Search

Thyroid immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, their independence from PD-L1 expression and quantitative impact on predicting PD-1 blockade efficacy remain unexplored. This multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal study from Korea included 71 metastatic NSCLC patients who underwent PD-L1 expression and thyroid function testing during PD-1 blockade. Disease progression by the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors was the main outcome. Three-stage analyses were performed: (1) multivariate Cox regression models adjusted for PD-L1 expression according to thyroid irAEs; (2) subgroup analyses; (3) regrouping and comparing predictivity of current and alternative staging. Patients with thyroid irAE + exhibited a longer progression-free survival [7/20 vs. 34/51, adjusted HR 0.19 (0.07-0.47); P < 0.001] than those with thyroid irAE-, independent of PD-L1 expression; the results remained across most subgroups without interaction. The three groups showed different adjusted HR for disease progression (Group 1: PD L1 + and thyroid irAE + ; Group 2: PD-L1 + or thyroid irAE + : 5.08 [1.48-17.34]; Group 3: PD-L1- and thyroid irAE- : 30.49 [6.60-140.78]). Alternative staging (Group 1 in stage IVB → stage IVA; Group 3 in stage IVA → stage IVB) improved the prognostic value (PVE: 21.7% vs. 6.44%; C-index: 0.706 vs. 0.617) compared with the 8th Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging. Our study suggests thyroid irAEs and PD-L1 expression are independent biomarkers that improve predicting PD-1 blockade efficacy in NSCLC. Thyroid irAEs would be helpful to identify NSCLC patients who benefit from PD-1 blockade in early course of treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Optimal treatment for stage IIIA/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab for stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC completely resected after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT)., Materials and Methods: In this open-label, single-center, single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC received adjuvant pembrolizumab for up to 2 years after complete resection following neoadjuvant CCRT. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. As an exploratory biomarker analysis, we evaluated the proliferative response of blood CD39+PD-1+CD8+ T cells using fold changes in the percentage of proliferating Ki-67+ cells from days 1 to 7 of cycle 1 (Ki-67D7/D1)., Results: Between October 2017 and October 2018, 37 patients were enrolled. Twelve (32%) and three (8%) patients harbored EGFR and ALK alterations, respectively. Of 34 patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 assessment, 21 (62%), nine (26%), and four (12%) had a tumor proportion score of < 1%, 1%-50%, and ≥ 50%, respectively. The median follow-up was 71 months. The median DFS was 22.4 months in the overall population, with a 5-year DFS rate of 29%. The OS rate was 86% at 2 years and 76% at 5 years. Patients with tumor recurrence within 6 months had a significantly lower Ki-67D7/D1 among CD39+PD-1+CD8+ T cells than those without (p=0.036). No new safety signals were identified., Conclusion: Adjuvant pembrolizumab may offer durable disease control in a subset of stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients after neoadjuvant CCRT and surgery.

Purpose: Leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) exhibit a high incidence in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) post-treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This investigation evaluates the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of 80 mg once daily osimertinib in patients with LMs resistant to prior first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs., Materials and Methods: In this phase II multicenter, open-label, single-arm study, 80 mg osimertinib was administered to patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had developed LMs subsequent to treatment with prior EGFR TKIs. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), assessed alongside objective response rate by the blinded independent central review (BICR) and a pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the first day of cycles 3 and 6., Results: A total of 73 patients diagnosed with LM were treated with osimertinib, including 64 patients evaluable for the LM efficacy set-T790M negative (n = 62) and T790M positive (n = 2). The median OS in the full-analysis set was 15.6 months (95% CI, 11.5 to 20.2). The objective response rate for LM was 51.6%, including a 15.6% complete response, and the disease control rate was 81.3% by BICR in the LM efficacy evaluable set. The median LM progression-free survival by BICR was 11.2 months (95% CI, 7.7 to 15.3), the duration of response was 12.6 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 17.7), and OS was 15.0 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 18.7). Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the CSF to free plasma osimertinib ratio was 22%. Most safety profiles were grade 1 and 2., Conclusion: The study demonstrates significant intracranial efficacy and survival benefits of 80 mg once daily osimertinib in NSCLC patients with LMs. The data support considering daily 80 mg of osimertinib as a treatment option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LMs, irrespective of T790M mutation status.

Lazertinib is a recently developed third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors used for patients with advanced EGFR T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. We evaluated the effectiveness of lazertinib compared with osimertinib using an external control. We obtained individual patient data for the lazertinib arm from the LASER201 trial and the osimertinib arm from registry data at the Samsung Medical Center. In total, 75 and 110 patients were included in the lazertinib and osimertinib groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, each group had 60 patients and all baseline characteristics were balanced. The median follow-up duration was 22.0 and 29.6 months in the lazertinib and osimertinib group, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) were 76.7% and 86.7% for lazertinib and osimertinib, respectively (p = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.5-19.1) and 14.4 months (95% CI 11.8-18.1) for the lazertinib and osimertinib group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95% CI 0.64-1.45, p = 0.86). The median overall survival with lazertinib was not reached and that with osimertinib was 29.8 months (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.25-0.77, p = 0.005). Our study suggests that lazertinib has an ORR and PFS comparable to those of osimertinib and has the potential for superior survival benefits., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The safety of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has not been thoroughly investigated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) or occult hepatitis B infection (OBI). The authors analyzed the incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation, immune-related hepatitis and jaundice in NSCLC patients in a real-world setting., Methods: A total of 1277 NSCLC patients treated with ICIs were analyzed. Among them, 52 patients were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (+) (group A, CHB), 759 patients were HBsAg (-)/hepatitis B core antibody immunoglobulin G (anti-HBc IgG) (+) (group B, OBI), and 466 patients were HBsAg (-)/anti-HBc IgG (-) (group C). Among the 52 patients with CHB, 38 (73.1%) were receiving antiviral therapy. The primary end point was HBV reactivation, immune-related hepatitis, and jaundice. The secondary end points included other immune-related adverse events and efficacy., Results: HBV reactivation was observed in two patients (0.2%) who were both in group A (CHB). Among CHB patients who were not receiving antiviral therapy, HBV reactivation was observed in 14.3% (2 of 14 patients). The incidences of immune-related hepatitis and jaundice were comparable among the three groups. The incidence of ≥grade 3 other immune-related adverse events and efficacy were all comparable among the three groups (p > .05 for all comparisons)., Conclusions: In this large, real-world cohort study, the safety and efficacy of ICIs were comparable in patients with CHB and OBI. HBV reactivation was observed in patients with CHB without antiviral therapy indicating antiviral prophylaxis should be required for them. For patients with OBI, the risk of HBV reactivation was minimal., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: In the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a driver mutation, the role of anti-PD-(L)1 antibody after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) remains unclear. This randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study evaluates the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (ABCP ) in EGFR- or ALK -mutated NSCLC that progressed before TKI therapy., Materials and Methods: We compared the clinical efficacy of ABCP followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab with pemetrexed plus carboplatin or cisplatin (PC) followed by pemetrexed maintenance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: A total of 228 patients with activating EGFR mutation (n = 215) or ALK translocation (n = 13) were enrolled from 16 sites in the Republic of Korea and randomly assigned at 2:1 ratio to either ABCP (n = 154) or PC arm (n = 74). The median follow-up duration was 26.1 months (95% CI, 24.7 to 28.2). Objective response rates (69.5% v 41.9%, P < .001) and median PFS (8.48 v 5.62 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.86]; P = .004) were significantly better in the ABCP than PC arm. PFS benefit increased as PD-L1 expression increased, with an HR of 0.47, 0.41, and 0.24 for PD-L1 ≥1%, ≥10%, and ≥50%, respectively. Overall survival was similar between ABCP and PC arm (20.63 v 20.27 months, HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.46]; P = .975). The safety profile of the ABCP arm was comparable with that previously reported, with no additional safety signals, but higher rates of treatment-related adverse events were observed compared with the PC arm., Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study is the first randomized phase III study to demonstrate the clinical benefit of anti-PD-L1 antibody in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with EGFR- or ALK -mutated NSCLC who have progressed on relevant targeted therapy.

Objectives: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutation or ALK fusion have achieved significant survival benefit with targeted agents. In contrast, EGFR-wild type and ALK negative lung adenocarcinoma still have poor survival outcome. This study assessed the impact of participating in clinical trials on clinical outcomes in patients with EGFR-wild-type and ALK-negative lung adenocarcinoma., Materials and Methods: This study included patients with advanced EGFR-wild-type and ALK-negative lung adenocarcinoma who received systemic treatment between March 2017 and June 2022. We compared clinical outcomes between patients who participated in clinical trials and those treated with standard-of-care (SOC) using propensity score matching (PSM)., Results: Overall, 1,686 patients with EGFR-wild-type and ALK-negative advanced lung adenocarcinoma were included in the final analysis. Of these, 1,380 (81.9 %) received SOC only and 306 (18.1 %) patients were enrolled in at least one clinical trial during their cancer journey. After PSM (1:1), 612 patients were matched to the SOC (n = 306) and clinical trial (n = 306) groups. Among those who participated in clinical trials, 27.8 % and 72.2 % were included in clinical trials involving targeted therapy and immunotherapy respectively. In the clinical trial group, more patients received targeted therapy (31.7 % vs. 5.5 %, p < 0.001) and immunotherapy (88.6 % vs. 62.8 %, p < 0.001) compared to the SOC group. The median overall survival was 17.1 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 13.2-21.4) in the SOC group and 27.3 months (95 % CI, 22.1-32.4) in the clinical trial group (hazard ratio = 0.71, [95 % CI, 0.58-0.88, P = 0.002])., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that participating in clinical trials resulted in a survival benefit that reduced the risk of death by 29.6% compared to receiving SOC in EGFR-wild-type and ALK-negative lung adenocarcinoma., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: MJ Ahn reports grants and personal fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Roche, outside of the submitted work. JS Ahn reports personal fees from Amgen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Menarini, Roche, Eisai, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS-Ono, MSD, Janssen, and Samsung Bioepis, outside of the submitted work. S-H Lee reports grants and personal fees from MSD, Novartis, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Roche, outside of the submitted work. JM sun reports grants and personal fees from MSD, outside of the submitted work. HA Jung reports grants and personal fees from Yuhan outside of the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Importance: Valuable evidence regarding clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited to individual hospital databases or national-level registries. The common data and federated analysis framework developed through the Extensible Platform for Observational Research in Lung Cancer (EXPLORE-LC) initiative allows for research across multiple high-quality data sources, which may provide a deeper understanding of the NSCLC landscape and identification of unmet needs of subpopulations., Objective: To describe clinical characteristics, initial treatment patterns, subsequent treatment, and overall survival (OS) of patients with NSCLC in South Korea., Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study included patients aged 18 years and older who were diagnosed with NSCLC between 2014 and 2019 and followed up until March 2020 at 3 tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Clinical data were collected using a common data model and clinical data warehouse. Patients who had an initial diagnosis of nonsquamous (NSQ) or squamous (SQ) NSCLC and who had received at least 1 treatment for NSCLC were included in the study. Data were analyzed from June through November 2022., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was clinical OS for patients with NSCLC. Secondary outcomes were clinical characteristics and treatment patterns subsequent to the diagnosis of NSCLC., Results: Among 22 101 patients with NSCLC who received anticancer treatment analyzed in this study, 17 350 patients (78.5%) had NSQ and 4751 patients (21.5%) had SQ NSCLC. Clinical characteristics and outcomes and treatment patterns were assessed for 13 084 patients with NSQ cancer who had known EGFR and ALK status (75.4%; mean [SD] 62.2 [10.5] years; 6552 males [50.1%]) and all 4751 patients with SQ cancer (mean [SD] age, 67.1 [8.6] years; 4427 males [93.2%]). More than half of patients with NSQ cancer were never smokers (7399 patients [56.6%]). Patients with SQ cancer were mostly males and former or current smokers (4235 patients [89.1%]) and were diagnosed at a later clinical stage than patients with NSQ cancer (eg, stage I: 1165 patients [24.5%] vs 5388 patients [41.2%]). Patients with EGFR-positive and ALK-positive NSQ cancer diagnosed between 2017 and 2019 had better median OS than similar patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2016 (EGFR-positive: not reached [95% CI, 35.9 months to not reached] vs 28.4 months [95% CI, 25.8 to 30.0 months]; P < .001; ALK-positive: not reached [95% CI, not reached] vs 49.5 months [95% CI, 35.1 months to not reached]; P < .001). No significant difference was observed in OS from first-line treatment for patients with SQ cancer., Conclusions and Relevance: This study, which pooled medical data from multiple clinical data warehouses to produce a large study cohort, may provide meaningful insights into the clinical practice of NSCLC and underscores the value of a common data model approach. The analyzable dataset may hold great promise for future comprehensive identification of subpopulations and unmet needs.

Purpose: Alectinib and brigatinib are second-generation anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinases (ALKs) that are widely used as first-line therapy for treating ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the lack of a head-to-head comparison of these drugs as first-line therapies, this retrospective observational study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of alectinib and brigatinib., Materials and Methods: Patients who received alectinib or brigatinib as the first-line treatment for ALK-positive advanced NSCLC were evaluated for clinical outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), intracranial ORR, time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles., Results: Of 208 patients who received either alectinib or brigatinib as a first-line treatment, 176 received alectinib and 32 received brigatinib. At the data cutoff point, the median follow-up duration was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7 to 18.3) in the brigatinib group and 27.5 months (95% CI, 24.6 to 30.4) in the alectinib group. The ORR was 92.5% with alectinib and 93.8% for brigatinib. The intracranial ORR rates were 92.7% (38/41) and 100% (10/10), respectively. The rate of PFS at 12 months was comparable between the alectinib group and the brigatinib groups (84.4% vs. 84.1%, p=0.64), and the median TTNT, PFS, and OS were not reached in either group. Treatment-related adverse events were usually mild, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was rare (alectinib 4.5% vs. brigatinib 6.25%)., Conclusion: Alectinib and brigatinib had similar clinical benefits when used as the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement in the real world.

Purpose: Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene rearrangement is a well-known driver event in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib is a selective inhibitor of RET kinase and has shown efficacy in oncogenic RET-altered tumors. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of expanded access program (EAP) use of pralsetinib in pretreated, advanced NSCLC patients with RET rearrangement., Materials and Methods: Patients who received pralsetinib as part of the EAP at Samsung Medical Center were evaluated through a retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) ver. 1.1 guidelines. Secondary endpoints were duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles., Results: Between April 2020 and September 2021, 23 of 27 patients were enrolled in the EAP study. Two patients who were not analyzed due to brain metastasis and two patients whose expected survival was within 1 month were excluded from the analysis. After a median follow-up period of 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0 to 21.2), ORR was 56.5%, the median PFS was 12.1 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 20.9), and the 12-month OS rate was 69.6%. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were edema (43.5%) and pneumonitis (39.1%). A total of 8.7% of patients experienced extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. TRAEs with a common grade of three or worse were neutropenia (43.5%) and anemia (34.8%). Dose reduction was required in nine patients (39.1%)., Conclusion: Pralsetinib presents a clinical benefit when used in patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC, consistent with a pivotal study.

Introduction: For patients with early stage EGFR-mutant-positive (EGFR-M+) NSCLC, curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is considered the standard of care. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of longitudinal monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a valuable biomarker for early detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) and provides identification of the group at high risk for recurrence in resected stages I to IIIA EGFR-M+ NSCLC., Methods: Between August 2015 and October 2017, a total of 278 patients with curative resected, stages I to IIIA (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh version) common EGFR-M+ NSCLC were analyzed. Radiological follow-up was accompanied with longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA using a droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction from baseline (preoperative), 4 weeks after curative surgery, and follow-up per protocol until 5 years. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) according to the status of ctDNA positivity at landmark points and the sensitivity of longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA., Results: Among 278 patients, preoperative baseline ctDNA was detected in 67 (24%) patients: 23% (stage IA), 18% (IB), 18% (IIA), 50% (IIB), and 42% (IIIA) (p = 0.06). Of patients with baseline ctDNA, 76% (51 of 67) had clearance at 4 weeks after surgery (postoperative). Patients were classified into the following three groups; group A, baseline ctDNA negative (n = 211) versus group B, baseline ctDNA positive but postoperative MRD negative (n = 51) versus group C, baseline ctDNA positive and postoperative MRD positive (n = 16). The 3-year DFS rate was significantly different among the three groups (84% for group A, 78% for group B, and 50% for group C, p = 0.02). After adjusting for clinicopathologic variables, ctDNA still remains an independent risk factor for DFS along with stage (p < 0.001) and micropapillary subtype (p = 0.02). With longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA, MRD was detected before radiological recurrence in 69% of patients with exon 19 deletion and in 20% with L858R mutation., Conclusions: These results suggest that patients with baseline ctDNA-positive or MRD-positive status were associated with poor DFS in curative resected stages I to IIIA EGFR-M+ NSCLC and that longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA, a noninvasive method, might be useful to detect early recurrence before radiological recurrence., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) copy number (CN) alteration as an additional biomarker to standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) in predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in advanced NSCLC., Methods: Before ICI monotherapy, tumor PD-L1 CN alteration (gain, neutral, or loss) was called using whole-exome sequencing data and compared with IHC results (tumor proportion score ≥50, 1-49, or 0). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were correlated with both biomarkers. In addition, the impact of CN alteration was further evaluated in two independent cohorts using next-generation sequencing panel., Results: A total of 291 patients with advanced-stage NSCLC met the study inclusion criteria. Although the IHC classification distinguished the best responsive group (tumor proportion score ≥ 50), the CN-based classification distinguished the worst responsive group (CN loss) from the others (PFS, p = 0.020; overall survival, p = 0.004). After adjusting for IHC results, CN loss was an independent risk factor for progression (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.73, p = 0.049) and death (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.85, p = 0.022). A risk classification system was developed on the basis of IHC and CN profiles, which outperformed the conventional IHC system. In the validation cohorts, CN loss determined by next-generation sequencing panel was independently associated with worse PFS after ICI treatment, revealing its practical value., Conclusions: This is the first study to directly compare CN alterations with IHC results and survival outcomes after anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Tumor PD-L1 CN loss can serve as an adjunct biomarker to predict the lack of response. Prospective studies are required to further validate this biomarker., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) clinically benefits cancer treatment. However, the ICI responses are only achieved in a subset of patients, and the underlying mechanisms of the limited response remain unclear. 160 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) or anti-programmed death ligand-1 (anti-PD-L1) are analyzed to understand the early determinants of response to ICI. It is observed that high levels of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in tumors and plasma of patients are associated with prolonged survival. Further reverse translational studies using murine syngeneic tumor models reveal that soluble ICAM-1 (sICAM-1) is a key molecule that increases the efficacy of anti-PD-1 via activation of cytotoxic T cells. Moreover, chemokine (CXC motif) ligand 13 (CXCL13) in tumors and plasma is correlated with the level of ICAM-1 and ICI efficacy, suggesting that CXCL13 might be involved in the ICAM-1-mediated anti-tumor pathway. Using sICAM-1 alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 enhances anti-tumor efficacy in anti-PD-1-responsive tumors in murine models. Notably, combinatorial therapy with sICAM-1 and anti-PD-1 converts anti-PD-1-resistant tumors to responsive ones in a preclinical study. These findings provide a new immunotherapeutic strategy for treating cancers using ICAM-1., (© 2023 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Purpose: The impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. This study was conducted to investigate the clinical outcomes and recurrence patterns after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with unresectable stage III non-squamous-cell lung cancer according to EGFR mutation status., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 604 patients with pathologically confirmed stage III NSCLC who were treated with definitive CRT and were examined for EGFR mutation at Samsung Medical Center, Korea, from January 2013 to December 2018. Among them, we identified 236 patients with stage III non-squamous-cell lung cancer who were treated with definitive CRT and were examined for EGFR mutation status. We analyzed the frequency of EGFR mutation, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and recurrence pattern., Results: Among 236 patients, EGFR mutation was detected in 71 patients (30.1%) and the median follow-up duration was 41.7 months. There were no significant differences in PFS (9.9 vs. 10.9 months, p=0.236), and ORR to CRT (93.0% vs. 90.3%, p=0.623) according to EGFR mutation status. However, the EGFR mutant group showed significantly higher recurrence (88.7% vs. 75.2%, p=0.022), distant metastasis (76.1% vs. 61.2%, p=0.036) rates, especially brain (38.0% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), and better median OS (59.2 vs. 41.3 months, p=0.037) compared with patients without EGFR mutation., Conclusion: Patients with EGFR mutation-positive unresectable stage III non-squamous lung cancer exhibited higher recurrence and distant metastasis rates, especially brain metastasis.

Purpose: Brain metastasis is common in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at initial presentation. A previous study showed that brain radiotherapy (RT) before first-generation (first-G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is associated with longer overall survival than TKI therapy alone. However, there is no data regarding the role of additional brain RT before afatinib therapy., Materials and Methods: Between October 2014 and June 2019, EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases who started first-G EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib) or afatinib as first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. This study compared overall survival and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who received EGFR-TKIs alone and EGFR-TKIs with brain RT and either a first-G EGFR-TKI or afatinib, respectively., Results: The median follow-up duration was 29.6 months (range, 1.5 to 116.9 months). In the first-G EGFR-TKI group (n=155), 94 patients (60.6%) received the first-G EGFR-TKI alone and 61 patients (39.4%) received brain RT prior to their first-G EGFR-TKI. In the afatinib group (n=204), 126 patients (61.8%) received afatinib alone and 78 patients (38.2%) received brain RT prior to afatinib. There was no difference in overall survival rates between the groups with RT (35.6 months: 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.9 to 43.3) and without RT (31.4 months: 95% CI, 23.9 to 38.9) in the afatinib group (p=0.58), but there was a significant difference in overall survival in the first-G EGFR-TKI group in a manner favoring additional brain RT (41.1 months: 95% CI, 30.5 to 51.7 vs. 25.8 months: 95% CI, 20.1 to 31.5; p=0.02). Meanwhile, median intracranial PFS was not different between patients who received EGFR-TKI therapy alone vs. EGFR-TKI therapy with brain RT in both the first-G EGFR-TKI (p=0.39) and afatinib (p=0.24) groups., Conclusion: Afatinib therapy alone showed comparable survival outcomes to those of afatinib with brain RT. The current study suggests that brain RT could be an optional, not mandatory, treatment modality when afatinib therapy is considered in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Importance: Over the past 10 years, treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been continually revolutionized. However, standard clinical trials may not reflect current multiple lines of treatment and corresponding outcomes in a timely manner., Objective: To investigate outcomes associated with new treatment of NSCLC in a clinical setting., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients with NSCLC between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2020, who received any anticancer treatment at Samsung Medical Center in Korea. Data were analyzed from November 2021 through February 2022., Exposures: Clinical and pathological stage, histology, and major druggable sequence variation, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS1, RET, MET exon 14 skipping, BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, and NTRK between 2 periods (period I: 2010-2015 vs period II: 2016-2020)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the 3-year survival rate of NSCLC. Secondary outcomes included median overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence-free survival., Results: Among 21 978 patients with NSCLC (median [range] age at diagnosis, 64.1 [57.0-71.0] years; 13 624 males [62.0%]), there were 10 110 patients in period I and 11 868 patients in period II; adenocarcinoma (AD) was the predominant histology (7112 patients [70.3%] in period I and 8813 patients [74.3%] in period II). There were 4224 never smokers [41.8%] in period I and 5292 never smokers [44.6%] in period II. Compared with patients in period I, patients during period II were more likely to undergo molecular tests in the AD (5678 patients [79.8%] vs 8631 patients [97.9%]) and non-AD (1612 of 2998 patients [53.8%] and 2719 of 3055 patients [89.0%]) groups. In patients with AD in period I, 3-year survival rates were 92.8% (95% CI, 91.8%-93.7%), 72.4% (95% CI, 68.3%-76.8%), 56.7% (95% CI, 53.4%-60.2%), and 28.7% (95% CI, 27.0%-30.4%) for stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. In period II, 3-year survival rates of patients with AD were 95.1% (95% CI, 94.4%-95.9%), 82.5% (95% CI, 79.1%-86.1%), 65.1% (95% CI, 61.8%-68.6%), and 42.4% (95% CI, 40.3%-44.7%) for each stage, respectively. In patients without AD, 3-year survival rates were 72.0% (95% CI, 68.8%-75.3%), 60.0% (95% CI, 56.2%-64.1%), 38.9% (95% CI, 35.6%-42.5%), and 9.7% (95% CI, 7.9%-12.1%) for each stage in period I. In period II, the 3-year survival rates of patients without AD were 79.3% (95% CI, 76.3%-82.4%), 67.3% (95% CI, 62.8%-72.1%), 48.2% (95% CI, 44.5%-52.3%), and 18.1% (95% CI, 15.1%-21.6%) for each stage., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 10 years of clinical data, survival outcomes were improved across all stages, with larger increases in patients with stage III to IV disease. The incidence of never-smokers and the use of molecular testing increased.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an essential treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, the tumor-related intrinsic factors in response to ICIs have mostly been elucidated in tissue samples. However, tissue immune status and changes in the immune microenvironment can also be reflected and monitored through peripheral blood., Methods: Single-cell RNA and T cell receptor (scTCR) sequencing were conducted using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 60 patients with stage IV NSCLC. Those samples were prospectively acquired from patients treated with anti-PD(L)-1 therapy for advanced lung cancer. Based on the clinical outcomes, samples were classified as durable clinical benefit (DCB) and non-durable clinical benefit (NCB). The samples constituted paired longitudinal samples, consisting of pre-treatment and on-treatment. Additionally, PBMC samples from 60 healthy donors from the Asian Immune Diversity Atlas project were used as a control., Results: The dynamic changes in major cell types between pre-treatment and on-treatment PBMCs were associated with an increase in proliferating T cells and NK cells in both DCB and NCB groups. Among T cell subtypes, effector memory CD8 + T cells (CD8 + T EM &#95;GZMK&#95;PDCD1) were increased after ICI treatment in both DCB and NCB. From the lineage trajectory analysis, effector memory CD8 + T cells resided at the bifurcation point, which has the potential to differentiate into lineages with precursor exhausted CD8 + T cells (CD8 + T CM cells) assumed to be related to the ICI response. From the scTCR-seq, effector memory CD8 + T cells along with T cells recognizing unknown antigen expanded and composed of novel clones skewed toward dysfunctional status, especially in on-treatment samples of the DCB group. The extent of immunophenotype conversion capabilities of the TCR with effector memory CD8 + T cells showed remarkable variation in the on-treatment sample in the DCB group., Conclusion: A transitioning T cell subtype identified in PBMCs might be related to the prolonged ICI response. From our study, expansion of effector memory CD8 + T cells with novel TCRs in PBMCs after ICI treatment could contribute to a better clinical outcome in patients with NSCLC. This proof-of-concept research strengthens the use of non-invasive PBMCs in studying systemic changes of immune reactions related to the ICI treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: S-HL reports grants and personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. W-YP is a founder and CEO of Geninus Inc. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Associations between immunosenescence and radiation pneumonitis (RP) are largely unknown. We aimed to identify a peripheral blood T cell senescence biomarker to predict RP in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods and Materials: Patients with locally advanced NSCLC who received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) were prospectively registered (cohort 1, n=23; cohort 2, n=31). Peripheral blood was collected at baseline, during dCRT, and at 1 month post-dCRT. Patients were dichotomized to grade ≥2 (G2+) RP and grade 0-1 (G0-1) RP. Flow cytometry was performed to assess phenotypes and functional properties of T cell subsets. RP incidence was estimated via competing risk analysis., Results: Five and six patients exhibited G2+ RP following dCRT in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Patients with G2+ RP exhibited a more aged T cell pool and higher frequencies of senescent CD57 + CD28 - CD8 + T cells than patients with G0-1 RP at baseline, during dCRT, and at 1 month post-dCRT. These senescent cells exhibited increased granzyme B, IFN-γ, and TNF-α production. Higher baseline frequency of CD57 + CD28 - CD8 + T cells was an independent predictor of G2+ RP (hazard ratio, 8.42; 95% confidence interval, 2.58-27.45; P<0.001). Recursive partitioning analysis revealed three distinct risk groups stratified by baseline CD57 + CD28 - CD8 + T cell frequency and lung V 20 Gy , with 1-year cumulative G2+ RP incidences of 50.0%, 16.7%, and 0% for high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups, respectively (P=0.002)., Conclusions: Higher baseline frequencies of CD57 + CD28 - CD8 + T cells correlated with increased G2+ RP risks. Our results suggest the need for further investigation of the role of T cell senescence on radiation-induced organ damage., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In early-stage, EGFR mutation-positive (EGFR-M+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgery remains the primary treatment, without personalized adjuvant treatments. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) to suggest personalized adjuvant strategies in resected early-stage EGFR-M+ NSCLC., Experimental Design: From January 2008 to August 2020, a total of 2,340 patients with pathologic stage (pStage) IB-IIIA, non-squamous NSCLC underwent curative surgery. To identify clinicopathologic risk factors, 1,181 patients with pStage IB-IIIA, common EGFR-M+ NSCLC who underwent surgical resection were analyzed. To identify molecular risk factors, comprehensive genomic analysis was conducted in 56 patients with matched case-controls (pStage II and IIIA and type of EGFR mutation)., Results: Median follow-up duration was 38.8 months (0.5-156.2). Among 1,181 patients, pStage IB, II, and IIIA comprised 577 (48.9%), 331 (28.0%), and 273 (23.1%) subjects, respectively. Median RFS was 73.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 62.1-84.9], 48.7 months (95% CI, 41.2-56.3), and 22.7 months (95% CI, 19.4-26.0) for pStage IB, II, and IIIA, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic risk factors, pStage, micropapillary subtype, vascular invasion, and pleural invasion, and pathologic classification by cell of origin (type II pneumocyte-like tumor cell vs. bronchial surface epithelial cell-like tumor cell) were associated with RFS. As molecular risk factors, the non-terminal respiratory unit (non-TRU) of the RNA subtype (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.72-7.09; P < 0.01) and TP53 mutation (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.24-5.04; P = 0.01) were associated with poor RFS independent of pStage II or IIIA. Among the patients with recurrence, progression-free survival of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in those with the Apolipoprotein B mRNA Editing Catalytic Polypeptide-like (APOBEC) mutation signature was inferior compared with that of patients without this signature (8.6 vs. 28.8 months; HR, 4.16; 95% CI, 1.28-13.46; P = 0.02)., Conclusions: The low-risk group with TRU subtype and TP53 wild-type without clinicopathologic risk factors might not need adjuvant EGFR-TKIs. In the high-risk group, with non-TRU subtype and/or TP 53 mutation, or clinicopathologic risk factors, a novel adjuvant strategy of EGFR-TKI with others, e.g., chemotherapy or antiangiogenic agents needs to be investigated. Given the poor outcome to EGFR-TKIs after recurrence in patients with the APOBEC mutation signature, an alternative adjuvant strategy might be needed., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Patients with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC) inevitably acquire resistance to ALK inhibitors. Longitudinal monitoring of cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) could predict the response and resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in ALK+ NSCLC., Methods: Patients with ALK+ NSCLC determined by standard tissue testing and planned to undergo TKI therapy were prospectively recruited. Plasma was collected at pretreatment, 2 months-post therapy, and at progression for cfDNA-NGS analysis, Guardant 360., Results: Among 92 patients enrolled, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was detected in 69 baseline samples (75%): 43 ALK fusions (62.3%) and two ALK mutations without fusion (2.8%). Two patients showed ALK-resistance mutations after ceritinib; G1202R, and co-occurring G1202R and T1151R. Eight patients developed ALK resistance mutations after crizotinib therapy; L1196M (n = 5), G1269A (n = 1), G1202R (n = 1), and co-occurring F1174L, G1202R, and G1269A (n = 1). Absence of ctDNA at baseline was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS; median 36.1 vs. 11.4 months, p = 0.0049) and overall survival (OS; not reached vs. 29.3 months, p = 0.0200). ctDNA clearance at 2 months (n = 29) was associated with significantly longer PFS (25.4 vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.0012) and OS (not reached vs. 26.1 months, p = 0.0307) than those without clearance (n = 22). Patients with co-occurring TP53 alterations and ALK fusions at baseline (n = 16) showed significantly shorter PFS (7.28 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.0307) than those without TP53 alterations (n = 25)., Conclusions: cfDNA-NGS facilitates detection of ALK fusions and resistance mutations, assessment of prognosis, and monitoring dynamic changes of genomic alterations in ALK+ NSCLC treated with ALK-TKI., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Vascular endothelial growth factor promotes an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that can be reverted by an antiangiogenic therapy. This two-stage, phase 2 study aimed to determine the treatment efficacy of adding bevacizumab to atezolizumab in patients with metastatic NSCLC whose disease had progressed after atezolizumab monotherapy., Methods: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive patients with NSCLC, without EGFR or ALK alterations, whose disease progressed after at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. The patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg once every 3 weeks until radiographic progression (stage I). Then, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was combined with atezolizumab 1200 mg once every 3 weeks (stage II). The primary end point was the disease control rate (DCR) confined to stage II., Results: A total of 42 and 24 patients were enrolled in stages I and II, respectively. Most patients had negative programmed death ligand-1 expression (71.4%) and received one or two lines of therapy (95.2%). In stage I, patients achieved a DCR of 35.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.6-52.0). In stage II, three (12.5%) and 18 (75.0%) of 24 patients had partial response and stable disease, respectively, leading to a DCR of 87.5% (95% CI: 67.6-97.3). For 24 patients enrolled in stage II, the median progression-free survival was 5.6 (95% CI: 4.1-7.1) months and the overall survival was 14.0 (95% CI: 10.7-17.4) months. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25% of the patients in stage II, but all were of grade 1 or 2., Conclusions: Combination of bevacizumab plus atezolizumab for patients with metastatic NSCLC whose disease had progressed after atezolizumab monotherapy was found to have a promising antitumor activity with good tolerability., (Copyright © 2022 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Biomarkers on the basis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are potentially valuable in predicting the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, clinical application remains challenging because of methodologic limitations and laborious process involved in spatial analysis of TIL distribution in whole-slide images (WSI)., Methods: We have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered WSI analyzer of TIL in the tumor microenvironment that can define three immune phenotypes (IPs): inflamed, immune-excluded, and immune-desert. These IPs were correlated with tumor response to ICI and survival in two independent cohorts of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Results: Inflamed IP correlated with enrichment in local immune cytolytic activity, higher response rate, and prolonged progression-free survival compared with patients with immune-excluded or immune-desert phenotypes. At the WSI level, there was significant positive correlation between tumor proportion score (TPS) as determined by the AI model and control TPS analyzed by pathologists ( P < .001). Overall, 44.0% of tumors were inflamed, 37.1% were immune-excluded, and 18.9% were immune-desert. Incidence of inflamed IP in patients with programmed death ligand-1 TPS at < 1%, 1%-49%, and ≥ 50% was 31.7%, 42.5%, and 56.8%, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 4.1 months and 24.8 months with inflamed IP, 2.2 months and 14.0 months with immune-excluded IP, and 2.4 months and 10.6 months with immune-desert IP., Conclusion: The AI-powered spatial analysis of TIL correlated with tumor response and progression-free survival of ICI in advanced NSCLC. This is potentially a supplementary biomarker to TPS as determined by a pathologist., Competing Interests: Sehhoon ParkStock and Other Ownership Interests: Lunit Chan-Young OckEmployment: LunitLeadership: LunitStock and Other Ownership Interests: Lunit, Medpacto, Y-BiologicsConsulting or Advisory Role: Medpacto, Y-Biologics, Idience Sergio PereiraEmployment: LunitStock and Other Ownership Interests: Lunit Seonwook ParkEmployment: LunitStock and Other Ownership Interests: LunitResearch Funding: Lunit Minuk MaEmployment: LunitStock and Other Ownership Interests: Lunit Seunghwan ShinEmployment: LunitStock and Other Ownership Interests: Lunit Jaehong AumEmployment: LunitStock and Other Ownership Interests: Lunit Kyunghyun PaengEmployment: LunitLeadership: LunitStock and Other Ownership Interests: Lunit Donggeun YooEmployment: LunitLeadership: LunitStock and Other Ownership Interests: LunitPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Having several patents about medical AI developments in Lunit Inc Se Hyun KimConsulting or Advisory Role: Ono Pharmaceutical Jin Seok AhnHonoraria: Pfizer, Roche, BC World, Yuhan, Hanmi, Novartis, JW Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Boehringer IngelheimConsulting or Advisory Role: Bixink, Bayer, Yooyoung Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Pharmbio Korea, Vifor Pharma Myung-Ju AhnHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Takeda, Alpha Pharmaceutical Keunchil ParkConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Merck KGaA, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, JNJ, Geinus, IMBdxSpeakers' Bureau: Boehringer IngelheimResearch Funding: AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology Sang Yong SongEmployment: AstraZeneca/MedImmuneLeadership: AstraZeneca/MedImmuneStock and Other Ownership Interests: AstraZeneca/MedImmune Yung-Jue BangConsulting or Advisory Role: BeiGene, Green Cross, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Novartis, MSD Oncology, Hanmi, Genentech/Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Samyang, Alexo TherapeuticsResearch Funding: AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), MSD (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst), Bayer (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Takeda (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Curis (Inst), GC Pharma (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Genexine (Inst) Yoon-La ChoiResearch Funding: Bayer Tony S. MokEmployment: The Chinese University of Hong KongLeadership: Sanomics Limited, AstraZeneca, Hutchison China Meditech, Aurora Tele-Oncology Platform, LunitStock and Other Ownership Interests: Sanomics Limited, Hutchison China Meditech, Aurora Tele-Oncology PlatformHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Alpha Biopharma, ACEA Pharmaceutical Research, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB Japan, Fishawack Facilitate, InMed, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Origimed, Pfizer, Prime Oncology, Roche, Sanofi Aventis GmbH, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Lucence Health Inc, Medscape, P. Permanyer SL, PeerVoice, Physicans' Education Resource, Research to Practice, Shanghai BeBirds Translation & Consulting Co, Liangyihui Network Technology Co., LtdConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, ACEA Pharmaceutical Research, Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Berry Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB Japan, Eisai, Fishawack Facilitate, Gritstone Oncology, Guardant Health, Hengrui Therapeutics, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, IQvia, Lilly, Loxo, Lunit, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group, Takeda, Vertex, Yuhan, Qiming Development (HK) LtdResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Novartis (Inst), SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group (Inst), Roche (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Xcovery (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst), Takeda (Inst) Se-Hoon LeeHonoraria: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MerckConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, RocheResearch Funding: MerckTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: NovartisNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: Although programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have shown survival benefits in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most patients progress. This study evaluated whether continuing pembrolizumab with additional chemotherapy after failure of prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor extends survival., Patients and Methods: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase II study enrolled patients with NSCLC who received one or two cytotoxic chemotherapy, including at least one platinum-doublet regimen, and progressed on second- or third-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy as the last systemic therapy. Patients were randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab or placebo plus chemotherapy, stratified by histology and clinical outcomes to prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: A total of 98 patients were randomized to the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (N = 47) and placebo-chemotherapy arm (N = 51). At the median follow-up duration of 10.5 months, there was no statistical difference in PFS [median 4.1 months vs. 5.9 months; HR = 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.62; P = 0.78) and overall survival (median 11.5 months vs. 12.0 months; HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.66-1.83; P = 0.73) between the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy and placebo-chemotherapy arms. In a subgroup with PD-L1 expression in ≥50% of tumor cells and favorable clinical outcomes to prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor (partial response or 6 months or longer of stable disease), the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy arm showed a higher 24-month survival rate than the placebo-chemotherapy arm (74% vs. 38%; HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.13-2.1; P = 0.34)., Conclusions: This study did not show a survival benefit with the continuation of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in patients whose NSCLC progressed on second- or third-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. See related commentary by Tseng and Gainor, p. 2206., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly improves survival in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, the optimal sequence for CRT and immune checkpoint inhibitors has not yet been established. We investigated the dynamics of peripheral blood immune cells during CRT to determine the best sequence for treatment., Methods and Materials: Peripheral blood samples were prospectively collected pretreatment, weekly during CRT for 6 weeks, and 1 month posttreatment in 24 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received definitive CRT. Immune cell analysis was performed by flow cytometry. Ex vivo PD-1 blockade assays were performed by IFN-γ intracellular cytokine staining., Results: Lymphopenia was prominently observed during CRT and mostly recovered 1 month post-CRT. Robust proliferation of CD8 + T cells was induced, peaking in the last week during CRT and decreasing post-CRT. The robust proliferation of CD8 + T cells led to an increase in the frequency of CD28 - CD57 + replicative senescent and terminally differentiated cells post-CRT. Tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells increased during CRT and peaked in the last week. One month post-CRT, the frequency of tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells decreased and TOX hi TCF1 lo terminally exhausted CD8 + T cells significantly increased. Anti-PD-1-induced functional restoration of PD-1 + CD8 + T cells was maximized in the last week of CRT and significantly decreased post-CRT., Conclusions: The findings suggest that earlier administration of PD-1 blockade may be associated with superior efficacy compared with delayed administration after completion of CRT. These findings provide an immunologic rationale for optimal timing of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with CRT in clinical trials., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with common mutations (Del19 or L858R); however, 7%-23% of NSCLC tumors harbor uncommon EGFR mutations. These mutations are highly heterogeneous, and developments in detection techniques are helping to identify mutations with little or no clinical data., Patients and Methods: In this retrospective, global, multi-center study (NCT04179890), existing health records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (T790M, ex20ins, major uncommon [G719X, L861Q, or S768I], or "other" mutations; compound mutations) treated with erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, or osimertinib in first or second line. Endpoints included time-to-treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Overall, 246 patients (median age: 69.5 years; Asian: 84%) were included from 9 countries. Most patients (92%) received an EGFR TKI as first-line therapy; 54%, 43% and 3% received afatinib, first-generation TKIs, and osimertinib, respectively. Median TTF and OS with EGFR TKIs were 9.9 and 24.4 months; ORR was 43%. In patients treated with first-line chemotherapy (n = 20), median TTF and ORR were 6.6 months and 41%. Outcomes were most favorable in patients with major uncommon or compound mutations. Overall, TTF was 11.3 months with afatinib and 8.8 months with first-generation EGFR TKIs across mutation categories. In most mutation categories, median OS was >2 years., Conclusion: In a real-world setting, EGFR TKIs were the preferred treatment option in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations; strongest outcomes were seen in patients with major uncommon and compound mutations., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Purpose: Metachronous brain-only oligorecurrence in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a rare event with favorable prognosis, but the clinical outcome has not been fully determined. We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in metachronous brain-only oligorecurrence in patients with NSCLC who underwent definitive treatment., Materials and Methods: We reviewed 4,437 NSCLC patients without oncogenic driver mutations who underwent definitive treatment between 2008 and 2018. Among them, we identified 327 patients who developed 1 to 5 brain metastases with or without systemic metastasis. Of the 327 patients, 71 had metachronous brain-only oligorecurrence without extracranial progression and were treated with local therapy to the brain. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and prognostic factors affecting OS were analyzed., Results: The median OS was 38.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8 to 56.1 months) in 71 patients. The 2-year OS rate was 67.8% and the 5-year OS rate was 33.1%. The median PFS was 25.5 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 14.4 months). The longest surviving patient had a survival period of 115 months. Through multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≥ 1 (hazard ratio, 5.33; p=0.005) was associated with poor survival. There was no significant difference in OS between patients with local therapy and those with local plus systemic therapy (18.5 months vs. 34.7 months, p=0.815)., Conclusion: Metachronous brain-only oligorecurrence NSCLC patients who underwent definitive treatment experienced long-term survival with local therapy, highlighting the unique patient population. The role of systemic chemotherapy in this patient population requires further investigation.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard of care for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, optimal sequence of treatment has yet to be defined. Overall survival (OS) is influenced by the availability/use of subsequent therapy after first-line treatment. Emergence of T790M is the main mechanism of resistance to afatinib and second-line osimertinib could be a treatment option in this instance., Methods: In this non-interventional, global study (NCT04179890), existing medical/electronic records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (Del19 or L858R) treated with first-line afatinib and second-line osimertinib in regular clinical practice (n = 191; all T790M-positive). The primary objective was time to treatment failure (TTF). Key secondary objectives were OS and objective response rate (ORR)., Results: At the start of afatinib treatment, median age (range) was 62 years (34-88). Fifty-five percent of patients were female and 67% were Asian. ECOG PS (0/1/≥2) was 31%/57%/12%. Fourteen percent of patients had brain metastases. At the start of osimertinib treatment, ECOG PS (0/1/≥2) was 25%/61%/14% and 14% had brain metastases (rising to 29% at the end of osimertinib treatment). The source of biopsy material (solid/liquid) was 86%/3% at the start of afatinib and 54%/33% at start of osimertinib. Mutations were mainly detected with PCR methods. Overall, median TTF was 27.7 months (95% CI: 24.0-30.2) and median OS was 36.5 months (95% CI: 32.9-41.8). ORR with afatinib and osimertinib was 74% and 45%. TTF, OS and ORR were generally consistent across subgroups., Conclusion: Sequential afatinib and osimertinib demonstrated encouraging activity in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and acquired T790M. Activity was observed across all subgroups, including patients with poor ECOG PS or brain metastases. ECOG PS and incidence of brain metastases remained stable prior to, and after, afatinib treatment., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pralsetinib, an RET inhibitor, has shown a dramatic response in patients with RET fusion- or mutation-positive tumours in previous studies. As a novel target agent, however, the safety of pralsetinib remains to be determined. Herein, we present two cases of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) that developed during pralsetinib therapy., Methods: From April 2020, we administered pralsetinib to a total of 10 patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer under the compassionate use program. We retrospectively analysed the clinical efficacy of and adverse events related to pralsetinib therapy., Results: Of the nine patients with measurable lesions, seven achieved a partial response. Additionally, one patient without measurable lesions also showed a clinical response. As of January 8, 2021, nine patients were still receiving pralsetinib therapy, while only one had discontinued pralsetinib therapy. Most adverse events were mild and manageable. However, two patients experienced extrapulmonary TB shortly after starting pralsetinib. The disease was well controlled with anti-TB medication, and the cancer lesions were managed through ongoing pralsetinib therapy., Conclusion: The development of TB during pralsetinib therapy is worth noting, although further large studies are required to demonstrate definitive relationship between causality and underlying mechanism., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper declared., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Because of the growing number of actionable biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sufficient tissue availability for testing is becoming a greater challenge. Liquid biopsy offers a potential solution by complementing standard tissue-based methods. In this study, the authors analyzed the concordance of actionable genomic alterations sequenced from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA; Guardant360) and tissue (Oncomine Focus Assay)., Methods: From September 2015 to May 2018, 421 paired plasma and tissue samples from patients with advanced NSCLC who had previously undergone tissue testing by standard methods were collected. Both types of samples were available for 287 patients (262 in cohort 1 [treatment-naive] and 25 in cohort 2 [treatment failure]), and only 1 sample type was available for 134 patients (50 in cohort 3 [plasma only] and 84 in cohort 4 [tissue only])., Results: In cohort 1, 198 samples (77.6%) showed concordance between tissue and plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS). Among the discordant cases, plasma testing detected additional genomic alterations in 11 patients (4.2%). In 50 patients without tissue-based NGS results (cohort 3), the ctDNA-based test detected genomic alterations in 20 samples (40.0%). The median allele frequency (AF) of mutations identified with ctDNA-based NGS (0.74%) was lower than that identified with the tissue-based NGS test (13.90%). Clinical responses to matched targeted therapy occurred, regardless of the ctDNA AF. Upfront ctDNA-based testing identified 60.4% of patients with genomic alterations. In addition, ctDNA-based testing uncovered 12.0% more actionable alterations when it was performed after tissue-based NGS testing., Conclusions: The results indicate that a ctDNA-based test identifies additional patients with actionable genomic alterations and could, therefore, be used to complement traditional tissue-based testing for NSCLC., Lay Summary: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing is becoming essential as the number of actionable genomic biomarker increases for the treatment selection of non-small cell lung cancer. This study demonstrates the additive value of ctDNA-based testing in addition to tissue-based NGS and standard of care-based biomarker testing for detecting additional patients with actionable genomic alterations. Clinical responses have also been observed in patients with a low allele frequency detected by ctDNA-based NGS testing., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Introduction: Entrectinib, an oral pan-TRK, ALK, and ROS1 inhibitor is approved as a first-line treatment for NTRK-rearranged solid tumors and ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It has demonstrated clinical efficacy for patients harboring the relevant gene rearrangement in both systemic and intracranial disease, regardless of the tumor type., Areas Covered: In this review, the authors analyzed data from preclinical and clinical studies, the characteristics of entrectinib compared to those of other relevant inhibitors (currently available and/or under investigation), and the emerging resistance mechanisms. The authors then provide the readers with their future perspectives., Expert Opinion: Entrectinib has been well studied across many tumor types, including NSCLC with ALK, ROS1, and NTRK rearrangements. The drug has demonstrated favorable properties with oral administration, prolonged response duration, high intracranial efficacy, and a favorable toxicity profile. However, with acquisition of resistance and the development of newer generation TKIs, the optimal place for entrectinib in the landscape of targeted therapies for NSCLC warrants further validation.

The non-small cell lung cancer with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation eventually acquires resistant to either first or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). As the following option, targeting EGFR T790M with third-generation EGFR TKI is now established as a standard treatment option. In this study, we are reporting the first case of resistance mechanism to the novel third-generation EGFR TKI, lazertinib, which showed promising clinical efficacy in phase 1-2 study. The patients showed resistance to the treatment by acquiring the additional EGFR C797S mutation in cis which is also confirmed from the patient-derived cell lines.

Introduction: Until the recent approval of immunotherapy after completing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), there has been little progress in treating unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This prompted us to search real-world data (RWD) to better understand diagnosis and treatment patterns, and outcomes., Methods: This non-interventional observational study used a unique, novel algorithm for big data analysis to collect and assess anonymized patient electronic medical records from a clinical data warehouse (CDW) over a 10-year period to capture real-world patterns of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of stage III NSCLC patients. We describe real-world patterns of diagnosis and treatment of patients with newly-diagnosed stage III NSCLC, and patients' characteristics, and assessment of treatment outcomes., Results: We analyzed clinical variables from 23,735 NSCLC patients. Stage III patients (N = 4138, 18.2 %) were diagnosed as IIIA (N = 2,547, 11.2 %) or IIIB (N = 1,591. 7.0 %). Treated stage III patients (N = 2530, 61.1 %) had a median age of 64.2 years, were mostly male (78.5 %) and had an ECOG performance status of 1 (65.2 %). Treatment comprised curative-intent surgery (N = 1,254, 49.6 %) with 705 receiving neoadjuvant therapy; definitive CRT (N = 648, 25.6 %); palliative CT (N = 270, 10.7 %), or thoracic RT (N = 170, 6.7 %). Median OS (range) for neoadjuvant, surgery, CRT, palliative chemotherapy, lung RT alone, and supportive care was 49.2 (42.0-56.5), 52.5 (43.1-61.9), 30.3 (26.6-34.0), 14.7 (13.0-16.4), 8.8 (6.2-11.3), and 2.0 (1.0-3.0) months, respectively., Conclusions: This unique in-house algorithm enabled a rapid and comprehensive analysis of big data through a CDW, with daily automatic updates that documented real-world PFS and OS consistent with the published literature, and real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in stage III NSCLC patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JS Ahn reports personal fees from Amgen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Menarini, Roche, Eisai, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS-Ono, MSD, Janssen, and Samsung Bioepis, outside of the submitted work. K Park reports personal fees from Astellas, Astra Zeneca, AMGEN, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis, Eli Lilly, Hanmi, KHK, Merck, MSD, Novartis, ONO, Roche, and BluePrint, outside of the submitted work. S-H Lee reports grants and personal fees from MSD, Novartis, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Roche, outside of the submitted work., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The PACIFIC study demonstrated the benefits of durvalumab consolidation on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, in real-world practice, patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC are heterogeneous with diverse tumor burdens and clinical factors; thus, it is important to examine the effectiveness and side effects of durvalumab when used in real clinical practice., Materials and Methods: We investigated the efficacy of durvalumab consolidation and the incidence of radiation pneumonitis in patients who received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) for unresectable LA-NSCLC in a single institute., Results: Overall, 55.3 % of patients did not meet the criteria of the PACIFIC study; however, they still received consolidation durvalumab in real-world practice. Durvalumab consolidation was associated with favorable PFS in the total population as well as in the subgroup of patients who did not meet the criteria of the PACIFIC study. However, radiation pneumonitis occurred more frequently in the durvalumab group, especially within 3-6 months after CCRT. The incidence of grade 3 radiation pneumonitis was 14.3 % in the durvalumab group versus 2.5 % in the observation group., Conclusions: Durvalumab consolidation was associated with favorable PFS in patients with LA-NSCLC in clinical practice. However, careful selection of candidates for durvalumab treatment and active surveillance and appropriate management for radiation pneumonitis are needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Keunchil Park has an advisor role in this study and received research funding from Astra Zeneca outside of this study., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: We evaluated programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma (PC)., Methods: We created two cohorts of patients diagnosed with pulmonary PC from 2016 to 2019, PD-L1 expression and programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy cohorts. The PD-L1 expression cohort included all patients evaluated for PD-L1 expression, irrespective of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. High PD-L1 expression was defined as ≥50% positive tumour cells (TC) for 22C3, ≥25% for SP263 or ≥10%/5% TC/immune cell (IC) for SP142. The PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy cohort included patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, irrespective of PD-L1 tests., Results: One hundred twenty-five of 175 patients diagnosed with pulmonary PCs were included in the PD-L1 expression cohort. Among them, 112 patients (89.6%) had PD-L1-positive (≥1%) tumours and 100 (80.0%) had tumours with high PD-L1 expression. A total of 49 patients were included in the efficacy cohort: 40 received pembrolizumab, 7 nivolumab and 2 atezolizumab. The objective response rate was 49.0%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.2 months and a median overall survival of 22.2 months. In the efficacy cohort, high PD-L1 expression (n = 41) was associated with longer PFS (median: 7.2 versus 1.5 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53 [0.22-1.29], p = 0.16) and overall survival (median: 22.2 versus 3.5, HR: 0.21 [0.08-0.57], p = 0.001) than low/negative/unknown PD-L1 expression (n = 8)., Conclusion: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors show outstanding efficacy for pulmonary PCs, and this is possibly attributable to high PD-L1 expression in these tumours., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest statement None declared., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Genetic sequencing testing has become widely used to inform treatment decisions for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We analyzed benefits of genetic sequencing testing in real practice., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 209 NSCLC patients who had no EGFR and ALK alterations on routine molecular tests and underwent next-generation targeted DNA sequencing of 380 cancer-related genes between November 2013 and October 2016. Median patient age was 59 years. A total of 96 patients (46%) were never smokers, and 195 patients (93%) had adenocarcinoma., Results: Among 209 total patients, 64 (31%) demonstrated actionable genetic alterations; 20 had EGFR mutations (6 L858R, 8 exon 19 deletions, 1 L861Q, 1 G719S, 4 exon 20 duplications), 4 ALK fusions, 9 ROS1 fusions, 6 BRAF V600E mutations, 15 RET fusions, 1 MET high-level amplification, 6 MET exon 14 skipping mutations, and 3 ERBB2 exon 20 insertion mutations. Of the 64 patients harboring actionable alterations, 28 patients received therapy targeted to their own actionable alterations (15 EGFR, 3 ALK, 1 ROS1, 8 RET, 1 BRAF). There were significant differences in overall survival between individuals with no actionable alterations, those with actionable alterations but no targeted therapy, and those with actionable alterations and targeted therapy (20.1 vs. 17.1 vs. 66.2 months, P < .001)., Conclusion: The results of targeted DNA sequencing testing could provide improved treatment options for some NSCLC patients and result in a survival benefit to NSCLC patients with no EGFR and ALK alterations on routine tests who are treated with targeted therapy., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: MET exon 14 skipping occurs in 3-4% of patients with lung adenocarcinomas. In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of clinical data from Korean non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with MET exon 14 skipping., Patients and Methods: Overall, 1,020 patients diagnosed with NSCLC between January 2015 and July 2017 were analyzed by next-generation sequencing., Results: MET exon 14 skipping was identified in 20 NSCLC patients (1.9%). The median age was 69 years (range=39-86 years), 60.0% were male, and most (55.0%) were ever-smokers. For first-line chemotherapy, the median overall survival was 9.5 months and progression-free survival was 4.0 months, respectively. Twelve patients received pemetrexed-based chemotherapy and the overall response rate was 33.3% (4/12). Among four crizotinib-treated patients, one continued therapy for 8 months with the best response being disease stability., Conclusion: Given the poor clinical outcome and response to therapy for NSCLC, and the availability of promising anti-tumor MET inhibitors, screening for the MET exon 14 skip mutation should be incorporated into clinical practice., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have provided new therapeutic options for non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients. However, due to concerning increases in immune-related adverse events, clinical trials usually exclude patients with special issues such as viral hepatitis, tuberculosis (Tbc), interstitial lung disease (ILD) and autoimmune disease., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of NSCLC patients who received ICIs, and analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with special issues., Results: Between January 2015 and October 2018, 237 patients received ICIs. Of these patients, 26% (61/237) had special issues: 32 had hepatitis B viral (HBV) infections, 20 Tbc, six ILD, one HIV infection, one Behçet's disease and a past HBV infection, and one rheumatoid arthritis. The incidence of hepatitis tended to be higher in patients with HBV infections than in those without (18.8% vs 8.91%, P = .082). Severe hepatitis (grade 3 or higher) was more common in HBV-infected patients (12.5% vs 1.9%, P = .0021), but the AEs were well-managed. During ICI treatment, three of the 20 patients with a history of pulmonary Tbc developed active pulmonary Tbc, considered reactivations. No aggravation of ILD was noted. One RA patient experienced a disease flare and was treated with a low-dose steroid. There was no significant difference in the overall response rate or progression-free survival between patients with and without special issues., Conclusion: Given the relatively low incidence of immune-related AEs and the comparability of clinical outcomes, ICIs can be treatment option of NSCLC patients with special issues., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) alterations are found in approximately 1%-3% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). We evaluated the clinical features and outcomes of NSCLC harboring HER2 alteration detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in Korea., Materials and Methods: A total of 1,108 patients who were diagnosed with NSCLC between December 2015 and December 2017 were screened and analyzed by NGS. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes from various treatments., Results: HER2 alterations were identified in 36 NSCLC patients. Of the patients, 22 (61.1%) had an exon 20 in-frame insertion mutation, 15 (41.7%) had HER2 amplification, and one had both. The median patient age was 58 years, 55.6% were male, and 50.0% were never-smokers. Adenocarcinoma was predominant (88.9%). The most common metastatic site was bone (58.3%), and 66.7% of patients were stage IV at initial diagnosis. Six patients (16.7%) had a coexistent sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, and two patients (5.6%) had anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement. With a median 14 months of follow-up, the median progression-free survival of first-line treatment was 6 months (95% confidence interval, 4.172 to 7.828), and median overall survival was not reached. The proportions of adenocarcinoma, never-smokers, and metastasis to the liver were higher in the exon 20 in-frame insertion mutation group, whereas coexistence of EGFR mutation was more frequently found in the HER2 amplification group., Conclusion: HER2-altered NSCLC showed distinct clinical features. Moreover, different characteristics were identified between the HER2 in-frame insertion mutation group and the HER2 amplification group.

Emerging immune profiling data suggest a higher sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), compared to those without COPD. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of COPD on the treatment response to ICIs in a large number of patients with NSCLC. In total, 133 patients with spirometry test results were retrospectively identified among those who received palliative pembrolizumab for NSCLC. COPD was defined as pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity <0.7. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate were analyzed according to the presence of COPD. Spirometry-based COPD was present in 59 (44%) patients. Patients with COPD had better OS (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.78) and PFS (HR for disease progression or death, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.79) than those without COPD. These associations persisted after adjusting for potential confounders including smoking history. The response rate was also higher in patients with COPD than in those without COPD (38.2% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.028). Spirometry-defined COPD was associated with a significantly longer OS and PFS in patients with NSCLC treated with palliative pembrolizumab. Identifying coexisting COPD could predict favorable treatment outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab., (© 2019 UICC.)

Objectives: Afatinib, a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is used for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are few reports about its resistance mechanisms. The aims of this study are to evaluate resistance mechanisms of afatinib compared with other TKIs and analyze the performance of repeat biopsy which is critical for subsequent treatment., Materials and Methods: We screened EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who started first-line afatinib, gefitinib, or erlotinib from 2014 to 2016, and included patients who acquired resistance. Among those patients, T790 M mutation rates and histologic transformation were compared as an acquired resistance mechanism., Results: A total of 524 patients started EGFR-TKIs, and 347 experienced disease progression until April 2018. After excluding nine patients with de novo T790 M mutations or who were treated with two TKIs before repeat biopsy, 338 patients were included. Among these patients, 263 (78%) were successfully biopsied and evaluated for EGFR mutations and histologic transformation. T790 M mutation was documented in 35 (41%) of 86 evaluable patients in afatinib group, which is significantly lower than in gefitinib (55%, 73/133) and erlotinib groups (57%, 25/44) (p =  0.026). In multivariate analysis considering both baseline EGFR mutation types (deletion 19 or L858R) and sex, the odds ratio for T790M in afatinib group was 0.45 (95% confidence interval: 0.254-0.795, p =  0.006), compared with gefitinib or erlotinib groups. Five histologic transformations (two small cell, three squamous cell) were detected in afatinib group, while one small cell transformation was detected in gefitinib group, and no transformations were detected in erlotinib group., Conclusions: In our clinical practice, repeat biopsy was possible in nearly four of five patients. Although T790 M mutation appears to be the main resistance mechanism for afatinib, it affects a lower proportion of patients than observed with first-generation TKIs., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Efficacy of gefitinib therapy strongly depends on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, cumulative data from many clinical studies demonstrated that some patients with wild-type (WT) EGFR also responded to gefitinib with durable disease control rate (DCR). The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gefitinib in NSCLC patients with WT EGFR who failed previous chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC whose tumors have WT EGFR were eligible. Gefitinib (250 mg/day) was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary end point was DCR at 8 weeks., Results: A total of 85 patients (53 men and 32 women; median age, 60 years; range 30-86) were enrolled between October 2010 and May 2013. Seventy-four patients (87.1 %) had adenocarcinoma. Forty-two patients (49.4 %) were treated with gefitinib as second-line chemotherapy. Eleven patients showed partial response, and 21 had stable disease. Thus, objective response rate was 12.9 %, and DCR at 8 weeks was 37.6 %. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 1.9 and 10.9 months, respectively. Skin rash was the most common side effect. It is of note that patients with skin rash of any grade had improved PFS with gefitinib as compared with patients experiencing no skin rash (median PFS: 3.0 vs. 1.7 months, P = 0.004). One patient developed interstitial lung disease (grade 2). Of 11 gefitinib responders, 6 patients were identified as having tumor with activating EGFR mutation by peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated PCR clamping method. Regarding the outcomes of the 79 patients, excluding 6 positive mutations, the response rate was 6.3 %, and DCR at 8 weeks was 31.8 %., Conclusion: Small proportion of NSCLC patients with the WT EGFR benefits with gefitinib. Optimized diagnosis through more sensitive bioassay could have major consequences in terms of the selection of candidate for EGFR TKI in patients with WT EGFR by direct sequencing.

Introduction: A germline BIM deletion polymorphism has been proposed to predict poor treatment response to certain kinase inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the BIM deletion polymorphism predicts treatment efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in Korean patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Peripheral blood samples from a total of 205 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated with EGFR TKIs between July 2008 and April 2013 were included. The incidence of BIM deletions in these samples was detected by polymerase chain reaction. We compared the clinical outcomes in patients with and without the polymorphism after treatment with EGFR TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib)., Results: The BIM deletion polymorphism was present in 15.6% (32 of 205) of patients. One patient was homozygous for the deletion, and the remaining 31 had heterozygous deletions. The majority of patients were younger than 65 years (74%), female (68%), never smokers (76%), and had stage IV NSCLC (67%). There were no associations between the BIM deletion polymorphism and clinicopathological features including gender, age, smoking status, histology, stage, and number of metastasis sites. Patients with and without the BIM deletion polymorphism had similar objective response rates (91 vs. 84%, p = 0.585). Progression-free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without the BIM deletion polymorphism (median progression-free survival 12 vs. 11 months, p = 0.160; median overall survival 31 vs. 30 months, p = 0.452). Multivariate analysis identified significantly predictive markers for clinical outcomes of EGFR TKIs including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, adenocarcinoma histology, recurrent disease, and EGFR mutation type. The results were validated in an independent cohort of 69 NSCLC patients., Conclusions: It remains to be determined whether the BIM deletion polymorphism provides intrinsic resistance or decreased sensitivity to EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.

Purpose: The incidence of lung cancer in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is higher than in the general population; however, the clinical benefit of chemotherapy and the appropriate regimen for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ILD remain unclear. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety and efficacy of palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine or pemetrexed, both in combination with a platinum agent in NSCLC patients with ILD., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and ILD who received gemcitabine or pemetrexed in combination with a platinum agent as first-line chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes, including response rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), in addition to the acute exacerbation of ILD after chemotherapy were investigated., Results: Between January 2007 and December 2011, 52 patients were analyzed. The median age at chemotherapy was 67. Thirty-two patients (61.5 %) had adenocarcinoma histology. With respect to the types of ILD, idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and non-IIP were observed in 42 (80.8 %) and 10 (19.2 %) patients, respectively. The FEV1 level was less than 80 % of the predicted value in 15 of the 41 patients in whom it was measured. The overall response rate was 42.3 % (95 % CI 28.8-55.9), and the median PFS was 5.4 months (95 % CI 4.6-6.2). The median OS was 7.9 months (95 % CI 5.5-10.3), and the 1-year survival rate was 31.7 % (95 % CI 19.0-44.4). Eight patients (15.4 %) died within 3 months of first-line chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a heavy smoking history (40 or more pack-year smoking history) was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. An acute exacerbation of ILD (AE-ILD) caused by first-line chemotherapy was noted in 5.8 % of patients., Conclusion: Our results suggest that gemcitabine or pemetrexed in combination with platinum agents could be a feasible option for advanced NSCLC with ILD with some risk of AE-ILD or early death. To establish the efficacy of palliative chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC and ILD, further well-controlled prospective studies are needed.

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have demonstrated some dramatic response rate and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating EGFR mutation. However, PFS and overall survival (OS) among those patients who were treated with EGFR TKIs are inconsistent and unpredictable. In this study, we evaluated predictors of clinical outcome in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKIs., Methods: A total of 148 patients who had metastatic or recurrent NSCLC with activating EGFR mutation treated with either erlotinib or gefitinib as a first-line (n = 10) and a second-line or more treatment (n = 138) were retrospectively reviewed., Results: The median follow-up duration was 21.9 months (range, 1.1-62.5). The median PFS and OS for a total 148 patients were 10.6 months (95 % CI 9.0-12.2) and 21.8 months (95 % CI 18.5-25.1), respectively. The survival outcomes were similar between the first-line and second-line or more line of treatment of EGFR TKIs (P = 0.512 for PFS, P = 0.699 for OS). Although a high number of metastasis sites (3-6 vs. 1-2) were associated with shorter PFS and OS (median PFS 9.9 vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.019; median OS 16.4 vs. 22.2 months, P = 0.021, respectively) in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. According to the clinical and molecular markers by multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in PFS. When PFS was dichotomized by median 11 months for 105 patients treated with EGFR TKIs as second-line therapy, no significant differences in any clinical or molecular features were found between longer PFS and shorter PFS groups., Conclusions: Despite the inconsistencies in PFS among EGFR mutant patients treated with EGFR TKIs, no significant differences of clinical features were noted, thereby suggesting a need for more understanding of the heterogeneity of underlying biology.

Background: Despite the key role of mutational analysis in targeted therapy, the difficulty in acquisition of adequate tumor tissues for molecular genotyping in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has led to the need for a fast and efficient method for detecting genetic alterations for targeted therapy., Patients and Methods: We analyzed tissue specimens of advanced NSCLC. A mass spectrometry-based assay was used to investigate 471 oncogenic mutations. All tumor specimens were prepared from fresh-frozen tissues., Results: In total, there were 59 hotspot mutations in 67% of the entire patient group (41 out of 61 patients). The most frequent mutation was in TP53 (n=24, 39.3%), followed by EFGR (n=19, 31.1%). Others included MLH1, KRAS, PIK3CA, ERBB2, ABL1 and HRAS., Conclusion: Our results suggest that molecular genotyping using high-throughput technology such as OncoMap v4 is feasible, even with small biopsied specimens from patients with advanced NSCLC.