1. Left bundle-branch block contraction patterns identified from radial-strain analysis predicts outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
- Author
-
Wang CL, Wu CT, Yeh YH, Wu LS, Chan YH, Kuo CT, Chu PH, Hsu LA, and Ho WJ
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biomechanical Phenomena, Bundle-Branch Block mortality, Bundle-Branch Block physiopathology, Chi-Square Distribution, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Failure diagnostic imaging, Heart Failure physiopathology, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Observer Variation, Predictive Value of Tests, Proportional Hazards Models, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Factors, Stress, Mechanical, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Remodeling, Bundle-Branch Block diagnostic imaging, Bundle-Branch Block therapy, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy adverse effects, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy mortality, Echocardiography, Doppler, Myocardial Contraction
- Abstract
A left bundle-branch block (LBBB) contraction pattern identified from longitudinal-strain analysis predicts outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated the use of an LBBB-contraction pattern identified from radial- or circumferential-strain analysis in the prediction of CRT benefits. Eighty CRT candidates were prospectively enrolled. Before CRT implantation, speckle-tracking analyses in three deformation directions were performed to determine whether an LBBB-contraction pattern was present. The study endpoints were reverse remodeling at 6 months, and adverse outcomes including death or heart failure hospitalization. At 6 months, 49 (61%) patients had reverse remodeling. An LBBB-contraction pattern identified from the radial strain in the mid-ventricular short-axis view or longitudinal strain in the four-chamber view provided excellent true-positive (86%) and false-negative (8%) rates for predicting reverse remodeling. During a median follow-up of 30 months, 31 patients (39%) had adverse outcomes. Absence of an LBBB-contraction pattern in radial (hazard ratio 3.74; 95% confidence interval 1.83-7.62) or longitudinal strain (hazard ratio 3.49; 95% confidence interval 1.71-7.13) was significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Adding the LBBB-pattern assessment by radial-(model χ
2 from 8.2 to 18.5, p = 0.005), or longitudinal-strain analysis (model χ2 from 8.2 to 16.9, p = 0.011) to a risk model significantly improved the model, including QRS duration and ischemic etiology. In conclusion, an LBBB-contraction pattern identified from radial-strain analysis in the mid-ventricular short-axis view predicted reverse remodeling and outcome following CRT, similarly to the longitudinal-strain analysis.- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF