Search

Objectives: Japan's healthcare expenditures, especially on oncology, are rapidly growing; however, there are scant data on actual costs and cost-effectiveness in the real world. The aim was to assess the medical costs and outcomes of patients with advanced lung cancer., Methods: We retrospectively investigated all patients who were diagnosed with advanced lung cancer at the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018. Patients were classified into three cohorts according to the year of diagnosis-Cohort 1: 2008-2010, Cohort 2: 2011-2014 and Cohort 3: 2015-2018-and assessed for medical costs and outcome. Medical costs were divided into outpatient and inpatient costs and were calculated on a monthly basis., Results: Ninety-five patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 330 with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were included. There was a trend toward increased costs during the first two years after diagnosis in NSCLC patients, without changes in monthly costs, reflecting improved survival. Compared to Cohort 1, Cohort 3 patients with NSCLC had longer survival (median: 24 versus 12 months, P < 0.001), with a median incremental cost of Japanese Yen 6 million during the initial two years. The proportion of outpatient costs increased over time, especially for NSCLC patients (P < 0.001). No changes in costs or survival were observed in SCLC patients., Conclusions: In NSCLC patients, medical costs increased with prolonged survival during the last decade. The costs on a monthly basis did not change. The proportion of outpatient costs increased., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Objective: The medical costs associated with cancer treatment have increased rapidly in Japan; however, little data exist on actual costs, especially for end-of-life care. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the medical costs of lung cancer patients during the last 3 months before death and to compare the costs with those of initial anticancer treatment., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients who died from lung cancer at the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between 1 January 2008 and 31 August 2019. Patients were classified into three cohorts (2008-2011, 2012-2015 and 2016-2019) according to the year of death; the medical costs were evaluated for each cohort. Costs were then divided into outpatient and inpatient costs and calculated per month., Results: Seventy-nine small cell lung cancer and 213 non-small cell lung cancer patients were included. For small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer patients, most end-of-life medical costs were inpatient costs across all cohorts. The median monthly medical costs for the last 3 months among both small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer patients did not differ significantly among the cohorts, but the mean monthly costs for non-small cell lung cancer tended to increase. The monthly medical costs for the last 3 months were significantly higher than those for the first year in SCLC (P = 0.013) and non-small cell lung cancer (P < 0.001) patients and those for the first 3 months in non-small cell lung cancer patients (P = 0.005)., Conclusions: The medical costs during the end-of-life period for lung cancer were high and surpassed those for initial treatment., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Aim: The current study reports the type of salvage chemotherapy following osimertinib and its treatment efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who acquire resistance to osimertinib., Patients and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data from the medical charts of 40 patients with NSCLC treated with osimertinib were obtained, primarily focusing on 14 undergoing salvage chemotherapy including epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) or cytotoxic agents immediately following osimertinib. The treatment efficacy of salvage chemotherapy was evaluated., Results: Five and nine patients received EGFR-TKI and cytotoxic agents following osimertinib, respectively. The overall response rate to EGFR-TKI treatment following osimertinib tended to be lower than that for cytotoxic agents (0% vs. 44.4%). The median progression-free-survival was significantly poorer in patients receiving EGFR-TKI treatment than in those receiving cytotoxic agents., Conclusion: Cytotoxic agent administration should be considered more frequently than EGFR-TKIs for patients with NSCLC resistant to osimertinib., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: The treatment efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop severe grade checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) are unclear. Here, we report on the treatment efficacy of ICI and prognosis in NSCLC patients with severe grade CIP., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, CIP severity, CIP-related mortality, and ICI efficacy in 71 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs were evaluated. Data was obtained from the patients' medical charts., Results: All grade and severe grade CIP were observed in 22 and 11 patients, respectively. The CIP-related mortality rate was 22.7% (N = 5). An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) score of ≥2 and pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) were significantly associated with the development of severe grade CIP (P = 0.001 and P = 0.035, respectively). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in patients with severe grade CIP than in those without severe grade CIP (PFS 1.0 month, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-2.0 vs. 3.5 months, 95% CI 2.0-5.0 months, P = 0.003; OS 3.0 months, 95% CI 0.5-13 vs. 12.7 months, 95% CI 8.0-21.0 months, P = 0.011)., Conclusion: CIP is a serious complication with a poor prognosis associated with high mortality. The efficacy of ICI is significantly worse in patients with severe grade CIP than in those without severe grade CIP. Whether ICIs should be administered to patients with CIP risk factors, such as an ECOG PS score of ≥2 or pre-existing ILD, should be carefully assessed., (© 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Radiation therapy might modify the cancer immune environment to enhance the antitumor effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We performed a feasibility study of nivolumab following stereotactic radiation therapy for chemotherapy pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer., Patients and Methods: Pretreated advanced/recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer patients received stereotactic radiation therapy to one of the disease sites. Nivolumab at a dose of 3 mg/kg was given within 2 weeks after the completion of stereotactic radiation therapy and continued every 2 weeks thereafter until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was the occurrence rate of Grade 3 pneumonitis (within 12 weeks) or other non-hematological toxicity (within 8 weeks)., Results: From September 2016 to September 2017, six patients were enrolled. Five received stereotactic radiation therapy to their primary lesions. All patients received nivolumab on the following day after stereotactic radiation therapy completion. Grade 3 pneumonitis occurred in one patient, but no other serious adverse events were reported for the other patients. One complete response and two partial responses were achieved. Four patients had measurable lesions outside the irradiated area, of whom three patients responded to the treatment. The initial progression sites were mainly outside the irradiated field, including one brain metastasis., Conclusions: Nivolumab therapy immediately following stereotactic radiation therapy was well tolerated. This sequential combination warrants further study.

Introduction: The frequency of detection of peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL) in suspected early lung cancer has been increasing, and whether preoperative pathological diagnosis (PPD) for small PPLs should always be established before their surgical resection can become a worrisome problem for physicians. The aim of the study was to clarify the impact of obtaining PPD on surgical and postoperative outcomes of lung resection for early stage lung cancer., Material and Methods: This was a retrospective review of cases that underwent surgical resection for known or suspected primary lung cancer presenting pathological stage 0 or I, enrolled from June 2006 to May 2016. The patients divided into two groups according to PPD group (n = 57) and non-PPD group (n = 157) were compared. The procedure, node dissection, operation time, amount of bleeding, postoperative complications, postoperative length of stay, and postoperative recurrences were analyzed., Results: Among the 214 patients, no significant differences in operation time (248.5 ± 88.6 versus 257.6 ± 89.0, min, mean ± SD, p = 0.328), amount of bleeding (195.3 ± 176.5 vs 188.1 ± 236.1, ml, p = 0.460), postoperative complication (5.2% vs 4.5%, p = 0.728), postoperative length of stay (10.6 ± 6.3 vs 10.4 ± 5.3, days, p = 0.827), or postoperative recurrences (21.0% vs 17.2%, p = 0.550) were seen between PPD and non-PPD groups., Conclusion: Therefore, PPD had less impact on surgical and postoperative outcomes of pathological stage 0 or I lung cancer; direct surgical resection without non-surgical biopsy would be acceptable with careful selection of cases.