Search

Freshwater lakes are known to release carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and methane (CH(4)) to the atmosphere; however, the importance of lakes in global nitrous oxide (N(2)O) budgets is not yet known. Further, despite the abundance of small lakes on the landscape, neither emissions of these gases nor their drivers are well described. Dissolved concentrations of CO(2), CH(4) and N(2)O greenhouse gases were related to water chemistry, hydrology and catchment characteristics in order to identify factors controlling gas concentrations for 121 small Irish headwater lakes (median area: 2.0ha) in relatively undisturbed catchments; lake-atmosphere gas fluxes were also calculated. The majority of lakes were supersaturated (relative to the atmosphere) with CO(2) and N(2)O while CH(4) was above saturation in all lakes. Dissolved gas concentrations were correlated with land cover (rock, forest and grassland), deuterium excess (an indicator of hydrologic character) and lake organic carbon concentrations, although dissolved CO(2) exhibited few significant relationships. Principal components analysis indicated that higher levels of CH(4) and N(2)O supersaturation were exhibited under different conditions. Methane supersaturation was highest in low elevation catchments with an evaporative hydrologic character and high organic carbon concentrations. In contrast, lakes characteristic of N(2)O supersaturation were low in carbon and located in more rapidly flushed higher elevation catchments. Estimated fluxes of CO(2), CH(4) and N(2)O to the atmosphere averaged 14, 0.36 and 1.3×10(-3)mmolm(-2)d(-1), respectively., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Inland waters are hotspots of greenhouse gas (GHG) cycling, with small water bodies particularly active in the production and consumption of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). However, wetland ponds are being replaced rapidly by small constructed reservoirs in agricultural regions, yet it is unclear whether these two water body types exhibit similar physical, chemical, and environmental controls of GHG content and fluxes. Here, we compared the content and regulatory mechanisms of all three major GHGs in 20 pairs of natural wetland ponds and constructed reservoirs in Canada's largest agricultural region. Carbon dioxide content was associated primarily with metabolic indicators in both water body types; however, primary production was paramount in reservoirs, and heterotrophic metabolism a stronger correlate in wetland ponds. Methane concentrations were correlated positively with eutrophication of the reservoirs alone, while competitive inhibition by sulfur‐reducing bacteria may have limited CH4 in both waterbody types. Contrary to expectations, N2O was undersaturated in both water body types, with wetlands being a significantly stronger and more widespread N2O sink. Varying regulatory processes are attributed to differences in age, depth, morphology, and water‐column circulation between water body types. These results suggest that natural and constructed water bodies should be modeled separately in regional GHG budgets. Plain Language Summary: Small inland water bodies, ponds and reservoirs, are hotspots of greenhouse gas (GHG) production. However, modern farming practices replace natural wetlands by artificial reservoirs, without consideration on the effects on landscape GHG fluxes. Here we measured concentrations and controls of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) in locally‐paired wetland ponds and agricultural reservoirs and found that while GHG concentrations were similar in the two waterbody types, underlying mechanisms differed, owing to the differences in shape, depth, and age of individual water bodies. Shallower wetland ponds were typically more fully mixed, exhibited more oxygen at depth, and had higher nutrients and organic carbon concentrations reflecting their ages. Findings suggest that the balance between wetland drainage and reservoir construction may have a pronounced effect on regional budgets of GHG fluxes, particularly in the face of forthcoming climate changes. Key Points: CO2 content was associated with metabolism; primary production in reservoirs, but bacterial respiration in wetlandsCH4 concentrations were correlated positively with either eutrophication (reservoirs) or competitive inhibition of methanogenesis (both)N2O undersaturation was ubiquitous, but wetlands were stronger and more widespread N2O sinks [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scientific Significance Statement: Metabolic stoichiometry predicts that dissolved oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in aquatic ecosystems should covary inversely; however, field observations often diverge from theoretical expectations. Here, we propose a suite of metrics describing this O2 and CO2 decoupling and introduce a conceptual framework for interpreting these metrics within aquatic ecosystems. Within this framework, we interpret cross‐system patterns of high‐frequency O2 and CO2 measurements in 11 northern lakes and extract emergent insights into the metabolic behavior and the simultaneous roles of chemical and physical forcing in shaping ecosystem processes. This approach leverages the power of high‐frequency paired O2–CO2 measurements, and yields a novel, integrative aquatic system typology which can also be applicable more broadly to streams and rivers, wetlands and marine systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Small farm reservoirs are abundant in many agricultural regions across the globe and have the potential to be large contributing sources of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) to agricultural landscapes. Compared to natural ponds, these artificial waterbodies remain overlooked in both agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and inland water global carbon (C) budgets. Improved understanding of the environmental controls of C emissions from farm reservoirs is required to address and manage their potential importance in agricultural GHG budgets. Here, we conducted a regional-scale survey (∼ 235 000 km 2) to measure CO2 and CH4 surface concentrations and diffusive fluxes across 101 small farm reservoirs in Canada's largest agricultural area. A combination of abiotic, biotic, hydromorphologic, and landscape variables were modelled using generalized additive models (GAMs) to identify regulatory mechanisms. We found that CO2 concentration was estimated by a combination of internal metabolism and groundwater-derived alkalinity (66.5 % deviance explained), while multiple lines of evidence support a positive association between eutrophication and CH4 production (74.1 % deviance explained). Fluxes ranged from -21 to 466 and 0.14 to 92 mmol m -2 d -1 for CO2 and CH4 , respectively, with CH4 contributing an average of 74 % of CO2 -equivalent (CO2 -e) emissions based on a 100-year radiative forcing. Approximately 8 % of farm reservoirs were found to be net CO2 -e sinks. From our models, we show that the GHG impact of farm reservoirs can be greatly minimized with overall improvements in water quality and consideration to position and hydrology within the landscape. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ice‐covered period on lakes in the northern hemisphere has often been neglected or assumed to have less importance relative to the open water season. However, recent studies challenge this convention, suggesting that the winter period is more dynamic than previously thought. In this review, we synthesize the current understanding of under‐ice carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) dynamics, highlighting the annual importance of CO2 and CH4 emissions from lakes at ice‐melt. We compiled data from 25 studies that showed that the ice‐melt period represents 17% and 27% of the annual CO2 and CH4 emissions, respectively. We also found evidence that the magnitude and type of emission (i.e., CO2 and CH4) varies with characteristics of lakes including geographic location, lake morphometry, and physicochemical conditions. The scarcity of winter and spring carbon data from northern lakes represents a major gap in our understanding of annual budgets in these lakes and calls for future research during this key period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]