Search

Purpose: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) continues to hinder the long-term success of heart transplant recipients. Redo-transplantation is currently the only definitive treatment for advanced CAV. We examined whether these patients are at similar CAV-risk with the second transplant. Methods: Heart recipients from 1985 to 2011 at the UTAH program were included in the study and those with CAV as an indication for redo-transplantation were identified. CAV diagnosis was made by coronary angiography and based on the 2010 ISHLT standardized nomenclature for CAV. Patient demographics, rejection history, and CAV incidence were analyzed. Results: Of the 1,169 eligible patients, 135 (11.5%) developed CAV post their first transplant; 78 cases within 10 years and 54 beyond 10 years. The mean time to CAV was 6.58 years. Of the 135 patients who developed CAV, only 21 (15.5%) ended up requiring a redo-transplant. Of the 21 retransplanted patients, 4 (19.0%) developed CAV again; 2 patients within 10 years and 2 patients beyond 10 years indicating a similar risk for CAV occurrence for first and redo-transplant. Conclusions: Our results indicate that CAV is as likely to develop in redo-transplants despite recent advances in immunosuppression and the standardized use of lipid-lowering agents. Although outcomes in redo-transplantation for the indication of CAV are favorable, efforts to better understand and minimize CAV are needed, especially in the face of scarce donor organs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The elevated baseline heart rate ( HR) of a heart transplant recipient has previously been considered inconsequential. However, we hypothesized that a resting HR above 100 beats per minute (bpm) may be associated with morbidity and mortality. Methods The U.T.A.H. Cardiac Transplant Program studied patients who received a heart transplant between 2000 and 2011. Outpatient HR values for each patient were averaged during the first year post-transplant. The study cohort was divided into two groups: the tachycardic ( TC) ( HR >100 bpm) and the non- TC group ( HR ≤100 bpm) in which mortality, incidence of rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy were compared. Results Three hundred and ten patients were included as follows: 73 in the TC and 237 in the non- TC group. The TC group had a higher risk of a 10-yr all-cause mortality (p = 0.004) and cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.044). After adjustment for donor and recipient characteristics in multivariable logistic regression analysis, the hazard ratio was 3.9, (p = 0.03, CI: 1.2-13.2) and 2.6 (p = 0.02, CI: 1.2-5.5) for cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality, respectively. Conclusion Heart transplant recipients with elevated resting HR appear to have higher mortality than those with lower resting HR. Whether pharmacologically lowering the HR would result in better outcomes warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]