Search

Aims: There is an emerging trend of using wearable digital technology to monitor patient activity levels in acute care contexts. However, the overall extent and quality of evidence for their use in acute cardiac surgery care are unclear. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to evaluate current literature regarding the use of wearable activity trackers/accelerometers to monitor patient activity levels in the first 30 days following cardiac surgery., Method and Results: A systematic scoping review was conducted. A search of CINAHL and MEDLINE Complete databases identified all peer reviewed research evidence published in English between 2010 and 2023. Studies evaluating the use of wearable technology in adults who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery and valve replacement were included. Study data were summarized thematically. A total of 853 citations were identified. Once duplicates were removed, 816 studies were screened by title and abstract, 54 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, and 11 studies were included. Accelerometers were able to capture changing exercise and physical activity levels over an acute care admission. Device use was acceptable to clinicians and patients. Low activity levels in the early post-operative period were associated with longer length of stay and higher 30-day readmissions., Conclusion: Wearable devices are acceptable and feasible to use in acute care. The use of wearable activity trackers by acute cardiac patients may increase patient participation in exercise and identify more sedentary patients who are a greater risk of increased length of stay and hospital readmission., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Objective: To compare patient booklets with clinical guidelines and care pathways to assess: gaps in content and depth of information delivered, opportunities for patients participation and to review the trajectory of care to inform recovery., Methods: A systematic review of the grey literature was conducted using Google search engine and a variety of terms related to cardiac surgery, patient outcomes and recovery pathways. Patient books and care pathways were obtained from major hospitals in Melbourne. Resources were included if they were published between January 2013-August 2018 and written in English., Results: A total of 31 resources were included in the review, (n = 14 patient booklets, n = 17 clinician guides). Twenty-one topics of recovery were identified. Patient booklets provided information on more topics of recovery than clinician guides (50 % and 24 % respectively). Clinician guides provided more depth on information on topics of recovery than patient booklets (85 % and 73 % respectively). The majority of patient booklets outlined patient participation was in five topics of recovery., Conclusions: Gaps in the type and depth of information exist between patient and clinician guidelines. Clearer guidelines on how patients can participate in care are needed., Practice Implications: Nurses are key drivers in facilitating patient participation in postoperative recovery., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)