Search

Background: Mechanical dyssynchrony is an important factor in the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, no echocardiographic measure can improve prediction of case selection for CRT., Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a newly combined echocardiographic index for ventricular dyssynchrony and contractility using speckled tracking strain analysis to predict responders to CRT., Methods: Forty-seven patients with severe heart failure in New York Heart Association functional class III/IV, left ventricular ejection fraction /=130 ms were included in the study. Echocardiography was performed, and a novel index (i-Index), the product of radial dyssynchrony and radial strain, was calculated. Responder to CRT was defined as a patient with a >/=15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6-month follow-up., Results: Thirty-two patients (68%) were classified as responders. The i-Index was significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders (3,450 +/- 1180 vs 1,481 +/- 841, P <.001). The area under receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.92 for the i-Index, which was better than the index of radial dyssynchrony only (0.74). A cutoff value of i-Index >2,000 predicted responders with 94% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The index using only radial dyssynchrony had 81% sensitivity and 53% specificity. Furthermore, i-Index decreased in responders (1,985 +/- 1261, P <.001) but not in nonresponders (1,684 +/- 866, P = .48)., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a novel combined index by radial strain echocardiography might be a predictor of response to CRT. The value of this novel echocardiographic index requires further assessment in larger studies., (Copyright 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Identification of arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins (PVs) initiating atrial fibrillation is helpful for catheter ablation. The aim of this study was to examine the possibility to recognize the arrhythmogenic PV using Holter ECG., Methods and Results: In 20 patients, P-wave characteristics were studied during pacing from four PVs. Holter ECG was recorded using two leads: the modified CC5 (Lead 1) and NASA (Lead 2), and the P-wave amplitude and duration were evaluated. In Lead 1, P-waves produced by left PV pacing were significantly lower in amplitude than right PV pacing (-3 +/- 75 vs. 86 +/- 43 microV, P < 0.001). In Lead 2, pacing in superior PVs produced P-waves with higher amplitude than inferior PVs (210 +/- 74 vs. 125 +/- 66 muV, P < 0.001). The criteria proposed by the morphological characteristics of P-waves identified putative arrhythmogenic PVs with an accuracy of 78%., Conclusion: It might be possible to identify putative arrhythmogenic PVs by modified Holter ECG recording.

Aims: We assessed the effects of cardiac re-synchronization therapy (CRT) in patients who developed otherwise unexplained heart failure (HF) during right ventricular apical (RVA)-pacing for acquired complete atrioventricular block (CAVB)., Methods and Results: Eighteen consecutive CAVB patients with HF during RVA-pacing were assessed with haemodynamic studies immediately and 12 months after CRT-upgrade. Ten patients had idiopathic CAVB and 13 showed normal left ventricular (LV) function at RVA-pacemaker implantation. HF developed after 81 +/- 10 months. RVA-pacing duration correlated (r = 0.49, P < 0.05) with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) deterioration. Biventricular- (BiV) and LV-pacing acutely improved the systolic function comparably, but only BiV improved diastolic function. One-year post-CRT-initiation, New York Heart Association classification improved 35 +/- 3% (P < 0.05) and the number of hospitalizations decreased 85 +/- 3% (P < 0.0001). CRT decreased LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd) 7 +/- 2% (P < 0.01) and increased LVEF by 23 +/- 7% (P < 0.01). The CRT-induced reduction in LVEDd tended to be greater in patients with RVA-pacing for < 5 years vs. > 5 years (7.7 +/- 2.5 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.0 mm, P = 0.08)., Conclusion: CRT-upgrade improves the cardiac function and symptoms in CAVB patients with HF progression related to RVA-pacing. Because adverse LV-remodelling may be partly irreversible, consideration should be given to BiV- and LV-pacing upgrade as soon as possible after the indications appear, and prospective studies of the optimal timing of CRT-upgrade may be useful.

Background and Objectives: The left ventricular (LV) stimulation site is currently recommended to position the lead at the lateral wall. However, little is known as to whether right ventricular (RV) lead positioning is also important for cardiac resynchronization therapy. This study compared the acute hemodynamic response to biventricular pacing (BiV) at two different RV stimulation sites: RV high septum (RVHS) and RV apex (RVA)., Methods and Results: Using micro-manometer-tipped catheter, LV pressure was measured during BiV pacing at RV (RVA or RVHS) and LV free wall in 33 patients. Changes in LV dP/dt(max) and dP/dt(min) from baseline were compared between RVA and RVHS. BiV pacing increased dP/dt(max) by 30.3 +/- 1.2% in RVHS and by 33.3 +/- 1.7% in RVA (P = n.s.), and decreased dP/dt(min) by 11.4 +/- 0.7% in RVHS and by 13.0 +/- 1.0% in RVA (P = n.s.). To explore the optimal combination of RV and LV stimulation sites, we assessed separately the role of RV positioning with LV pacing at anterolateral (AL), lateral (LAT), or posterolateral (PL) segment. When the LV was paced at AL or LAT, the increase in dP/dt(max) with RVHS pacing was smaller than that with RVA pacing (AL: 12.2 +/- 2.2% vs 19.3 +/- 2.1%, P < 0.05; LAT: 22.0 +/- 2.7% vs 28.5 +/- 2.2%, P < 0.05). There was no difference in dP/dt(min) between RVHS- and RVA pacing in individual LV segments., Conclusions: RVHS stimulation has no overall advantage as an alternative stimulation site for RVA during BiV pacing. RVHS was equivalent with RVA in combination with the PL LV site, while RVA was superior to RVHS in combination with AL or LAT LV site.