Search

Background & Aims: The diagnostic accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v.2018 and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria for the diagnosis of HCC have been widely evaluated, but their reliability should be investigated. We aimed to assess and compare the reliability of LI-RADS v.2018 and EASL criteria for the diagnosis of HCC using MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECAs) and gadoxetic acid (GA) and determine the effect of ancillary features on LI-RADS reliability., Approach & Results: Ten readers reviewed MRI studies of 92 focal liver lesions measuring <3 cm acquired with ECAs and GA <1 month apart from two prospective trials, assessing EASL criteria, LI-RADS major and ancillary features, and LI-RADS categorization with and without including ancillary features. Inter-reader agreement for definite HCC diagnosis was substantial and similar for the two contrasts for both EASL and LI-RADS criteria. For ECA-MRI and GA-MRI, respectively, inter-reader agreement was k = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.81) and k = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80); for nonrim hyperenhancement, k = 0.63 (95% CI, 0.54-0.72) and k = 0.57 (95% CI, 0.48-0.66); and for nonperipheral washout, k = 0.49 (95% CI, 0.40-0.59) and k = 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37-0.58) for enhancing capsule. The inter-reader agreement for LI-RADS after applying ancillary features remained in the same range of agreement., Conclusions: Agreement for definite HCC was substantial and similar for both scoring systems and the two contrast agents in small focal liver lesions. Agreement for LI-RADS categorization was lower for both contrast agents, and including LI-RADS ancillary features did not improve agreement., (© 2022 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the association between the liver uptake of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in cirrhotic patients and the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), and how these features impact on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection in the HBP., Patients and Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of 62 cirrhotic patients with newly US-detected nodule between 1-2 cm (study group). Twenty healthy subjects were used as control group. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the liver contrast uptake in the HBP assessed by Relative Liver-Enhancement (RLE), Liver-Spleen (LSCR), Liver-Muscle (LMCR), and Liver-Kidney Contrast-Ratio (LKCR), Contrast Enhancement Index (CEI), and Hepatic Uptake (HUI), and biliary excretion, were registered. CSPH was confirmed invasively (HVPG > 10 mmHg) or by indirect parameters. The appearance of HCC at the HBP was analyzed., Results: Nineteen patients (30.6%) did not have CSPH. In 41 patients (66.1%) the final diagnosis was HCC. All indices were significantly higher in the control group, indicating a more intense HBP liver signal intensity compared to patients with cirrhosis, even if the comparison was restricted to patients with no CSPH. CSPH was associated to a lower rate of HCC hypointensity in the HBP (51.9% vs . 85.7% without CSPH, p = 0.004)., Conclusions: Liver uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA at the HBP is decreased in cirrhosis even if the liver function is minimally impaired and it falls down significantly in patients with CSPH compromising the recognition of hypointense lesions. This fact may represent a limitation for the detection of small HCC in patients with cirrhosis and CSPH., (© 2022 Carla Caparroz, Alejandro Forner, Jordi Rimola, Anna Darnell, Ángeles García-Criado, Juan Ramón Ayuso, María Reig, Jordi Bruix, Carmen Ayuso, published by Sciendo.)

Background & Aims: Recognition of non-characterized liver nodules (NCLN) prior to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) is associated with increased hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in patients with HCV. The risk of HCC has not been defined in F3/F4 patients in whom NCLN have been ruled-out before starting DAAs and at sustained virological response (SVR). This study aimed to estimate HCC incidence in this population., Methods: We performed a prospective study including HCV-infected patients with F3/F4 fibrosis, without a history of HCC, and who achieved SVR after DAAs. Patients were only included if they had undergone ultrasound imaging that excluded the presence of HCC/NCLN within 30 days after SVR. All patients were evaluated every 6 months until developing primary liver cancer, death or withdrawal of informed consent. HCC incidence was expressed per 100 patient-years (/100PY). Adherence to screening program was calculated every 6 months for the first 48 months., Results: A total of 185 patients (63/122, F3/F4) were included. Among those with cirrhosis, 92% were Child-Pugh A and 42.7% had clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Albumin-bilirubin score was 1 in 84.9% and 2 in 15.1% of patients, respectively. The median clinical and radiologic follow-up was 52.4 months and 48 months, respectively. Ten patients developed HCC: HCC incidence was 1.46/100PY (95% CI 0.79-2.71) in the whole cohort, 2.24/100PY (95% CI 1.21-4.17) in F4 only and 3.63/100PY (95% CI 1.95-6.74) in patients with CSPH. No HCC was registered in patients with F3. Median time between SVR and HCC occurrence was 28.1 months; 12 non-primary liver cancers were also identified., Conclusions: Patients with cirrhosis without NCLN at SVR remain at risk of HCC development. The absence of HCC in patients with F3 reinforces their marginal cancer risk, but prospective studies are needed to exclude them from screening programs., Lay Summary: Patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, without non-characterized liver nodules at sustained virologic response, remain at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma despite viral cure. However, the cancer risk after successful direct-acting antiviral treatment is marginal in patients with F3 fibrosis without non-characterized liver nodules. If confirmed in larger prospective studies, current screening recommendations may need to be revisited in this group of patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest MSZ: received speaker fees from Bayer and travel grants from Bayer, BTG and Eisai; ZM: received consultancy fees from Gilead, Abbvie, Alexion, Orphalan and Deep Genomics; speaker fees from Gilead and Abbvie and research grants from Gilead; SL: received consultancy and speaker fees from Gilead and Abbvie and grants from Gilead, VS: received travel grants from Bayer; GI: received ravel grants from Bayer; NG: congress inscriptions: Eisai; NLL: Bayer, AstraZeneca, Travel funding: Bayer Congress inscriptions: Eisai; AD: speaker fees and travel grants from Bayer; AGC: Speaker fees from BTG and Terumo; AD: speaker fees from Bayer and travel grants from Bayer; SMM: received speaker fees from Bayer and travel grants from Bayer and Eisai; CA: Speaker fees, travel and research grants from Bayer, BTG and Terumo. Consultancy from ROCHE; JR: has consulted for Roche and received speaker fees from Bayer and Roche and travel grants from Bayer; AF: Lecture fees from Bayer, Gilead and MSD; consultancy fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Roche and Guerbert; FT: DSMB fees from Archivel Farma, S.L., Daiichi-Sankyo Pharma Development, ArQule and Rovi; speaker fees from Bayer; lecture fees from Janssen; JB: has consulted for Arqule, Bayer-Shering Pharma, Novartis, BMS, BTG- Biocompatibles, Eisai, Kowa, Terumo, Gilead, Bio-Alliance, Roche, AbbVie, MSD, Sirtex, Ipsen, Astra-Medimmune, Incyte, Quirem, Adaptimmune, Lilly, Basilea, Nerviano, Sanofi; and received research/educational grants from Bayer, and lecture fees from Bayer-Shering Pharma, BTG-Biocompatibles, Eisai, Terumo, Sirtex, Ipsen; XF: acted as advisor for Gilead and Abbvie; MR: received consultancy fees and/or travel support from Bayer, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, UniversalDX, Boston Scientific and Lilly, lecture fees from Bayer, BMS, Gilead, and Lilly and research grants from Bayer and Ipsen. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest MR: reports consultancy from Bayer, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, Astra Zeneca, Boston Science and Lilly; lecture fees from Bayer, BMS, Gilead, Lilly,Roche and UniversalDX and travel support from Bayer, BMS, Lilly and Astra Zeneca. Received research funding (to institution) from Bayer and Ipsen. AF: reports lecture fees from Bayer, Boston Science, Gilead, and MSD, consultancy fees from Bayer, Astra Zeneca, Roche, SIRTEX, AB Exact Science and Guerbert. JR: reports lectures and travel grants from Bayer and Roche. JFF: reports lecture fees from Bayer. MB: reports lectures and/or travel support from Boston Science, Terumo, Guerbet and Bayer. AGC: reports lectures fee from Boston Science, Terumo. KRK: reports consultancy fees (to self) from Exact Sciences, Genentech/Roche, Gilead. Received travel support from Ipsen. Received research funding (to institution) from Agios, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Merck, Novartis, Partner Therapeutics, QED, Relay Therapeutics, Surface Oncology, Taiho. PRG: consultancy fees and/or travel support from Bayer, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Adaptimmune, BMS, MSD, Sirtex, Lilly, Roche, Guerbet, Ipsen, Eisai. VM: Nothing to disclose. RS: reports consultancy fees from Boston Scientific, Cook, Bard, Genentech, Astrazeneca, Eisai, Sirtex, Siemens, research support from Boston Scientific. BS: reports consultancy fees from Adaptimmune, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific, BTG, Eisai, Eli Lilly, H3 Biomedicine, Ipsen, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Sirtex Medical, Terumo; speaker fees from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, BTG, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Sirtex Medical, Terumo; research grants (to Institution) from BMS and Sirtex Medical. AS: has served on advisory boards or consulted for Genentech, Bayer, Eisai, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Exelixis. AV: Speaker, consultancy and advisory role: Amgen, Roche, Bayer, Sanofi, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, EISAI, AstraZeneca, Merck, Incyte, Ipsen, PierreFabre, MSD, Sirtex, BTG, Servier, Terumo, GSK. JFu: Nothing to disclose. CA: reports lectures fee from Bayer. JB: has consulted for Arqule, Bayer-Shering Pharma, Novartis, BMS, BTG- Biocompatibles, Eisai, Kowa, Terumo, Gilead, Bio-Alliance, Roche, AbbVie, MSD, Sirtex, Ipsen, Astra-Medimmune, Incyte, Quirem, Adaptimmune, Lilly, Basilea, Nerviano, Sanofi and UniversalDX; and received research/educational grants from Bayer, and lecture fees from Bayer-Shering Pharma, BTG-Biocompatibles, Eisai, Terumo, Sirtex, Ipsen. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The American College of Radiology has released the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) scheme which categorizes focal liver lesions (FLLs) in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the degree of risk of nodules to be HCC. It subgroups FLL in LR-1 (definitely benign), LR-2 (probably benign), LR-3 (intermediate probability of malignancy), LR-4 (probably HCC), LR-5 (definitely HCC), and LR-M (probable malignancy not specific for HCC). Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS diagnostic algorithm have the goal to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, reporting, and data collection for imaging examinations in patients at risk for HCC. Nevertheless, there remain controversial issues that should be dealt with. The aim of this review is to discuss the pros and cons of the interpretation and reporting part of CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS diagnostic algorithm to permit future refinements of the scheme and optimize patient and nodule management., Competing Interests: Dr. Jordi Bruix reports grants from INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III (PI18/00768), grants from AECC (PI044031), grants from WCR (AICR) 16–0026, personal fees from ABBVIE, personal fees from ADAPTIMMUNE, personal fees from ARQULE, personal fees from ASTRA-MEDIMMUNE, personal fees from BASILEA, grants and personal fees from BAYER-SHERING PHARMA, personal fees from BIO-ALLIANCE, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from BTG-BIOCOMPATIBLES, personal fees from EISAI, personal fees from GILEAD, personal fees from INCYTE, grants and personal fees from IPSEN, personal fees from KOWA, personal fees from LILLY, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from NERVIANO, personal fees from NOVARTIS, personal fees from POLARIS, personal fees from QUIREM, personal fees from ROCHE, personal fees from SIRTEX, personal fees from SANOFI, personal fees from TERUMO, from null, outside the submitted work.Dr. Carmen Ayuso reports grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from BAYER, grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from BTG, personal fees from TERUMO, personal fees from ROCHE, outside the submitted work.Prof. Fabio PIscaglia reports personal fees from: Astrazeneca, Bayer, Bracco, BMS, EISAI, ESAOTE, GE, Tiziana Life Sciences, Roche, Alkermes, and Samsung. Dr. Eleonora Terzi has no conflicts of interest to declare., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Defining optimum management of patients progressing beyond Milan criteria on the waiting list is a controversial topic. Our aim was to determine whether the policy of allowing a limited progression beyond enlistment criteria permits acceptable post-transplant outcomes in terms of survival and recurrence., Methods: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma included on the waiting list for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) between January 1989 and December 2016 were analysed. Tumour features were assessed at inclusion on the waiting list, before OLT and at explant pathology. Patients were retained on the waiting list despite exceeding enlistment criteria if not presenting with macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread or cancer-related symptoms., Results: A total of 495 patients constituted the target population. Comparison between the Milan-in (n = 434) and Milan-out (n = 61) groups showed statistically significant differences in: largest tumour size; BCLC stage; patients treated before OLT; alpha-fetoprotein, and time on the waiting list. Milan-out patients showed a significantly higher number of poorly differentiated nodules, satellitosis and microscopic vascular invasion. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rate was 89.6%, 82.5%, 75%, and 55.5%, vs. 83.6%, 70.5%, 65.5%, and 53.9% for Milan-in/Milan-out patients, respectively. Recurrence rates at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years were 1.2%, 3.3%, 5.5%, and 10.8% vs. 7.1% 14.5%, 23%, and 23% for Milan-in and Milan-out patients, respectively (p <0.01)., Conclusion: This study shows that although limited tumour progression without reaching major adverse predictors (vascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, cancer symptoms) has an expected impact on recurrence rate, overall survival remains above the minimum proposed benchmark of 65% at 5 years. The clinically relevant increase in tumour recurrence must be considered when analysing the benefit of this approach in the face of limited organ supply., Lay Summary: When considering orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, optimum results are achieved when transplanting patients within the Milan criteria. However, the most appropriate strategy for patients who progress beyond these criteria while on the waiting list is still unclear. Herein, we show that transplantation is associated with acceptable overall survival in select patients who progress beyond the Milan criteria, although recurrence rates were notably higher. Therefore, the assessment of transplantation viability in these patients must consider the availability of organs and the impact on other patient categories., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega: Lecture fees from Bayer. Alejandro Forner: Speaker fees from Bayer, Gilead and MSD; consultancy fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca and Guerbert; received grants support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI13/01229 and PI18/00542). Víctor Sapena: Travel grants from Bayer. Alba Díaz: Lecture fees from Bayer. Carmen Ayuso: Consulting fees from Roche. Speaker fees, travel and research grants from Bayer, BTG and Terumo. Jordi Bruix: Received grant support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI18/00768), AECC (PI044031), and WCR (AICR) 16-0026. CIBERehd is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III; COIs: Consultancy from Arqule, Bayer, Novartis, BMS, BTG- Biocompatibles, Eisai, Kowa, Terumo, Gilead, Bio-Alliance, Roche, AbbVie, Merck, Sirtex, Sanofi, Ipsen, Astra-Medimmune, Incyte, Nerviano, Quirem, Adaptimmune, Lilly; research grants from Bayer; educational grants from Bayer; lecture fees from Bayer, BTG-Biocompatibles, Terumo, Sirtex, and Ipsen. María Reig: Consultancy fees from Bayer, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca and Lilly. Lecture fees from Roche, Bayer, BMS, Gilead, and Lilly. Research grants from Bayer and Ipsen. Maria Reig received grant support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI15/00145 and PI18/0358). Josep Fuster: Received grant support from “Llavaneres contra el cáncer” Association (grant IP004500). Jaime Sampson-Dávila, Ramón Vilana, Miquel Navasa, Rosa Miquel, Constantino Fondevila and Juan Carlos García-Valdecasas have no conflicts of interest to declare. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis in high-risk patients is a dynamic system, which was lastly updated in 2018. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy for HCC diagnosis of LI-RADS v2018 with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with extracellular contrast for solitary nodules ≤ 20 mm detected during ultrasound (US) surveillance in cirrhotic patients, with particular interest in those observations categorized as LI-RADS 3., Methods: Between November 2003 and February 2017, we included 262 consecutive cirrhotic patients with a newly US-detected solitary ≤ 20-mm nodule. A LI-RADS (LR) v2018 category was retrospectively assigned. The diagnostic accuracy for each LR category was described, and the main MRI findings associated with HCC diagnosis were analyzed., Results: Final diagnoses were as follows: 197 HCC (75.2%), 5 cholangiocarcinoma (1.9%), 2 metastasis (0.8%), and 58 benign lesions (22.1%); 0/15 (0%) LR-1, 6/26 (23.1%) LR-2, 51/74 (68.9%) LR-3, 11/12 (91.7%) LR-4, 126/127 (99.2%) LR-5, and 3/8 (37.5%) LR-M were HCC. LR-5 category displayed a sensitivity and specificity of 64% (95% CI, 56.8-70.7) and 98.5% (95% CI, 91.7-100), respectively. Considering also LR-4 as diagnostic for HCC, the sensitivity slightly increased to 69.5% (95% CI, 62.6-75.9) with minor impact on specificity (96.2%; 95% CI, 89.3-99.6). Regarding LR-3 observations, 51 out of 74 were HCC, 2 were non-HCC malignancies, and 20 out of 21 LR-3 nodules > 15 mm (95.2%) were finally categorized as HCC., Conclusions: The high probability of HCC in US-detected LR-3 observations (68.9%) justifies triggering an active diagnostic work-up if intended to diagnose HCC at a very early stage., Key Points: • In cirrhotic patients with nodules ≤ 20 mm detected during US surveillance, 51 out of 74 (68.9%) of LR-3 nodules by MRI corresponded to an HCC. • In LR-3 nodules, HCC diagnosis was closely related to baseline tumor size. All 5 nodules smaller than 1 cm were diagnosed as benign. Oppositely, 20 out of 21 LR-3 observations > 15 mm (95.2%) were diagnosed as HCC. • The high probability of HCC in US-detected LR-3 observations justifies triggering an active diagnostic work-up if intended to diagnose HCC at a very early stage.

Background: Despite atezolizumab and bevacizumab (A + B) is currently the first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, some patients will not be adequate for this combination. In the setting of sorafenib some adverse events have been proposed as prognostic factors., Objective: To characterize the early diarrhoea development as prognostic factor in 344 HCC patients., Methods: The development of early diarrhoea in sorafenib treatment defined as patients who developed diarrhoea and needed dose modification within the first 60 days of treatment (e-diarrhoea) and 3-grouping variables were analysed: Patients with e-diarrhoea, patients who developed diarrhoea after the first 60 days of treatment (L-diarrhoea) and patients that never developed diarrhoea (never diarrhoea)., Results: The median overall survival in sorafenib treated patients was significantly different across groups (6.8 months for e-diarrhoea, 26.7 months for L-diarrhoea and 13.3 months for never-diarrhoea). The emergence of e-diarrhoea was associated with poor outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84 [95%CI 1.15-2.95]), while there was no increased/decreased risk of dismal evolution in patients with L-diarrhoea (HR 0.66 [95%CI 0.42-1.03])., Conclusion: The emergence of e-diarrhoea in HCC patients treated with sorafenib is an early predictor of dismal evolution under this therapy. Thus, prompt identification of these non-responders may be useful for an early switch to second-line therapies., (© 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver neoplasm and one of the most common causes of death in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. In parallel, with recognition of the clinical relevance of this cancer, major new developments have recently appeared in its diagnosis, prognostic assessment and in particular, in its treatment. Therefore, the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) has driven the need to update the clinical practice guidelines, once again inviting all the societies involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease to participate in the drafting and approval of the document: Spanish Society for Liver Transplantation (SETH), Spanish Society of Diagnostic Radiology (SERAM), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI), Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) and Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). The clinical practice guidelines published in 2016 and accepted as National Health System Clinical Practice Guidelines were taken as the reference documents, incorporating the most important recent advances. The scientific evidence and the strength of the recommendation is based on the GRADE system., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Goals: To describe the occurrence of malabsorption (MA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients under sorafenib, the potential relationship with pancreatic insufficiency (PI), and the role of pancreatic enzymes supplementation., Background: With the increasing options of second-line systemic therapies for HCC, the recognition of drug intolerance using practical tools is crucial. It has been proposed that a MA syndrome could be due to sorafenib-induced pancreatic dysfunction., Study: All sorafenib-treated patients with suspicion of MA (defined as decreased stool consistency lasting >4 wk or presenting ≥10% body weight loss without HCC progression) were prospectively evaluated by serum markers, endoscopy, and imaging techniques., Results: We evaluated 81 sorafenib-treated patients and 21 developed MA suspicion (85.7% male, 81.5% Child-Pugh A, 52.4% BCLC-B, and 47.6% BCLC-C) within a median 5.9 months after starting sorafenib. The median treatment duration, follow-up, and overall survival after MA suspicion were 5.9, 20.3, and 20.3 months, respectively. Nine of them (42.9%) presented hyperparathyroidism secondary to vitamin D deficiency and 8 with PI. A gradual decrease in pancreatic volume of up to 19% was observed among patients with PI. Six of the 8 patients with PI received pancreatic enzymes, with complete recovery from MA symptoms and stabilization of pancreatic volume., Conclusions: We validated the association between MA and PI in 10% of sorafenib-treated patients. Pancreatic enzymes supplementation successfully led to symptomatic recovery. Awareness of this adverse event can help in the management of sorafenib irrespective of cancer type and likely, of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors for HCC patients., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are effective in many advanced tumors. However, there is scarce information regarding the radiological response to these agents in hepatocellular carcinoma outside clinical trials. We aimed to describe the radiological response in a retrospective cohort of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab and to analyze the radiological evolution according to tumor response at first post-treatment radiological assessment., Methods: We reviewed pre-treatment and post-treatment images (CT or MRI) obtained at different time-points in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with nivolumab outside clinical trials at seven Spanish centers, assessing the response according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST and registering atypical responses. We also analyzed the imaging findings on subsequent assessments according to tumor status on the first posttreatment imaging assessment., Results: From the 118 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with nivolumab, we finally analyzed data from 31 patients (71 % Child-Pugh A; 74 % BCLC-C). Median follow-up was 8.39 months [IQR 5.00-10.92]; median overall survival was 12.82 months (95 %CI 10.92-34.79). According to RECIST 1.1, the objective response rate was 16 % and according to iRECIST, the objective response rate was 22.6 %. Findings at the first post-treatment assessment varied, showing stable disease in 44.8 % of patients; findings during follow-up also varied widely, including 4 hyperprogressions and 3 pseudoprogressions., Conclusion: Imaging findings during nivolumab treatment are heterogeneous between and within patients. Progression of disease does not always signify treatment failure, and surrogate end-points may not reflect survival outcomes, making the management of hepatocellular carcinoma patients under immunotherapy challenging., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background & Aims: Sorafenib and lenvatinib are the first-line treatments approved in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but information is lacking about the relationships between their pharmacokinetics, patients pharmacogenetic profiles, adverse events (AE) and overall survival. We aimed to elucidate these relationships of tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, such as sorafenib, in order to improve the design of trials testing it in combination with checkpoint inhibitors., Methods: We assessed the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib and its N-oxide metabolite at day-0, day-7, day-30, day-60, day-90, day-120, day-150 and day-180 and nine single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in five genes related to sorafenib metabolism/transport to identify the best point for starting the combination between tyrosine kinases and checkpoint inhibitors., Results: We prospectively included 49 patients (96% cirrhotic, 37% hepatitis-C, 82% Child-Pugh-A and 59% BCLC-C). Pharmacokinetic values peaked at day-7 and progressively declined until day-60. In the 16 patients without further dose modifications after day-60, pharmacokinetic values remained stable through day-180 (sorafenib P = .90; N-oxide P = .93). Pharmacokinetic values were higher in patients with early dermatological adverse events and lower in patients with early diarrhoea. Sorafenib and N-oxide pharmacokinetic values varied linearly with different alleles of MRP2*3972., Conclusions: Sorafenib's pharmacokinetics is heterogeneous across HCC patients. This heterogeneity affects adverse events development and must be taken into account in setting the dose and timing of its combination with checkpoint inhibitors., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of gadoxetic acid liver MRI (Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI) alone or in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a second-line tool for detecting early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence in cirrhotic patients with previous HCC treated with resection or ablation., Methods: Between 2014 and 2017, we prospectively included 34 cirrhotic patients with complete response to resection and/or ablation of early HCC in whom a new focal lesion enhancing in the arterial phase without washout was detected during follow-up with EC-MRI. After signing the informed consent, all patients underwent DWI and Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI; two readers analyzed signal intensities on each phase of dynamic study and on DWI. The final diagnosis was established by histology or follow-up EC-MRI. We used cross-tabulation to calculate indices of diagnostic accuracy., Results: We evaluated 34 patients (7 women; 73.5% with hepatitis C virus) with a total of 53 new arterial-phase-enhancing foci (median size, 10 [IQR 9-14] mm). The final diagnosis, reached by histopathology in 15 (35.7%) lesions and EC-MR follow-up in 27 (64.3%), was HCC in 42 (79.2%) and benign conditions in 11 (21.8%). Hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI plus hyperintensity on DWI yielded 54.8% sensitivity, 90.9% specificity, 95.8% positive predictive value, and 34.5% negative predictive value for diagnosing HCC recurrence., Conclusion: Among potential indices, combining hypointensity on hepatobiliary-phase Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI and hyperintensity on DWI has the highest specificity and positive predictive value to optimally detect HCC recurrence prior to confident diagnosis by conventional imaging criteria on EC-MRI in cirrhotic liver., Key Points: • In patients at risk of HCC recurrence, the use of gadoxetic acid liver MRI and DWI may improve the differentiation of unspecific new arterial-enhancing foci from early hypervascular HCC recurrence in patients with non-conclusive findings on extracellular liver MRI. • Combined findings on hepatobiliary-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI and DWI had high specificity (90.9%) and positive predictive value (95.8%) for detecting early hypervascular HCC recurrence, but limited sensitivity. • Combining hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity on gadoxetic acid MRI and hyperintensity on diffusion-weighted imaging allows early diagnosis of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and may help select patients for salvage therapy.

Background and Aims: Most of the published studies about the diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (EOB-MR) for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have had a retrospective design. Thus, we aimed to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EOB-MR for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in nodules ≤2 cm detected by screening ultrasound (US) in patients with cirrhosis., Methods: Between July 2012 and October 2015, 62 consecutive asymptomatic Child-Pugh A-B cirrhotic patients with newly US-detected solitary nodules between 1 and 2 cm were prospectively included in the study. Hepatic extracellular contrast-enhanced MR (ECCE-MR) followed by EOB-MR were obtained in less than 1-month interval. Two independent radiologists blindly reviewed the EOB-MR studies, and the diagnosis of HCC was assigned when the lesion showed arterial enhancement followed by portal venous phase washout and/or hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The final HCC diagnosis was made by ECCE-MR according to the accepted non-invasive criteria, or by biopsy in lesions with atypical vascular profile., Results: Final diagnoses were as follows: HCC (n = 41), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2), colorectal metastases (n = 1) and benign conditions (n = 18). The sensitivity and specificity of EOB-MR for HCC diagnosis were 56.1% (95% CI: 39.7-71.5) and 90.5% (95% CI: 69.6-98.8), respectively, while sensitivity of ECCE-MR was 63.4% (95% CI: 46.9-77.9). The low rate of hypointense HCCs in the HBP and suboptimal liver uptake of contrast agent justify the low sensitivity of EOB-MR for HCC diagnosis., Conclusion: EOB-MR does not surpass the diagnostic accuracy of ECCE-MR for non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in nodules ≤2 cm in cirrhotic patients., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: Despite direct-acting antivirals being highly effective at eradicating hepatitis C virus infection, their impact on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcome of cirrhotic patients treated with interferon-free regimens to estimate the risk of developing HCC., Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study focusing on cirrhotic patients treated with direct-acting antivirals until December 2016. Clinical and radiologic characteristics were collected before the start of antiviral therapy, at follow-up and at HCC development. Diagnosis of HCC was centrally validated and its incidence was expressed as HCC/100 person-years., Results: A total of 1,123 patients were included (60.6% males, 83.8% Child-Pugh A) and 95.2% achieved a sustained virologic response. Median time of follow-up was 19.6 months. Seventy-two patients developed HCC within a median of 10.3 months after starting antiviral treatment. HCC incidence was 3.73 HCC/100 person-years (95% CI 2.96-4.70). Baseline liver function, alcohol intake and hepatic decompensation were associated with a higher risk of HCC. The relative risk was significantly increased in patients with non-characterized nodules at baseline 2.83 (95% CI 1.55-5.16) vs. absence of non-characterized nodules. When excluding these patients, the risk remained increased., Conclusion: These data expose a clear-cut time association between interferon-free treatment and HCC. The mechanisms involved in the increased risk of HCC emergence in the short term require further investigation., Lay Summary: In this cohort of cirrhotic patients, interferon-free therapies achieved a high rate of sustained virologic response (>95%); however, we reported a risk of de novo hepatocellular carcinoma of 3.73 per 100 person-years and a clear-cut time association with antiviral therapy. The time association between starting direct-acting antivirals and developing hepatocellular carcinoma, together with the association with the presence of non-characterized nodules at baseline ultrasound, suggests that antiviral therapy elicits a mechanism (probably immune-related) that primes the growth and clinical recognition of hepatocellular carcinoma early during follow-up. As a result, short-term liver cancer risk is significantly increased., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

One of the key strategies to improve the prognosis of HCC, beside prevention, is to diagnose the tumor in early stages, when the patient is asymptomatic and the liver function is preserved, because in this clinical situation effective therapies with survival benefit can be applied. Imaging techniques are a key tool in the surveillance and diagnosis of HCC. Screening should be based in US every 6 months and non-invasive diagnostic criteria of HCC based on imaging findings on dynamic-MR and/or dynamic-CT have been validated and thus, accepted in clinical guidelines. The typical vascular pattern depicted by HCC on CT and or MRI consists on arterial enhancement, stronger than the surrounding liver (wash-in), and hypodensity or hyposignal intensity compared to the surrounding liver (wash-out) in the venous phase. This has a sensitivity of around 60% with a 96-100% specificity. Major improvements on liver imaging have been introduced in the latest years, adding functional information that can be quantified: the use of hepatobiliary contrast media for liver MRI, the inclusion of diffusion-weighted sequences in the standard protocols for liver MRI studies and new radiotracers for positron-emission tomography (PET). However, all them are still a matter of research prior to be incorporated in evidence based clinical decision making. This review summarizes the current knowledge about imaging techniques for the early diagnosis and staging of HCC, and it discusses the most relevant open questions., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A subset of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond Milan criteria might obtain acceptable survival outcomes after liver transplantation. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as a feasible alternative to overcome the paucity of donors. In 2001, we started a protocol for LDLT in Child A-B patients with HCC fulfilling a set of criteria-the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) expanded criteria-that expanded the conventional indications of transplantation: 1 tumor ≤ 7 cm, 5 tumors ≤ 3 cm, and 3 tumors ≤ 5 cm without macrovascular invasion or downstaging to Milan after locoregional therapies. We present a prospective cohort of 22 patients with BCLC extended indications based on size/number (n = 17) or downstaging (n = 5) treated with LDLT between 2001 and 2014. Characteristics of the patients were as follows: median age, 57 years old; males/female, n = 20/2; Child-Pugh A/B, n = 16/6; and alpha fetoprotein < 100 ng/mL, n = 21. Twelve patients received neoadjuvant locoregional therapies. At the time of transplantation, 12 patients had HCC staging beyond Milan criteria and 10 within. Pathological reports showed that 50% exceeded BCLC expanded criteria. Perioperative mortality was 0%. After a median follow-up of 81 months, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 95.5%, 86.4%, 80.2%, and 66.8%, respectively. Overall, 7 patients recurred (range, 9-108 months), and the 5-year and 10-year actuarial recurrence rates were 23.8% and 44.4%, respectively. In conclusion, a proper selection of candidates for extended indications of LDLT for HCC patients provide survival outcomes comparable to those obtained within the Milan criteria, but these results need confirmation. Liver Transplantation 24 369-379 2018 AASLD., (© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

The clinical benefit of sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been undervalued due to the absence of complete responses, even though patients who develop early dermatologic reactions have shown to have a positive outcome. In addition, sorafenib is described as an antiangiogenic drug, but it also acts on immunological cells. Thus, the goal of this study was to assess the complete response rate in a retrospective cohort of HCC patients treated with sorafenib and to describe the profile of the patients who achieve complete response for identifying factors related to this event and their connection with the immunological profile of sorafenib. Ten Spanish centers submitted cases of complete response under sorafenib. The baseline characteristics, development of early dermatologic reactions, and cause of treatment discontinuation were annotated. Radiological images taken before starting sorafenib, at first control, after starting sorafenib, at the time of complete response, and at least 1 month after treatment were centrally reviewed. Of the 1119 patients studied, 20 had been classified as complete responders by the centers, but eight of these patients were excluded after central review. Ten patients had complete disappearance of all tumor sites, and two had just a small residual fibrotic scar. Thus, 12 patients were classified as complete responders (58% HCV, median age 59.7 years, 83.4% Child-Pugh class A, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 91.7%, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C 83.3%). The median overall survival and treatment duration were 85.8 and 40.1 months, respectively. All but one patient developed early dermatologic reactions, and seven patients discontinued sorafenib after achieving complete response due to adverse events, patient decision, or liver decompensation. Conclusion: Complete response affects 1% of patients with HCC who are treated with sorafenib. The association of complete response with early dermatologic reactions supports the role of a specific immune/inflammatory patient profile in the improved response to sorafenib. (Hepatology 2018;67:612-622)., (© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary malignancy of the liver and one of the most frequent causes of death in patients with liver cirrhosis. Simultaneously with the recognition of the clinical relevance of this neoplasm, in recent years there have been important developments in the diagnosis, staging and treatment of HCC. Consequently, the Asociación Española para el Estudio del Hígado has driven the need to update clinical practice guidelines, continuing to invite all the societies involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease to participate in the drafting and approval of the document (Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica, Sociedad Española de Radiología Vascular e Intervencionista y Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica). The clinical practice guidelines published in 2009 accepted as Clinical Practice Guidelines of the National Health System has been taken as reference document, incorporating the most important advances that have been made in recent years. The scientific evidence for the treatment of HCC has been evaluated according to the recommendations of the National Cancer Institute (www.cancer.gov) and the strength of recommendation is based on the GRADE system., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller detected during ultrasonographic (US) surveillance in patients with cirrhosis., Materials and Methods: Between November 2003 and January 2010, patients with cirrhosis with a newly US-detected solitary hepatic nodule 20 mm or smaller were included in this institutional ethics committee-approved study. All patients provided written informed consent before the study; the need to obtain consent for reanalysis of the data was waived. Patients underwent MR imaging and fine-needle biopsy (the reference standard). Nodules without pathologic confirmation were followed up with MR imaging every 6 months. A LI-RADS category was retrospectively assigned to nodules seen at MR imaging. The diagnostic accuracy for each LI-RADS category was described by sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with 95% confidence intervals., Results: Final diagnoses of 133 nodules in 159 patients were as follows: 102 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), three intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs), one neuroendocrine metastasis, and 27 benign lesions (median MR imaging follow-up, 95 months). None (0%) of five LI-RADS category 1 lesions, three (25%) of 12 category 2 lesions, 29 (69%) of 42 category 3 lesions, 24 (96%) of 25 category 4 lesions, and 44 (98%) of 45 category 5 lesions were HCCs. One category 3 lesion was ICC, one category 5 lesion was a neuroendocrine metastasis, and two (50%) of four lesions categorized as other malignancies were HCCs. In patients with nodules detected at surveillance US, LI-RADS category 4 criteria were as effective as category 5 criteria for HCC diagnosis. Combining both categories would improve sensitivity without impairing specificity or positive or negative predictive value for HCC diagnosis (42.3%, 98.2%, 97.8%, and 47.4% vs 65.4%, 96.4%, 97.1%, and 59.6%, respectively)., Conclusion: In patients with cirrhosis with US-detected nodules 20 mm or smaller, both LI-RADS category 4 and category 5 have high specificity for HCC. In addition, a relevant proportion of lesions categorized as LI-RADS category 2 or 3 or as other malignancies were HCCs. Thus, active diagnostic work-up, including biopsy to allow prompt treatment, is recommended in such patients. Online supplemental material is available for this article., (RSNA, 2015)

Background & Aims: Current guidelines recommend diagnostic work-up for nodules >1cm detected during screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This implies that patients with benign conditions may undergo unnecessary evaluation and those with small nodules may be intervened too early, leading to overdiagnosis. Since increased arterial vascularization is the hallmark of malignancy, its detection by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could become the signal to proceed with diagnosis confirmation. The aim was to assess if HCCs <2 cm without arterial hyperenhancement by baseline CEUS have a benign evolutionary profile, suggesting that diagnosis and invasive treatment could be delayed until detection of an overt malignant profile, associated with increased vascularization., Methods: We prospectively included 168 cirrhotic patients with a newly detected solitary nodule of 5-20mm by screening ultrasonography. MRI, CEUS and fine needle biopsy (FNB) were performed and if no confident diagnosis was obtained, patients were closely followed to rule out HCC. Final diagnosis was: HCC (n = 119), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 3), neuroendocrine tumour (n = 1) and benign lesions (n = 45)., Results: CEUS did not detect contrast hyperenhancement in the arterial phase in 55 cases (34%). Eighteen out of these 55 nodules were diagnosed as HCC. Non-CEUS hyperenhanced HCCs were more frequently well-differentiated than CEUS-hyperenhanced HCCs (p < 0.004). Fourteen patients were treated with ablation and 4 with resection. Ten (55.6%) patients experienced tumour recurrence after treatment, mostly distant, confirming their overt malignant profile., Conclusions: Absence of contrast hyperenhancement on CEUS during the arterial phase in nodules <2 cm in a cirrhotic liver does not predict a less malignant profile. Accordingly, priority for diagnostic work-up and treatment should not differ according to contrast profiles on CEUS., (Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Recent advancements have improved the management of patients with liver cancer. Results of studies have informed how to stage and decide the optimal treatment option for each patient with an adequate balance between risks and benefits. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging and treatment strategy has been widely endorsed for this purpose. This is not a rigid system: One of the key aspects in the management of patients is the optimal timing for systemic treatment initiation and for declaring tumor progression and/or treatment failure. Some patients at intermediate or even early stage may be considered for systemic therapy as options of higher priority may have failed or may not be feasible. Sorafenib is the sole systemic agent that has shown efficacy in phase 3 trials. Other agents (sunitinib, brivanib, linifanib, everolimus, ramucirumab) have failed in terms of safety and/or survival benefit. Optimal sorafenib administration and adequate adherence of the patients are crucial requirements to obtain the benefits of the drug. Because development of adverse events has been shown to correlate with better outcome, careful dose adjustments should be in place while avoiding unnecessary treatment interruption. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that progression at imaging may not translate in poor prognosis and that treatment beyond progression may be considered if there is no option for a second-line research trial.In this review, the authors examine all of the controversial aspects that affect treatment initiation and maintenance, how response to treatment should be evaluated, and define the needs that are faced by current research., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Background & Aims: There are no clinical data/markers to predict improved survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Majority of sorafenib adverse events appear within the first 60 days of treatment and studies correlating them with outcome are needed., Methods: We prospectively studied 147 hepatocellular carcinoma patients (97% cirrhotic, 82% Child-Pugh A, BCLC-B 77, BCLC-C 69) treated with sorafenib. Follow-up included monthly clinical and laboratory monitoring and tumor staging at week 4 and every 8 weeks., Results: After a median follow up of 11.6 months (treatment duration 6.7 months), time to progression and overall survival were 5.1 and 12.7 months. All but one patient presented at least one adverse event (median time to appearance 56 days). Time dependent covariate analysis (HR [95% CI]) identified baseline performance status (2.86 [1.75 to 4.55], p<0.001), BCLC (1.69 [1.18 to 2.50], p = 0.005), and dermatologic adverse event requiring dose adjustment within the first 60 days (0.58 [0.36 to 0.92], p = 0.022) as independent predictors of better outcome. Other early adverse events did not have an impact in outcome. The predictive value of dermatologic adverse events for survival was confirmed by the landmark analysis (p = 0.0270)., Conclusions: Development of dermatologic adverse events within 60 days of sorafenib initiation is associated with better survival. Therefore, this should not to be taken as a negative event and discourage treatment maintenance. Likewise, second line clinical trials should be designed and/or evaluated considering this information to avoid significant bias., (Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Sorafenib improves overall survival (OS) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the absence of objective response. Thus, time to tumor progression (TTP) is used to capture benefits of novel molecular agents, but proof of its surrogacy with survival is lacking. Furthermore, survival predictors upon progression are not established and there is a need to characterize postprogression survival (PPS) and assess with time-dependent covariates analysis if it is influenced by progression pattern, and not solely by simultaneous impairment of liver function and performance status. We prospectively followed HCC patients treated with sorafenib. Clinical and biochemical evaluation were done every 4 weeks. Radiologic assessment of progression was done at week 4 and then every 8 weeks using RECIST 1.1. The progression pattern was divided into: intrahepatic/extrahepatic increase in tumor size, new intrahepatic lesion, and new extrahepatic lesion (NEH). We included 147 patients (hepatitis C virus [HCV] 57.1%, performance status [PS] 0 83.6%, Child-Pugh A 82.3%, and BCLC-C 47.3%). The median OS was 12.7 months and its independent predictors (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]) were: baseline BCLC 2.49 [1.66-3.73], PS 1.86 [1.12-3.10], registration during follow-up of Child-Pugh B or Child-Pugh C scores (2.36 [1.51-3.69] and 2.89 [1.62-5.15], respectively), definitive sorafenib interruption 2.48 [1.54-4.01], and TTP 3.39 [1.89-6.1]. The presence of NEH 2.42 [1.32-4.44] is also an independent predictor of OS and PPS in patients with radiologic progression., Conclusion: Tumor progression is a surrogate of survival but its impact varies according to progression pattern. Thus, PPS is influenced by progression pattern and this is key in prognostic prediction and second-line trial design and analysis., (© 2013 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background and Aims: Conventional pathological analysis fails to achieve sufficient sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in small nodules. Immunohistochemical staining for glypican 3 (GPC3), heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) and glutamine synthetase (GS) has been suggested to allow a confident diagnosis but no prospective study has established the diagnostic accuracy of this approach. The aim of this study is to assess prospectively the diagnostic accuracy of a panel of markers (GPC3, HSP70, GS) for the diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis with a small (5-20 mm) nodule detected by ultrasound screening., Methods: Sixty patients with cirrhosis with a single nodule 5-20 mm newly detected by ultrasound were included in the study. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance and fine needle biopsy of the nodule (gold standard) were performed; the biopsy was repeated in case of diagnostic failures. Three consecutive sections of the first biopsy sample with meaningful material were stained with antibodies against GPC3, HSP70 and GS., Results: Forty patients were diagnosed with HCC. The sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis were: GPC3 57.5% and 95%, HSP70 57.5% and 85%, GS 50% and 90%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the different combinations were: GPC3+HSP70 40% and 100%; GPC3+GS 35% and 100%; HSP70+GS 35% and 100%; GPC3+HSP70+GS 25% and 100%. When at least two of the markers were positive (regardless of which), the sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 100%, respectively. Conventional pathological analysis yielded three false negative results, but the addition of this panel only correctly classified one of these cases as HCC., Conclusion: These data within a prospective study establish the clinical usefulness of this panel of markers for the diagnosis of early HCC. However, the panel only slightly increases the diagnostic accuracy in an expert setting.

Background & Aims: To prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of the incorporation of additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in those based on contrast enhancement pattern for the diagnosis of solitary nodules between 5 and 20mm, detected during surveillance in patients with cirrhosis., Methods: Between November 2003 and January 2010, we prospectively included 159 cirrhotic patients with a newly detected solitary nodule between 5 and 20mm in diameter by screening ultrasonography (US). Hepatic MRI and fine-needle biopsy were performed in all patients., Results: Final diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n=103), other malignant lesions (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma/metastases) (n=4), and benign lesions (n=52). The specific enhancement pattern (arterial enhancement followed by washout) yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 58.3% and 96.4%, respectively. Peritumoral capsule was present in 43 HCC and in 2 non-HCC lesions. Intralesional fat was detected in 24 nodules; 5 nodules were non-HCC. Finally, the presence of both capsule and fat was observed in 10 cases, all of them HCC (100% specificity), but all of them also displayed the specific enhancement pattern, thus adding no sensitivity or specificity., Conclusions: Conclusive non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis should be based only on the contrast enhancement pattern, while other characteristics at MRI do not increase the diagnostic accuracy., (Copyright © 2012 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) improves survival of properly selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Drug eluting beads (DEB) provide a calibrated and homogenous procedure while increasing efficacy. Outcome data applying this technology is lacking, and this is instrumental for clinical decision-making and for trial design. We evaluated the survival of HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE following a strict selection (preserved liver function, absence of symptoms, extrahepatic spread or vascular invasion)., Methods: We registered baseline characteristics, the development of treatment-related adverse events, and the overall survival of all HCC patients treated by DEB-TACE from February 2004 to June 2010., Results: One hundred and four patients were treated with DEB-TACE. All but one were cirrhotic, 62.5% HCV+, 95% Child-Pugh A, 41 BCLC-A and 63 BCLC-B. Causes of DEB-TACE treatment in BCLC-A patients were: 35 unfeasible ablation, and six post-treatment recurrences. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, 38 patients had died, two patients had received transplantation and 24 had received sorafenib because of untreatable tumour progression. Median survival of the cohort was 48.6 months (95% CI: 36.9-61.2), while it was 54.2 months in BCLC stage A and 47.7 months in stage B. Median survival after censoring follow-up at time of transplant/sorafenib was 47.7 (95%CI: 37.9-57.5) months., Conclusions: These data validate the safety of DEB-TACE and show that the survival expectancy applying current selection criteria and technique is better than that previously reported. A 50% survival at 4 years should be considered when suggesting treatment for patients fitting into controversial scenarios such as expanded criteria for transplantation/resection for multifocal HCC., (Copyright © 2012 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Imaging techniques play a crucial role in the management of patients with liver cirrhosis in whom a nodular hepatic lesion is detected. The most severe complication of patients with liver cirrhosis is the development of a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the prognosis of the disease depends on the tumoral stage. Surveillance programs based on ultrasonography (US) are recommended in cirrhotic patients with possibility to be treated if an HCC is detected, in order to improve the patient's survival. Nevertheless, early detection and diagnostic confirmation of HCC remains a challenge despite technological advances. The non-invasive criteria to characterize small HCCs in patients with cirrhosis are based on the evaluation of the vascular profile of the lesion. Dynamic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the suitable techniques for this purpose. When diagnosis is not achieved, fine US-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) is indicated. Cellular-MRI contrast agents may have a role in lesions with atypical vascular pattern in which FNB is not feasible. The assessment of the disease extent is another important goal for imaging techniques. Again, dynamic MDCT and dynamic MRI may be used for staging purposes. Although MRI is more accurate in the detection of additional nodules ranging 1-2 cm, both remain relatively insensitive for the detection of tiny satellite nodules below 1 cm. The therapeutic decision can be made in any particular patient on the basis of the tumoral extension, the liver function, and the general status. After curative and palliative therapeutic procedures, the monitoring of the response is mandatory to decide the next approach: to follow-up, to repeat the treatment, to modify the treatment indication, or to suspend the treatment. In this review, we discuss the most recent information on the imaging of HCC.

This addendum is aimed to review and discuss the updated non-invasive diagnostic algorithm recently published by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD)., (Copyright © 2010 SERAM. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a poor prognosis when diagnosed in advanced stages. Patients with cirrhosis of any etiology are a clear risk group. Thus, to improve prognosis, these patients should be included in surveillance programs to detect HCC in the early phases. Ultrasonographic examination is recommended for this purpose. The imaging techniques currently available for characterization of focal liver lesions are dynamic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). MRI and CT are also suitable to determine tumoral extension. This article reviews the role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and study of extension of HCC and in assessment of tumoral response after treatment, according to tumoral stage at diagnosis and the clinical status of the patient., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a tumor with a high incidence and high mortality. These data justify screening programs to enable curative treatments to improve survival rates. Screening the population at risk (mainly patients with cirrhosis of the liver) should include ultrasonographic examination twice yearly. Given the vascular characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma, it can be detected using dynamic techniques (contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, CT, and MRI). In cases in which the enhancement pattern is not characteristic, these techniques should be complemented with lesion biopsy. Once hepatocellular carcinoma is diagnosed, the tumor is staged, and together with the clinical condition of the patient, the stage will determine the most appropriate treatment strategy in each case., (Copyright © 2009 SERAM. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Background: The sole effective option for patients with advanced HCC is sorafenib and there is an urgent need to develop new therapeutic approaches. Immunotherapy is a promising option that deserves major investigation. In this open label, single arm clinical trial, we analyzed the effect of a low dose cyclophosphamide treatment in combination with a telomerase peptide (GV1001) vaccination in patients with advanced HCC., Methods: 40 patients with advanced HCC were treated with 300 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide on day -3 followed by GM-CSF + GV1001 vaccinations on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 15, 22, 36 followed by 4-weekly injections. Primary endpoint of this phase II trial was tumor response; secondary endpoints evaluated were TTP, TTSP, PFS, OS, safety and immune responses., Results: None of the patients had a complete or partial response to treatment, 17 patients (45.9%) demonstrated a stable disease six months after initiation of treatment. The median TTP was 57.0 days; the median TTSP was estimated to be 358.0 days. Cyclophosphamide, GV1001 and GM-CSF treatment were well tolerated and most adverse events, which were of grade 1 or 2, were generally related to the injection procedure and injection site reactions. GV1001 treatment resulted in a decrease in CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells; however, no GV1001 specific immune responses were detected after vaccination., Conclusions: Low dose cyclophosphamide treatment followed by GV1001 vaccinations did not show antitumor efficacy as per tumor response and time to progression. Further studies are needed to analyze the effect of a combined chemo-immunotherapy to treat patients with HCC., Trial Registration: NCT00444782.

This study assesses the magnetic resonance (MR) features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in patients with cirrhosis with specific analysis of the contrast enhancement pattern. Cholangiocarcinoma may show increased contrast uptake in the arterial phase, and, if washout in the delayed venous phase were to be detected, the noninvasive diagnostic criteria proposed in the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines would be refuted. We reviewed the MR findings of 25 patients with cirrhosis with 31 histologically confirmed ICC nodules. Signal intensity on basal T1-weighted and T2-weighted images and characteristics of enhancement after contrast administration on arterial, portal, and delayed phase were registered. Enhancement pattern was defined according to the behavior of the lesions in each phase, and dynamic pattern was described according to the progression of enhancement throughout the different phases. The most frequent pattern displayed by ICC was a progressive contrast uptake (80.6%). Stable contrast enhancement was registered in 19.4%. None of the ICCs showed a washout pattern, a profile that is specific for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The ICC dynamic behavior differed significantly according to tumor size: progressive enhancement pattern was the most frequent (20 of 25 cases) in lesions larger than 20 mm, whereas the stable pattern was mainly identified in nodules smaller than 20 mm. The most characteristic MR contrast pattern in ICC in cirrhosis is a progressive contrast uptake throughout the different phases, whereas contrast washout at delayed phases is not observed. Because stable enhancement pattern without washout also can be registered in small HCC nodules, the evaluation of delayed phase is mandatory for a proper nodule characterization. If washout is not registered, a biopsy should be mandatory for diagnosis.

Background: Evaluation of response to treatment is a key aspect in cancer therapy. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are used in most oncology trials, but those criteria evaluate only unidimensional tumor measurements and disregard the extent of necrosis, which is the target of all effective locoregional therapies. Therefore, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines recommended that assessment of tumor response should incorporate the reduction in viable tumor burden. The current report provides an assessment of the agreement/concordance between both RECIST and the EASL guidelines for the evaluation of response to therapy., Methods: The authors evaluated a cohort of 55 patients within prospective studies, including 24 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and 31 patients who underwent percutaneous ablation (percutaneous ethanol injection [PEI]/radiofrequency [RF]). Triphasic helical computed tomography scans were performed at baseline, at 1 month, and at 3 months after procedure, and 2 independent radiologists evaluated tumor response., Results: Evaluating response according to RECIST criteria, no patients achieved a complete response (CR), 21.8% of patients achieved a partial response (PR) (none in the PEI/RF group), 47.3% of patients had stable disease (SD), and 30.9% of patients had progressive disease (PD). When response was evaluated according to the EASL guidelines, 54.5% of patients achieved a CR, 27.3% of patients achieved a PR, 3.6% of patients had SD, and 14.5% had PD. The kappa coefficient was 0.193 (95% confidence interval, 0.0893-0.2967; P < .0001)., Conclusions: RECIST missed all CRs and underestimated the extent of partial tumor response because of tissue necrosis, wrongly assessing the therapeutic efficacy of locoregional therapies. This evaluation should incorporate the reduction in viable tumor burden as recognized by nonenhanced areas on dynamic imaging studies., ((c) 2008 American Cancer Society.)

This study prospectively evaluates the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of nodules 20 mm or smaller detected during ultrasound (US) surveillance. We included 89 patients with cirrhosis [median age, 65 years; male 53, hepatitis C virus 68, Child-Pugh A 80] without prior hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in whom US detected a small solitary nodule (mean diameter, 14 mm). Hepatic MRI, CEUS, and fine-needle biopsy (gold standard) (FNB) were performed at baseline. Non-HCC cases were followed (median 23 months) by CEUS/3 months and MRI/6 months. FNB was repeated up to 3 times and on detection of change in aspect/size. Intense arterial contrast uptake followed by washout in the delayed/venous phase was registered as conclusive for HCC. Final diagnoses were: HCC (n = 60), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), and benign lesions (regenerative/dysplastic nodule, hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia) (n = 28). Sex, cirrhosis cause, liver function, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were similar between HCC and non-HCC groups. HCC patients were older and their nodules significantly larger (P < 0.0001). First biopsy was positive in 42 of 60 HCC patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of conclusive profile were 61.7%, 96.6%, 97.4%, and 54.9%, for MRI, 51.7%, 93.1%, 93.9%, and 50.9%, for CEUS. Values for coincidental conclusive findings in both techniques were 33.3%, 100%, 100%, and 42%. Thus, diagnosis of HCC 20 mm or smaller can be established without a positive biopsy if both CEUS and MRI are conclusive. However, sensitivity of these noninvasive criteria is 33% and, as occurs with biopsy, absence of a conclusive pattern does not rule out malignancy. These results validate the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) guidelines.

Background/aims: This study assesses the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization using drug eluting beads (DEB), an embolizing device that slowly releases chemotherapy to decrease systemic toxicity., Methods: Twenty-seven Child-Pugh A cirrhotics (76% male, 59% HCV) with untreated large/multifocal HCC received chemoembolization with doxorubicin loaded DEBs at doses adjusted for bilirubin and body surface (range: 47-150 mg). Clinical and analytical data were recorded at 24 and 48 h, 7, 14 and 30 days after first and second TACE. Response rate was assessed by CT at 6 months. Blood samples were obtained in 13 patients at 5, 20, 40, 60, 120 min, 6, 24, 48 and 168 h to determine doxorubicin Cmax and AUC., Results: DEB-TACE was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. Two cases developed liver abscess, one leading to death. Response rate was 75% (66.6% on intention-to-treat). Doxorubicin Cmax and AUC were significantly lower in DEB-TACE patients (78.97+/-38.3 ng/mL and 662.6+/-417.6 ng/mLmin) than in conventional TACE (2341.5+/-3951.9 ng/mL and 1812.2+/-1093.7 ng/mLmin, p=0.00002 and p=0.001, respectively). After a median follow-up of 27.6 months, 1- and 2-year survival is 92.5% and 88.9%, respectively., Conclusions: Chemoembolization using DEBs is an effective procedure with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with SonoVue to evaluate the response to percutaneous treatment (ethanol injection/radiofrequency) of hepatocellular carcinoma in comparison with spiral computed tomography (CT) immediately and 1 month after treatment. Forty-one consecutive cirrhotic patients with early stage tumor (not suitable for resection) were included. Spiral CT and CEUS were performed in all patients before treatment, in the following 24 h, and 1 month later. The results of each examination were compared with the 1-month spiral CT, considered the gold standard technique. The 24-h CEUS and the 24-h spiral CT sensitivity to detect residual disease were 27% and 20%, respectively. The 24-h CEUS and the 24-h spiral CT positive predictive value of persistent vascularization detection were 75% and 66%, respectively. The 1-month CEUS detected partial responses in ten out of 11 cases (91% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 95% accuracy). Spiral CT and CEUS performed in the 24 h following treatment are slightly useful to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. The 1-month CEUS has a high diagnostic accuracy compared with spiral-CT in the usual assessment of percutaneous treatment response.

Outcome predictors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are treated with percutaneous ablation are ill defined, and it is unknown if successful therapy is associated with improved survival. In our study, 282 cirrhotic patients with early nonsurgical HCC were treated with percutaneous ablation during a 15-year period. Single tumors were seen in 244 patients, and 2 to 3 nodules were seen in 38 patients. Initial complete response was achieved in 192 patients and was independently related to the size of the main tumor (P = .015) and tumor stage (P = .0001) (< or =2 cm, 96%; 2.1-3 cm, 78%; >3 cm, 56%; 2-3 nodules, 46%). At the end of follow-up, 80 patients presented sustained complete response. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 87%, 51%, and 27%, respectively. The independent predictors of survival were Child-Turcotte-Pugh class (P = .0001) and initial complete response (P = .006). Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A patients with initial complete response achieved 42% survival at 5 years; this figure increased to 63% in patients with tumors 2 cm or smaller. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that initial complete response to percutaneous ablation is associated with an improved survival in both Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A and B patients with nonsurgical HCC. Accordingly, initial complete tumor necrosis should be considered a relevant therapeutic target irrespective of tumor size and liver function.

Helical computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used for staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prior to curative treatments but underestimate tumor extension in 30% to 50% of cases when compared with pathologic explants. This study compares a new technology, MRI angiography (MRA), with triphasic helical CT in detection of HCC. Fifty cirrhotic patients, 29 with HCC, undergoing liver transplantation were analyzed. MRA was performed with a 3-D breath-hold fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence by using an effective section thickness of 2 to 2.5 mm. The gold standard was the pathologic examination (liver cut into 5-mm slices). One hundred twenty-seven lesions were identified at the explant: 76 HCC, 13 high-grade dysplastic nodules, 31 macroregenerative nodules, 7 hemangiomas. Diameter of the main HCC nodules was 29 +/- 14 mm and 11 +/- 7 mm for the 47 additional nodules. On a per nodule basis, sensitivity of MRA was superior to CT (58/76 [76%] vs. 43/70 [61%], respectively, P =.001). Sensitivity of MRA for detection of additional nodules decreased with size (>20 mm: 6/6 [100%]; 10-20 mm: 16/19 [84%]; <10 mm: 7/22 [32%]) and was superior to CT for nodules 10 to 20 mm (84% vs. 47%, P =.016). Nonspecific hypervascular nodules >5 mm at MRA were HCC in two thirds of the cases. In conclusion, MRA has a high diagnostic accuracy for HCC > or =10 mm and is more sensitive than triphasic helical CT in nodules sized 10 to 20 mm. MRA is the optimal technique for HCC staging prior to curative therapies.

Purpose: We compared the usefulness of Levovist-enhanced power Doppler imaging (PDI) and helical CT in the depiction of tumor vascularity before and after percutaneous ablation of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs)., Methods: Thirty-one cirrhotic patients with solitary unresectable HCCs smaller than 5 cm (mean size, 2.7 +/- 0.8 cm; range, 1.5-5.0 cm) recruited over a 15-month period were treated with percutaneous ethanol injection (n = 9) or radiofrequency ablation (n = 22). PDI, contrast-enhanced PDI (using Levovist), and multiphase contrast-enhanced helical CT were performed before and after percutaneous ablation, and vascularity findings were compared., Results: Levovist significantly increased baseline intratumoral Doppler signals on PDI compared to non-contrast PDI. The most frequent tumor vascularity pattern was heterogeneous (45%). Vascularity was identified in all tumors by both contrast-enhanced PDI and helical CT before ablation. After percutaneous ablation, intratumoral vascularity was detected in 11 tumors by contrast-enhanced PDI and in 15 tumors by CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced PDI in demonstrating intratumoral vascularity, with CT being the gold standard, were 66%, 93%, and 81%, respectively. There was significant agreement between the 2 modalities in the depiction of tumor vascularity after ablation (kappa = 0.6, p = 0.001). However, there were 5 false negatives and 1 false positive with contrast-enhanced PDI. Complete tumor necrosis was achieved in 21 patients (68%)., Conclusions: There was a good concordance between contrast-enhanced PDI and helical CT in the depiction of HCC vascularity before and after percutaneous ablation. However, although contrast-enhanced PDI may be useful for real-time guidance of treatment, its low sensitivity makes it inadequate to accurately assess the completeness of ablation., (Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 31:119-128, 2003)

Background: There is no standard treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Arterial embolisation is widely used, but evidence of survival benefits is lacking., Methods: We did a randomised controlled trial in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma not suitable for curative treatment, of Child-Pugh class A or B and Okuda stage I or II, to assess the survival benefits of regularly repeated arterial embolisation (gelatin sponge) or chemoembolisation (gelatin sponge plus doxorubicin) compared with conservative treatment. 903 patients were assessed, and 112 (12%) patients were finally included in the study. The primary endpoint was survival. Analyses were by intention to treat., Findings: The trial was stopped when the ninth sequential inspection showed that chemoembolisation had survival benefits compared with conservative treatment (hazard ratio of death 0.47 [95% CI 0.25-0.91], p=0.025). 25 of 37 patients assigned embolisation, 21 of 40 assigned chemoembolisation, and 25 of 35 assigned conservative treatment died. Survival probabilities at 1 year and 2 years were 75% and 50% for embolisation; 82% and 63% for chemoembolisation, and 63% and 27% for control (chemoembolisation vs control p=0.009). Chemoembolisation induced objective responses sustained for at least 6 months in 35% (14)of cases, and was associated with a significantly lower rate of portal-vein invasion than conservative treatment. Treatment allocation was the only variable independently related to survival (odds ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.25-0.81], p=0.02)., Interpretation: Chemoembolisation improved survival of stringently selected patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an alternative to percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) for single nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is currently used as adjuvant therapy before liver transplantation. This phase II study assesses the treatment-related complications and response rate of RF for the treatment of single HCC < or = 5 cm. Percutaneous RF was performed under conscious sedation and ultrasound (US) guidance with an electrical generator connected to a single cooled-tip electrode. Neoplastic cells in peripheral blood (reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for alpha fetoprotein [AFP] messenger RNA) were analyzed before and after RF. Treatment response was assessed by spiral computed tomography (CT) at 1 month and every 3 months by US or spiral CT thereafter. Thirty-two patients (20 men; age 67 +/- 4 years; 78% hepatitis C virus; 24 Child-Pugh A) with a mean tumor size of 2.8 cm (25 patients < or = 3 cm) were treated by RF (1.25 sessions; mean time, 22.1 +/- 2 minutes). Adjuvant PEI was performed in 9 cases. Complete response was achieved in 21 patients (65%), being significantly higher for HCC < or = 3 cm (76% vs. 29%, P = .03). After a median follow-up of 10 months, 8 patients showed treatment-related morbidity. Four of them (12.5%) showed biopsy-proven needle-track seeding detected between 4 to 18 months. Neoplastic seeding was related to subcapsular location (P = .009), poor differentiation degree (P = .02), and baseline AFP levels (P = .02). Thus, RF ablation with cooled-tip needle for HCC is associated with a high risk of neoplastic seeding. Iatrogenic dissemination was related to subcapsular location or an invasive tumoral pattern, and has to be considered when selecting curative treatments for HCC or adjuvant therapies before liver transplantation.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the efficacy of interferon alfa-2b (IFN) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Fifty-eight patients with HCC who were not suitable for resection, transplantation, ethanol injection, or arterial embolization were stratified according to their Okuda stage and randomized to receive IFN (3 x 10(6), 3 times a week, for 1 year) (n = 30) or symptomatic treatment (n = 28). Both groups were identical in terms of age, sex, performance status, presence of constitutional syndrome, Child-Pugh class, Okuda stage, multinodularity, portal thrombosis, and extrahepatic spread. Adhesion to IFN treatment was adequate in 27 patients, with a mean duration of treatment of 8 +/- 3 months. However, IFN treatment was associated with side effects in 23 patients, leading to treatment discontinuation in 13 patients. Two of the 30 patients (6.6%) presented a partial response with greater than 50% size reduction and normalization of alpha-fetoprotein levels. The survival at 1 and 2 years according to intention to treat was not different between the 2 groups (58% and 38% vs. 36% and 12%, respectively, Breslow P =. 19, log rank P =.14) and the absence of difference was maintained when dividing patients according to their Okuda stage. The probability of presenting tumor progression (P =.17), or deterioration of Child-Pugh class (P =.37), performance status (P =. 07), or Okuda stage (P =.44) was not modified by IFN treatment. These results indicate that IFN is not properly tolerated in patients with cirrhosis and advanced HCC and that its administration prompts no benefit in terms of tumor progression rate and survival.

This study analyzed the natural history and prognostic factors of patients with nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Twenty variables from 102 cirrhotic patients with HCC who were not treated within prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) were investigated through uni- and multivariate analyses. None of them was suitable for radical therapies (surgical resection, liver transplantation, or ethanol injection) or presented end-stage disease as reflected by an Okuda stage 3 or a Performance Status >/=3. Sixty-five patients were Child-Pugh A, 34 were B, and 3 were C. Most of them exhibited a preserved Performance Status Test (PST) (0 = 56; 1 = 38; 2 = 8). Tumor was solitary in 26 (

Background & Aims: The progression of hepatocellular carcinoma may be influenced by estrogens. This has offered the rationale for evaluating the therapeutic usefulness of estrogen-receptor blockers; it is being debated whether long-term tamoxifen administration improves survival in patients with this neoplasm. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of tamoxifen administration in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma., Methods: One hundred twenty patients with this neoplasm who were not suitable for surgery, ethanol injection, or transarterial embolization were included in a placebo-controlled trial and randomized to tamoxifen, 20 mg/day per os, (group A, n = 58) or placebo (group B, n = 62). Patients with terminal diseases were excluded., Results: Both groups were similar with regard to sex, age, liver function (Child-Pugh's score, 6.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.4 +/- 1.4), baseline performance status, and tumor stage. Tamoxifen had no antitumoral effect with no differences in the survival between groups (1- and 2-year actuarial rate: group A, 51% and 27%; and group B, 43% and 29%; P = 0.75), even when stratifying patients according to baseline status. Furthermore, there were no differences in the probability of disease progression (P = 0.46) and baseline performance status maintenance (P = 0.93) during follow-up., Conclusions: Tamoxifen has no efficacy in the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background/aims: The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to investigate the need for prophylactic antibiotherapy in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent transarterial embolization and to establish the parameters that determine the development of fever > 38 degrees C after this procedure., Methods: Sixty-one consecutive patients with cirrhosis undergoing 75 procedures were randomized into Group I [(n = 37) allocated to receive prophylactic antibiotics (Cefotaxime + Metronidazole)] and Group II [(n = 38) allocated to receive no antibiotic treatment]., Results: Twelve of the 37 patients (32%) in Group I and 13 of the 38 patients (34%) in Group II developed fever > 38 degrees C after treatment. However, none of them developed bacterial infection, and all biological fluid cultures were negative. A logistic regression analysis disclosed that the obtention of an extensive tumor necrosis was the unique parameter independently associated with the development of fever., Conclusions: Antibiotic prophylaxis is therefore not necessary in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial embolization. The appearance of fever after this procedure does not indicate bacterial infection; it rather represents a clinical marker of extensive tumor necrosis and thus of a favorable response to treatment.