Search

The diets and environments that individuals experience can vary greatly within and among wildlife populations. These individual experiences can be compared using the chemical signatures of animal tissues, which can differentiate animals into groups, including those raised in the wild versus those held in captive facilities. In this study, we compared different combinations of four stable isotope ratios and 15 trace elements derived from the claw tips of captive wood turtles throughout the eastern U.S. and wild wood turtles (Glyptemys insculpta) from Maine to develop predictive models used to determine their origins. The purpose of this work is to develop an objective statistical tool that law enforcement can use to help prosecute poachers. We found that the chemical signatures of 14 (12 trace elements and 2 stable isotope ratios) of the 19 markers we explored were different between wild and captive wood turtles, thus reflecting the differences in their diets and environments. We found that our stable isotope ratio model had nearly perfect predictive accuracy in classifying wild wood turtles as wild and captive wood turtles as captive, whereas our trace element and combined model were 100% accurate, thus validating this statistical approach for determining the origins of confiscated wood turtles from Maine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Wildlife trafficking is a major contributor to global biodiversity loss, especially reptiles, which are confiscated by law enforcement more than any other vertebrate class. Wildlife forensic experts can use chemicals from animal tissues to determine the origin of confiscated animals. Such physical evidence can help law enforcement prosecute wildlife traffickers in court and hold poachers accountable. In this study, we developed a statistical tool that can be used to determine if a confiscated wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) from Maine came from the wild or captivity. We used carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes from wood turtle claw tips to construct a statistical model that correctly classified all wild turtles as wild and nearly all captive turtles as captive (predictive accuracy 97.2%). Results from our study can be used to assist law enforcement in Maine and to develop a forensics tool used to help combat the illegal turtle trade. Wildlife traffickers often claim that confiscated animals were captive-bred rather than wild-caught to launder wild animals and escape prosecution. We used stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) derived from the claw tips of wild wood turtles from Maine and captive wood turtles throughout the eastern U.S. to develop a predictive model used to classify confiscated wood turtles as wild or captive. We found that the claw tips of wild and captive wood turtles (Glyptemys insculpta) were isotopically distinct. Captive turtles had significantly higher δ13C and δ15N values than wild turtles. Our model correctly classified all wild turtles as wild (100%) and nearly all captive turtles as captive (94%). All but two of the 71 turtles tested were successfully predicted as wild or captive (97.2% accuracy), yielding a misclassification rate of 2.8%. In addition to our model being useful to law enforcement in Maine, we aim to develop a multi-species model to assist conservation law enforcement efforts to curb illegal turtle trafficking from locations across the eastern United States and Canada. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]