Search

Objective: Trifluoromethane and CO are produced simultaneously during the breakdown of isoflurane and desflurane by dry CO2 absorbents. Trifluoromethane interferes with anesthetic agent monitoring, and the interference can be used as a marker to indicate anesthetic breakdown with CO production. This study tests representative types of gas monitors to determine their ability to provide a clinically useful warning of CO production in circle breathing systems., Methods: Isoflurane and desflurane were reacted with dry Baralyme at 45 degrees C. Standardized samples of breakdown products were created from mixtures of reacted and unreacted gases to simulate the partial degrees of reaction which might result during clinical episodes of anesthetic breakdown using 1% or 2% isoflurane and 6% or 12% desflurane. These mixtures were measured by the monitors tested, and the indication of the wrong agent or a mixture of agents due to the presence of trifluoromethane was recorded and related to the CO concentration in the gas mixtures., Results: When presented with trifluoromethane from anesthetic breakdown, monochromatic infrared monitors displayed inappropriately large amounts of isoflurane or desflurane. Agent identifying infrared and Raman scattering monitors varied in their sensitivity to trifluoromethane. Mass spectrometers measuring enflurane at mass to charge = 69 were most sensitive to trifluoromethane., Conclusion: Monochromatic infrared monitors were unable to indicate anesthetic breakdown via interference by trifluoromethane, but did indicate falsely elevated anesthetic concentrations. Agent identifying infrared and Raman monitors provided warning of desflurane breakdown via the interference of trifluoromethane by displaying the wrong agent or mixed agents, but may not be sensitive enough to warn of isoflurane breakdown Some mass spectrometers provided the most sensitive warnings to anesthetic breakdown via trifluoromethane, but additional data processing by some patients monitor units reduced their overall effectiveness.

Background: The chemical breakdown of isoflurane, enflurane, or desflurane in dried carbon dioxide absorbents may produce carbon monoxide. Some mass spectrometers can give false indications of enflurane during anesthetic breakdown., Methods: During clinical anesthesia with isoflurane or desflurane, the presence of carbon monoxide in respiratory gas was confirmed when enflurane was inappropriately indicated by a clinical mass spectrometer that identified enflurane at mass to charge ratio = 69. In vitro, isoflurane, enflurane, or desflurane in oxygen was passed through dried carbon dioxide absorbents at 35, 45, and 55 degrees C. Gases were analyzed by gas chromatography and by mass spectrometry., Results: Mass spectrometry identified several clinical incidents in which 30-410 ppm carbon monoxide was measured in respiratory gas. Trifluoromethane was produced during in vitro breakdown of isoflurane or desflurane. Although these inappropriately indicated quantities of "enflurane" correlated (r2 > 0.95) to carbon monoxide concentrations under a variety of conditions, this ratio varied with temperature, anesthetic agent, absorbent type, and water content., Conclusions: Trifluoromethane causes the inappropriate indication of enflurane by mass spectrometry, and indicates isoflurane and desflurane breakdown. Because the ratio of carbon monoxide to trifluoromethane varies with conditions, this technique cannot be used to quantitatively determine the amount of carbon monoxide to which a patient is exposed. If any warning of anesthetic breakdown results from this technique then remedial steps should be taken immediately to stop patient exposure to carbon monoxide. No warning can be provided for the breakdown of enflurane by this technique.