Search

Background: The therapeutic benefit of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy for patients with advanced non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) remains unclear., Patients and Methods: We reviewed clinical data from 93 patients with advanced nccRCC who received first-line systemic therapy including IO combination therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy at our affiliated institutions. Patients were divided based on the period when the treatment was implemented as the standard of care into the IO and TKI eras. Survival and tumor response outcomes were compared between the IO and TKI eras., Results: Of the 93 patients, 50 (54%) and 43 (46%) were categorized as IO era and TKI era groups, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the IO era than in the TKI era (median PFS: 8.97 vs. 4.96 months, p = 0.0152; median OS: 38.4 vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.0001). After the adjustment using other covariates, the treatment era was an independent factor for PFS (hazard ratio: 0.59, p = 0.0235) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.27, p < 0.0001). Objective response and disease control rates was not significantly different between the treatment eras (26% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.268; 62% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.594)., Conclusion: The implementation of IO therapy was significantly associated with longer survival in the nccRCC population. Further studies are needed to establish a more effective treatment strategy in this population using multiple regimens of IO combination therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: The impact of glucocorticoid administration for adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs, on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unknown., Objectives: To clarify the prognostic impact of glucocorticoid use for AEs during first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data from 194 patients who received dual ICI combination therapy [i.e., immunotherapy (IO)-IO] or combinations of ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the history of glucocorticoid administration in each treatment group. Survival based on glucocorticoid administration was assessed., Results: A total of 101 (52.0%) and 93 (48.0%) patients received IO-IO and IO-TKI combination therapy, respectively. Glucocorticoids were administered to 46 (46%) and 22 (24%) patients in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, respectively. In the IO-IO group, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in patients with glucocorticoid administration than in those without administration (median PFS: 14.4 versus 3.45 months, p = 0.0005; median OS: 77.6 versus 33.9 months, p = 0.0025). Multivariable analysis showed that glucocorticoid administration was an independent predictor of longer PFS (hazard ratio: 0.43, p = 0.0005) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.35, p = 0.0067) after adjustment for covariates. In the IO-TKI group, neither PFS nor OS significantly differed between patients treated with and without glucocorticoid administration (PFS: p = 0.0872, OS: p = 0.216)., Conclusions: Glucocorticoid administration did not negatively impact the effectiveness of ICI combination therapy for RCC, prompting glucocorticoid treatment use when AEs develop., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Long-term follow-up data regarding treatment outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma as a first-line therapy are limited in real-world Japanese populations., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 56 advanced renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with a follow-up of at least 3 years. Survival, tumour response and adverse event profiles were assessed., Results: A total of 41 patients (73%) were histopathologically diagnosed with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, and 34 (61%) were categorized into the International Metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate-risk group. The median follow-up period was 34.4 months. Regarding an effectiveness profile, median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure and overall survival were 9.01, 12.5 and 49.0 months, respectively. Objective response was observed in 27 patients (48%), including eight patients with complete response (14%), and the median duration of response was 30.8 months. Multivariate analyses showed that clear-cell histology was an independent factor of longer overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.23, P = 0.0013). Regarding safety profiles, adverse events of any grade and those with grade ≥3 developed in 40 (71%) and 25 patients (45%), respectively. Median time to adverse event development was 1.68 months. Treatment was interrupted in 28 patients (50%), and corticosteroid administration was needed in 25 (45%)., Conclusion: The 3-year follow-up data showed that nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy exhibited a feasible effectiveness in real-world Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Accordingly, the high risk of adverse event development, which often requires treatment withdrawal and corticosteroid administration, should be considered., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Background: It remains unclear whether kidney function affects outcomes following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 167 patients with advanced RCC, including 98 who received ICI dual combination therapy (ie, immunotherapy [IO]-IO) and 69 who received ICI combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (ie, IO-TKI). In each regimen, treatment profiles were assessed according to the grade of chronic kidney disease (CKD) as defined by the KDIGO 2012 criteria., Results: Of the 98 patients who received IO-IO, 31 (32%), 30 (31%), 15 (15%), and 22 (22%) had CKD G1/2, G3a, G3b, and G4/5, respectively. Of the 69 patients who received IO-TKI, 18 (26%), 25 (36%), and 26 (38%) had G1/2, G3a, and G3b/4/5, respectively. Regarding efficacy, progression-free survival, overall survival, or objective response rate was not different according to the CKD grade in both treatment groups (P > .05). Regarding safety, the rate of adverse events, treatment interruption, or corticosteroid administration was not different according to the CKD grade in the IO-IO group (P > .05), whereas in the IO-TKI group, the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events were significantly higher (P = .0292), and the rates of ICI interruption (P = .0353) and corticosteroid administration (P = .0685) increased, according to the CKD grade., Conclusion: There is a differential safety but comparable efficacy profile between the IO-IO and IO-TKI regimens in patients with CKD. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are few comparative studies on dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (i.e., IO-IO) and combination therapies comprising ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (i.e., IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in real-world settings., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 175 patients with IMDC intermediate-risk or poor-risk RCC; as first-line therapy, 103 received IO-IO, and 72 received IO-TKI. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to balance patients' backgrounds in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups., Results: Based on the IPTW analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (median: 15.6 vs. 8.3 months; p = 0.0386). In contrast, overall survival was not different between groups (median: 46.7 vs. 49.0 months; p = 0.465). Although the IPTW-adjusted objective response rate was not significantly different (51.2% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.359), the progressive disease rate as the best overall response was lower in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (3.3% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.0001). Regarding the safety profile, the treatment interruption rate was higher in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (70.3% vs. 49.2%; p = 0.005). In contrast, the IO-IO group had a higher corticosteroid administration rate (43.3% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001)., Conclusion: IO-TKI therapy exhibited superior effectiveness over IO-IO therapy in terms of PFS improvement and immediate disease progression prevention and was associated with a higher risk of treatment interruption and a lower risk of needing corticosteroids., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Real-world data of cabozantinib after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japanese population are limited. Additionally, prognostic factors of cabozantinib in this setting are still unknown., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 56 patients treated with cabozantinib subsequent to failed immune checkpoint inhibitors at four institutions. Regarding the efficacy profile, progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate were assessed. In terms of the safety profile, rate of adverse events, dose reduction and treatment interruption were assessed. Furthermore, risk factors of progression-free survival were analyzed., Results: Twenty-nine patients (52%) were treated with cabozantinib as second-line therapy. Most frequent prior immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy as first-line therapy (n = 30, 54%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.76 and 25.5 months, respectively, and objective response rate was 34%. All patients experienced at least one adverse event, and grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 31 patients (55%). Forty-four (79%) and 31 (55%) patients needed dose reduction and treatment interruption, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that reduced initial dose (i.e. <60 mg) (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0355) and presence of lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0172) were independent factors of shorter progression-free survival., Conclusion: Cabozantinib in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who failed immune checkpoint inhibitors was efficacious and had a manageable safety profile. These results appear to be similar to those of previous clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To investigate the impact of global aging on the trends in the age of hospitalized patients with a urological cancer diagnosis., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a cumulative total of 10 652 cases of referred patients (n = 6637) with a urological disease who were hospitalized in our institution between January 2005 and December 2021. We compared age and the proportion of patients aged ≥80 years among patients who were hospitalized in the urological ward between the period of 2005-2013 and that of 2014-2021., Results: We identified 8168 hospitalized patients with urological cancer. The median age was significantly increased in patients with urological cancer between the periods of 2005-2013 and 2014-2021. The proportion of hospitalized patients with urological cancer aged ≥80 years was significantly increased between the periods of 2005-2013 (9.3%) and 2014-2021 (13.8%). The median ages of the patients with urothelial cancer (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but not the median age of those with prostate cancer (PC), were significantly increased between the study periods. The proportion of hospitalized patients with UC, but not the proportions of those with PC and RCC, aged ≥80 years was significantly increased between the study periods., Conclusions: The age of patients with urological cancer who were hospitalized in the urological ward and the proportion of patients with UC aged ≥80 years significantly increased over the entire study period., (© 2023 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Background: Prognostic impact of sex in patients with malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors has been intensively discussed but remains unclear, especially in advanced renal cell carcinoma., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 184 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with either nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined treatment as first-line therapy (n = 73) or nivolumab as later-line therapy (n = 111) at our affiliated institutions. Progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate as well as adverse event profile were compared between sexes., Results: Of the total 184 patients, 48 (26%) were female. Female patients had a significantly shorter progression-free survival than male patients (median: 3.8 vs. 8.3 months, P = 0.0005), but overall survival (median: 39.2 vs. 45.1 months, P = 0.283) and objective response rate (29% vs. 42%, P = 0.119) were not different between them. Similar findings were observed when analyzing within each treatment; in both patient groups treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined therapy and nivolumab monotherapy, progression-free survival was significantly shorter in female than in male patients (P = 0.007, P = 0.017), but overall survival (P = 0.914, P = 0.117) and objective response rate (P = 0.109, P = 0.465) were comparable between them. Moreover, in a more restricted cohort consisting of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, a shorter progression-free survival in female patients was also observed (3.8 vs. 11.0 months, P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: This retrospective study showed that immune checkpoint inhibitors-based treatment for renal cell carcinoma exhibited less marked effects in female than in male patients. Thus, sex may be an important factor for decision-making on systemic therapy as renal cell carcinoma treatment, although further studies are required to validate the present findings., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Clinical trials have demonstrated the superior efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy over sunitinib, a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, such benefits have not been elucidated in populations outside of clinical trials., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data from 467 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received ICI-based combination therapy or TKIs, as first-line therapy. Clinical outcome was compared between ICI-based combination therapy and TKIs in each population divided according to trial eligibility., Results: Among 152 patients treated with ICI-based combination therapy and 315 patients treated with TKIs, 76 (50.0%) and 156 (49.5%) were trial ineligible, respectively. Overall survival (p = 0.0072) and objective response rate (p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in ICI-based combination therapy than in TKIs, but progression-free survival was comparable (p = 0.681). In the trial-eligible population, overall survival was longer (p = 0.0906) and the objective response rate was significantly higher (p = 0.0124) in ICI-based combination therapy than in TKIs. In the trial-ineligible population, overall survival (p = 0.0208) and objective response rate (p = 0.0006) were significantly higher with ICI-based combination therapy than with TKIs. A multivariate analysis also showed that ICI-based combination therapy was independently associated with prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.47; p = 0.0016). Regardless of trial eligibility, progression-free survival did not differ between ICI-based combination therapy and TKIs (trial eligible: p = 0.287; trial ineligible: p = 0.0708)., Conclusions: The present study, using real-world data, provides evidence indicating the therapeutic benefit of ICI-based combination therapy over TKIs for advanced renal cell carcinoma was more statistically significant in the trial-ineligible population than in the trial-eligible population., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objectives: To clarify the impact of body mass index (BMI) on treatment outcomes including survival, tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or urothelial carcinoma (UC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in an Asian population., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 309 patients with advanced RCC or UC who received ICIs between September 2016 and July 2021. The patients were divided into high- (i.e., ≥25 kg/m 2 ) and low-BMI (<25 kg/m 2 ) groups according to the BMI at the time of treatment initiation., Results: Overall, 57 patients (18.4%) were classified into the high-BMI group. In RCC patients treated with ICIs as first-line therapy or UC treated with pembrolizumab, progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.309; p = 0.842), overall survival (OS) (p = 0.701; p = 0.983), and objective response rate (ORR) (p = 0.163; p = 0.553) were comparable between the high- and low-BMI groups. In RCC patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy as later-line therapy, OS (p = 0.101) and ORR (p = 0.102) were comparable, but PFS was significantly longer in the high-BMI group (p = 0.0272). Further, multivariate analysis showed that BMI was not an independent factor of PFS or OS in all the treatment groups (any, p>0.05). As for AE profiles, in nivolumab monotherapy, the rate was significantly higher in the high-BMI group (p = 0.0203), whereas in the other two treatments, the rate was comparable., Conclusions: BMI was not associated with survival or response rates of advanced RCC or UC patients treated with ICIs in an Asian population. AEs might frequently develop in high-BMI patients with RCC in nivolumab monotherapy., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma remains unclear, especially in terms of differences between regimens., Objective: We aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor dual combination therapy (IO-IO) or immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination therapy (IO-TKI)., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 148 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy as first-line therapy. Patients were divided into two groups based on regimens, namely IO-IO and IO-TKI. The associations between immune-related adverse event development and outcomes, such as progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate, were compared between the two groups., Results: In the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, 67 of 91 (74%) and 31 of 57 (54%) patients, respectively, experienced at least one immune-related adverse event and the rate was significantly higher in the IO-IO group (p = 0.0204), where immune-related adverse events development was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (p = 0.0102), and a higher objective response rate (p = 0.0028). A multivariate analysis revealed immune-related adverse event development as an independent factor for longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.25; p < 0.0001) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.42; p = 0.0287). There were no significant associations between immune-related adverse events and progression-free survival, overall survival, or objective response rate in the IO-TKI group., Conclusions: The development of immune-related adverse events was positively associated with the outcome of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with IO-IO combination therapy; no such correlation was observed for IO-TKI combination therapy., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objectives: To explore the therapeutic role of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab., Patients and Methods: Forty-one patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line systemic therapy at our affiliated institutions were retrospectively evaluated. We focused on the prognosis, including tumor responses in primary kidney and metastatic lesions in patients treated with deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy. In addition, the overall survival according to nephrectomy status (i.e. deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy vs. upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy vs. without cytoreductive nephrectomy) was compared., Results: During a median follow-up period of 12.0 months, seven (30%) patients received deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy at a median time of 10.4 months after nivolumab plus ipilimumab initiation. All the patients showed tumor shrinkage in their primary kidney lesions, including six (86%) patients with ≥30% of shrinkage. Metastatic lesions were also shrunk by ≥30% in six (86%) patients, including two (29%) obtaining complete response. At the last time of follow-up, three (43%) patients were disease-free. The overall survival rate after nivolumab plus ipilimumab initiation tended to be higher in patients with deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy compared with those with upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (1-year survival rate: 100% vs. 72.4%, P = 0.0587) and those without cytoreductive nephrectomy (vs. 58.2%, P = 0.0613)., Conclusions: The present retrospective data showed that deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy had the potential to exert a therapeutic effect in a subset of patients who obtained favorable tumor responses to nivolumab plus ipilimumab for a certain period. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the prognostic impact of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy after frontline immunotherapy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To investigate the long-term follow-up outcomes of nivolumab monotherapy for previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, using real-world data., Methods: A total of 121 patients were treated with nivolumab monotherapy as subsequent therapy after the failure of prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy between January 2013 and December 2021 at four affiliated institutions. To evaluate the outcome after 2 years or more, we selected patients in whom nivolumab therapy was started in December 2019 or earlier because data collection was performed until the end of December 2021., Results: Seventy-four patients were evaluated. During the median follow-up period of 25.8 months, 62 (84%) and 40 (54%) patients had disease progression and died, respectively. Nivolumab was administered as second-line therapy in 43 patients (58%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.52 and 31.1 months, respectively, and objective response rate was 36%. There was no difference in progression-free survival or overall survival based on the treatment line of nivolumab (P = 0.915, P = 0.559). The magnitude of tumor response and development of immune-related adverse events were significantly associated with progression-free survival (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, respectively) and overall survival (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0002, respectively). Treatment-related adverse events developed in 38 patients (51%), including 33 (45%) who had immune-related adverse events. Steroid administration was needed in nine patients (12%)., Conclusions: The present real-world multi-institution study with long-term follow-up data demonstrates that nivolumab monotherapy is effective for previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, prolonging survival, improving tumor response and has a manageable safety profile., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Background: Data regarding the efficacy and safety profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) trial-ineligible patients in the real world remain unclear., Objectives: The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of trial eligibility on ICI-based combination therapy for mRCC., Patients and Methods: We collected clinical data of mRCC patients receiving ICIs since 2016, and 222 patients were registered. Among these patients, we evaluated 93 patients treated with ICI-based combination therapy, including nivolumab plus ipilimumab, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, or avelumab plus axitinib, as first-line therapy. Patients were classified into the trial-ineligible group when they had at least one of the following factors at the time of treatment initiation: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) < 70%, hemoglobin level < 9.0 g/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 40 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , platelet count < 100,000/µL, neutrophil count < 1500/µL, non-clear cell histology, or brain metastasis. The remaining patients were classified into the trial-eligible group., Results: Forty-eight patients (52%) were classified into the trial-ineligible group. The frequency of patients with trial-ineligible factors was highest for low eGFR (n = 20, 45%), followed by non-clear cell histology (n = 17, 36%) and low KPS score (n = 12, 25%). There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (median: 24.0 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.416), overall survival (1-year rate: 87.0% vs. 85.3%, p = 0.634), or objective response rate (52% vs. 42%, p = 0.308) between the trial-eligible and -ineligible patients. The incidence rate of adverse events was higher in the trial-eligible patients than in the trial-ineligible patients (91% vs. 75%, p = 0.0397); however, the rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events was comparable between the two groups (42% vs. 40%, p = 0.796)., Conclusions: There are many trial-ineligible patients in the real world. Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of ICI-based combination therapy in trial-ineligible patients were non-inferior compared with those of trial-eligible patients., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objectives: To evaluate the serologic response to the BNT162b2 messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine in patients with urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma., Methods: Between June 2021 and November 2021, we retrospectively evaluated blood samples from 60 healthy controls (control group), 57 patients with urothelial carcinoma, and 28 patients with renal cell carcinoma who had received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine at Hirosaki University Hospital. We determined the immunoglobulin G antibody titers against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike receptor-binding domain. Seropositivity was defined as ≥15 U/mL. We investigate factors associated with antibody titers and seropositivity in the patients with urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma., Results: Antibody titers in the control, urothelial carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma groups were 813, 431, and 500 U/mL, respectively. Seropositivity was 100%, 90%, and 96% in the control, urothelial carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma groups, respectively. Of the 85 patients, 37 of 57 (65%) and 21 of 28 (75%) were actively undergoing anticancer treatment for urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma, respectively. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike immunoglobulin G antibody titers and seropositivity was not significantly different between the patients with urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike immunoglobulin G antibody titers were not significantly associated with active anticancer therapy or steroid treatment for immune-related adverse events. Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that older age and metastatic disease were significantly and negatively associated with seropositivity., Conclusions: Patients with urothelial carcinoma or renal cell carcinoma exhibited an adequate antibody response to the BNT162b2 vaccine. Active anticancer therapy was not significantly associated with seropositivity following vaccination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 BNT162b2 in patients with urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma., (© 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Background: The efficacy of combined immunotherapy for papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) based on prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in several clinical trials remains unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy of cabozantinib in patients with pRCC and those with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 27 patients with metastatic RCC who received cabozantinib as second-line or later therapy between June 2020 and October 2021. Objective response, PFS, and toxicity were compared between the ccRCC and pRCC groups., Results: Out of 27 patients, seven and 20 were diagnosed with pRCC and ccRCC, respectively. Out of the seven patients with pRCC, cabozantinib was used as second-line treatment in four patients and as third-line treatment in three patients, and all seven patients had had prior immunotherapy. One and two patients achieved complete and partial responses, respectively; four patients had stable disease, and none had progressive disease. The rates of objective response (43% vs. 30%, p=0.65) and disease control (100% vs. 85%, p=0.54) were similarly high in patients with pRCC and ccRCC. Changes in the target lesions were -19% and -10% (p=0.11), respectively. With a median follow-up of 7.1 months, the median PFS tended to be longer in patients with pRCC than in those with ccRCC (not reached vs. 10.7 months, p=0.12). Discontinuation due to toxicity was observed in four (57%) patients with pRCC and 10 (50%) patients with ccRCC., Conclusion: Cabozantinib is effective for pRCC, similar to ccRCC. This information may help physicians to select treatment options for pRCC., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Knowledge of changes in the outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma from the molecular-targeted therapy era to the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) era remains limited in the real-world setting., Objectives: We aimed to clarify outcome changes from the previous molecular-targeted therapy era to the current ICI era in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma using multi-institution real-world data., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 415 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received first-line systemic therapy at five Japanese institutions between January 2008 and August 2021. We divided the patients into two groups based on the treatment era: molecular-targeted therapy era (January 2008-August 2018) and ICI era (September 2018-August 2021). According to the era, progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate from first-line systemic therapy were compared., Results: Overall, 304 (73.3%) and 111 (26.7%) patients were categorized into the molecular-targeted therapy and ICI eras, respectively. The proportion of patients without prior nephrectomy (p = 0.0030) or those with low Karnofsky Performance Status scores [≤ 70] (p = 0.0258) were significantly higher in the ICI era group. The patients in the ICI era group had significantly longer overall survival (median: not reached vs 23.2 months, p = 0.0001) and a higher objective response rate (47.8% vs 24.7%, p < 0.0001) than those in the molecular-targeted therapy era group, and progression-free survival tended to be longer in the ICI era group (median: 13.3 vs 8.75 months, p = 0.0579). Multivariate analysis further showed that the treatment era (ICI vs molecular-targeted therapy) was an independent factor for overall survival and objective response (both, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: The present multi-institution real-world data showed the improved outcome of previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the ICI era group compared with that in the molecular-targeted therapy era group. These findings strongly encourage the use of ICI-based treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the real-world setting. Further studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to confirm our findings., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is reportedly associated with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) activity. However, in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the predictive value of CRP is unclear. In this study, we investigated the predictive impact of pretreatment CRP levels and early changes in CRP levels for the treatment of mRCC with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO-IPI) therapy., Methods: Forty-eight patients with mRCC treated with NIVO-IPI as a first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. First, patients were divided into 2 groups: initial CRP ≥ 1.0 mg/dL and < 1.0 mg/dL. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between the 2 groups. Second, based on the CRP change within the first 3 months of NIVO-IPI, patients were placed in the normal group (CRP remains < 1.0 mg/dL), normalized group (CRP decreased < 1.0 mg/dL), and non-normalized group (CRP remained or increased to ≥ 1.0 mg/dL). The predictive association between CRP change and PFS was evaluated., Results: PFS was significantly lower in the high initial CRP group (n = 24, 50%) compared to the normal CRP group (n = 24, 50%) (median: 4.3 vs. 28.1 months, P = .03). As for the early CRP change, the normal (2.7 vs. 28.1, P = .0002) and normalized (2.7 vs. 11.0, P = .0094) groups showed significantly higher PFS, compared to the non-normalized group. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between normal, and normalized groups (P = .51). The objective response rate was higher in the normal (57.1% vs. 18.7%, P = .015) and normalized (81.8 vs. 18.7%, P = .0008) groups, compared to the non-normalized group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that normal [Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.15, 95% Confidence interval (CI) = 0.02-0.70, P = .026] and normalized (HR 0.21, 95% CI = 0.05-0.73, P = .015) CRP showed significant association with PFS., Conclusion: In the NIVO-IPI therapy for mRCC, early changes in CRP could predict PFS. This data may be useful for the early detection of ineffective NIVO-IPI therapy and conversion to subsequent therapies., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To clarify the efficacy and safety profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 149 mRCC patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy as subsequent therapy (n = 89) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy (n = 60) at 5 affiliated institutions. The patients were divided according to age: > 70 (elderly) vs. ≤ 70 years (young). Efficacy was analyzed by comparing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) between elderly and young patients. Safety was assessed by comparing the incidence rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs)., Results: In the nivolumab monotherapy group, 34/89 patients (38%) were classified as elderly. There was no significant difference in PFS (p = 0.607), OS (p = 0.383), ORR (p = 0.0699), or DCR (p = 0.881) between elderly and young patients. In the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 20/60 patients (33%) were classified as elderly. There was no significant difference in PFS (p = 0.995), OS (p = 0.714), ORR (p = 0.763), or DCR (p = 1.000) between the two groups. The incidence rate of irAEs was not significantly different in the nivolumab (any grade: p = 0.121; grade ≥ 3: p = 0.542) or in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab (any grade: p = 0.666; grade ≥ 3: p = 0.576) group; a higher rate of gastrointestinal irAEs was observed in elderly than in young patients (any grade 15% vs. 3%)., Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab were comparable between elderly and young patients. Thus, chronological age alone should not be a contraindication in the use of ICIs for mRCC., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Objectives: To investigate the prognostic impact of tumor burden in patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy for previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 62 patients with IMDC intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC, treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy at five affiliated institutions. Tumor burden was defined as the sum of diameters of baseline targeted lesions according to the RECIST version.1.1. We categorized the patients into two groups based on the median value of tumor burden (i.e., high vs. low). The association of tumor burden with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment was analyzed., Results: The median tumor burden was 63.0 cm (interquartile range: 34.2-125.8). PFS was significantly shorter in patients with high tumor burden (n = 31) than in those with low tumor burden (n = 31) (median: 6.08 [95% CI: 2.73-9.70] vs. 12.5 [4.77-24.0] months, P = 0.0134). In addition, OS tended to be shorter in patients with high tumor burden; however, there was no statistically significant difference (1-year rate: 77.3 vs. 96.7%, P = 0.166). ORR was not significantly different between patients with high and low tumor burden (35 vs. 55%, P = 0.202). Multivariate analysis of PFS further showed that tumor burden was an independent factor (HR: 2.22 [95% CI: 1.11-4.45], P = 0.0242)., Conclusions: Tumor burden might be a useful factor for outcome prediction, at least for PFS prediction, in patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab for mRCC. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Objectives: Evidence regarding the prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains limited in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line systemic therapy. Thus, we investigated the association between irAE development and oncological outcomes during nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients with mRCC who were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab at our hospital and its affiliated institutions. The associations between irAE development and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rates (ORRs) were assessed after treatment initiation., Results: A total of 60 irAEs occurred in 33 patients (72%), with 24 grade ≥ 3 irAEs developed in 20 patients (43%). PFS was significantly longer in patients with irAEs than that in patients without irAEs (P < 0.0001); however, OS was not different (P = 0.571). Multivariable analysis further revealed that the development of irAEs was an independent predictor of a longer PFS (hazard ratio: 0.18, P = 0.0005). A landmark analysis for the initial four cycles of nivolumab plus ipilimumab administration also showed that PFS was significantly longer in patients with irAEs than that in patients without irAEs (P = 0.0386). The ORRs were also higher in patients with irAEs (P = 0.0064). Furthermore, in 22 patients (48%) who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment, the 6-month PFS rate was 87%., Conclusion: This multi-institutional study showed that irAE development was significantly associated with PFS but not with OS in patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line therapy. The development of irAEs may be used as a surrogate prognostic marker for PFS in this treatment regimen., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Toshio Takagi received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical. Tsunenori Kondo received honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, and Ono Pharmaceutical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: It remains unclear how early treatment interruption of nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to immune-related adverse events affects the outcome of previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Objective: To investigate the prognostic impact of the early interruption of nivolumab plus ipilimumab, used as first-line therapy for mRCC., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 59 intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy. Based on whether early treatment interruption was implemented within the initial four treatment cycles (i.e., 3 months) or not, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared. The prognostic association was further compared with that of 186 patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy., Results: Twenty-three of the 59 patients (39%) experienced interruption of nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy. The patients with interruption had longer PFS (p = 0.0055), similar OS (p = 0.366), and likely higher ORR (p = 0.0660) than those without interruption. Of the patients treated with TKIs, 60 of 186 (32%) experienced interruption, with shorter PFS (p = 0.0121), similar OS (p = 0.378), and similar ORR (p = 0.738) than those without interruption. In the 23 patients with nivolumab plus ipilimumab interruption, high-dose corticosteroids were administered in seven patients (30%). PFS (p = 0.638), OS (p = 0.968), or ORR (p = 0.760) did not differ based on corticosteroid administration., Conclusions: Early treatment interruption, which exerted a negative effect for TKIs, was a preferable event for nivolumab plus ipilimumab when considering PFS. Furthermore, early administration of high-dose corticosteroids did not diminish the anti-tumor effect of nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

Metastasis is the leading cause of mortality from kidney cancer, and understanding the underlying mechanism of this event will provide better strategies for its management. Here we investigated the biological, functional, and clinical significance of lncTCL6 and its interacting miR-155 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We employed a comprehensive approach to investigate the lncTCL6-miR-155-Src/Akt-mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway as a novel regulatory mechanism in ccRCC progression. Expression analyses revealed that lncTCL6 is downregulated in ccRCC compared with normal tissues. Overexpression of lncTCL6 in ccRCC cell lines impaired their oncogenic functions, such as cell proliferation and migration/invasion, and induced cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis; conversely, depletion of lncTCL6 rescued these phenotypic effects. Furthermore, lncTCL6 directly interacted with miR-155. Unlike lncTCL6, miR-155 was overexpressed in ccRCC. Stable knockdown of miR-155 phenocopied the effects of lncTCL6 overexpression. Conversely, reconstitution of miR-155 and suppression of lncTCL6 in noncancerous renal cell HK2 induced tumorigenic characteristics. Patients with higher expression of lncTCL6 and lower expression of miR-155 had better survival probability. When overexpressed, lncTCL6 recruited STAU1 and mediated decay of Src mRNA, followed by a marked downregulation of an integrated network of Src target genes involved in migration, invasion, and EMT. However, the interaction between miR-155 and lncTCL6 attenuated the regulatory role of lncTCL6 on Src-mediated EMT. In conclusion, this study is the first report documenting the lncTCL6-miR155-Src/Akt/EMT network as a novel regulatory mechanism in aggressive ccRCC and a promising therapeutic target to inhibit renal cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: This study's investigation of noncoding RNA interactions in renal cell carcinoma identify miRNA-155-lncRNA TCL6-mediated regulation of the Src-Akt-EMT network as a novel mechanism of disease progression and metastasis., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: This study compared real-world outcomes of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or nivolumab plus ipilimumab., Methods: Using the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC), we retrospectively evaluated intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC patients who were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo-Ipi), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as the first-line therapy between August 2015 and January 2020. We compared oncological outcomes between the Nivo-Ipi group and TKIs group using multivariate logistic regression analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method., Results: In this study 278 patients were included. There were 52 and 226 patients in the Nivo-Ipi and TKIs groups (sunitinib 97, axitinib 118, sorafenib 9, pazopanib 2), respectively. The median age in the Nivo-Ipi and TKIs groups were 69 and 67 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in age, performance status, history of nephrectomy, and the IMDC risk group distribution between the groups. The objective response rate was significantly higher in the Nivo-Ipi group (38%) than in the TKIs group (23%, P = 0.018). The IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that a significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.60, P = 0.039) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.51, P = 0.037) rates in the Nivo-Ipi group than those in the TKIs group., Conclusions: The oncological outcomes of patients receiving the first-line therapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in real-world practice were significantly improved in comparison with first-line TKIs therapy.

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients treated with metastatic renal cell carcinoma., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 52 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab between August 2015 and January 2020. Data on patient characteristics, treatment parameters and adverse events were obtained. Oncological outcomes were assessed according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model. Furthermore, differences in treatment parameters between patients with objective response (responders) and non-responders were compared., Results: The median age and follow-up periods were 69 years and 8.2 months, respectively. The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 55% and 75%, respectively. The objective response rate was 39%, and it was significantly different between the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate- and poor-risk groups (52% vs 24%). We observed 36 (69%) any immune-related adverse events, and 19 (37%) severe immune-related adverse events (grades III-V). The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor-risk group and higher value of initial C-reactive protein (≥1.0 mg/dL) were significantly associated with non-responders. Patients with two factors (the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor-risk group plus C-reactive protein ≥1.0 mg/dL) had a significantly poor overall survival than those with none or a single factor., Conclusions: In our experience, treatment response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab is comparable with that of the CheckMate 214 clinical trial, but the incidence of treatment-related adverse events is lower. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor-risk group and initial C-reactive protein value might have a prognostic value for poor survival., (© 2020 The Japanese Urological Association.)

The molecular heterogeneity of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) complicates the therapeutic interventions for advanced metastatic disease and thus its management remains a significant challenge. This study investigates the role of the lncRNA CDKN2B-AS1 and miR-141-3p interactions in the progression and metastasis of kidney cancer. Human renal cancer cell lines (ACHN and Caki1), normal RPTEC cells, tissue cohorts, and a series of in vitro assays and in vivo mouse model were used for this study. An overexpression of CDKN2B-AS1 was observed in RCC compared to normal samples in TCGA and our in-house SFVAMC tissue cohorts. Reciprocally, we observed reduced expression of miR-141 in RCC compared to normal in the same cohorts. CDKN2B-AS1 shares regulatory miR-141 binding sites with CCND1 and CCND2 genes. Direct interactions of CDKN2B-AS1/miR-141/Cyclin D1-D2 were confirmed by RNA immunoprecipitation and luciferase reporter assays indicating that CDKN2B-AS1/miR-141/Cyclin D1-D2 acts as a ceRNA network in RCC. Functionally, attenuation of CDKN2B-AS1 and/or overexpression of miR-141 inhibited proliferation, clonogenicity, migration/invasion, induced apoptosis in vitro and suppressed tumor growth in xenograft mouse model. Further, overexpression of CDKN2B-AS1 is positively correlated with poor overall survival of RCC patients. Expression of miR-141 also robustly discriminated malignant from non-malignant tissues and its inhibition in normal RPTEC cells induced pro-cancerous characteristics. CDKN2B-AS1 attenuation or miR-141 overexpression decreased CCND1/CCND2 expression, resulting in reduced RAC1/pPXN that are involved in migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. This study, for the first time, deciphered the role of CDKN2B-AS1/miR-141/Cyclin D axis in RCC and highlights this network as a promising therapeutic target for the regulation of EMT driven metastasis in RCC.

Background: The objective of the study was to validate the characteristics of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model in patients treated with first-line axitinib in clinical practice., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 143 patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were treated with axitinib as the first-line therapy between October 2008 and February 2019. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated according to the IMDC prognostic model. We investigated the intragroup heterogeneity in the intermediate-risk group and divided these patients according to abnormal C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. An inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of the CRP-risk model of OS in the patients in the IMDC intermediate-risk group., Results: A significant difference in OS was observed in patients in the IMDC intermediate- and poor-risk group, although no significant difference was observed between the IMDC favorable- and intermediate-risk group. Significantly shorter prognosis was observed in patients in the IMDC intermediate-risk group who had 2 risk factors and CRP ≥0.3 mg/dL (inter-high group) than in those with 1 risk factor or 2 risk factors with CRP <0.3 mg/dL (inter-low group). IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed significant differences in the OS between the inter-low and inter-high groups., Conclusion: The IMDC prognostic model was active in patients who received first-line axitinib treatment. The combination of CRP value with the number of positive risk factors in the IMDC model might predict prognosis in patients with IMDC intermediate-risk treated with first-line axitinib., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and modified Glasgow prognostic score on the prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma., Methods: A retrospective study was carried out in 176 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The effect of adding inflammatory prognostic scores to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium-C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium-Glasgow prognostic score models) on overall survival was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The prognostic value of inflammatory prognostic scores (C-reactive protein/albumin ratio-modified Glasgow prognostic score) was tested using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression models., Results: Patients were stratified into two groups using the cut-off value of 0.05: C-reactive protein/albumin ratio-low (<0.05) and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio-high (≥0.05). The area under the curve was significantly higher in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium-C-reactive protein/albumin ratio model (0.720) than that of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model (0.689) and the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium-modified Glasgow prognostic score model (0.703). Significant differences were observed in overall survival stratified by the number of risk factors in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium-C-reactive protein/albumin ratio risk model between one or two and three or four factors (P < 0.001), and three or four and five or more factors (P = 0.001). For the patients in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate-risk group, overall survival was significantly different between the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio-low and -high groups (P = 0.001), whereas it was not significantly different between the patients with one and two International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk factors (P = 0.106)., Conclusion: The C-reactive protein/albumin ratio is a simple and independent predictor of overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The predictive activity was significantly improved in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium-C-reactive protein/albumin ratio model compared with the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium/International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium-modified Glasgow prognostic score models., (© 2019 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Purpose: To investigate the impact of the risk group disagreement between the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) models on prognosis., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 176 patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapy in 5 hospitals between October 2008 and August 2018. The risk group classification differences between the MSKCC and the IMDC models were evaluated using criteria of agreement (identical risk group in both the MSKCC and IMDC models) and disagreement (not identical risk group in both the MSKCC and IMDC models). The agreement of risk stratification between the models was evaluated using the Cohen κ coefficient. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the agreement and disagreement groups., Results: The number of patients with agreement, upgrade, and downgrade was 135 (77%), 39 (22%), and 2 (1.1%), respectively. Of 41 patients with disagreement, reclassification from the MSKCC-intermediate to the IMDC-poor risk group was most frequent (n = 34, 19%). The Cohen κ coefficient for agreement was substantial, with κ = 0.613 (P < .001). Significantly poorer prognosis was observed in patients with disagreement than in those with agreement. Neutrophil count, hemoglobin, serum calcium concentration, and C-reactive protein were significantly different between the groups., Conclusion: Disagreement between the MSKCC and IMDC models may have a negative impact on prognosis in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. The inclusion of systematic inflammation markers in a risk model may be essential for prognosis prediction., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We aimed to compare oncological outcomes and safety of axitinib and sunitinib in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We retrospectively evaluated 169 patients with mRCC who were treated with axitinib or sunitinib as the first-line therapy in five hospitals between October 2008 and August 2018. Oncological outcomes and safety were compared between axitinib (n = 68) and sunitinib (n = 101) groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate effects of first-line therapies on progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Patients in the axitinib group were significantly older (66 vs. 72 years) than those in the sunitinib group. Median relative dose intensity was significantly higher in the axitinib group (94 ± 62%) than in the sunitinib group (65 ± 20%; P = 0.001). Objective response rate was significantly higher in the axitinib group (21%) than in the sunitinib group (10%; P = 0.042). IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed significant differences in CSS and OS but not in PFS between the two groups. Safety in terms of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was significantly different between the axitinib (34%) and sunitinib (55%) groups (P = 0.006). Compared with sunitinib, axitinib significantly prolonged CSS and OS and showed a safer profile as the first-line therapy for treatment-naïve mRCC.

The molecular heterogeneity of clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) makes prediction of disease progression and therapeutic response difficult. Thus, this report investigates the functional significance, mechanisms of action, and clinical utility of miR-182-5p and metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 ( MALAT1/NEAT2 ), a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), in the regulation of kidney cancer using human kidney cancer tissues as well as in vitro and in vivo model systems. Profiling of miR-182-5p and MALAT-1 in human renal cancer cells and clinical specimens was done by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). The biological significance was determined by series of in vitro and in vivo experiments. The interaction between miR-182-5p and MALAT-1 was investigated using luciferase reporter assays. In addition, the effects of miR-182-5p overexpression and MALAT-1 downregulation on cell-cycle progression were assessed in ccRCC cells. The data indicate that miR-182-5p is downregulated in ccRCC; the mechanism being CpG hypermethylation as observed from 5-Aza CdR treatment that decreased promoter methylation and expression of key methylation regulatory genes like DNMT1, DNMT3a , and DNMT3b Overexpression of miR-182-5p-inhibited cell proliferation, colony formation, apoptosis, and led to G 2 -M-phase cell-cycle arrest by directly targeting MALAT-1 Downregulation of MALAT-1 led to upregulation of p53, downregulation of CDC20, AURKA, drivers of the cell-cycle mitotic phase. Transient knockdown of MALAT-1 mimicked the effects of miR-182-5p overexpression. Finally, overexpression of miR-182-5p decreased tumor growth in mice, compared with controls; thus, demonstrating its antitumor effect in vivo Implications: This is the first study that offers new insight into role of miR-182-5p/ MALAT-1 interaction on inhibition of ccRCC progression. Mol Cancer Res; 16(11); 1750-60. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

This study aims to investigate the role of miR-203-HOTAIR interaction in the suppression of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We employed series of in vitro assays such as proliferation, invasion, migration, and colony formation along with in vivo tumor xenograft model. Profiling of miR-203 and HOTAIR expression revealed that miR-203 was significantly underexpressed, whereas HOTAIR was overexpressed in RCC cell lines and clinical specimens compared with normal cell line and tissue. Both miR-203 and HOTAIR expression significantly distinguished malignant from normal tissues and significantly correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics of patients. Overexpression of miR-203 significantly inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion with an induction of apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest. However, HOTAIR suppression resulted in the similar functional effects in the same RCC cell lines. In silico , RNA-22 algorithm showed a binding site for miR-203 in HOTAIR. We observed a direct interaction between miR-203 and HOTAIR by RNA-immunoprecipitation (RIP) and luciferase reporter assays. We show that miR-203-HOTAIR interaction resulted in the inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastatic genes as indicated by induction of key metastasis-suppressing proteins E-cadherin, claudin (epithelial markers), and PTEN along with induction of tumor suppressor genes p21 and p27. A significant decrease in vimentin (mesenchymal marker), KLF4, and Nanog (stemness markers) was also observed. This is the first report demonstrating miR-203-mediated regulation of HOTAIR induces tumor suppressor effects in RCC by regulating EMT and metastatic pathway genes. Thus, the study suggests that therapeutic regulation of HOTAIR by miR-203 overexpression may provide an opportunity to regulate RCC growth and metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(5); 1061-9. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Clinical benefits of presurgical axitinib therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) remain unclear. We aimed to investigate surgical benefits and pathological antitumor effects of presurgical axitinib therapy for RCC with IVC thrombus., Methods: Of 56 consecutive RCC patients with IVC thrombus between January 1994 and December 2016, 41 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy (RN) were categorized as upfront RN (Upfront group) or presurgical axitinib followed by RN (Presurgical group). We retrospectively evaluated safety, radiologic tumor responses, and Ki-67 proliferation index before and after axitinib administration in the Presurgical group. Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and fibrosis within the IVC thrombus were compared between the Upfront and Presurgical groups., Results: The number of patients in the Upfront and Presurgical groups was 31 and 10, respectively. Major presurgical axitinib-related adverse events were grade 2 or 3 hypertension (50%). The median radiological tumor response in the renal tumor, IVC thrombus length, and IVC thrombus volume were -19%, -21 mm, and -54%, respectively. The fibrosis within the IVC thrombus was significantly higher in the Presurgical group (10%) than in the Upfront group (3.4%). The Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly decreased in RN specimens (7.3%) versus needle biopsy specimens (23%) in the Presurgical group. Blood loss and operative duration were significantly lower and shorter, respectively, in the Presurgical group than in the Upfront group., Conclusions: Presurgical axitinib therapy enhanced tumor reduction accompanied by fibrosis and may contribute to surgical risk reduction for selected patients.

We report three cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma-like thyroid carcinoma as a novel clinicopathologic entity possibly associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. A 15-year-old female, a 19-year-old male, and a 21-year-old male presented with primary thyroid carcinoma. Two of the patients had associated tuberous sclerosis complex. Macroscopically, the carcinomas showed invasive growth. Histologically, the carcinoma cells showed a trabecular pattern with thin vascular stroma, and were characterized by abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with perinuclear clearing, a prominent cell border, a wrinkled nuclear membrane, and binucleation, which are all features of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemically, the carcinoma cells were positive for thyroglobulin, TTF1, and PAX8, and negative for CD10, calcitonin, and carcinoembryonic antigen. Vascular invasion was visible in all cases, but distant metastasis was not detected during follow-up. The original pathological diagnoses of the three cases were widely invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma, and oxyphilic variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thus, the cases were similar to chromophobe renal cell carcinoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex as they were characterized by histologic findings consistent with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, occurrence in an adolescent or young adult, and favorable prognosis regardless of the presence of vascular invasion and an infiltrating growth pattern resembling poorly differentiated carcinoma. The etiopathogenesis also seemed to suggest the presence of the tuberous sclerosis complex genetic abnormality.

Background and Objective: A quantitative tumor response evaluation to molecular-targeting agents in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is debatable. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between radiologic tumor response and pathological response in patients with advanced RCC who underwent presurgical therapy., Results: Of 34 patients, 31 underwent scheduled radical nephrectomy. Presurgical therapy agents included axitinib (n = 26), everolimus (n = 3), sunitinib (n = 1), and axitinib followed by temsirolimus (n = 1). The major presurgical treatment-related adverse event was grade 2 or 3 hypertension (44%). The median radiologic tumor response by RECIST, Choi, and CMER were -19%, -24%, and -49%, respectively. Among the radiologic tumor response tests, CMER showed a higher association with tumor necrosis in surgical specimens than others. Ki67/MIB1 status was significantly decreased in surgical specimens than in biopsy specimens. The magnitude of the slope of the regression line associated with the tumor necrosis percentage was greater in CMER than in Choi and RECIST., Materials and Methods: Between March 2012 and December 2016, we prospectively enrolled 34 locally advanced and/or metastatic RCC who underwent presurgical molecular-targeting therapy followed by radical nephrectomy. Primary endpoint was comparison of radiologic tumor response among Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Choi, and contrast media enhancement reduction (CMER). Secondary endpoint included pathological downstaging, treatment related adverse events, postoperative complications, Ki67/MIB1 status, and tumor necrosis., Conclusions: CMER may predict tumor response after presurgical molecular-targeting therapy. Larger prospective studies are needed to develop an optimal tumor response evaluation for molecular-targeting therapy.

The proteoglycan versican (VCAN) promotes tumor progression and enhances metastasis in several cancers; however, its role in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains unknown. Recent evidence suggests that VCAN is an important target of chromosomal 5q gain, one of the most prevalent genetic abnormalities in ccRCC. Thus, we investigated whether VCAN expression is associated with the pathogenesis of ccRCC. VCAN expression was analyzed using three RCC and normal kidney cell lines as well as a clinical cohort of 84 matched ccRCC and normal renal tissues. Functional analyses on growth and progression properties were performed using VCAN-depleted ccRCC cells. Microarray expression profiling was employed to investigate the target genes and biologic pathways involved in VCAN-mediated ccRCC carcinogenesis. ccRCC had elevated VCAN expression in comparison with normal kidney in both cell lines and clinical specimens. The elevated expression of VCAN was significantly correlated with metastasis ( P < 0.001) and worse 5-year overall survival after radical nephrectomy ( P = 0.014). In vitro , VCAN knockdown significantly decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis in Caki-2 and 786-O cells, and this was associated with alteration of several TNF signaling-related genes such as TNFα, BID , and BAK Furthermore, VCAN depletion markedly decreased cell migration and invasion which correlated with reduction of MMP7 and CXCR4. These results demonstrate that VCAN promotes ccRCC tumorigenesis and metastasis and thus is an attractive target for novel diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies. Implications: This study highlights the oncogenic role of VCAN in renal cell carcinogenesis and suggests that this gene has therapeutic and/or biomarker potential for renal cell cancer. Mol Cancer Res; 15(7); 884-95. ©2017 AACR ., (©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the possibility of postoperative deterioration of renal function must be considered before surgery. We investigated the contribution of the aortic calcification index (ACI) to the prediction of deterioration of renal function in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy., Methods: Between January 1995 and December 2012, we performed 511 consecutive radical nephrectomies for patients with RCC. We retrospectively studied data from 109 patients who had regular postoperative follow-up of renal function for at least five years. The patients were divided into non-CKD and pre-CKD based on a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively. The ACI was quantitatively measured by abdominal computed tomography before surgery. The patients in each group were stratified between low and high ACIs. Variables such as age, sex, comorbidities, and pre- and postoperative renal function were compared between patients with a low or high ACI in each group. Renal function deterioration-free interval rates were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Factors independently associated with deterioration of renal function were determined using multivariate analysis., Results: The median age, preoperative eGFR, and ACI in this cohort were 65 years, 68 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , and 8.3%, respectively. Higher ACI (≥8.3%) was significantly associated with eGFR decline in both non-CKD and pre-CKD groups. Renal function deterioration-free interval rates were significantly lower in the ACI-high than ACI-low strata in both of the non-CKD and pre-CKD groups. Multivariate analysis showed that higher ACI was an independent risk factor for deterioration of renal function at 5 years after radical nephrectomy., Conclusions: Aortic calcification burden is a potential predictor of deterioration of renal function after radical nephrectomy., Trial Registration: This study was registered as a clinical trial: UMIN000023577.

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) between patients undergoing dialysis for ≤240 and >240 months. Data from all dialysis patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with LRN between 2008 and 2015 in our hospital were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups, shorter- and longer-term dialysis patients, according to the preoperative duration of dialysis (≤240 vs. >240 months). Of 174 patients, 58 (33.3%) were on longer-term dialysis. Perioperative minor complications were significantly more frequent in the longer-term dialysis patients (P = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other perioperative outcomes. Patients on longer-term dialysis more frequently had pathologically advanced RCC (P = 0.009) with poorer prognosis (P = 0.005). LRN for RCC in longer-term dialysis patients appears to be safe and feasible; however, careful follow-up is needed because these patients tend to have poorer prognosis., (© 2017 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.)

Purpose: We compared surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) by using volumetric analysis in a propensity score-matched analysis., Methods: We analyzed the records of 279 patients with normal contralateral kidneys who underwent RAPN or OPN for T1 renal tumors between 2012 and 2014. Volumetric studies to assess the vascularized parenchymal volume of the operated kidney were performed 2 months preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Patient data, including age, body mass index, presence of hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor size, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate, and tumor complexity using the renal nephrometry score, were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching between groups., Results: This cohort included 100 patients who underwent RAPN and 179 who underwent OPN. After matching, 48 patients were included in each group. Mean tumor diameter was 31 mm, and about 14 % were high-complexity tumors (RENAL score 10-12). The RAPN and OPN groups showed no significant differences in the rate of preservation of global renal function (95 vs. 92 %) and parenchymal volume of the operated kidney (84 vs. 79 %). Similarly, urological complications did not significantly differ between groups. Surgical margins were negative in all tumors. Patients who underwent RAPN had lower estimated blood loss (p < 0.0001) and shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (p < 0.0001) than those who underwent OPN., Conclusion: RAPN can offer acceptable surgical outcomes and precision, compared to OPN, with decreased estimated blood loss and hospital stay.

Purpose: We analyzed trends related to surgical approach for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN), in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD), and identified predictors for postoperative progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring permanent dialysis., Methods: We enrolled patients with stage 4 CKD who underwent surgery for non-metastatic RCC. We compared their characteristics according to surgical approach (PN vs. RN). Moreover, predictors for postoperative progression to requiring permanent dialysis were determined using multivariable analyses. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was adjusted for age., Results: Fifty-one patients (PN 23, RN 28) were evaluated in the present study. Their mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 24 ml/min/1.73 m(2), and four patients had a solitary kidney. Three of 23 patients (13 %) who underwent PN progressed to requiring dialysis after surgery after a median 16 months. In contrast, 13 of 28 patients (46 %) who underwent RN developed dialysis immediately after surgery (median 2 days). Patients who underwent PN had lower T stages (T1, PN 100 % vs. RN 50 %, p = 0.004) and smaller tumors (31 mm vs. 65 mm, p < 0.0001) than did those who underwent RN. RN and lower preoperative eGFR significantly predicted progression to requiring dialysis, while tumor size and CCI did not., Conclusions: PN tended to be selected for patients with lower T stage and smaller tumors in the limited cohort of stage 4 CKD patients. PN had a significant benefit of preventing dialysis in the multivariable analysis.

We retrospectively identified patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis treated with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors as a second- and/or third-line targeted therapy after treatment failure with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Patient medical records were reviewed to evaluate the response to therapies and treatment-related toxicities. Four patients were identified. All patients had undergone nephrectomy, and one had received immunotherapy before targeted therapy. Two patients had clear cell histology, and the other two had papillary histology. All patients were classified into the intermediate risk group according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk model. All patients were treated with everolimus as a second- or third-line therapy, and two patients were treated with temsirolimus as a second- or third-line therapy after treatment failure with sorafenib or sunitinib. The median duration of everolimus therapy was 6.7 months, whereas that of temsirolimus was 9.5 months. All patients had stable disease as the best response during each period of therapy. There were no severe adverse events. The use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in patients who previously failed to respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors appears to be feasible in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis., (© 2016 International Society for Hemodialysis.)

Objective: To assess differences in overall survival (OS) between patients receiving partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for stage 1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) according to age distribution, as the survival advantage of PN vs RN has been unclear owing to conflicting data., Patients and Methods: We studied 952 patients with stage 1 RCC who underwent either PN or RN. Patients were divided into three groups according to age: Group 1 (≤54 years), Group 2 (55-64 years), and Group 3 (≥65 years). Patient variables including age, body mass index, sex, presence of hypertension (HT) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM), performance status, tumour size, pathological diagnosis, nuclear grade, and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching between PN and RN., Results: Group 1 included 66 matched patients; Group 2, 72; and Group 3, 70. Group 1 tended to have higher preoperative eGFR values and lower rates of HT and DM compared with Groups 2 and 3. Postoperative eGFR dropped by 11-13% in PN patients and by 34-36% in RN patients. In Group 3, PN patients had longer OS than RN patients (5-year OS: PN 96%, RN 81%, P = 0.043); however, there was no significant difference in Group 1 (5-year OS: PN 100%, RN 93%, P = 0.302) or Group 2 (5-year OS: PN 94%, RN 87%, P = 0.358)., Conclusions: Only the oldest group of patients showed significantly better OS for PN compared with RN; however, we still recommend PN in young patients., (© 2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Little information has been published on the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for treatment of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). We investigated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients undergoing HD., Methods: Twenty patients undergoing HD were treated with sorafenib as first-line therapy for mRCC at our hospital between April 2008 and August 2014. Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the response to sorafenib and treatment-related toxicity., Results: Fifteen and 5 patients were classified in the intermediate and poor risk groups, respectively, of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk model. Eighteen patients had 3 or more metastatic lesions, and 7 patients had metastases in 2 or more organs. Of 16 patients who had previously undergone nephrectomy, 8 were pathologically diagnosed with non-clear-cell carcinoma. The median duration of sorafenib therapy was 4.7 months. Sorafenib was discontinued owing to progressing disease for 15 patients and because of serious adverse events (AE) (≥grade 3) for 4 patients, i.e. subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral hemorrhage, sepsis, and syncope for 1 patient each. Median time to progression was 6.3 months, and median overall survival was 14.2 months., Conclusions: In this study, many patients had unfavorable clinical features, for example poor risk classification and metastases in multiple organs. Although sorafenib treatment of HD patients seems feasible, careful monitoring is needed because of the tendency for a high incidence of serious AE, even when a reduced dose is administered.

Objective: We compared the clinical features and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between patients on hemodialysis (RCC-HD) and those in the general population (RCC-general)., Methods: We included a total of 1,794 patients who underwent surgery (RCC-HD, 408; RCC-general, 1,386) and analyzed the clinical characteristics and oncological outcomes using a stage-for-stage analysis between the two groups., Results: In the RCC-HD group, the mean duration of dialysis before surgery was 120 months. Compared to the RCC-general group, the RCC-HD group tended to be younger (55 vs. 60 years, p < 0.0001) and more predominately male (84 % vs. 70 %, p < 0.0001), and the tumor size was smaller in this group (39 vs. 49 mm, p < 0.0001). The pathological characteristics of the RCC-HD group included a higher frequency of papillary tumors (22 % vs. 5 %, p < 0.0001) and stage I tumors (82 % vs. 68 %, p < 0.0001). During the follow-up period, 39 of patients (10 %) in the RCC-HD group and 193 patients (14 %) in the RCC-general group died of cancer. The patients on hemodialysis had better cancer-specific survival (CSS) than their counterparts (p = 0.0292) in the univariable analysis, but no significance was found in the multivariable analysis. In the stage-for-stage analysis, the 5-year CSS was similar between the two groups for each stage., Conclusions: CSS appeared to be better in the RCC-HD group than in the RCC-general group, which may be associated with the higher incidence of stage I disease in the RCC-HD group. The comparable CSS between the groups in the stage-for-stage analysis supports this finding.

Background: Clinical benefit of axitinib as a first line agent to treat patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of axitinib as first-line therapy in Japanese patients with locally advanced RCC or mRCC., Methods: In this retrospective study, we focused on eighteen patients who underwent first-line therapy with axitinib between May 2012 and May 2014 at Hirosaki University. Axitinib was orally administered at a dose of 10 mg daily. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint, while secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs)., Results: All patients had histologically proven clear cell RCC. The median duration of the administration of axitinib was 10.8 months. According to the response evaluation criteria for solid tumors, five patients (27.8%) achieved a partial response and nine (50%) had stable disease. The 1-year PFS rate was 84.4%, and the median PFS was 20.4 months (95% confidence interval, 17.5 - 21.7). No serious AEs were reported during the study, and there were no toxicity-related deaths., Conclusions: In the current study, axitinib showed acceptable oncological outcomes and favorable safety profile as first-line therapy for locally advanced RCC or mRCC in treatment-naïve Japanese patients. Thus, first-line therapy with axitinib may provide a feasible option for treatment of advanced RCC or mRCC patients.

RNAi enables potent and specific gene silencing, potentially offering useful means for treatment of cancers. However, safe and efficient drug delivery systems (DDS) that are appropriate for intra-tumor delivery of siRNA or shRNA have rarely been established, hindering clinical application of RNAi technology to cancer therapy. We have devised hydrogel polymer nanoparticles, or nanogel, and shown its validity as a novel DDS for various molecules. Here we examined the potential of self-assembled nanogel of cholesterol-bearing cycloamylose with spermine group (CH-CA-Spe) to deliver vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-specific short interfering RNA (siVEGF) into tumor cells. The siVEGF/nanogel complex was engulfed by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells through the endocytotic pathway, resulting in efficient knockdown of VEGF. Intra-tumor injections of the complex significantly suppressed neovascularization and growth of RCC in mice. The treatment also inhibited induction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, while it decreased interleukin-17A production. Therefore, the CH-CA-Spe nanogel may be a feasible DDS for intra-tumor delivery of therapeutic siRNA. The results also suggest that local suppression of VEGF may have a positive impact on systemic immune responses against malignancies., (© 2014 The Authors. Cancer Science published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Objective: To evaluate which clinical symptoms predict the survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma associated with end-stage renal disease under chronic dialysis., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 401 patients with renal cell carcinoma associated with end-stage renal disease who underwent radical nephrectomy at our institute up through December 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: the symptomatic group and the incidental group, by diagnosis. We compared the clinicopathologic features and patient survival of the two groups and investigated prognostic factors using Cox multivariate analysis., Results: Of the 401 patients, 124 (30.9%) were in the symptomatic group and 277 (69.0%) in the incidental group. The symptomatic group included more advanced tumors in terms of larger tumor size, higher stage and higher grade compared with the incidental group. The 5-year cancer-specific survival and overall survival of the symptomatic and incidental groups were 76.9 vs. 95.3% (P < 0.001) and 64.2 vs. 84.9% (P < 0.001), respectively. On multivariate analysis, the presence of symptoms, higher age, higher stage, diabetic nephropathy and longer hemodialysis duration were independent prognostic factors., Conclusions: Symptomatic detection was significantly associated with worse overall survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma associated with end-stage renal disease as well as sporadic renal cell carcinoma. The high incidence of renal cell carcinoma as well as the poor oncologic outcome in patients with longer dialysis therapy may suggest an important role for routine screening in these patients., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The prognostic factors for the overall survival (OS) of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients treated with nephrectomy are not well defined. In the present study, we investigated the prognostic significance of preoperative butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) levels in 400 ccRCC patients undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy from 1992 to 2013 at our institution. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the clinical factors associated with OS. Among the enrolled patients, 302 were diagnosed with organ-confined disease only (T1-2N0M0), 16 with lymph node metastases, and 56 with distant metastases. The median preoperative BChE level was 250 U/L (normal range, 168-470 U/L), and median follow-up period was 36 months. The 3-year OS rate in patients with preoperative BChE levels of ≥100 U/L was significantly higher than in those with levels of <100 U/L (89.3% versus 77.7%, P = 0.004). On univariate analysis, performance status; anemia; hypoalbuminemia; preoperative levels of BChE, corrected calcium, and C-reactive protein; and distant metastasis status were significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative BChE levels and distant metastasis status were significantly associated with OS. Our findings suggest a possible role of preoperative BChE levels as an independent predictor of OS after nephrectomy in ccRCC patients.