Search

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is well known as a serious health problem worldwide, especially in low-income countries or those with limited resources, such as most countries in Latin America. International guidelines cannot always be applied to a population from a large region with specific conditions. This study established a Latin American guideline for care of patients with head and neck cancer and presented evidence of HNSCC management considering availability and oncologic benefit. A panel composed of 41 head and neck cancer experts systematically worked according to a modified Delphi process on (1) document compilation of evidence-based answers to different questions contextualized by resource availability and oncologic benefit regarding Latin America (region of limited resources and/or without access to all necessary health care system infrastructure), (2) revision of the answers and the classification of levels of evidence and degrees of recommendations of all recommendations, (3) validation of the consensus through two rounds of online surveys, and (4) manuscript composition. The consensus consists of 12 sections: Head and neck cancer staging, Histopathologic evaluation of head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-oral cavity, Clinical oncology-oral cavity, Head and neck surgery-oropharynx, Clinical oncology-oropharynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-reconstruction and rehabilitation, and Radiation therapy. The present consensus established 48 recommendations on HNSCC patient care considering the availability of resources and focusing on oncologic benefit. These recommendations could also be used to formulate strategies in other regions like Latin America countries.

Background: The rates of laryngeal preservation according to therapeutic modality in patients with initial laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) are still controversial. This study evaluated the rates of laryngeal preservation in patients who underwent treatment with surgery or radiotherapy., Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 151 patients with stage I or II LSCC. Ninety-six patients were matched using a propensity-score and outcomes were compared within this group., Results: Regarding overall, cancer-specific survival and larynx preservation, no differences were observed according to the therapeutic modalities, but patients who underwent radiotherapy had a higher rate of local recurrence than those who underwent surgery. Patients classified as ASA 3 or 4 and treated with radiotherapy showed a tendency of higher risk of larynx loss., Conclusions: Patients with stage I or II laryngeal tumours can be submitted to surgery or radiotherapy with similar rates of laryngeal preservation., (Copyright © 2021 Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy.)

Introduction: The treatment of advanced stage laryngeal suffered a major shift away from surgery and towards larynx-preservation alternatives after the publication of major clinical trials. But its applicability in real-world situations is not consensual., Materials and Methods: We reviewed a population-based database from Brazil regarding patients treated for laryngeal cancer and selected those with stage IV disease at presentation. Survival analysis was realized by the Cox proportional hazards method and propensity scores were used to compensate for non-random allocation to different treatment arms., Results: A total of 5577 patients were included in the analyses, with 4243 staged as CS IVa, 1010 as CS IVb and 324 as CS IVc. In univariate and multivariate analysis, gender, cT stage, cN stage, cM stage and treatment modality were significant predictors of disease-specific survival. In patients with CS IVa, age, gender, payment modality, location within the larynx, cT and cN stages and treatment modality were significant. After propensity score adjustment, treatment modality remained significant, favoring primary surgery with disease-specific survival (HR: 0.5041, 95% CI: 0.4494-0.5644, p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR: 0.5485, 95% CI: 0.4955-0.6072, p < 0.001) as outcomes of interest. Patients staged as cT4a cN0 were selected and analyzed as a distinct subset. In multivariate analysis, treatment modality was the only variable with significant prognostic impact with improved outcome for surgery-based treatment (HR: 2.521, 95% CI: 1.897-3.350, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The extrapolation of clinical trials to the real-world facilities must be carefully weighted. The setting of trial conduction may influence its outcome and may not be reproducible. Our results show that patient selection and the facilities of clinical trials may play a significant role in the success of non-surgical approaches to non-metastatic stage IV laryngeal cancer., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The current treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is based on radical surgery and radiotherapy resulting in high morbidity. Chemoradiotherapy has been used as alternative to organ sparing; however, several advanced cases presented resistance to treatment, which contributes to a high risk of recurrence and mortality. Coding RNAs and miRNAs have potential to be used as biomarkers or targets for cancer therapy., Materials and Methods: In this study, 36 LSCC and 5 non-neoplastic control samples were investigated using miRNA and mRNA large-scale expression analysis and a cross-validation was performed using the TCGA database (116 LSCC and 12 surrounding normal tissues)., Results: The large-scale profiling revealed the involvement of 28 miRNAs and 817 genes differentially expressed in LSCC. An integrative analysis comprising predicted and experimentally validated miRNA/mRNA interactions (negatively correlated), resulted in 28 miRNAs and 543 mRNAs. Decreased expression of miR-199b was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival in LSCC (internal and TCGA datasets). The expression levels of selected miRNAs (miR-199b-5p, miR-29c-3p, miR-204-5p, miR-125b-5p and miR-92a-3p) and genes (COL3A1, COL10A1, ERBB4, HMGA2, HLF, TOP2A, MMP3, MMP13, MMP10 and PPP1R3) were confirmed as altered in LSCC by RT-qPCR. Additionally, a drug target prediction analysis revealed drug combinations based on miRNA and mRNA expression, pointing out novel alternatives to optimize the LSCC treatment., Conclusion: Collectively, these findings provide new insights in the LSCC transcriptional deregulation and potential drug targets., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)