Search

This study investigated changes in soil organic carbon ( SOC) in a poorly drained clay loam soil under (i) permanent grassland ( PG) over 7 years and (ii) after PG renovation over 2·5 years. The experimental area was divided into four blocks with four paddocks per block. Composite soil samples from each PG block were taken to 30-cm depth on five occasions between 2004 and 2011. In June 2008, one paddock per block was renovated by ploughing and reseeding and sampled as above on the latter four occasions. Renovation decreased SOC ( P < 0·05) by 32·2 t ha−1 in the 2·5 years following ploughing; the difference developed almost entirely (86%) in the first four months. Renovation had no effect on above-ground productivity, standing root and stubble phytomass or on dissolved organic matter leaching. Therefore, soil respiration was considered to be a single potential pathway responsible for the SOC loss from renovated grassland. Although a simple linear regression indicated a tendency for PG to accumulate SOC, there was no evidence of recovery in SOC to previous levels following renovation during the study period. These results could have implications for greenhouse gas inventories in countries where PG is an important land-use type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • We measured soil nitrous oxide flux, methane flux and soil respiration followiing driange installation. • We measuered water filled pore space (WFPS), soil mineral nitrogen (N), herbage N uptake, soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total nitrogen (TN) following the installation of mole and gravel mole drainage systems in a clay-loam soil in two experiments over 36 months. • Drainage treatment deepened the water table and decreased WFPS. • Mole and gravel mole drainage had no impact on soil GHG fluxes, soil N mineralisation, soil N nitrification, SOC and TN. Abstract Shallow drainage (e.g. mole and gravel mole drainage installed at 0.55 m below soil surface) is used on pasture-based farms to reduce soil moisture, deepen water table depth and thus increase grass utilization on soils with impeded drainage. There is, however, a lack of research on the effect that these drainage techniques have on soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Hence the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of mole and gravel mole drainage on soil GHG fluxes. Soil nitrous oxide (N 2 O), soil root respiration (CO 2) and soil methane (CH 4) fluxes were measured in two experiments conducted over a 36 month period. The experiments were conducted on permanent grassland with impeded drainage on a eutric gleysol (humic) in Ireland (52°30′N, 08°12′W). Both experiments were arranged in randomized complete block design. There were three treatments: (i) undrained control, (ii) mole drainage and (iii) gravel mole drainage. Soil GHG fluxes, soil water filled pore space (WFPS) and soil temperature were measured on a weekly basis and soil mineral nitrogen (N), herbage N uptake, soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total N (TN) were measured seasonally and annually over the sampling period. Drainage treatments (P < 0.05) deepened (mean ± SE) the water table by 0.17±0.03 m and decreased WFPS by 7±0.2%. However no (P > 0.05) impact of drainage treatment was detected on soil average daily GHG fluxes (9.84±6.34g N 2 O-N ha−1day−1, 34.05 ± 12.90 kg CO 2 -C ha−1day−1 and −0.91 ± 3.70 g CH 4 -C ha-1day-1), soil N mineralisation, soil N nitrification, SOC and TN in both experiments. The results indicate that mole and gravel mole drainage can be installed on farms with similar management and soil type to that described in the present study without impact on the soil GHG emissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]