Search

Purpose: To study the additional benefit from adenoviral p53 gene therapy in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients with nonresectable NSCLC were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter phase II study of three cycles of regimen A, carboplatin (area under the curve, 6; day 1) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), day 1), or regimen B, cisplatin (100 mg/m(2), day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22) in combination with intratumoral injection of 7.5 x 10(12) particles of SCH 58500 (rAd/p53, day 1). Responses of individual tumor lesions were assessed after each cycle, and gene transfer was examined in posttreatment tumor biopsies using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction., Results: There was no difference between the response rate of lesions treated with p53 gene therapy in addition to chemotherapy (52% objective responses) and lesions treated with chemotherapy alone (48% objective responses). Subgroup analysis according to the chemotherapy regimens revealed evidence for increased mean local tumor regressions in response to additional p53 gene therapy in patients receiving regimen B, but not in patients receiving regimen A. There was no survival difference between the two chemotherapy regimens, and the median survival of the cohort was 10.5 months (1-year survival, 44%). Transgene expression was confirmed in tumor samples from 68% of patients, and toxicities attributable to gene therapy were mild to moderate., Conclusion: Intratumoral adenoviral p53 gene therapy appears to provide no additional benefit in patients receiving an effective first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

Background: Docetaxel and gemcitabine are active against chemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monthly docetaxel combined with weekly gemcitabine in NSCLC patients failing one prior regimen., Patients and Methods: Forty patients were enrolled. Prior chemotherapy was a platinum-based combination in 36 patients, using vinorelbine in 26 patients and etoposide in 10 patients. The other four patients had prior single agents. Tumors were refractory or resistant to front-line therapy in 80% of patients. Treatment was gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 day 1, with cycles repeated every four weeks., Results: Thirteen patients responded (32.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19%-49%), including one complete and 12 partial responses. Responses were observed at all metastatic sites, with similar response frequencies in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant/refractory tumors. The median time to progression for responders was nine months, with two responses lasting longer than a year. Median survival was 8.1 months. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in 23 patients, with 4 episodes of febrile neutropenia, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 9 patients, and anemia requiring red cell transfusions in 9 patients. With the exception of asthenia, severe non-hematologic toxicities were infrequent., Conclusions: Monthly docetaxel, combined with weekly gemcitabine, is an active and safe second-line therapy for NSCLC patients.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel multiday schedule of vinorelbine and displatin in patients with advanced NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Thirty patients were enrolled, including 27 patients with stage IV disease, and 11 patients with performance status of 2. They received a maximum of four chemotherapy cycles with cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2/day intravenously (i.v.) for four consecutive days, every three weeks, with prophylactic filgrastim., Results: Sixteen patients responded (53%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 34%-72%), including two complete and fourteen partial confirmed responses. Median survival for all patients was 8.1 months, with actuarial one-year and two-year survival rates of 40% and 15%. Despite prophylactic filgrastim, the delivered vinorelbine dose intensity of 16.8 mg/m2/week caused febrile neutropenia in 48% of patients (16% of cycles), resulting in one treatment-related death. Common nonhematologic toxicities included delayed emesis, asthenia, and constipation., Conclusions: This multiday vinorelbine-cisplatin schedule is highly active against advanced NSCLC but results in frequent neutropenic complications. The myelotoxicity and antitumor efficacy of vinorelbine in NSCLC patients may be schedule-dependent.

Purpose: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of monthly docetaxel combined with fixed-dose weekly gemcitabine and describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the combination., Patients and Methods: Patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with gemcitabine days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks at a fixed dose of 800 mg/m2. Two docetaxel administration schedules were studied, with the drug administered either day 1 or day 15 at doses of 45, 60, 75, and 100 mg/m2 per cycle., Results: Forty patients received 132 cycles of chemotherapy. On the day-1 schedule, the maximum-tolerated docetaxel dose was the highest planned dose of 100 mg/m2 with two DLT episodes among 12 patients treated with 34 cycles at this dose level. On the day-15 schedule, delivery of the planned docetaxel doses was not feasible because of thrombocytopenia and hepatic dysfunction. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in 16 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia; grades 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia in nine patients; and anemia that required RBC transfusions in 10 patients. For patients treated at the highest docetaxel dose level, myelosuppression was not dose limiting and only one of 34 cycles was complicated by febrile neutropenia. The most common nonhematologic toxicities were asthenia, flu-like symptoms, and fluid retention. Antineoplastic activity was noteworthy, with partial responses in nine of 21 patients with pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 43%; 95% confidence interval, 22 to 66), in four of seven patients with breast cancer, and in one patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma., Conclusion: Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 days 1,8, and 15 can be safely combined with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 day 1 of a 28-day cycle. The observed antitumor activity warrants phase II evaluation.

Background: The assessment of treatment efficacy in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited by the lack of a clear association between clinical response and survival. The prognostic usefulness of treatment-induced tumor-marker declines in NSCLC has not been established. The authors investigated the prognostic significance of treatment-induced declination in tumor marker levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9, and CA 125 in a group of patients with NSCLC treated with a brief course of cisplatin-based chemotherapy., Methods: Eighty-three patients with NSCLC enrolled on 2 related treatment protocols had pretreatment tumor-marker determinations. Patients were restaged 10 to 12 weeks after study entry, and clinical and marker responses were determined., Results: Thirty-eight patients (46%) had elevated pretreatment tumor markers, 36 (42%) of whom were evaluable for both clinical and marker responses. Pretreatment, the latter 36 individuals had measurable or evaluable disease, and at least one elevated tumor marker (greater than twice normal); posttreatment, they had follow-up measurements of both parameters. Of the 36 patients, 8 had normalization of tumor marker levels, 13 had 50-99% marker level declination, and 15 had less than 50% or no declination. In the same group of 36 patients, there were, 1 patient with complete clinical response, 11 with partial response, 19 with stable disease, and 5 with progressive disease. Marker responses occurred with equal frequency in clinical responders and nonresponders. There was no association between clinical response and survival, but there was a strong association between marker response and survival., Conclusions: In patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer with elevated pretreatment tumor marker levels, treatment-induced marker level declination can be a surrogate indicator for survival.