Search

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) is a well-established, safe procedure. However, problems with RGEA grafts in subsequent abdominal surgeries can lead to fatal complications. This report presents the first case of right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma after CABG using the RGEA., Case Presentation: We describe a case in which a right hepatectomy for an 81-year-old male patient with hepatocellular carcinoma was safely performed after CABG using a RGEA graft. Preoperatively, three-dimensional computed tomography (3D- CT) images were constructed to confirm the run of the RGEA graft. The operation was conducted with the standby of a cardiovascular surgeon if there was a problem with the RGEA graft. The RGEA graft had formed adhesions with the hepatic falciform ligament, necessitating meticulous dissection. After the right hepatectomy, the left hepatic lobe descended into the vacated space, exerting traction on the RGEA. However, this traction was mitigated by suturing the hepatic falciform ligament to the abdominal wall, ensuring stability of the RGEA. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications., Conclusion: It is crucial to confirm the functionality and anatomy of the RGEA graft preoperatively, handle it gently intraoperatively, and collaborate with cardiovascular surgeons., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The effectiveness of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemo- or/and chemoembolization therapy after curative hepatectomy of initial hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate whether hepatectomy combined with adjuvant transcatheter arterial infusion therapy (TAI) for initial HCC has better long-term survival outcomes than hepatectomy alone., Methods: From January 2012 to December 2014, a prospective randomized controlled trial of patients with initial HCC was conducted. Then, 114 initial HCC patients were recruited to undergo hepatectomy with adjuvant TAI (TAI group, n = 55) or hepatectomy alone (control group, n = 59) at our institution. The TAI therapy was performed twice, at 3 and 6 months after curative hepatectomy (UMIN 000011900)., Results: The patients treated with TAI had no serious side effects, and operative outcomes did not differ between the two groups. No significant differences were found in the pattern of intrahepatic recurrence or time until recurrence between the two groups. Moreover, no significant differences were found in the relapse-free survival or overall survival. Low cholinesterase level (< 200) had been identified as a risk factor affecting relapse-free survival. Furthermore, compared with surgery alone, adjuvant TAI with hepatectomy improved the overall survival for lower-cholinesterase patients., Conclusions: Adjuvant TAI is safe and feasible, but it cannot reduce the incidence of postoperative recurrence or prolong survival for patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for initial HCC.

Background: Post-hepatectomy liver regeneration is of great interest to liver surgeons, and understanding the process of regeneration could contribute to increasing the safety of hepatectomies and improving prognoses., Methods: Five hundred thirty-eight patients who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated, with a focus on the effects of portal vein resection and resected liver volume on remnant liver regeneration in patients with liver tumors. Remnant liver volumes (RLVs) and laboratory data were measured postoperatively using multidetector computed tomography on day 7 and months 1, 2, 5, 12, and 24 after the operation., Results: Liver regeneration speed peaked at 1 week postoperatively and gradually decreased. Regeneration with large resections was longer than that with small resections, with the remnant liver regeneration rate being significantly lower in the former at all time points. Remnant liver regeneration plateaued around 5 months postoperatively, when regeneration is almost complete. Up to 1 month postoperatively, laboratory data were significantly worse when more portal veins was resected. After 2 months postoperatively, these data recovered to near normal levels., Conclusion: The speed and rate of remnant liver regeneration primarily showed a strong correlation with the number of resected portal veins and the amount of removed liver parenchyma. The larger the resection ratio, the longer it took the liver to regenerate. We confirmed that recovery of the liver's functional aspects accompanies recovery of the RLV.

Background: There is no consensus about remnant liver regeneration associated with middle hepatic vein (MHV) resecting., Methods: Seventy-five patients who underwent hemihepatectomy were retrospectively analysed with respect to remnant liver regeneration. The liver remnant volume (LRV) and each sectional volume were postoperatively measured with multidetector computed tomography at day 7 and months 1, 2, 5, and 12 after the operation., Results: In right hemihepatectomy cases, the regeneration rate of LRV in the MHV preservation group was significantly higher than that of the MHV resection group at months 5 and 12. In particular, the regeneration rate of remnant segment IV peaked at day 7 and was shrunk after 1 month, and was significant higher in the MHV preservation group. In left hemihepatectomy cases, the regeneration rate of LRV at month 12 was significantly higher in the MHV preservation group. The regeneration rate of the remnant anterior section peaked at 1 month and was shrunk., Conclusion: In this study, the MHV should be preserved or reconstructed whenever possible during hepatic hemihepatectomy. Hepatic regeneration in the MHV perfusion region becomes poor within 7 days to 1 month after surgery (UMIN000023714).

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often recurs after curative hepatectomy; and early recurrence after hepatectomy (ERAH) is associated with poor prognosis. This study aimed to clarify risk factors and disease patterns for ERAH., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological factors of 232 patients who underwent initial curative hepatectomies for HCC between April 2000 and March 2013, and examined associated risk factors and early recurrence patterns by liver function status (as indicated by indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min [ICGR15])., Results: Patients who experienced recurrence within 6 months after hepatectomy (i.e., ERAH) had significantly shorter survival than those with longer disease-free intervals (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, microvascular invasion (mVI; P = 0.034) and ICGR15 ≥ 16% (P = 0.010) were independent risk factors for ERAH. In the ICGR1<16% subgroup, positive L3-AFP (P = 0.04), tumor size ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.011), surgical margin = 0 (P = 0.0103), mVI (P = 0.034), and extrahepatic recurrence were significant predictors of ERAH; in the ICGR15 ≥ 16%, subgroup, multiple tumors (P = 0.046) were identified as a risk factor for ERAH; however, this group did not experience much extrahepatic recurrence., Conclusions: ERAH was associated with mVI and ICGR15 ≥ 16%. Recurrence patterns and risk factors vary by liver function status, which should be considered in forming management strategies for early recurrence of HCC after curative hepatectomy., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: The prevention of recurrence is important for improving long-term outcome for HCC. To identify candidates for postoperative adjuvant therapy after curative hepatectomy for HCC in Child-Pugh classification A (Child A)., Methodology: Of 157 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for Child A HCC, 93 had recurrence and were divided into 2 groups: group A, ≤2 tumors, each <3 cm in size at the time of intrahepatic recurrence; group B, ≥3 tumors or tumor ≥3 cm in size at the time of intrahepatic recurrence and/or extrahepatic recurrence. Clinicopathological and survival data were analyzed retrospectively in each group to identify poor prognostic factors., Results: The 1-year recurrence rate was 50%, and the time to recurrence was shorter in group B (10 months) than in group A (20 months) Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were poorer in group B (83%, 52%, and 35% respectively; p < 0.001) than in group A (100%, 96%, and 71% respectively) Cancer spread (vascular invasion and/or intrahepatic metastasis) was significantly affecting the recurrence pattern of Group B (p=0.0238) on multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy af ter curative hepatectomy for HCC in Child A should be given to patients with microscopic vascular invasion and/or intrahepatic metastasis.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological features of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after hepatectomy in order to schedule optimal treatment strategies for better long-term outcomes., Methods: A cohort of 206 patients who had undergone curative hepatectomy for HCC was analysed; 133 patients had developed relapse. Among them, 101 patients had intrahepatic recurrence only (IHR), and 32 patients had extrahepatic recurrence (EHR). Clinicopathological and survival data were compared between the two groups., Results: The overall survival rate after hepatectomy was better in the IHR than in the EHR group (p<0.0001). The recurrence-free interval after hepatectomy was significantly shorter in the EHR than in the IHR group (258 vs. 487 days, p<0.0043). Patients in the EHR group were more likely to have a high PIVKA II, a large tumour, and microscopic portal vein invasion when compared with patients in the IHR group. Microscopic portal vein invasion was the most important independent risk factor for EHR after hepatectomy (p=0.0295). Patients with more than two risk factors for EHR showed poor prognosis in comparison with patients without any risk factors (p<0.001). In the EHR group, patients who underwent repeated resection had significantly better survival than patients receiving only the best supportive care (539 vs. 133 days, p=0.0098). Furthermore, among EHR patients with concomitant IHR, patients with controllable IHR had significantly better survival than those with uncontrollable IHR (524 vs. 147 days, p=0.0131)., Conclusions: EHR of HCC was associated with early recurrence, and risk factors for the occurrence of EHR included the presence of high PIVKA II, large tumours, and microscopic portal vein invasion. Resection of recurrent tumour and local control of concomitant IHR may improve the prognosis of EHR patients.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of elderly patients (≥ 70 years old) undergoing curative hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: Clinicopathological data and treatment outcomes in 100 elderly patients (≥ 70 years old) and 120 control patients (≤ 70 years old) with HCC who underwent curative hepatectomy between 2000 and 2011 were retrospectively collected and compared., Results: The overall survival rate was similar between the two groups, but the disease-free survival rate was worse in the elderly group when compared with the control group. Prognostic factors for overall and disease-free survival were the same when comparing the two groups. The elderly group had higher rate of females (p = 0.0230), higher hepatitis C virus infection rate (p = 0.0090), higher postoperative pulmonary complication rate (p = 0.0484), lower rate of response to interferon (IFN) therapy (p = 0.0203) and shorter surgical time (p = 0.0337) when compared with the control group. The overall recurrence rate was higher in the elderly group than in the control group (p = 0.0346), but the rate of recurrence within 2 years after the operation was similar when comparing the two groups., Conclusion: The survival of elderly patients with HCC was similar to that of younger patients. However, the disease-free survival was worse in elderly patients than in younger patients. Aggressive antiviral therapy (e.g. IFN therapy) may be necessary to improve the disease-free survival, even in elderly patients. Additionally, clinicians should be aware of the risk of pulmonary complications in elderly patients after hepatectomy.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the appropriate treatment for intrahepatic recurrence after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: Of 151 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC, 82 had intrahepatic recurrence and were divided into two groups: group A, ≤2 tumors, each 3 cm in size; and group B, beyond the group A. Survival and treatment in each group were analyzed retrospectively to determine the best therapeutic modality for intrahepatic recurrence., Results: The 5-year overall survival and recurrence rate were 65% and 58%, respectively. Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after recurrence were better in group A (100%, 76%, and 54%) than in group B (74%, 23%, and 5.8%; p < 0.001). The clinical backgrounds were not different for each modality. Of the 43 patients in group A, 10 underwent hepatectomy, 21 ablation therapy, and 12 transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). The survival rate of hepatectomy was similar to that of ablation therapy and significantly better than that of TACE (p = 0.0248). Of the 39 patients in group B, the results of TACE were similar to other therapies after recurrence., Conclusions: Repeat hepatectomy and ablation therapy were more effective than TACE in the group with ≤2 tumors up to 3 cm in size at recurrence, while any treatment modality was more effective than best supportive care, but the outcome was poorer in the group with ≥3 tumors or tumor size ≥3 cm at recurrence.

Abdominal drainage after liver resection is considered unnecessary: however, there still exist a number of cases where drain is effective to prevent serious infectious complications. We re-evaluated the necessity of drain placement after liver resection from the retrospective analysis of postoperative complications with special reference to the need for drain insertion of 140 patients undergoing hepatectomy without intraoperative abdominal drainage from 2007 through 2010. Three patients required drain reinsertion in the early postoperative period (before postoperative Day 7); all had undergone extended right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombus followed by postoperative liver failure. Risk factors for postoperative bile leakage included repeated hepatectomy, operative procedure with exposure of the major Glisson's sheath (i.e., central bisegmentectomy and anterior segmentectomy), and intraoperative bile leakage. However, because the onset of this complication was as late as postoperative Day 19.5, prophylactic drainage does not appear useful. Although not required routinely, prophylactic drainage might be useful in patients undergoing extended hepatectomy, a high-risk hepatectomy procedure exposing the major Glisson's sheath, those with positive intraoperative bile leakage, for hepatocellular carcinoma, and especially complicated with portal vein thrombus.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) shows a high rate of recurrence after hepatectomy; predictive factors for early recurrence would help determine optimal therapeutic and management strategies. Among 163 patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy with curative intent, 46 patients developed recurrence within 1 year. Clinicopathological data were retrospectively analyzed to identify predictive parameters for early recurrence. Survival rates in cases of recurrence within 1 year were worse than those of no recurrence within 1 year or recurrence after 1 year. Protein induced by vitamin K absence/antagonist II (PIVKA-II) greater than 150, positive fucosylated alpha-fetoprotein (L3-AFP), and deviancy from Milan criteria (MC) on preoperative imaging were associated with high risk of early recurrence and total number of these three risk factors predicted the survival. With multivariate analysis, (1) preoperatively, positive factors of two or more among three items of PIVKA-II, L3-AFP, and deviancy from MC; (2) and postoperatively, pathological cancer spread (microscopic vascular invasion and/or intrahepatic metastasis) both represented risks for early recurrence. A combination of three preoperative factors, PIVKA-II, L3-AFP, and MC status, in conjunction with the postoperative factor of cancer spread status represents a significant indicator for recurrence within 1 year. Improving the prognosis of patients with HCC would depend on how to adequately treat those at high risk of early recurrence.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the optimal timing for removal of abdominal drainage after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 148 patients were divided into 2 groups. In Group I, drains were removed according to the judgment of the surgeon. In Group II, drains were removed on postoperative day (POD) 2, except in cases of bile leakage, purulent ascites, or hemorrhage. Postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in Group II than in Group I. Six patients required drain reinsertion for abdominal abscess and massive ascites. The risk factor for drain reinsertion was volume of drain discharge greater than 450 mL on POD 2. Early removal of the drain is desirable after surgical treatment of HCC. Moreover, it seems preferable to determine the necessity of drain removal based on assessment of the volume and nature of drain discharge on POD 2.