Search

Chronic occupational exposure to carbon disulfide (CS2) has debilitating motor and sensory effects in humans, which can increase the risk of falls. Although no mention of vestibulotoxic effects is contained in the literature, epidemiological and experimental data suggest that CS2 could cause low-frequency hearing loss when associated with noise exposure. Low-frequency noise might also perturb the peripheral balance receptor through an as-yet unclear mechanism. Here, we studied how exposure to a low-frequency noise combined with 250-ppm CS2 affected balance in rats. Vestibular function was tested based on post-rotary nystagmus recorded by a video-oculography system. These measurements were completed by behavioral tests and analysis of the cerebellum to measure expression levels for gene expression associated with neurotoxicity. Assays were performed prior to and following a 4-week exposure, and again after a 4-week recovery period. Functional measurements were completed by histological analyses of the peripheral organs.Nystagmus was unaltered by exposure to noise alone, while CS2 alone caused a moderate 19% decrease of the saccade number. In contrast, coexposure to 250-ppm CS2 and low-frequency noise decreased both saccade number and duration by 33% and 34%, respectively. After four weeks, recovery was only partial but measures were not significantly different from pre-exposure values. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of cerebellar tissue revealed a slight but significant modification in expression levels for two genes linked to neurotoxicity in CS2-exposed animals. However, neither histopathological changes to the peripheral receptor nor behavioral differences were observed. Based on all these results, we propose that the effects of CS2 were due to reversible neurochemical disturbance of the efferent pathways managing post-rotatory nystagmus. Because the nervous structures involving the vestibular function appear particularly sensitive to CS2, post-rotary nystagmus could be used as an early, non-invasive measurement to diagnose CS2 intoxication as part of an occupational conservation program., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Carbon disulfide (CS 2 ) is used in industry; it has been shown to have neurotoxic effects, causing central and distal axonopathies.However, it is not considered cochleotoxic as it does not affect hair cells in the organ of Corti, and the only auditory effects reported in the literature were confined to the low-frequency region. No reports on the effects of combined exposure to low-frequency noise and CS 2 have been published to date. This article focuses on the effects on rat hearing of combined exposure to noise with increasing concentrations of CS 2 (0, 63,250, and 500ppm, 6h per day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks). The noise used was a low-frequency noise ranging from 0.5 to 2kHz at an intensity of 106dB SPL. Auditory function was tested using distortion product oto-acoustic emissions, which mainly reflects the cochlear performances. Exposure to noise alone caused an auditory deficit in a frequency area ranging from 3.6 to 6 kHz. The damaged area was approximately one octave (6kHz) above the highest frequency of the exposure noise (2.8kHz); it was a little wider than expected based on the noise spectrum.Consequently, since maximum hearing sensitivity is located around 8kHz in rats, low-frequency noise exposure can affect the cochlear regions detecting mid-range frequencies. Co-exposure to CS 2 (250-ppm and over) and noise increased the extent of the damaged frequency window since a significant auditory deficit was measured at 9.6kHz in these conditions.Moreover, the significance at 9.6kHz increased with the solvent concentrations. Histological data showed that neither hair cells nor ganglion cells were damaged by CS 2 . This discrepancy between functional and histological data is discussed. Like most aromatic solvents, carbon disulfide should be considered as a key parameter in hearing conservation régulations., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Occupational noise can damage workers' hearing, and the phenomenon is even more dangerous when noise is associated with an ototoxic solvent. Aromatic solvents are known to provoke chemical-induced hearing loss, but little is known about the effects on hearing of carbon disulfide (CS 2 ) when combined with noise. Co-exposure to CS 2 and noise may have a harmful effect on hearing, but the mechanisms involved are not well understood. For instance, CS 2 is not thought to have a cochleotoxic effect, but rather it is thought to cause retrocochlear hearing impairment. In other words, CS 2 could have a distal neuropathic effect on the auditory pathway. However, a possible pharmacological effect of CS 2 on the central nervous system (CNS) has never been mentioned in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess, in rats, the effects of a noise (continuous vs. impulse), associated with a low concentration of CS 2 [(short-term threshold limit value) x 10 as a safety factor] on the peripheral auditory receptor. The noise, whatever its nature, was an octave band noise centered at 8kHz, and the 250-ppm CS 2 exposure lasted 15min per hour, 6h per day, for 5 consecutive days. The impact of the different experimental conditions on hearing loss was assessed using distortion product oto-acoustic emissions and histological analyses. Although the LEX,8h (8-h time-weighted average exposure) for the impulse noise was lower (84dB SPL) than that for the continuous noise (89dB SPL), it appeared more damaging to the organ of Corti, in particular to the outer hair cells. CS 2 exposure alone did not have any effect on the organ of Corti, but co-exposure to continuous noise with CS 2 was less damaging than exposure to continuous noise alone. In contrast, the cochleo-traumatic effects of impulse noise were significantly enhanced by co-exposure to CS 2 . Therefore, CS 2 can clearly modulate the middle-ear reflex function. In fact, CS 2 may have two distinct effects: firstly, it has a pharmacological effect on the CNS, modifying the trigger of the acoustic reflex; and secondly, it can make the organ of Corti more susceptible to impulse noise. The pharmacological effects on the CNS and the effects of CS 2 on the organ of Corti are discussed to try to explain the overall effect of the solvent on hearing. Once again, the results reported in this article show that the temporal structure (continuous vs. impulse) of noise should be taken into consideration as a key parameter when establishing hearing conservation regulations., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)