Search

Background: Pulmonary carcinoids, which are well-differentiated lung neuroendocrine carcinomas, account for only 1-2 % of primary lung malignancies. Although fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography performs poorly in the identification of mediastinal lymph node metastases, particularly for pulmonary carcinoids, endobronchial ultrasound-guided (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) may be a useful means of preoperative nodal assessment in patients with these conditions. However, the diagnostic performance of EBUS TBNA is unknown. This study was designed to determine the sensitivity of EBUS for mediastinal staging in patients with typical carcinoid., Study Design and Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with carcinoids who underwent EBUS TBNA and/or surgical resection with lymphadenectomy at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was performed. The sensitivity of EBUS -TBNA in diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases was determined., Results: Of the 212 patients with pulmonary carcinoids we identified, 137 had surgery with no preoperative EBUS TBNA, 68 had EBUS TBNA followed by surgery, and 7 had EBUS TBNA only. The sensitivity rate for EBUS TBNA in diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases was 77.78 % overall (95 % CI, 57.7-91.3%) and it was 87.5 % (95 % CI, 67.6-97.3%) when we considered only patients with EBUS TBNA-accessible lymph nodes., Discussion: The sensitivity of EBUS TBNA for diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases of pulmonary carcinoids was slightly lower than that reported previously for non-small cell lung cancer. Preoperative EBUS TBNA identified nodal metastases not previously identified by imaging., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Standard nodal staging of lung cancer consists of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), followed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) if PET/CT shows mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA in patients with N0/N1 disease by PET/CT is unclear and largely based on retrospective studies. We assessed the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA in this setting., Methods: We enrolled patients with proven or suspected lung cancer staged as N0/N1 by PET/CT and without metastatic disease (M0), who underwent staging EBUS-TBNA. Primary outcome was sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA compared with a composite reference standard of surgical stage or EBUS-TBNA stage if EBUS demonstrated N2/N3 disease., Results: Seventy-five patients were included in the analysis. Mean tumour size was 3.52 cm (±1.63). Fifteen of 75 patients (20%) had N2 disease. EBUS-TBNA identified six while nine were only identified at surgery. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for N2 disease was 40% (95% CI: 16.3-67.7%)., Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with N0/N1 disease by PET/CT had N2 disease (20%) and EBUS-TBNA identified a substantial fraction of these patients, thus improving diagnostic accuracy compared with PET/CT alone. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA however appears lower compared with historical data from patients with larger volume mediastinal disease. Therefore, strategies to improve EBUS-TBNA accuracy in this population should be further explored., (© 2017 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being evaluated for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) are typically staged noninvasively with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Incorporating endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) into the staging workup of these patients has not been evaluated. Our primary objective was to compare the performance of PET/CT with EBUS-TBNA for intrathoracic nodal assessment among SABR-eligible patients., Methods: This was a retrospective study consisting of two parts. First, we assessed the concordance for nodal metastasis of PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA. Second, we evaluated clinical outcomes among patients who underwent SABR with and without a prior EBUS-TBNA., Results: We identified 246 eligible patients. Compared with PET/CT, EBUS-TBNA led to a stage shift in 48 of 246 patients (19%). Of 174 N0 patients by PET/CT, 6 (3.4%) had nodal metastasis on EBUS-TBNA. Among 72 clinical N1 patients, 36 (50%) were downstaged to N0 after EBUS-TBNA, therefore becoming eligible for SABR. Concordance between PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA for nodal metastasis was 83% (κ = 0.53). Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent SABR with or without a prior EBUS-TBNA did not differ significantly., Conclusions: Concordance of PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA for nodal disease was only moderate. Incorporating EBUS-TBNA into the staging workup was beneficial in identifying occult nodal metastasis that would otherwise be left untreated with SABR and in expanding the pool of potentially SABR-eligible patients., (Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)