied in a larger multicentre cohort of patients and for a longer follow-up period., (Copyright © 2014 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: A subset of celiac patients shows a high risk for small bowel malignancies., Aims: To select celiac patients considered at risk and evaluate the diagnostic yield of enteroscopy in this context., Methods: Celiac patients were enrolled from a tertiary referral centre during the period June 2011-June 2013, based on the following criteria: (i) patients diagnosed when aged 50+ and with poor response to gluten-free dieting; (ii) low dietary compliance; (iii) alarm symptoms. The patients underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy and/or double-balloon enteroscopy. Control populations were represented by the 165 non-celiac patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, and the 815,362-strong population of the Italian province of Varese as a registered cohort., Results: Fifty-three patients (19% males, mean age 43.6±17.4 years) were evaluated. Two jejunal adenocarcinomas and one ileal neuro-endocrine tumour were diagnosed by enteroscopy (the diagnostic yield for malignancies in the selected population being 5.7%). In the non-celiac controls the detection rate of small bowel tumours by capsule endoscopy was 0.6% (P=0.04). When compared to the registered population, the relative risk for intestinal malignancy was 1282 (95% CI, 407-4033; P<0.0001)., Conclusions: Capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy can be considered for early disease management of a subset of celiac patients., (Copyright © 2013 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Dieulafoy's-like lesions (DLs-like) represent a cause of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, enteroscopy being the main diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Frequently, more than one enteroscopy is needed to identify the bleeding vessel. In our practice, video capsule endoscopy (VCE) identified and guided therapy in four cases of DLs-like; three of them were localized on the small bowel. We report, for the first time, a diagnosis of colonic DL-like performed by colon capsule endoscopy. Two patients presented with severe cardiovascular disorders, being hemodynamically unstable during VCE examination. Based on the VCE findings, only one invasive therapeutic procedure per patient was necessary to achieve hemostasis. VCE and enteroscopy may be regarded as complementary procedures in patients with gut DLs-like.

Aim: To assess the rate of recurrent bleeding of the small bowel in patients with obscure bleeding already undergone capsule endoscopy (CE) with negative results., Methods: We reviewed the medical records related to 696 consecutive CE performed from December 2002 to January 2011, focusing our attention on patients with recurrence of obscure bleeding and negative CE. Evaluating the patient follow-up, we analyzed the recurrence rate of obscure bleeding in patient with a negative CE. Actuarial rates of rebleeding during follow-up were calculated, and factors associated with rebleeding were assessed through an univariate and multivariate analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of negative CE were calculated., Results: Two hundred and seven out of 696 (29.7%) CE studies resulted negative in patient with obscure/overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall, 489 CE (70.2%) were positive studies. The median follow-up was 24 mo (range 12-36 mo). During follow-up, recurrence of obscure bleeding was observed only in 34 out of 207 negative CE patients (16.4%); 26 out of 34 with obscure overt bleeding and 8 out of 34 with obscure occult bleeding. The younger age (< 65 years) and the onset of bleeding such as melena are independent risk factors of rebleeding after a negative CE (OR = 2.6703, 95%CI: 1.1651-6.1202, P = 0.0203; OR 4.7718, 95%CI: 1.9739-11.5350, P = 0.0005). The rebleeding rate (CE+ vs CE-) was 16.4% vs 45.1% (χ(2) test, P = 0.00001). The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV were 93.8%, 100%, 100%, 80.1%, respectively., Conclusion: Patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and negative CE had a significantly lower rebleeding rate, and further invasive investigations can be deferred.

ABSTRACT Background and Aim Methods Results Conclusion We aimed to develop and validate a simple capsule endoscopy (CE) training assessment tool, the Capsule Endoscopy Training Assessment (CETA), and prospectively use it to analyze the learning progression achieved by participants in our CE training program.Over a 3‐year period, all participants in our CE training program completed pre‐training and post‐training CETA, ranging between 0% and 100%, and encompassing theoretical questions and interpretation of segmented CE videos. We compared the mean differences in overall, theoretical, and practical pre‐training and post‐training CETA, and assessed the influence of previous endoscopic experience (upper gastrointestinal endoscopy [UGE], colonoscopy, device‐assisted enteroscopy [DAE] and CE) using generalized linear models.Fifty‐seven participants were included. After training, there was a significant increase in participants' overall (mean difference, 26.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.70 to 31.83), theoretical (mean difference, 27.2; 95% CI, 19.81 to 34.57), and practical (mean difference, 25.9; 95% CI, 20.09 to 31.63) CETA components. Compared to those without experience, participants with previous endoscopic experience demonstrated a smaller increase in overall CETA after training (UGE, rate ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.91; colonoscopy (rate ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; DAE (rate ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.97; CE, rate ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92, respectively).CETA is a valid and useful tool in assessing the learning progression achieved by participants following the CE training program. We demonstrated a significant improvement in participants' CETA after training, being the least experienced participants in endoscopic procedures who benefited the most from CE training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Video capsule endoscopy has become the gold standard for the evaluation of small bowel pathology. Capsular retention remains the most significant risk of this intervention. Here, we present two cases of retained capsules and our minimally invasive approach to retrieval. We also review the literature pertaining to retained endoscopy capsules and highlight a range of medical, surgical, and preventative strategies utilized in its management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopy plays a wide range of roles from diagnosis to treatment in the management of Crohn's disease. With the spread of small intestinal endoscopy, the importance of early diagnosis and endoscopic monitoring of small intestinal lesions, which frequently cause intestinal complications, has been recently discussed. In Crohn's disease, prevention of postoperative recurrence is also important, and the methods of endoscopic monitoring and the timing of therapeutic intervention in postoperative cases should be further discussed. On the other hand, endoscopic dilation is suggested to be effective for avoiding surgery in patients complicated by intestinal stenosis. However, it is necessary to determine appropriate indications and long-term results of endoscopic dilation in order to clarify the usefulness of the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A GI hospitalist (GIH) is a physician who practices in the inpatient setting performing consultations and endoscopic procedures. Obscure small bowel bleeding is a common inpatient diagnosis that is difficult to manage and associated with longer hospitalizations. Having an onsite GIH physician with expertise in video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Aims: This study will be the first to explore how implementing a GIH model and providing a GIH with training in DBE can affect the outcomes of patients with small bowel pathology. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients who received an inpatient DBE at an academic medical center before and after initiation of a GIH model and credentialing of a GIH in DBE. We compared outcomes, including procedure volumes, diagnostic and therapeutic yields, procedure duration, time to procedure, and length of stay. Results: There was a 46.5% increase in the number of DBEs performed by the GIH. The diagnostic yield increased from 56.3 to 74.0% (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2–4.2), and the proportion of DBEs with a therapeutic intervention increased from 38.0 to 65.4% (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4–7.0). The total procedure time increased from 77.8 to 96.4 min (p < 0.05) with a GIH. Conclusion: Having a GIH perform inpatient DBEs was associated with an increased number of procedures, duration of procedures, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic interventions. The onsite presence of a GIH with competency in DBE improves the care of hospitalized patients with small bowel pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diagnosing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can often be challenging, and differentiating between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis can be particularly difficult. Diagnostic procedures for IBD include laboratory tests, endoscopy, pathological tests, and imaging tests. Serological and stool tests can be easily performed in an outpatient setting and provide critical diagnostic clues. Although endoscopy is an invasive procedure, it offers essential diagnostic information and allows for tissue biopsy and therapeutic procedures. Video capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy are endoscopic procedures used to evaluate the small bowel. In addition to endoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and ultrasound (US) are valuable tools for small bowel assessment. Among these, US is noninvasive and easily utilized, making its use highly practical in daily clinical practice. Endoscopic biopsy aids in the diagnosis of IBD and is crucial for assessing the histological activity of the disease, facilitating a thorough evaluation of disease remission, and aiding in the development of treatment strategies. Recent advances in artificial intelligence hold promise for enhancing various aspects of IBD management, including diagnosis, monitoring, and precision medicine. This review compiles current procedures and promising future tools for the diagnosis of IBD, providing comprehensive insights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Despite advances in imaging and endoscopic technology, diagnostic modalities for small bowel tumors are simultaneously performed. We investigated the discrepancy rate between each modality and predictive factors of discrepancy in patients with definite small bowel tumors. Methods: Data of patients with definite small bowel tumors who underwent both device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) and computed tomography (CT) were retrieved from web-based enteroscopy registry database in Korea. Predictive risk factors associated with discrepancy were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results: Among 998 patients, 210 (21.0%) were diagnosed with small bowel tumor using DAE, in 193 patients with definite small bowel tumor, DAE and CT were performed. Of these patients, 12 (6.2%) showed discrepancy between examinations. Among 49 patients who underwent DAE and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) examination, 13 (26.5%) showed discrepancy between examinations. No significant independent risk factors were associated with concordance between DAE and CT in multivariate logistic regression analysis among the patients. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, red blood cell transfusion was negatively associated with concordance between DAE and VCE in patients with small bowel tumor (odds ratio, 0.163; 95% confidence interval, 0.026 to 1.004; p=0.050). Conclusions: For small bowel tumors, the discrepancy rate between DAE and CT was 6.2%, and 26.5% between DAE and VCE. Despite developments in cross-sectional imaging (VCE and DAE modalities), discrepancies still exist. For small bowel bleeding that require significant transfusion while showing insignificant VCE findings, DAE should be considered as the next diagnostic approach, considering the possibility of missed small bowel tumor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Recent technological advances, including capsule endoscopy (CE) and balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE), have revealed that small intestinal disease is more common than previously thought. Early diagnosis of small intestinal tumors is essential for favorable outcomes. For early diagnosis, after examination of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, the possibility of small bowel lesions should be considered in patients with unexplained symptoms and signs, including gastrointestinal bleeding, chronic anemia, abdominal pain, obstructive symptoms, body weight loss, palpable abdominal mass, and fever of unknown origin. Recent technological advances, including capsule endoscopy (CE) and balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE), have revealed that small intestinal disease is more common than previously thought. CE has advantages, including a high diagnostic yield, discomfort-free, outpatient basis, and physiological images. BAE enabled endoscopic diagnosis and treatment in the deep small bowel. Computed tomography (CT) enterography with negative oral contrast can evaluate masses, wall thickening, and narrowing of the small intestine. In addition, enhanced CT can detect abnormalities outside the gastrointestinal tract that endoscopy cannot evaluate. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages, and a good combination of multiple modalities leads to an accurate diagnosis. As a first-line modality, three-phase enhanced CT is preferred. If CT shows a mass, stenosis, or wall thickening, a BAE should be selected. If there are no abnormal findings on CT and no obstructive symptoms, CE should be selected. If there are significant findings in the CE, determine the indication for BAE and its insertion route based on these findings. Early diagnosis of small intestinal tumors is essential for favorable outcomes. For early diagnosis, the possibility of small bowel lesions should be considered in patients with unexplained symptoms and signs after examination of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because of both difficulties in accurate diagnosis and appropriate management, small bowel bleeding due to angiodysplasia remains a challenging and perplexing issue in clinical practice. Advancement in small bowel endoscopy including capsule endoscopy as well as balloon enteroscopy has expanded the domain of endoscopic hemostatic interventions in the small bowel. This has led on to marked improvement in immediate homeostasis rates in patients with small bowel angiodysplasias (SBA) bleeding. However, high recurrent bleeding rates are an important limitation of endoscopic interventions. Therefore, there is an unmet need of an effective therapeutic as well as prophylactic pharmacotherapy that can alter the course of the disease. Long-acting octreotide as well as thalidomide has been used in patients with SBA bleeding with encouraging results, but the evidence on their efficacy is not robust. In news and views of this issue, we discuss a randomized controlled study that investigates the efficacy and safety of thalidomide for the treatment of recurrent bleeding due to SBA.

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Traditional methods have their limitations when it comes to unraveling the mysteries of the small bowel, an area historically seen as the "black box" of the gastrointestinal tract. This is where capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy have stepped in, offering a remarkable synergy that transcends the sum of their individual capabilities. From their introduction, small bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy have consistently evolved and improved, both on their own and interdependently. Each technique's history may be told as a success story, and their interaction has revolutionized the approach to the small bowel. Both have advantages that could be ideally combined into a perfect technique: safe, non-invasive, and capable of examining the entire small bowel, taking biopsies, and applying therapeutical interventions. Until the realization of this perfect tool becomes a reality, the key for an optimal approach lies in the right selection of exploration method. In this article, we embark on a journey through the intertwined development of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy, exploring the origins, technological advancements, clinical applications, and evolving inquiries that have continually reshaped the landscape of small bowel imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) without a unique, gold standard diagnostic test. UC and Crohn's colitis are impossible to distinguish in approximately 10% of cases. The term IBD type unclassified (IBD-U) is recommended for cases of chronic colitis showing overlapping endoscopic, radiological, and biopsy histological features between UC and CD, while indetermined colitis is reserved for colectomy specimens. Our aim was to assess the role of small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) in the diagnostic work-up of IBD-U. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied the cases of IBD-U explored by SBCE in a tertiary referral gastroenterology center. Patients were investigated using SBCE after contraindications were excluded. Diagnostic criteria for small bowel CD consisted in more than three ulcerations, irregular ulcers, or stenosis, and the Lewis score was used for the quantification of inflammation. The immediate impact of reclassification and outcome data was recorded over a follow-up period of more than one year. Results: Twenty-eight patients with IBD-U were examined using SBCE. Nine patients had small bowel lesions that met the diagnostic criteria for CD, resulting in a reclassification rate of 32.1%. In five of these cases, the treatment was subsequently changed. In the remaining nineteen examinations, no significant findings were observed. There were no complications associated with SBCE. Median follow-up time was 32.5 months (range 12–60). During follow-up, twelve patients were classified as having UC, and seven remained as having an unclassified type; one case of colectomy, for medically refractory UC, was recorded. Conclusions: SBCE is a useful safe tool in the work-up of IBD-U, allowing reclassification in about one third of cases, with subsequent treatment modifications. SBCE may provide a definite diagnosis, enhance the comprehension of the disease's progression, and optimize the short- and long-term management strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Small bowel disorders present a diagnostic challenge due to the limited accessibility of the small intestine. Accurate diagnosis is made with the aid of specific procedures, like capsule endoscopy or double-ballon enteroscopy, but they are not usually solicited and not widely accessible. This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic effectiveness of enteroscopy and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when combined with artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for the automatic detection of small bowel diseases. Materials and methods: We performed an extensive literature search for relevant studies about AI applications capable of identifying small bowel disorders using enteroscopy and VCE, published between 2012 and 2023, employing PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Results: Our investigation discovered a total of 27 publications, out of which 21 studies assessed the application of VCE, while the remaining 6 articles analyzed the enteroscopy procedure. The included studies portrayed that both investigations, enhanced by AI, exhibited a high level of diagnostic accuracy. Enteroscopy demonstrated superior diagnostic capability, providing precise identification of small bowel pathologies with the added advantage of enabling immediate therapeutic intervention. The choice between these modalities should be guided by clinical context, patient preference, and resource availability. Studies with larger sample sizes and prospective designs are warranted to validate these results and optimize the integration of AI in small bowel diagnostics. Conclusions: The current analysis demonstrates that both enteroscopy and VCE with AI augmentation exhibit comparable diagnostic performance for the automatic detection of small bowel disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intestinal lymphangiectasia (IL) is a rare protein-losing enteropathy caused by disorders of the intestinal lymphatics. There are only a few case reports and case series concerning the VCE (video capsule endoscopy) findings of IL. This work aimed to evaluate the VCE characteristics of small intestinal mucosal abnormalities in patients with IL, and to investigate the relationship between clinical and VCE characteristics. Methods: Consecutive patients with IL who underwent VCE were enrolled in this retrospective study. The cases were classified into the white villi group and non-white villi group according to mucosal abnormalities detected by VCE. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics were investigated and analyzed. Results: A total of 98 patients with IL with a median onset age of 26.3 ± 19.2 years were included. VCE revealed the following small intestinal lesions: (i) white villi type (57/98, 58.2%), i.e.: white-tipped or granular villi, white nodular villi or plaques; (ii) non-white villi type (41/98, 41.8%), i.e.: diffused low and round villi; (iii) complications (46/98, 46.9%), i.e.: bleeding, ulcers, protruding or vesicular-shaped lesions, stenosis and lymphatic leakage. A total of 58.2% (57) and 41.8% (41) of the cases were classified into the white villi and non-white villi groups respectively. The percentage of chylothorax in the white villi group was significantly lower than that in the non-white villi group (12/57 vs. 19/41, p = 0.008). In VCE, there were no significant differences in the involved segments and total detected rate of complications between the white villi and non-white villi groups (p > 0.05), while the detected rate of lymphatic leakage in the white villi group was significantly higher than that in the non-white villi group (31.6% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.026). Conclusions: Our study evaluated the entire small intestinal mucosal abnormalities of IL by VCE, especially endoscopic complications. IL has specific VCE abnormalities in addition to classical endoscopic findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although several devices are available for small bowel capsule endoscopy, few studies have compared their visualization quality and diagnostic yield, despite users reporting subjective differences between them. This study aims to compare two widely used systems (Mirocam® MC1600 and OMOM® HD). Patients who underwent OMOM® HD capsule enteroscopy between August 2022 and February 2023 were prospectively included consecutively (cases). Controls were retrospectively selected from a database of patients who underwent Mirocam® MC1600 enteroscopy between March 2018 and July 2022 in a 1:1 ratio. Controls were matched for potential confounders (age, sex, indication, hospitalization, comorbidities, and opioid prescription). The small bowel cleanliness (global and divided by tertiles), the diagnostic yield (positive findings) and the transit times (TT) were compared. Overall, 214 patients were included (107:107). Global bowel preparation was similar between the OMOM® and Mirocam® groups. However, the average scores for each tertile were significantly higher when the OMOM® HD capsule was used (p < 0.05). Small bowel TT was shorter for OMOM® HD (265 ± 118 versus 307 ± 87 min, p = 0.020), while the diagnostic yield (55.0%) and relative distribution of lesions were similar. This study suggests that capsule characteristics, namely resolution, and illumination, systematically interfere with the perception of preparation quality. However, this did not affect the diagnostic yield. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Capsule endoscopy (CE) and balloon‐assisted enteroscopy (BAE) have become indispensable techniques for the diagnosis and management of small bowel disease in both adult and pediatric cases. However, relevant differences exist in the indications between these cohorts, with body weight and age having particular relevance in decisions for the latter. Both CE and BAE are designed for adult physique and they were not widely used among children. In addition, the types of small intestinal diseases differ between adults and children, and consequently, the indications also differ between them. This review focuses on the issues relevant to pediatric cases and describes the practical application of endoscopy in clinical practice. In conclusion, although there are age and weight restrictions, both CE and BAE are safe and useful devices for use in children, and their indications for use in children are likely to expand in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The development of assistive devices has allowed for the performance of capsule endoscopy in children. Anticipating the capsule's transit time could affect the efficacy of the investigation and potentially minimize the fasting period. This study determined the predictors of small bowel transit time for small-bowel capsule endoscopy in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Methods: We retrospectively examined children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease who underwent capsule endoscopy by the age 18 at a Japanese tertiary care children's hospital. Small bowel transit time predictors were analyzed using multiple regression with explanatory variables. Results: Overall, 92 patients, aged 1-17 years, with inflammatory bowel disease (63 Crohn's disease and 29 ulcerative colitis cases) were examined for factors affecting small bowel transit time. In the simple regression analysis, diagnosis, age, height, weight, serum albumin, general anesthesia, and small intestine lesions were significantly associated with small bowel transit time. In the multiple regression analyses, serum albumin (partial regression coefficient:-58.9, p=0.008), general anesthesia (partial regression coefficient: 127, p<0.001), and small intestine lesions (partial regression coefficient: 30.1, p=0.037) showed significant associations with small bowel transit time. Conclusion: Hypoalbuminemia, the use of general anesthesia for endoscopic delivery of the capsule, and small intestine lesions appeared to be predictors of prolonged small bowel transit time in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Expecting the finishing time may improve examination with a fasting period reduction, which benefits both patients and caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OOGIB) is defined as continued bleeding with unknown source despite esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy evaluation. Small bowel evaluation through video capsule endoscopy (VCE) or double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is often warranted. We studied the timing of DBE in hospitalized OOGIB patients regarding diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield, and GI rebleeding. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of DBEs performed at a tertiary medical center between November 2012 and December 2020. The inclusion criterion was first admission for OOGIB undergoing DBE. Those without previous EGD or colonoscopy were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: DBE performed within 72 h of OOGIB (emergent) and beyond 72 h of OOGIB (nonemergent). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for the difference in patients in the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with diagnostic and therapeutic yield. Kaplan–Meir survival curve showed GI bleed‐free survival following initial bleed and was compared using the log rank test. Results: A total of 154 patients met the inclusion criterion, of which 62 had emergent DBE and 92 had nonemergent DBE. The propensity‐score‐matched sample consisted of 112 patients, with 56 patients each in the emergent and nonemergent groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between VCE and emergent DBE and diagnostic and therapeutic yield (P < 0.05). Emergent DBE patients had increased GI bleed‐free survival compared to those in the nonemergent group (P = 0.009). Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that emergent DBE during inpatient OOGIB can impact the overall diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield, and GI rebleeding post DBE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because of both difficulties in accurate diagnosis and appropriate management, small bowel bleeding due to angiodysplasia remains a challenging and perplexing issue in clinical practice. Advancement in small bowel endoscopy including capsule endoscopy as well as balloon enteroscopy has expanded the domain of endoscopic hemostatic interventions in the small bowel. This has led on to marked improvement in immediate homeostasis rates in patients with small bowel angiodysplasias (SBA) bleeding. However, high recurrent bleeding rates are an important limitation of endoscopic interventions. Therefore, there is an unmet need of an effective therapeutic as well as prophylactic pharmacotherapy that can alter the course of the disease. Long-acting octreotide as well as thalidomide has been used in patients with SBA bleeding with encouraging results, but the evidence on their efficacy is not robust. In news and views of this issue, we discuss a randomized controlled study that investigates the efficacy and safety of thalidomide for the treatment of recurrent bleeding due to SBA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the importance of endoscopy in improving the application value of diagnosing and treating intestinal obstruction. It emphasizes the significance of early diagnosis and intervention in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with intestinal obstruction. Endoscopy provides real-time imaging, aids in distinguishing between different types of obstructions, and offers therapeutic options such as dilation and foreign body extraction. The study highlights the synergy between endoscopic and radiographic approaches in enhancing diagnostic precision and treatment strategies for intestinal obstruction. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an emerging tool in the diagnosis and management of occult bleeding and overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OOGIB). Maximizing the efficiency of CE can lead to rapid bleeding localization and shorter time to therapy. We investigated whether a trained registered nurse (RN) can accurately interpret bleeding by observing the CE findings in real time by measuring inter-observer agreement between RN and physician interpretation. Methods: We conducted a prospective study of patients admitted for OOGIB who underwent live-view capsule endoscopy (LVCE) between December 2016 and November 2017. A matched control group who underwent standard CE was obtained through retrospective review. An RN received a 2-day training program for CE interpretation. RN bedside interpretation for bleeding was followed by interpretation by 2 gastrointestinal physicians blinded to LVCE findings. Outcomes were compared between groups using t-tests and χ2 tests. Cohen's kappa measured the agreement between the physicians and the RN. Results: Ten subjects were in the LVCE group, and 12 subjects were in the standard-of-care group. The agreement between the physicians and the RN was 9/10 (90%), with a kappa of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.26–1.00; p = 0.016). Patients in the LVCE group had shorter duration to physician interpretation (0.6 vs. 0.7 days [p = 0.50]), shorter duration to endoscopy (1.8 days vs. 3 days [p = 0.240]), and shorter length of stay (8.1 vs. 11.4 days [p = 0.26]) compared to the standard-of-care group. Conclusion: This study utilizing an RN for LVCE interpretation found inter-observer agreement between RN and physician findings. Larger studies are needed to assess whether this RN-physician team approach can translate to improved outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by a transmural inflammation that may involve any part of the gastrointestinal tract. An evaluation of small bowel involvement, allowing recognition of disease extent and severity, is important for disease management. Current guidelines recommend the use of capsule endoscopy (CE) as a first-line diagnosis method for suspected small bowel CD. CE has an essential role in monitoring disease activity in established CD patients, as it can assess response to treatment and identify high-risk patients for disease exacerbation and post-operative relapse. Moreover, several studies have shown that CE is the best tool to assess mucosal healing as part of the treat-to-target strategy in CD patients. The PillCam Crohn's capsule is a novel pan-enteric capsule which enables visualization of the whole gastrointestinal tract. It is useful to monitor pan-enteric disease activity, mucosal healing and accordingly allows for the prediction of relapse and response using a single procedure. In addition, the integration of artificial intelligence algorithms has showed improved accuracy rates for automatic ulcer detection and the ability to shorten reading times. In this review, we summarize the main indications and virtue for using CE for the evaluation of CD, as well as its implementation in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last few years, capsule endoscopy has been established as a fundamental device in the practicing gastroenterologist’s toolbox. Its utilization in diagnostic algorithms for suspected small bowel bleeding, Crohn’s disease, and small bowel tumors has been approved by several guidelines. The advent of double-balloon enteroscopy has significantly increased the therapeutic possibilities and release of multiple devices (single-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy) aimed at improving the performance of small bowel enteroscopy. Recently, some important innovations have appeared in the small bowel endoscopy scene, providing further improvement to its evolution. Artificial intelligence in capsule endoscopy should increase diagnostic accuracy and reading efficiency, and the introduction of motorized spiral enteroscopy into clinical practice could also improve the therapeutic yield. This review focuses on the most recent studies on artificial-intelligence-assisted capsule endoscopy and motorized spiral enteroscopy.

The article "Intestinal Duplication Diagnosed by Capsule Endoscopy and Double-Balloon Enteroscopy" published in Digestive Diseases & Sciences discusses a case of a 40-year-old man with recurrent hematochezia. Despite initial tests showing no abnormalities, capsule endoscopy revealed a double-lumen change in the ileum, leading to a suspicion of small bowel duplication. Subsequent double-balloon enteroscopy confirmed the diagnosis, highlighting the importance of accurate diagnostic methods in identifying rare congenital malformations like small bowel duplication. The patient opted for conservative treatment without pathological confirmation, emphasizing the need for further research and intervention in such cases. [Extracted from the article]

Abstract A 48‐year‐old female patient presented with longstanding unrecognized celiac disease (CD), a family history of CD, and a short duration of alarming symptoms. The diagnostic evaluation revealed the concomitant presence of small and large bowel ulcers raised a dilemma about differential diagnosis in her case. Pathologic examination of tissue specimens from the jejunal ulcer led to the diagnosis of enteropathy‐associated T‐cell lymphoma. In recent years, the availability of modern cross‐sectional imaging and endoscopy modalities has dramatically improved the detection and characterization of small bowel lesions. Characterization of small bowel ulcers by endoscopy and radiology imaging in a patient with suspected complicated CD (CCD) needs to be made in conjunction with all clinical factors, as there is a wide overlap of the possible etiologic factors. Enteropathy‐associated T‐cell lymphoma is a highly aggressive T‐cell lymphoma with a poor prognosis, since early diagnosis and appropriate treatment may be delayed due to nonspecific clinical and endoscopic presentation. Therefore, it is crucial to timely recognize patients with suspected CCD and properly navigate diagnostic imaging tools, acquire adequate biopsy, and perform immunophenotyping to set early diagnosis in patients with diffuse intestinal ulcers and CD.

Background and Aim: Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is a well-established procedure for direct visualisation of the entire small bowel mucosa, and, in contrast with other imaging techniques, allows to perform biopsies and therapeutic interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications, diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield, and complications of DBE in a cohort of consecutive patients according to patients' age. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent DBE in our endoscopy unit between January 2006 and December 2021. Results: A total of 387 consecutive patients who underwent 460 DBE procedures were included. Mean age of the patients was 63 years. The overall diagnostic yield was 67.6%; vascular lesions were the predominant endoscopic findings (31.5%), followed by polyps or neoplastic masses (17.6%). Older patients (≥65 years) showed statistically higher rates of clinically relevant findings than adult patients (18–65 years) (p = 0.001). Crohn's disease and polyps or neoplastic masses were more frequent in the younger group (p = 0.009 and p = 0.066, respectively), while vascular lesions and non-specific inflammation were the most common findings in the older group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The therapeutic intervention rate was 31.7%. Rates of endoscopic treatment were significantly higher in the older group (p < 0.001). Total complications occurred in five procedures (1.1%). Conclusion: In clinical practice, DBE is an efficient diagnostic and therapeutic tool with a high safety profile, particularly in the elderly population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]